Micro 55: Vengeful Potatoes Part 2... Game Over

[Zoidberg]

Sup.

[Zoidberg]

Sup. I'm still town, guise.

[Zoidberg]

Extra hello to everyone except for Zoidberg.

Why not Zoidberg?

[Zoidberg]

^ Concerned about votes this early shos?
I think I found somebody whose alignment changed after the reroll.

VOTE: shos

How do you know it was town before?

[Zoidberg]

Charter, what do you think of drmyshotty?

[Zoidberg]

Zoidberg for his general lack of reacting to what I consider very suspect behavior by both Maestro and Shos

I 100% do not understand this "reacting" bullshit. If you click on my wiki page you can find the newbie game I played (poorly, I suppose) where Majiffy pulled the same stupid "reaction test" and erroneously called me scummy because I "didn't react" to something.

a) Not everyone reacts to things the same way, or with the same magnitude

b) A non-reaction cannot possibly be an alignment tell, in the same way that a lack of activity is not an alignment tell.

Do players on this site

actually

take the time to post every single thought that comes into their head? Every time people bring up the "you didn't react to whatever" argument I feel like it's a tactic from real-life games that is being misapplied to forum games.

[Zoidberg]

VOTE: Zoidberg

Reasons?

[Zoidberg]

Zoidberg hasn't commented on anything

That's because I apparently don't have the first fucking clue what's happening. People are linking to weird threads that apparently have no bearing on this thread and it's somehow relevant?????????????

[Zoidberg]

@48: you don't have a clue what's happening? READ THE THREAD. have you even OPENED THAT LINK?

Yes, I've read the thread and the game you linked to already

it is a link to a micro game (vengeful too if I remember correctly) which had a hammer on page 1, and ended on page 2. it "had bearing on this thread and is somewhat relevant" because people questioned me why I did not vote people if they already have a vote. skimming *already*??

Nope, not skimming, just didn't see why it was relevant. Do now.

[Zoidberg]

@48: you don't have a clue what's happening? READ THE THREAD. have you even OPENED THAT LINK?

Yes, I've read the thread and the game you linked to already

And what use is it giving you now?

The short game that was linked? No use for me whatsoever.

[Zoidberg]

5. Unwillingness to actually discuss who's scummy in his opinion.

Not sure where you're getting that from. It's not like I was asked who was scummy and said "I'm not going to tell you"

Please don't misrepresent me.

[Zoidberg]

Charter and Maestro in my opinion.

Charter because he's lurking just like he did in our last micro together (48) where he was scum. He basically just said the bare minimum but nobody seemed to call him out on it.

Maestro I find kinda hard to read, actually.

[Zoidberg]

Shos too, actually. Compared to the last game we played together where he was town, he's being much more lighthearted and "frivolous" if that's the right word.

[Zoidberg]

Zoidberg, what kind of posts DID charter post in that game? and what was the setup please?

It was a 5p vengeful, the link is on my wiki page. Micro 48, I think. He hardly posted anything at all, less than 20 posts all game.

and how comes you find Maestro scummy when you can't read him?

I said I find him difficult to read; there's a difference.

[Zoidberg]

Well this was nowhere to be found in your ISO previously, so I wasn't misrepping you, was I? Tut tut.

Pardon my french, but that's fucking retarded. There is a huge difference between being asked something and being unwilling/refusing to discuss, and simply not saying something. Just because YOU feel it's okay to post an un-asked-for list of players ranked in order of scummyness so that scum knows who to focus on doesn't mean I feel the need to do so spontaneously. You are either an idiot or being deliberately argumentative.

[Zoidberg]

If you read the last game you will see that I'm not playing anything like last game.

People can decide for themselves. I think you're playing very much like that game, actually.

VOTE: charter

[Zoidberg]

Well this was nowhere to be found in your ISO previously, so I wasn't misrepping you, was I? Tut tut.

Pardon my french, but that's fucking retarded. There is a huge difference between being asked something and being unwilling/refusing to discuss, and simply not saying something. Just because YOU feel it's okay to post an un-asked-for list of players ranked in order of scummyness so that scum knows who to focus on doesn't mean I feel the need to do so spontaneously. You are either an idiot or being deliberately argumentative.

You claimed that I misrepped you meaning that your posts

did

contain them when they surely did not. Now you are trying to fix your past mistake and it is so clearly visible.

Uhhh let's try this again.

1. You claim I'm unwilling to discuss scum reads
   
2. I'd never been asked directly about scum reads so I hadn't posted them

You're ascribing motive/intent when there had been none. That is misrepresenting me.

[Zoidberg]

:/

[Zoidberg]

Oh, drmyshotgun is gunny?

>.< things make sense now.

[Zoidberg]

Bet ya didn't see me-scum coming did ya, Zoid?

I had an inkling, actually. But I keep second-guessing myself and it gets me into trouble.