Totally right.
I hate those holdouts.
Well i voted Salamence because I did an ISO on him and he looked really really scummy. I mean how dont you see it?
No but really, ive played the most games with him from everyone in the player list so I felt comfortable with putting my rvs vote there.
In post 51, Mr_Ree wrote:unvote: Lucky, vote: Bud
Now that we are getting to know each other a little bit better, it's time for a little RQS..
1. What timezone do you live in? (EST)
2. Do you consider yourself an investigator or an analyzer? Ie. Do you actively ask questions in order to draw out scum or do you sit back and analyse everything that is said? (Personally I prefer to analyse because that is where my strengths are but I feel that the key to winning is to investigate and be actively asking questions. I will expand more on this when I've heard from everyone else.)
3. What was your first impression of Sal's first post and Djd's eventual proclamation that Sal is town? (I believe I answered this in my previous post)
In post 54, Mr_Ree wrote:You are correct good sir, I thought I was placing him at L-2.
UNVOTE: Bud.
I don't want this day to end too fast. I still have some questions to ask.
(3) Bud Bidderskins: zabriel, Mehdi2277, DoubleJD [Mr Ree] (L-2)
In post 52, ProsecutorGodot wrote:
I don't mind if we wagon someone quickly. I'd just prefer that we not set ourselves up for scum to hammer. The sooner they can get mislynches and move out of our two NK-free days, the better for them. As such, I'm becoming wary of the Bub wagon, too. He's now at L-1, and we're almost 24 hours into this game. We really should slow down. I know it's a micro game, but that shouldn't affect how we use our time (or if we use our time). Speedwagons don't allow us to exchange information in a calmer, less delicate situation.
Here, it's at the point where anyone who wants to be an idiot and sprint in for the kill can. If someone does hammer soon, then we'll have to take a good, LONG look at Bub's flip D2 and see what we can put together. This is definitely not a point in the game to rush someone to the gallows. We have this gift of two lynches without fear of the scum returning fire. Let's use it and not speedwagon anyone.
Oh yay, the DJD player slot has it out for me.
SHOCKER.
On my phone, will reply tonight.
But first:
LOL. LOL.
THIS GUY IS SCUM 100%
OMG YOU MAKE AN EXCELLENT REPLACEMENT FOR DJD, I CAN'T WAIT TO LYNCH YOU NOW.
Show
In post 188, Mehdi2277 wrote:Bub what's your opinion on sala's earlier posting near the start of the game (page 2 mainly)? His reaction to having two/three votes was to scum hunt which to me shows quite a bit of town motivation.
Although I'm willing to agree from what you said on joh/djd that his vote switch early on was likely town motivated. Ree/zab/bork is where I want to lynch now (ree>zab>bork most scummy to least).
In post 360, Mr_Ree wrote:Scummy in the fact that he's not really contributing much to the game. For someone who is ALWAYS online, he is not posting nearly enough. His reads are few and far between due to the fact that he has mainly been tunnelling 2 or 3 players.
In post 411, borkjerfkin wrote:Ok. Bub, the reason that your theory is wrong is that it makes no sense for ScumRee to put himself off the wagon for terms of wagon analysis; as scum he's going to try to put himself into the biggest group possible to widen the number of people we'd have to potentially mislynch before we were sure he was the scum on the wagon, whereas if he tries to pawn himself off as off the wagon, it'd be just between Lucky and him.
@Godot: what are you trying to say here:
Godot wrote:That and he isn't alive to use this nugget of insight courtesy of Bork.
That he's dead cause I hammered him? He was the better of the two wagons, and I don't have the benefit of hindsight to guide my decisions. Do you think Zab is scum and I should've hammered him instead?
Ree wrote:@Godot, bub and bork: care to do a town to scum list for us?
In post 411, borkjerfkin wrote:Ok. Bub, the reason that your theory is wrong is that it makes no sense for ScumRee to put himself off the wagon for terms of wagon analysis; as scum he's going to try to put himself into the biggest group possible to widen the number of people we'd have to potentially mislynch before we were sure he was the scum on the wagon, whereas if he tries to pawn himself off as off the wagon, it'd be just between Lucky and him.
@Godot: what are you trying to say here:
Godot wrote:That and he isn't alive to use this nugget of insight courtesy of Bork.
That he's dead cause I hammered him? He was the better of the two wagons, and I don't have the benefit of hindsight to guide my decisions. Do you think Zab is scum and I should've hammered him instead?
In post 510, borkjerfkin wrote:Bub, you were here and had nothing to say at all other than you were right?
In post 531, Mr_Ree wrote:
@Bub: What made you change your reads? It's a big change even though your last reads were from day 2. Why do you think Bork is scum? What do you think about the possibility of Godot/Lucky as a scum team?
@Bub would you be willing to vote Ree? I havnt heard your answer yet.
In post 553, ProsecutorGodot wrote:Just so I have this clear,
Bub, you did this back at the beginning of the game. Care to explain why you didn't go straight into your comment on Lucky?
In post 571, borkjerfkin wrote:Allrighty -- I'm not gonna go through a "What-if" thing on every player. I don't think that's particularly productive and I think would "muddy the waters" as Ree put it -- I'm instead going to touch on what I think are the most likely scenarios.
Bub
Bub is starting to worry me a little -- Day 1 and Day 2 play are town, through and through, but his Day 3 play has been pretty much "throw a vote down and coast" which is undermining the previous two days. If he is town, and my gut is still saying he is, then the scumteam just has no stones and don't think they can coordinate a quickhammer before Bub gets back and busts them. This probably means Lucky is on the scumteam, since he's much less consistently around than either Godot or especially Ree. Thus I will say that if Bub is town, Lucky is definitely scum.
Lucky
The chameleon read -- my read on him has mostly fit around how I feel about everyone else since he has so little content. I will say this though -- he looks like he's looking for an easy out on D3 with Ree -- he's got little oomph behind his suspicion (unlike myself). I thought I had him dead to rights on D1 with his ill-timed AtE, but his head kind of stayed in the clouds and I don't have the benefit of past play with him besides Micro 3 which barely got off the ground before town won to see if he's BSing me. I will say that #569 is a bad, bad post -- you specifically are trying to get me to keep all my options open and undermine my read on Bub.
Godot
Good D1 play. Slightly reserved D2 play. Has received essentially no pressure throughout the entire game -- fine in and of itself, but the minute I exert any, he seriously starts to overreact and start pointing at me. Seems like you're more upset that I swapped a read onyouthan that I swapped a read.
Godot wrote:Lashing out today when he had me down as town for a while doesn't help that out.
Am I not supposed to reevaluate given all that's happened?
IthoughtI caught a daytalk slip from him, and I maintain that it was a reasonable thing for scum that had daytalk to say -- but it doesn't add up because any team sans Godot/Bub could've quickhammered me now with it (I'd been waiting for Lucky to post before I said this). His inquiry into Bub about the early game selfvote is silly and serves no purpose other than to fabricate a scummy interaction.
My "Mehdi quickwagon" as you want to put it wasn't a quickwagon at all -- I'd very noticeably been waving his flag all day; prior to that point, though, no one had been willing to run with me on it.
Ree
Uses a lot of logic that I don't agree with; see mostly his case against DJD early on. Seemed at least genuine when I pressed him on it. Was a little better D2 and caused me to side with him over Johhog who had a pretty weak case. His D3 claim was poorly executed -- the pro-town way to claim that role would've been to lay down the role name, what it did, and BOTH of your targets immediately. The more incrementally you do it the more I'm forced to believe that you wanted to gauge people's reactions before you decided what you're going to say. You cansayyou're reaction testing there, but the fact of the matter is that the more you say up front, the more likely people are to think that you're being honest with them and not changing your story based on how people initially respond to it.
Your suspicion of me mostly seems to revolve on the fact that I was the hammer vote on both Sala and Johhog and that I might've hammered to "stifle conversation". This strikes me as odd, considering how close we were to deadline, the fact that you knew exactly where I stood on the issues before I hammered, the fact that the other wagon was on YOU, and the fact that I gave people up plenty of time to chime in before I dropped it. The scum thing to do there would've been to shut up and hope for a No Lynch, thereby giving no one any flip info. I'm curious as to if you can adequately describe an alternate course of action there that would've been more pro-town or if you're just blowing smoke.
Overall, you're scummy, but not as scummy as Lucky or Godot. If your claim does turn out to be fake, I'm going to be really, really upset with myself.
HOS: Lucky
FOS: Godot (could easily flip but I have a hunch Lucky will get wagonned before Godot ever would today).
p-edit: figures someone would wall right as I was walling. haven't read it yet.
(and a bunch of other times calling me town, including calling me your "strongest read")Bub's still town
In post 593, borkjerfkin wrote:I'd have gone for Lucky or Godot yesterday;
Lucky for his attempt to discredit my town reads (#569), his whole trying to get people to lynch you without really talking about why he didn't believe your claim (#534), and his end of D1 play.
Godot for his bad reaction to the first pressure he'd received all game by basically OMGUSing me, and misrepping what I did with Mehdi on D1 (#566).
Bork wrote:
Bub
Bub is starting to worry me a little -- Day 1 and Day 2 play are town, through and through, but his Day 3 play has been pretty much "throw a vote down and coast" which is undermining the previous two days. If he is town, and my gut is still saying he is, then the scumteam just has no stones and don't think they can coordinate a quickhammer before Bub gets back and busts them. This probably means Lucky is on the scumteam, since he's much less consistently around than either Godot or especially Ree. Thus I will say that if Bub is town, Lucky is definitely scum.
Bork wrote:Ree
Uses a lot of logic that I don't agree with; see mostly his case against DJD early on. Seemed at least genuine when I pressed him on it. Was a little better D2 and caused me to side with him over Johhog who had a pretty weak case. His D3 claim was poorly executed -- the pro-town way to claim that role would've been to lay down the role name, what it did, and BOTH of your targets immediately. The more incrementally you do it the more I'm forced to believe that you wanted to gauge people's reactions before you decided what you're going to say. You can say you're reaction testing there, but the fact of the matter is that the more you say up front, the more likely people are to think that you're being honest with them and not changing your story based on how people initially respond to it.
Your suspicion of me mostly seems to revolve on the fact that I was the hammer vote on both Sala and Johhog and that I might've hammered to "stifle conversation". This strikes me as odd, considering how close we were to deadline, the fact that you knew exactly where I stood on the issues before I hammered, the fact that the other wagon was on YOU, and the fact that I gave people up plenty of time to chime in before I dropped it. The scum thing to do there would've been to shut up and hope for a No Lynch, thereby giving no one any flip info. I'm curious as to if you can adequately describe an alternate course of action there that would've been more pro-town or if you're just blowing smoke.
Overall, you're scummy, but not as scummy as Lucky or Godot. If your claim does turn out to be fake, I'm going to be really, really upset with myself.
In post 595, borkjerfkin wrote:So was I calling you town yesterday or willing to lynch you? It's apparently one or the other depending on what argument you're trying to make.
Bork wrote:think it's pretty obvious that Bub was off the table yesterday -- at no point in that first paragraph did I ever even intimate that I was interested in lynching Bub; even moreso considering that Ree WAS willing to lynch him. My point was that your contribution day 3 was essentially non-existent. Why is that? Did you figure this game was just going to roll into your lap due to the difficulty of 5p LyLo for town? But you're firing from all cylinders now, which indicates a difference in the likelihood of your team winning from the previous days, and lo and behold, we lynched scum yesterday for the first time and now that desperation is starting to show.
In post 597, borkjerfkin wrote:My read flipped on you, today, when I found out that Ree was town. That has nothing to do with the fact that your D3 play was passive and unhelpful, which I hadn't been expecting from you at the time. Just because I thought you were the towniest one around doesn't mean you were shitting rainbows the whole game. After my read post, therewasno further suspicion on you D3 from my end, so you can claim that I'd have taken part in your lynch if it had been brought up again and have absolutely nothing to back that up. As far as my willingness to vote you (or lack thereof): you're conveniently ignoring the fact that Ree in fact DID vote you and I chose not to indulge.
Besides, even if I'd called you an unerring beacon of towniness yesterday and swore on my grandmother's gravestone, I'd still be sitting here, today, calling you scum because I now know that you are scum.
Your play was markedly different than mine as far as swapped reads. You said: "Ree's claim is believable, especially since he named off his targets. While he could be scum gambiting, I think it's most likely that he and Godot are town." There are two problems with this:
1) Ree sending a message to Godot says nothing about Godot, only about Ree.
2) Godot didn't even get the message, so even to try to argue, fallaciously, that the message somehow makes Godot town can't be done here.
You never came back to this point, not even once. You just saw that Ree didn't want to lynch Godot and realized that you'd be better served to try to get me lynched instead. When that failed you bussed.
There has been so marked a change in your play over the three days that it's worth noting here:
On Day 1 and 2, Bub posted little, but was concise and took stances on things.
Day 3 (5p lylo; heavily scum favored) was coasting and hoping a townie would take the second vote on me so Lucky could finish it.
Day 4 (3p lylo, momentum switching back toward town) is panic mode.
Overall, trying to smear me for swapping reads, rather than the manner in which those reads were swapped, makes it pretty obvious which one of us is thinking like a townie.
I did not do the exact same thing and I explained why. Shouting it again while ignoring my counterargument does not make it so.
There was no way I was lynching you, and I was leaning against lynching Ree. You wanna get into semantics that I didn't call Ree town? Weak.
Are you really trying to argue that scum don't ever distance in the early game? Especially when it becomes very obvious that no one's going for that lynch and therefore you don't have to bus?
Your D1 and D2 play was reasonable, but you basically were a non-entity D3 because you had no pressure on you and it looked like I might be a probable lynch target -- optimal scum play there is not to rock the boat.
I'll concede the D4 issue, your only hope now really IS to do what you're doing.
So concede that you were being hypocritical when you called me scummy for changing my playstyle in a 3-person LYLO?
In post 604, Mr_Ree wrote:Lol, so this is fun right? I've already chosen who I want to lynch. Don't let me interrupt your arguement though. I'm rather enjoying this.
In post 611, Mr_Ree wrote:Dude, you're making this too easy. Resist or something. Put some fight into it man!