[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13440798 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1057 YABM Mafia (Postgame) - Mafiascum.net
And also fun now with the rules we at the very least know that we have 1 scum team of at least 2 members and 5 townies. So let's just assume the worst and say we got 4 non townies here.
Thing is though.
The host Bolded
Initial
which makes me wonder if that means something important.
There's a lot of traffic happening between us. For some reason, she's insisting on putting one letter in every pm - I think it's some type of joke. I have 17 unopened ones, but the last ones I've opened spelled out "profe". I'll probably get to it in the morning.
Post
Post #51 (isolation #13) » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:35 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
If they also tell you the Non-Town role I appear as to investigative, don’t out it as it may confirm my actual role as it won’t be hard to put two and two together.
Post
Post #57 (isolation #15) » Wed Jul 13, 2022 2:01 am
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
In post 56, bugspray wrote:ALSO I AM A NIGHT 2 INNOCENT CHILD SO ANY PROTECTIVE ROLES SHOULD PROTECT ME TONIGHT. I WILL BE CONFIRMED TOWN AT THE END OF DAY 1
In post 56, bugspray wrote:ALSO I AM A NIGHT 2 INNOCENT CHILD SO ANY PROTECTIVE ROLES SHOULD PROTECT ME TONIGHT. I WILL BE CONFIRMED TOWN AT THE END OF DAY 1
I also doubt this one, if that was truth, you would't claim as you are blatant protection target anyway.
I’m just paranoid he has like some auto win day 2 wolf role.
Post
Post #76 (isolation #21) » Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:04 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
I mean I can be self resolving tonight and so can Bug if they really wish to try me.
There is nothing wrong with hitting someone to see if they are actually Yeet proof or not, Bug is acting like I would expect someone who is fake claiming about it would react.
Post
Post #83 (isolation #25) » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:56 am
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
In post 81, bugspray wrote:i don't think megaz actually considered the implications of my role when desinging it, that i am both d1 yeetproof and an n1 IC
Post
Post #91 (isolation #27) » Thu Jul 14, 2022 4:36 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
In post 90, Bambi Jay wrote:Not that yet. I will, however, confirm I leave the game if the Werewolf or Werewolves die.
From what I can tell, either the Werewolves is the main scum team and I'm basically a townie that leaves you all to a cult/SK, or the Werewolf is acting as the Serial Killer this game and the main scum team has nothing to worry about from me.
IK you gave me permission to use my ability on you but I kinda don’t want to use it on you.
In post 93, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Looker also probably town because my role suggests there is an investigative that can get the Miller result.
Isn't that true in literally any game tho? Any role can get a false guilty in one form or another.
Also I thought this game would be at 8 pages by now but it appears we got the quiet group here. I expected more madness.
Why are you all voting fish again?
1)My role implies there HAS to be an investigation role that can receive the false result.
2)Looker claimed Fish was scum and it was on their starting Rolecard which according to the OP doesn’t lie to you.
Spoiler: I thought this interaction hinted that we were joking
In post 22, Bambi Jay wrote:You also a day 0 cop Looker? Excellent PFP to go with that name btw.
In post 23, Looker wrote:It says "You are informed. You are cop. GoldfishFromTheMoon is scum. Gg."
And thank you.
In post 24, Bambi Jay wrote:Lmao I literally was gonna do that when I came in but it sounded too cliche to me. Good to see it lives on in spirit.
VOTE: ceejayvinoya I'm still leery of Post 53 and ProfessorDrapion's decision to sheep it
Then by this logic, shouldn't you be going for the professor first?
was his decision to sheep me townier?
what if he didn't vote? would you have still found my vote suspicious?
Excuse me?
I didn’t vote with the intent to sheep you.
You just happened to have already had a vote when I decided to vote the player with the proclaimed red check.
Post
Post #143 (isolation #38) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 4:18 am
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
In post 125, Sara wrote:If hellbooks or FishMoon flip town I will get nk by the other so i will VOTE: bugsprays anyway
because professer is Miller and Enchant is probably not scum because it is not in Looker initial role pm
???
What.
I mean according to Looker he is claiming he was bullshitting.
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
You literally tried spelling out my name.
VOTE: Looker
Are you saying that 130 is untrue?
@ProfessorDrapion
I don't understand your point and would like to discuss.
How many posts did I make before you brought up my name?
Post
Post #165 (isolation #44) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 5:31 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
Yeah tbh for me it’s either Looker or Bugs.
I feel Bugs could be some auto win Day 2 role that’s fake claiming here and I don’t like how Looker has been fake claiming then bullshitting on their reasoning.
ProfessorDrapion is desperate - yes, opportunistic - and can't explain their half-formed case against me. I'm curious why they're so much more paranoid than the rest of the player list. Especially after coming out immediately with an unsolicited miller claim (which they followed with telling Bambi to cease discussion of it). Weird.
No I ain’t desperate, that was to do with the image not you, what the fuck are you doing?
In post 202, Sara wrote:I think GoldFish could be scum but also I want to know if bugspray have d1 yeetproof
sorry forget to sumbit
I’m kinda the same, I’m just really not liking Looker’s responses to me rn and he’s definitely not being genuine at all RN.
ngl it seems like scum salty for being pushed for a bullshit reason
Maybe.
The main reason I think their wolf though is they are trying to lie about something they know they did and then claim it was “voting” when that wasn’t even what was said.
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
You literally tried spelling out my name.
VOTE: Looker
Are you saying that 130 is untrue
You know upon further re-read they did say “voting” but the previous question I had was that Looker’s fake claim what was the point of it. So my main concern is why did he even bring me up in his fake claim.
Post
Post #208 (isolation #56) » Sun Jul 17, 2022 1:11 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
He also lied about the mod responding to him and is now doing so gambit with the “oh wonder what wolves be doing in scum chat” shit which doesn’t honestly seem like a town thought.
Post
Post #211 (isolation #57) » Sun Jul 17, 2022 3:28 pm
Postby ProfessorDrapion »
The fact you can’t seem to understand that a town can pressure you when they have found you to be lying or at least being half ass and instead you immediately jump into the they are wolf and wolf chat BS shit.
Like you said it was a joke I asked why you mentioned my name and bro you refused to answer that.
The mod response was referring to the image so idk how TF you think it had something to do with you.