[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 4284702 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 15 - Alternating Semi-Open 9P: Mafia Wins! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #73 (isolation #6) » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:01 pm
Postby Lupo »
In post 67, Seanald wrote:also @ copper, I asked those 2 because I was most suspicious of them at the given time, evilpac was in the background didn't give any opinions or thought on the game thus far except to say that whosever post was a joke.
And Greyice just voted lupo, and was wondering on lupo's opinion or read on greyice. still awaiting their answers though....
In post 46, Seanald wrote:you require more ziggurats....i mean posts.
Evilpacman & Lupo how you feel about Greyice's gameplay so far?
^ missed that. sorry.
I've never seen anyone play like he does. He's somewhat annoying. He appears to have a maybe serious vote on me for no stated reason. I need to see more play from him before I have a read
In post 92, KrazyEyeKilla7 wrote:So now ICE, you are pissed off because I'm skeptical and you decide WITH NO REASONING to vote on me?
I think you're scum. Copper has laid it out pretty well for me.
@Lupo: if you think voting for many people is a scum tell, you're just wrong. Scum are the only people who have the luxury of being consistent and steadfast, they can win during night phase.
Copper, explain Lupo to me. I mean Kek claimed scum last page, but for the love of me I cannot read el Lupo.
Voting many people when you have a good reason to is not scummy. Voting many people for no reason is not. It's only a distraction.
In post 126, Seanald wrote:^ such a bad vote, also a defense to darkqu is noted. also your very likely scum, sitting back making the easiest of posts possible and not really formulating your own reads and or cases.
OMGUS much v2
In post 125, evilpacman18 wrote:Darkqu is stupid to start a wagon on right now. Seanald did the same thing you're voting him for anyway. In 67 he says Lupo and I were his top reads but votes Darkqu in 66. Also there's really no reason for the lower sentence in 119. It has the pretentious air of an informed minority.
vote: Seanald
Btw, hate to burst your bubble seanald but that ^ looks like a "read and or case" to me
Post
Post #149 (isolation #12) » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:48 pm
Postby Lupo »
In post 147, Copper wrote:Lupo, what is your read on Telo? Or more specifically, why is throwing votes around all "willy nilly" scummier than placing someone at a quick L-1?
Telo seems annoying. Not sure if its just the noob or what.
When you throw votes around, it is pointless. Nobody will treat your vote seriously especially when you give no reasons.
A quick L-1 vote isn't bad at all for me. It just adds pressure which can be used to find scum. A quick lynch however is most surely a scum-tell.
Post
Post #172 (isolation #13) » Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:21 am
Postby Lupo »
Welp,
UNVOTE: VOTE: Seanald
He's claiming everybody's reads are wrong even though he hasn't taken initiative to post his own. The only read he has posted was basically a repeat of what others had to say and was in response to someone telling him to find a read on the player.
In post 171, Copper wrote:
Pacman, why exactly does the single emote posting make White Shadows town?
It's just one of those things you know? If I replace in as scum my mentality is to have a super solid first post or at least a promise to have a super solid post after reading. Not straight fluff.
I feel like your using too much WIFOM. It's not too terrible to use in some occasions but don't make it the basis for your reads.
Post
Post #187 (isolation #16) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:42 am
Postby Lupo »
In post 186, Copper wrote:Lupo, you seemed to jump off that Seanald wagon pretty quickly.
Lupo 149 wrote:When you throw votes around, it is pointless.
Explain. This looks like a contradiction.
If you are going to quote me at least quote my whole post. I urge every one to read my 149 post. I'm on mobile and can't get multiquote to work currently. I said its pointless except when you give reasoning.
@pacman buddying is not a harsh thing for me to say to you. Find me one post that he is doing anything to help the town. If you find one then maybe I won't claim that you are buddying.
I mean your vote was on him for a brief moment in time a page ago, is he still on your radar in any way? Have anything you want to ask him to help you cement your read on him (whatever it is)?
IMO there is only scummy OMGUS. Townie OMGUS doesn't exist.
The reason for my vote change is that it doesn't matter if he has that one extra vote since the deadline is in like a day. I'd still be happy with a seanald lynch, it's just I felt like pacmans actions needed more attention then what they were getting so I changed my vote.
