VOTE: Ethos
Who are you?
Hi, shos!
Did you take that comment to be serious?
This made me laugh out loud.
Were you scum?In post 37, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:I did but you’re probably right. I literally freaked out over a couple of RVS votes in Necromancer and almost got myself mislynched in the span of two hours.In post 34, Amrun wrote:Did you take that comment to be serious?
I know you said mislynched, but your comment was confusing. I felt like you were saying freaking out at RVS is scummy, so saying you did it as town was like ???In post 40, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:I said, ”mislynched”.In post 39, Amrun wrote:Were you scum?In post 37, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:I did but you’re probably right. I literally freaked out over a couple of RVS votes in Necromancer and almost got myselfIn post 34, Amrun wrote:Did you take that comment to be serious?mislynchedin the span of two hours.
Ironically enough, by the end of the day, I was nearly everyone’s top town. I have basically done my level best to avoid RVS since then but I’m trying to get more comfortable with it.
But weren’t you hoping to read the potential reaction? How could you know if the reaction to your inquiry would be scummy or not?In post 67, Flicker wrote:I just didn't see anything scummy about it.
Sounds like someone who knows shos is town.In post 72, Flicker wrote:Fair point, there could have been a scummy reaction. I guess I'm just not creative enough to imagine what that would look like.In post 70, Amrun wrote:But weren’t you hoping to read the potential reaction? How could you know if the reaction to your inquiry would be scummy or not?In post 67, Flicker wrote:I just didn't see anything scummy about it.
You’re arguing the opposite on the sense you think it makes flicker town?In post 80, shos wrote:I'd actually argue exactly the opposite. If memory serves me right, I used to do that on RVS in games to provoke reactions. Can't remember if I did that as scum too though (last scum game was probably 2 years ago...). I was surprised to see flickers post as he indeed was spot on.In post 74, Amrun wrote:Sounds like someone who knows shos is town.In post 72, Flicker wrote:Fair point, there could have been a scummy reaction. I guess I'm just not creative enough to imagine what that would look like.In post 70, Amrun wrote:But weren’t you hoping to read the potential reaction? How could you know if the reaction to your inquiry would be scummy or not?In post 67, Flicker wrote:I just didn't see anything scummy about it.
VOTE: Flicker
While that may be some sort of white knighting, I didn't even begin to have any pressure on ME so WK wasn't needed or useful for flickerscum.
Interesting
Either way I'm happy to say I broke RVS yoooo
Why wasn’t this post accompanied by a flicker vote?In post 91, Robbnva wrote:I agree with amrun
Flicker was reaction testing YOU. It had nothing to do with your reaction test. Confused by this post.In post 92, shos wrote:OiPlease answer me ONLY after Robbnva answers (my reply below), as his post looks like shit to me:In post 90, Amrun wrote:Shos: I disagree. All scum are trying to look Town so appearing to be making reads is something all scum have incentive and reason to do. It is weird to reaction test someone and not consider the fact that the reaction might be scummy. That’s not a reaction test. It’s a rote way of going about generating fake reads.Could you explain in your words what you are thinking?In post 91, Robbnva wrote:I agree with amrunMy vote was not a reaction test of Fisherman. It was a general attempt to provoke, but specifically intended to pressure ethos (picked at random). So if any, I'd call that a reaction test for ethos, not for fisherman.In post 90, Amrun wrote:Shos: I disagree. All scum are trying to look Town so appearing to be making reads is something all scum have incentive and reason to do. It is weird to reaction test someone and not consider the fact that the reaction might be scummy. That’s not a reaction test. It’s a rote way of going about generating fake reads.
You were previously scumreading shos? For what reason?In post 127, Robbnva wrote:Cause I liked my shos vote better.In post 126, Amrun wrote:Why wasn’t this post accompanied by a flicker vote?
For what it’s worth, I believe that if Flicker flips scum, shos is town.In post 133, Robbnva wrote:I have no idea if they can be scum together. it’s not impossible. I’m not going to let pre-flip associations bias my reads.
Yes, but Y player not considering that X player might say something scummy almost universally makes X player town if Y player is scum. That’s not something a partner would think or do. It’s about the mentality of it.In post 136, Robbnva wrote:Ok thanks for sharing. I still don’t think there’s been enough to rule that out. Distancing/bussing stuff happens all the time. If either of them are town, I’d wish they start playing better.
@shos: Flicker was attempting to reaction test YOU. I’m honestly not sure what you are talking about.In post 59, Flicker wrote:Maybe Maybe it was just a joke and completely null. Maybe it was actually a reaction test and I could have gotten a town lean from that.
In any case, I would have appreciated it if you'd let shos answer that.
In post 202, power27 wrote:UNVOTE:agreeIn post 185, Doctor Drew wrote:I really am getting strong town vibes from Robb.
will post more soon
This is his only content (basically) and it stinks in light of the shos flip.In post 211, power27 wrote:On robb vs shos
It seems most likely town/town
maf/town or town/maf wouldn't work because scum wouldn't want to get into such a big argument, and they are both equally provoking the other
maf/maf is obviously not it why in the world would they be bussing so much
I didn’t townread shos. I don’t know why you even think that. His push on you was scummy, and I didn’t get the chance to espouse a strong read either way, but I clearly remarked several times his push on you was bad.In post 246, Robbnva wrote:I’m going with the assumption they all are and amrun somehow townread shos which boggles my mind.In post 140, shos wrote:Also I'm utterly confused as for why it seems I am universally scumread for pressuring Robb. I can't imagine a situation these three are all town.
No, it doesn’t imply that. It implies that shos is town IF Flicker flipped scum. IF Flicker flipped scum, that wasn’t a buddy interaction. Up to and until that happened, shos could easily have been scum. Once he had flipped scum, I would have townread Flicker because I still don’t see buddies doing that (and obviously they were not buddies).In post 250, Robbnva wrote:This plus voting flicker 1. Implies shos is a town read and 2. Is a great way to distance from shos.In post 137, Amrun wrote:Flicker and shos could be town, shos could be scum and Flicker could be town, but I would be extremely shocked if they flipped scum together.
I’d feel better lynching you first cause based on day 1 and shos actually being scum. With two scum you can’t really bus so you can only push an alternate narrative and distance.
In case I accidentally buried this question with my multi post. (Sorry.)In post 261, Amrun wrote:Also Robb - why would I kill Flicker, as scum?
power was sheeping my espoused Flicker read, and so he wouldn’t kill Flicker, but me, the originator, would?
I can see that. I don’t know why adjusting my read on Flicker would be a threat to me, as scum, especially more so than the MANY other slots who are now basically conftown and are also stronger players than that slot.In post 265, Robbnva wrote:Your day one was pushing shos v flicker. Shos flipping scum means your contribution was wasted and you’d have to somehow adjust your read on flicker or have essentially flicker becoming conf townIn post 261, Amrun wrote:Also Robb - why would I kill Flicker, as scum?
power was sheeping my espoused Flicker read, and so he wouldn’t kill Flicker, but me, the originator, would?
Do you think his replacing into the slot had something to do with why it was killed?In post 267, Doctor Drew wrote:I have played a few games with A50, I have hard town read him when he was scum.....so there's that.
He does have a....'unique' playstyle at times.
We remember.In post 275, Doctor Drew wrote:Amrun, on a side note.....can't believe I missed your sig.
The tigerpocalypse brings back memories haha.
In post 61, power27 wrote:The bolded gives me weird vibesIn post 59, Flicker wrote:Maybe Maybe it was just a joke and completely null.Maybe it was actually a reaction test and I could have gotten a town lean from that.
In any case, I would have appreciated it if you'd let shos answer that.
Why didn’t you vote anyone all day?
Literally what is the difference?In post 289, power27 wrote:Fair point
But it was more of a 'this isn't town motovation' not 'this is scum'
Also, I don’t even think you were on the site the last time I played a game. How would you know anything about my meta?In post 305, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Btw guys, I really don’t think Amrun’s push on me is townie, so after I flip, you should probably lynch him.
Town!Amun, would read the game I linked before dearth tunneling me, because it proves what I’m saying and if he was town here, that absolutely should matter to him.
How am I all over the place? I’ve said that the hammer was scummy since the beginning of the day. My stance is consistent.In post 310, Robbnva wrote:Scum reading hammer of scum doesn’t warrant a scum read right now. You say you haven’t played in 6 years, hammers without claims have become a thing sometimes.
You’re all over the place amrun.
That is ridiculous.In post 313, Robbnva wrote:You started voting power and when it didn’t seem like anyone was interested you moved to Pyrrha.
You started it by attacking somebody who hammered scum. In this setup somebody off the wagon, pushing an alternate lynch is better imo. Pushing somebody who hammered scum because they didn’t ask for a claim and then ignoring his reason why is scummy at best, anti-town at worst.
Yes, quickhammers much more frequently come from scum than town.In post 316, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Do you usually sr players who hammer scum or is it just in THIS game?In post 307, Amrun wrote:I don’t care about the linked game. I have read what you are saying, but it’s 100% irrelevant. We already know shos is scum. In fact, saying you “caught scum” when you were the LAST person on the wagon is disingenuous in and of itself. None of it is a good reason to QUICKhammer. A quickhammer is not the same as any other vote.
A quick hammer is an inherently scummy action. The fact that you seem to think it requires no apology or explanation leaves me scared for the state of meta today.
Please, recent players - tell me if I’m being an old fart and this is now normal.
It’s still important to get a claim.In post 322, Robbnva wrote:I’m pyrrah v amrun I like pyraah. He’s making much better arguments than amrun is and amrun is refusing to consider presented evidence to explain pyrrah’s motives. This means amrun doesn’t care about why he did it, just the fact he hammered scum is a scum tell which we all know it isn’t that simple. Town does this a lot. Tbh nothing shos could have claimed would have stopped me from wanting him lynched.
Claims are pointless anyway. Scum fake claim. You can’t give somebody a free pass just cause they claim a PR. If the play indicates scum you lynch it.
No I didn’t. I have explained this post several times. Honestly, it’s basic English. You both need to work on reading comprehension.In post 324, Robbnva wrote:So he did say shos was town. That means he lied earlier.
In post 334, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:He could also be flat out role fishing. It’s really super scummy of him to demand a claim before I’m anywhere close to being at L-1.In post 322, Robbnva wrote:I’m pyrrah v amrun I like pyraah. He’s making much better arguments than amrun is and amrun is refusing to consider presented evidence to explain pyrrah’s motives. This means amrun doesn’t care about why he did it, just the fact he hammered scum is a scum tell which we all know it isn’t that simple. Town does this a lot. Tbh nothing shos could have claimed would have stopped me from wanting him lynched.
Claims are pointless anyway. Scum fake claim. You can’t give somebody a free pass just cause they claim a PR. If the play indicates scum you lynch it.
You won’t even read what’s actually posted in game, so ok.In post 337, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Thank you for not letting Amron get away with shrugging off not reading the link I posted. Like what is he afraid of, finding out that what I said is valid?In post 328, Robbnva wrote:Thanks for finding that post Pyrrha
Ok I understand this one.In post 349, Robbnva wrote:You can’t parse my post? You want to criticize my reading comprehension. My post is very clear.
Basically I didn’t know shos’s alignment and I thought he was scum which means I scum read him.
So you saying you didn’t know his alignment and you saying you think he is town means you town read him. You’re arguing that’s false narrative which it can’t be and isn’t.
Just own up to the fact you said you thought he was town and be done with it. You’re caught in that lie already so may as well admit it.
At that point, I felt like you were misrepping me, but not necessarily on purpose. That’s why I said that, and also the NAI thing. I still feel like you were just being hotheaded and getting worked up. A key example is you thinking I asked you to claim. I still do not understand how that post could EVER be interpreted as me asking you to claim. Like - ever. However I don’t really think it’s something you would try to stretch as scum - I think you would say that as either alignment.In post 350, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:What tf are you even referring to here?In post 339, Amrun wrote:You won’t even read what’s actually posted in game, so ok.In post 337, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Thank you for not letting Amron get away with shrugging off not reading the link I posted. Like what is he afraid of, finding out that what I said is valid?In post 328, Robbnva wrote:Thanks for finding that post Pyrrha
You asked me to explain the sudden hammer and I not only did that, I backed it up, so you’d know I didn’t just mull that out of my ass. I expected you to read it but for some reason, you had 0 interest in doing so. What possible town motivation could you possibly have for refusing to read that game? If it was too much effort, you could have then asked me to try and find the relevant posts but you did neither. Why?
No, this does not answer my question. It says why you voted him, not why you quickhammered him.In post 358, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:But I DID answer you. I told you, while I was reading Gamma’s and Robb’s posts, trying to make sense of how Shos can have such an idiotic tunnel on Robb yet seem so sincere, I suddenly remembered Thor doing pretty much the exact same thing to Gamma in YGM and then it suddenly clicked that he was more likely to be scum than not. Had I recalled that game earlier, my vote would have already been on him but thank God I did.In post 356, Amrun wrote:At that point, I felt like you were misrepping me, but not necessarily on purpose. That’s why I said that, and also the NAI thing. I still feel like you were just being hotheaded and getting worked up. A key example is you thinking I asked you to claim. I still do not understand how that post could EVER be interpreted as me asking you to claim. Like - ever. However I don’t really think it’s something you would try to stretch as scum - I think you would say that as either alignment.In post 350, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:What tf are you even referring to here?In post 339, Amrun wrote:You won’t even read what’s actually posted in game, so ok.In post 337, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Thank you for not letting Amron get away with shrugging off not reading the link I posted. Like what is he afraid of, finding out that what I said is valid?In post 328, Robbnva wrote:Thanks for finding that post Pyrrha
You asked me to explain the sudden hammer and I not only did that, I backed it up, so you’d know I didn’t just mull that out of my ass. I expected you to read it but for some reason, you had 0 interest in doing so. What possible town motivation could you possibly have for refusing to read that game? If it was too much effort, you could have then asked me to try and find the relevant posts but you did neither. Why?
The majority of your response is AI, but I specifically was referring to your confrontational attitude is the part I don’t think is AI. The content still is relevant. I hope that makes sense. I got a little heated too - didn’t mean to offend but I can see how it might have, so I apologize.
Once again, the reason I am not interested in reading the game is because there is no need to. You summarized it succinctly and I got what you were going for. It’s also two unrelated players so I don’t think it is relevant.
I felt like you were explaining to me why you voted shos. I already had read your post on why you voted shos, so I knew that already. I was asking why you quickhammered and I still don’t think you’ve answered that beyond the fact that you don’t appear to place any importance on the fact that you did so, which is bizarre to me.
P-edit: I do not want you to claim. For the Nth time.
P-edit 2: hold your horses.