Micro 279: Uncommon Mafia - OVER

[Wake1]

Confirming.

[Wake1]

In general I don't favor quicklynches. We are given time. Let's not waste it.

My only Scum game on MS was an Open game: "Rows and Columns." Town made it a cakewalk for anyone, though.

[Wake1]

wake why did you say you only played one game as scum

Please reread my post, because I never said that.

You'd learn that,

on MS

, I've only played as Scum once.

[Wake1]

*Reveals

Annihilator Beam

*

[Wake1]

Implosion

———✹

Why exactly does PhDScar seem Towny?

———✹

Between Alduskkel and Yessiree, who'd you vote for?

———✹

Want to share any of your Town/Scum games?

Alduskkel

———✹

Regarding both Bob and Bert, please explain why you think they're vote-worthy at this point.

———✹

Why does Implosion's #27 weird you out?

———✹

Reads on PhDScar?

Yessiree

———✹

Please share any reads you have so far.

———✹

Where'd Bert claim Scum??

———✹

And why are you voting him?

[Wake1]

Klick

———✹

Any reads on everyone else?

———✹

Why does your gut read tell you that?

———✹

What makes you think I'll be easy to read, especially when youk now me not?

———✹

Open 532: Rows and Columns

———✹

Do you have any Scum games of yours to link, please?

[Wake1]

Klick

———✹

Any reads on everyone else?

———✹

Why does your gut read tell you that?

———✹

What makes you think I'll be easy to read, especially when youk now me not?

———✹

Open 532: Rows and Columns

———✹

Do you have any Scum games of yours to link, please?

1: Not right now, haven't really been able to look at anyone else much.
2: It's... a gut read. I could probably find something scummy about the people I think look scum and vice versa for town, but as of now, I don't know.
3: I've seen your games. I read around a lot.
4: Thanks, I'll look at that later, leaving right now.
5: I have a lot. I'll have fun linking every game I can find later. I know there were a lot on my previous account missing in the '11 crash.

Why not? You've had more than a few minutes, haven't you/ Now, I know you're intelligent, so I'm more than confident that you can deposit least on more read from yourself. Besides, I find you rather interesting, therefore I'm certain you'll be able to do so. What do you say to that?

Likewise, because I know you're smart, I'm sure you'll find the words to match the feelings... right? Are you not able to at the moment? Perhaps, maybe, you can do so within the next 20 minutes at the very least?

... ...and? You've seen my games. You have a very general understanding of the person standing before you now don't you? And, because you've read around a lot, you can, I would think, be able to expound a little more than some on what you know of my gameplay.

It was very simple for FakeGod and I, because Town made it a cakewalk due to their perpetual discord and hastiness. If you'd like, you can also take a glimpse at Mini 1516: Mafia in Space, to understand a very different facet of my play as well as the lessons I've learned which have lead to an evolution of my gameplay.

I'm looking forward to those links, and I'll be sure to enjoy them.

[Wake1]

Alduskkel

———✹

Regarding both Bob and Bert, please explain why you think they're vote-worthy at this point.

———✹

Why does Implosion's #27 weird you out?

———✹

Reads on PhDScar?

1. Bert because bandwagons are good and because he hasn't checked in yet, so a dissolution of his bandwagon

now

would yield less information. Bob because seriously look at that avatar, it's horrifying.
2. It's a confusing statement.
3. Town -- posts 39 and 41 were good responses.

---

Anyone not voting right now -- why aren't you voting?

...I like the thought of keeping you busy, if it means it will keep you engaged.

If Bert were to near or be at L-1, what will be your course of action? In general I'm more than a little leery of quick wagons. We have a lot of time, and I believe in using as much of that time as necessary.

What exactly about his #27 do you find confusing? If you would point it out, I would be more than willing to help try and understand it with you, if it's not too much trouble.

I tend to break things down through intense analysis. Why, please, do you find his two posts to be good responses. The more you can explain your very thoughts and actions in-depth, the more I will be willing to trust you. It's the very nature of the beast, this game.

[Wake1]

@Wake88 what are your thoughts on the people that have responded to your questioning?

I'm getting around to it.

[Wake1]

Klick and Alduskkel are engaging. That doesn't clear them, but it does prevent inquisitive jihad.

[Wake1]

*Reveals

Lightning Gloves

*

[Wake1]

If Bert were to near or be at L-1, what will be your course of action?

Am I on the wagon or off the wagon?

✦1

What exactly about his #27 do you find confusing? If you would point it out, I would be more than willing to help try and understand it with you, if it's not too much trouble.

I tend to break things down through intense analysis. Why, please, do you find his two posts to be good responses. The more you can explain your very thoughts and actions in-depth, the more I will be willing to trust you. It's the very nature of the beast, this game.

1. There's no logic to it -- it's just a casual, "well, you can not vote scum if you like." If that makes sense to you as anything other than a joke statement (and I see that implosion has said it is) then feel free to tell me.

2. The responses are genuine. Why are they genuine? Tone. Past that you're not getting any more information out of me

✦2

. Partly because there isn't much else to it, but mostly because I dislike explaining my townreads unless it becomes very important.

Speaking of tone, I dislike yours

✦3

. You buddy up to Klick by telling him he's intelligent/smart and so on, and essentially place the burden of proficiency on him

✦4

. Additionally, you're being excessively ingratiating. "Why, please, ..." "if it's not too much trouble." are examples of that

✦5

. Bonus points for trying to set up gaining your trust as a goal for me

✦

.

Klick and Alduskkel are engaging. That doesn't clear them, but it does prevent inquisitive jihad.

Is this seriously all you're getting from these questions?

Vote: Wake88

✦7

✦1

Either.

✦2

Why?

✦3

?

✦4

Point it out and walk everyone through it, because that makes no sense.

✦5

You haven't read Mini 1516. What you mistake as ingratiation is actually politeness.

✦6

This makes no sense either.

✦7

So you're voting for a guy you don't understand, who also happens to be contributing quite a bit. Let's go in-depth here.

[Wake1]

wake why did you say you only played one game as scum

Please reread my post, because I never said that.

You'd learn that,

on MS

, I've only played as Scum once.

don't dodge my question

also why are you and klick pretending not to know each other

Let's be clear. I never said I only played one game as Scum. On MS, I've had only one game. I haven't dodged your question, so stop lying.

What do you mean about Klick? We had one game together in Masons and Mafia, and that was about, what, over a month ago? So... what are you doing?

[Wake1]

accusing you of stuff, trying to get you lynched

so why did you say you only played one game as scum on ms even though no one asked

Do you assume that providing information when not asked means one is Scum?

I do this quite a bit, because knowledge helps Town.

[Wake1]

How does that information help town?

Because you are provided an example of my one and only game on MS.net as Scum.

You can analyze that information, and use it as a rough frame of reference.