Absolutely! I dislike playing scum as a lot of the game's comes from solving, etc.
~Ircher
Absolutely! I dislike playing scum as a lot of the game's comes from solving, etc.
In post 27, Mathematical Demon wrote:2) Why dod you join this game?
3) If you were scum this game, would you quickhammer given the opportunity? Why or why not?
4) What do you think the optimal strategy for town is in this setup?
5) How long do you think we should take to finish D1 this game?
So going back to why I don't like the bugspray slot:In post 29, bugspray wrote:2) I can't talk about this to ongoing games.In post 27, Mathematical Demon wrote:Well, if we're gonna do it, we should do it properly with several questions. Not just one; one doesn't get people talking enough.
RQS:
2) Why dod you join this game?
3) If you were scum this game, would you quickhammer given the opportunity? Why or why not?
4) What do you think the optimal strategy for town is in this setup?
5) How long do you think we should take to finish D1 this game?
I'll post my answers at a later time.
~Ircher
3) No. I would definitely hammer but I'd try to be less obvious about it. Maybe fake an accidental hammer.
4) Eliminate scum. How? I'm working on it
5) We take as long as we need. That's a dumb question.
That said, I would say I continued it because 1) I took bugspray at face value at the time that we couldn't vote (wasn't thinking much then) and 2) if we started it, we shouldn't ignore it. It may be useful in some way or fashion.In post 24, Mathematical Demon wrote:So remind me, why are we doing RQS? It's not a newbie game, so I don't think it'll be that effective.
~Ircher
My other head gets a pass because well, I know their alignment.In post 88, bugspray wrote:Demon what about the other 5 answers that agreed with me?
Somehow I missed this.In post 40, JacksonVirgo wrote:What does tentative mean, I've seen it a lot the past day or two and I forget.In post 28, Mathematical Demon wrote:Also, tentative scumlean on JacksonVirgo based on RQS response so far.
~Ircher
bugspray for flagbearer. Drew or Infinity for goon.In post 87, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok fair enough. I don’t really agree with your case on bugspray, but it looks like you believe it at least. What are your guesses for flagbearer and goon?
Nah, I'd rather keep that information hidden. That way I can use it in future games as well.In post 93, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can you tell me how my responses were goodIn post 90, Mathematical Demon wrote:JacksonVirgo did not agree with you whatsoever and actually gave some good responses.
Exercise some patience please. Also, this doesn't improve my read of your slot at all.In post 94, bugspray wrote:Can you tell them how their responses were good?In post 93, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can you tell me how my responses were goodIn post 90, Mathematical Demon wrote:JacksonVirgo did not agree with you whatsoever and actually gave some good responses.
Some responses in purple.In post 122, Marky Mark wrote:Here's where I am at so far. I will caveat this with it is pg 5 so there's still more time to develop these.
Of particular note I find it weird how people are TRing bugspray. Their 43 is towny but is also just stating a widely-accepted truth and is an angle that scum often push too to try and push non-active players. I'd challenge the other players to name any other posts from them that contain genuine scrutiny or analysis (maybe 64, but it is very WIFOMy). I'd like to hear from people why they are TRing them as I am just not seeing what you're seeing.
Demon (slight scumlean)
+TR
Being pinged by the JV u-turn of whether scum quickhammering is a genuine threat D1 as this was also what stood out to me
+SR
The over-analysis in 84 on the RQS response
It's not over analysis; it is simply analysis. If anyone is over analyzing rn, I would argue it is you with your mile long posts. (That being said, I don't think you are over analyzing here, at least not to a scummy level.)
The keenness to rush through D1 in 98
It's not keenness to rush. It is me making the evaluation that using the full deadline is a waste of time, and when discussion dies down, as it did, we should decide an elimination.
The assumption in 100 that JV was universally TRed and the general coyness around the reason for the TR
It's not really an assumption so much as my perspective. I articulated quite clearly why I think trying to twist a scumread on Jackson would be difficult and a bad idea from scum!me.
JV (townlean)
+TRThe general reasoning and feel of their posts overall are on the money, rather than any one specific post
^The interactions you have with infinity in particular came across as genuine towny from you.
Just going to point out that the Infinity interactions was one of the things I referenced when I noted Jackson was pretty townie here. You are obviously in agreement, so...
+SR
The change in position over scum quickhammering just feels really off in terms of the tone used to express it
Bugspray (slight scumlean)
+TR
43 is townish and I agree with the sentiment that getting activity going is good.
+SR
64 is a WIFOMy justifcation of his vote on my slot in 59 on the grounds that the pressure of being flagbearer could paralyse a player. Not massively AI, but goes against the general consensus that an effective way to play flagbearer is to try and actively get townread.
^Also odd to be "pretty sure" a slot with 1 post is bearer on pg 3
82 is borderline busywork
92 is LAMIST
Infinity (somewhere between null and slight townlean)
+TR
50 feels on the money
62 in response to bugspray's 59 feels like good scrutiny and chimes with my thinking
+SR
The assertion that demon is not trying to look town doesn't match what I'm seeing from them
^ It feels like you are using this to angle towards a possible elim on my slot even if you SR me less on paper than demon
So I think this is a townie response because 1) Every response answers the question asked without dodging the question and 2) I think the answer to #3 is a legitimate strategy that could work in our favor. I don't think it's the kind of strategy suggested by scum, especially when it seems most of you have very little experience with the setup. Furthermore, I think scum would be more inclined to answer that question the lazy way by dodging it altogether... because they can probably get away with it.In post 41, JacksonVirgo wrote:1)It was a small game that was probably going to be lightweight and fun compared to a few other games where I got a bit aggressive.
2) Quickhammering as scum outs the mafia so not with vengeful townies
3) Probably to create a PoE of three, lynch within that and if it's a vengeful they kill in the other two.
4) As long as it takes, I'm not setting a deadline for before the deadline happens.
Can we get an ETA for when we'll get an explanation?