[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5666225 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 295: Cowardly Hider Mafia (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
50 posts
• Page 1 of 1
BROseidon
BROseidon
Expert Marxman
BROseidon
Expert Marxman
Expert Marxman
Posts: 8242
Joined: April 18, 2013
Post
Post #22 (isolation #0) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:08 pm
Postby BROseidon »
I think that town read on Varsoon is premature. Scum-Varsoon would want to shoot down the plan knowing that someone else would shoot down the plan and make supporters of the plan look bad.
pedit: Not necessarily. Scum know exactly how many hiders they can claim b/c they know the setup.
Post
Post #53 (isolation #2) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:14 am
Postby BROseidon »
Maybe.
Also we aren't mass claiming. Scum already know exactly how many hiders there are, there's no need to give them extra info.
We do need a good way to slip hider crumbs through without them being obvious. I think each person stating who they would hide behind were they a hider in such a way that it forms a circle might be the best way to go about it.
Post
Post #61 (isolation #6) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:27 am
Postby BROseidon »
Okay, on the off chance that there are four hiders who would end up without VTs or scum b/w them in the chain AND scum just happen to shoot the person it resolves on...
Post
Post #70 (isolation #11) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:11 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 2, Cabd wrote:6: In the event of a hiding "chain" a night kill on the non-hidden endpoint will kill everyone else in that chain. In the event of the chain terminating in a hide behind a non-commuting mafia player, only the endpoint of the chain will die. If you are confused, feel free to PM me your questions about action resolution.
Post
Post #107 (isolation #12) » Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:10 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 72, Varsoon wrote:Crumbs can help anyone. The problem is that now that we've talked about crumbs, scum can just comb for them. Not cool and stuff.
...Like they weren't anyways?
If you're scum in a setup where you're told "THERE ARE THIS MANY HIDERS," do you not fucking comb for crumbs?
Post
Post #108 (isolation #13) » Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:12 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 83, Ghatokaca wrote:I disagree with the mass-claim idea. I think we should scumhunt normally during Day 1 and come up with plans to optimize role usage later on. The setup speculation is boring and I don't have any reads yet. I'll check with Nacho and re-read to see where he is at regarding the claims and our reads. I don't feel confident about any reads yet.
Post
Post #109 (isolation #14) » Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:13 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 92, GuyInFreezer wrote:{BROseidon (Before this game starts, I gave myself some thinking time and thought about "If I was scum, which strategy would I convince town to pull it off?" Circular hiding is what I thought the scum would most likely to try to push. Hence my initial push. But then, I didn't read the specifics lol. Meh. Now all I have on him is some minor stuff like "meh I don't like how he's outright trying to discourage my varsoon townread".)}
Post
Post #113 (isolation #16) » Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:01 am
Postby BROseidon »
It's more like burden of proficiency. You're a strong enough player that you should be able to grasp theory points like setup breaking fairly easily, and the fact that you're discouraging it is indicative of you not putting forth your 100% town game. Which implies you're scum.
Post
Post #153 (isolation #19) » Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:04 pm
Postby BROseidon »
In post 136, Ghatokaca wrote:What is your current read on him?
My current read has a complete lack of meta. I mean hell yeah feels and shit, but no meta.
In post 138, Ghatokaca wrote:i feel that bro is scum because meta and also because Able is his scumbuddy
Post
Post #209 (isolation #22) » Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:59 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 156, penguin_alien wrote:BRO, in your initial proposal, at what point would you expect people to commit to their supposed hider plans?
The point was that nobody would have to personally commit to anything, and that we could set up a mechanized way to "track" hider results without having to have people crumb them beforehand. This thought process stems from the hardboiled game I played, where I was forced to claim tracker day 2 after Mac hid behind scum night 1. I figured that there was a more optimal way to play that scenario than the way we did, so I've been working on how to break open/semi-open setups with hiders.
Post
Post #210 (isolation #23) » Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:02 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 174, Varsoon wrote:If you hide and hit scum, you die (unless scum commutes).
You can't claim that you hid behind someone and that it therefore clears them because scum can lie about this AND scum can commute.
So, really, why would anyone hide behind anyone ever?
It's a thousand times easier if we all just never hide and try to pin scum through lynches.
I say we forget the mechanics entirely. Too scum-based. Too easily for scum to kill multiple town one night. Results mean nothing too.
We minimize town deaths by never hiding.
Easymode engaged.
This feels safe and suboptimal. This setup is probably breakable, probably by the way that I've already proposed (although I think the plan could use some minor optimization to prevent scum from "hider-hunting")
Post
Post #212 (isolation #25) » Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:04 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 186, Ghatokaca wrote:1) I don't like shooting down an early townread on Varsoon. I don't think it served any purpose for BRO as town and it seemed strange to criticize GiF reads before offering his own.
...Except early unsubstantiated town reads indicate a scum-interest of trying to avoid conflict and appear natural.
Post
Post #284 (isolation #27) » Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:19 pm
Postby BROseidon »
In post 224, Ghatokaca wrote:F-16 also said "setup discussion is boring". He didn't say shit about actual theory, so calling his actual theory bullshit when none was presented is dumb.
Calling it boring is implicitly bad theory game.
Opens and Semi-Opens are made to be broken. Especially ones with hiders.
Post
Post #285 (isolation #28) » Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:23 pm
Postby BROseidon »
In post 233, Ghatokaca wrote:I don't think he's scum because of the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his plan. I don't think the effectiveness or the ineffectiveness of his plan is related to his alignment. Why do you disagree?
Why would scum-me endeavor to break a setup this ornate?
Post
Post #334 (isolation #33) » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:52 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 301, penguin_alien wrote:Aside from you and GiF, I'm not sure who he'd be afraid of, and GiF's a guess. And no, I'm not being disingenuous by leaving myself off that list, given how thoroughly BRO snookered me in NY 165 and would have in bork's Mini Touhou.
There's nobody on this list that I'm afraid of playing from either side. There is almost nobody on this site that I'm not confident in my ability to beat as either alignment if I bring my A-game.
Post
Post #336 (isolation #35) » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:55 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 314, Xayzeck wrote:A couple of thoughts I'd put out there before I head off. I'm a little busier now that's school started, so I may not always have time to do longer posts, but I'll always be reading.
Moving on.
I'm not sure how I feel about NS being scum just because his posts are off.
Then again, I haven't played with him ever, but just because his posts aren't what you expect of his townself doesn't mean he's scum. Varsoon did say he's been off(or something) in his recent games, so it could very well be a change in play style.
NS don't really have posts that strike me as towny, with the exception of 202 where he made some efforts to contribute to town. But other than that everything he's posted has been kinda bleh. I wouldn't mind lynching him.
Varsoon's town for me. After he brought up the no hiding thing and all the thought he put into set up, I'm pretty confident he's town. There's no scum-motivation in doing that. Strongest townread so far.
Penguin's town for me too. More recent posts have a lot more content, but doesn't post a lot. Enough for me to say he's towny though.
bubba needs to post more.
The other half of the player list I'm not really sure. I'll have to go through their posts soon. For the beginning of the game I felt GiF was towny, but that may be because he's just posting a lot. I'll have to look through his posts again.
Not sure what to think about Bro.
Can't read the hydras for nuts.
This in particular I'm not a fan of (in reference to my reads list)
Post
Post #347 (isolation #36) » Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:32 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 338, GuyInFreezer wrote:What exactly have I lied about the game flow?
Go look for yourself. There's your post commenting on nacho/f-16's 83, but there's no vote.
it implies that you didn't find him scummy enough to cast a vote on them.
And then you commented on my post, and then you proceeded to vote nacho.
Whatever you found scummy off of them, it must've been the posts after 83.
What's after the post 83? Nacho's vote.
All my posts are consecutive.
Would your opinion change if I'd written a wall instead of spam-posted?
Post
Post #348 (isolation #37) » Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:36 am
Postby BROseidon »
In post 337, penguin_alien wrote:Either, actually, but more the rest of the game and their non-you interactions. Until your recent reads list, I didn't have much of a sense of what your other thoughts were. My gut says this is town-you and doesn't trust Ghatokaca's reactions here, and if that's accurate, your reads are darn useful. Based on #333, I assume you don't see GiF and Varsoon as partners? How would you rank that second-string list?
I tend to agree about Xayzeck's reads list not in light of yours but more in light of that it includes the high-volume posters, and while he's deferring reading them, it reads more like they're null right now. Which, I get being hesitant about you and Ghatokaca, but GiF as well?
GiF, what I don't quite jive with on Jessica is that this doesn't feel like the town-Marquis I've played with. Within the hydra he looks townier than normal, especially with his other head posting a lot in a very stream-of-consciousness way. I'll trust your bubba read for now though.
BRO, I assume you still like your basically circular plan similar to Medical Mafia strategy, except that presumably we'd pick someone to pre-hypoclaim , and their target claims, etc.?
GiF/Varsoon don't make sense as partners b/c Ghatokaca is scum. I haven't worked out any argument from their interactions themselves.
I rank that second list as GiF/Xay/Varsoon. The issue I have with Xay's list is that he goes out of his way to talk about how unsure he is about so many people.
Post
Post #375 (isolation #41) » Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:21 pm
Postby BROseidon »
In post 364, Ghatokaca wrote:You didn't "endeavor" to break the setup. You made a half-assed attempt at it and offered a little setup speculation.
Do you really think that makes you town in any respect?
More town than you and GiF, who've:
1) Proposed explicitly anti-town breaking or
2) Made no attempt to break the setup.