why reck you look so handsome in your tux!
did grimm or grimm's mom pick it out?
hi guyz
wats going on
In post 10, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:hey all!
mollie why no acceptance of reck's beautiful proposal? are you waiting for someone else? if i was a gentleman, i would totally ask you.
In post 94, xRECKONERx wrote:I have no read on mollie yet
In post 89, ika wrote:no i lied, i just wanted to troll a bit. but i asked her something that will help me decide her much better.
reck do you think mollie is scum?
mollie if you think reck is scum why dont you leave?
In post 61, pirate mollie wrote:well scum!reck would know that I was town and not likely to get lynched very easily.
obvsly I wanna see more of him before I make any kind of determination of his alignment.
I didn't follow the other game but I take it scum picked each other? do you have a link?
In post 98, xRECKONERx wrote:i haven't seen you in so long I forgot you do that
In post 103, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 101, xRECKONERx wrote:I think Marquis is town
Where is this coming from?
p-edit: ty mollie. take the words out of my post
In post 110, ika wrote:for you convience, her last visit:
Last visited:Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:56 am
its been almost 12 hr scince she logged in
In post 125, Antihero wrote:In post 84, xRECKONERx wrote:weird. ika's making sense, so he must be scum
really? news to me.
ika wrote:reck asking mollie, i dont see reck putting foward effort to pair with mollie like that as scum. i would expect him to be more passive
>you think mollie's scum anyway sooooooooo.... wat?
>i asked etl and mollie in my first post, two people who know me the best on this site and i get a yellow because.............. why? and don't act like you don't know about etl and i's dynamic; you were in how do you want to die
In post 133, ika wrote:etl: did you roll scum this game? you dont sound like your spontaneous town self now with that last post now that i read it again.
also anti is an analitcal player, hes one of those playstlyes i easly look past and fade off to me. reck is more spontatious and trollsy (last game he hammered day one 12 hrs in and was town and we had hilarity on that) so his pattern is more memorable.
when you haev players like anti who just post analitcals and nothign thats trolling/funny/fun they fade out rather fast.
god i feel like im town emulating scum meta with this post.
In post 186, ika wrote:well me givnign info when im being suspected and finding that it will most likely be in vain, i find no point in doing it then is my entire problem etl.
why do things when it yeild no results?
In post 213, Kagami wrote:I kind of think ika is town here, btw, but I hate this reaction to being asked for reasoning.
In post 212, Kagami wrote:What's wrong with anti? I like him so far.
In post 224, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 217, droog wrote:Reck is it something I did or something marquis did
u
In post 215, xRECKONERx wrote:@Mollie why do you read me/anti as scum?
^^^
HEY MOLLIE
In post 230, Antihero wrote:
WHAT KIND OF SHIT IS THIS?
seriously, i still haven't heard THE FIRST WORD about ika who i EXPLICITLY ASKED ABOUT HOWEVER LONG AGO, and now i'm being made to feel like I'M FALLING SHORT on something here?
and now i have to pull some notscience like "ohheylolollooz, i'm obvtown" shit or start screaming about how town i am (which... i don't think i've EVER done)
mollie, this is all horseshit and you know it
VOTE: mollie
In post 293, xRECKONERx wrote:- I wasn't assessing people off the first few posts because I posted once, then didn't come back until after the game had progressed. Which is why, since there were 3 pages of posts by the time I posted again, I found it weird that mollie was scumreading me off ofonepost out of50-75posts fromsevenother people. It wasn't the bulk of posts from people who had provided ample content that struck her as odd, she found a way to fixate on my one (informationless/contentless) post.
- Is your argument basically that, "As town, your frame of mind should be that you should scumread someone off of one post"? Because holy fuck that's retarded.
- I'd see someone scumreading meoff of one postas fucking stupid becauseit's fucking stupid. Hence my exclamation, "is mollie scumreading me off of one post, seriously?"! Is this too hard to follow?
Forcing a scumread on someone off of one post (in which no content or opinion or analysis was provided) is stupid. This is why I pointed it out. Because it's not genuine or honest. And it's ESPECIALLY stupid coming from Mollie, because she has a history of reading me incorrectly and it's very annoying. She even goes on to comment later that the immediate scumread on me was a dig to drive a reaction out of me. It got a reaction out of me.
There are meta reasons for me to be upset that mollie is scumreading me after one post, and there are common sense reasons for me to be upset at being scumread off of one post. You can't have an actual fucking discussion that is in any way healthy for gamestate over one fucking post.
In post 307, xRECKONERx wrote:also I never really pay attention to anything that doesn't involve me, I'm a selfish player and it's super hard for me to even pretend to give a shit about anything else going on early in the game
like, this is how I operate. it's how I play all the time.
In post 308, Bicephalous Bob wrote:yeah yeah yeah
mollie, what do you think of reck's history argument? Also, can you read back on page 3 and say if reck's reaction to your scumread feels natural?
In post 314, droog wrote:In post 256, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 252, Kagami wrote:I ask him if he's an alt and if he knows the playerlist, answers: yes, no
Okay, then FUCK this shit about him acting "so noob"... he's not a noob at all, he's pretending to be.
go look at some games im playing in this account
then reread kagaimi's summary
then say again with a staright face that im pretending to be a noob
or claiming to be a noob at all
i will say all day
with a straight face
i had no idea subbing into this that most people here knew each other and relied on tells like
"weird. ika's making sense, so he must be scum"
In post 315, droog wrote:In post 292, Bicephalous Bob wrote:I gave up on getting homework done so I reread
arc's response to ika's loaded question was borderline nonsensical but I can easily see him as town overestimating the result of a reaction test
I could also see him using it as an excuse to hard-buddy arc, but that seems less likely
am i misreading or is bob townreading the player he subbed in for?
In post 241, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 240, Antihero wrote:reck, what are your impressions from what's going on in the pt?
She's just acting paranoid/schizo
Like one post she'll be like "OMG this is like a hydra yayyyy" implying we're both town, then when I'm like "but I don't know that you're 100% town" she's like "oh yeah me neither same to you"
we both agree on Kagami-town for now
she doesn't see droogscum, I do
then droog posted:
and she changed her mind (but not her vote)
I dunno, it's hard to read mollie on the forum, she's so goddamn spastic
In post 322, xRECKONERx wrote:congrats, I didn't know this? Why would I know the game habits of your old site? I know vague details about your old site, like that one guy who you all loved to troll or w/e, but why would I have vast/intimate knowledge of your site's playstyle/deadlines and, even if I did have knowledge of it, why would I immediately make the connection of OH MOLLIE IS PLAYING LIKE THIS ON MAFIASCUM WHERE SHE HAS BEEN FOR YEARS NOW BECAUSE OF HER OLD SITE?
I have no idea, mollie. What the fuck game had scum serene or scum desp or scum pie? And sorry, can't hear your bragging about RW over the glorious win I had.
I really really have no clue what you're talking about, we have not talked about catching people off of one post
That's it. I clearly think you can catch scum off of one weird post becausethat's why I fucking scum read droog originally. The issue here is the one post that I made which had LITERALLY NOTHING to scumread anything off of and it's especially weird because you responded SEVERAL times after that post without mentioning a scumread on me.
Uh where did I say I suspect you for the droog progression
How exactly am I discrediting you
In post 338, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 331, pirate mollie wrote:reck i feel like you are going to take what I said the wrong way and I really think it is cos we have not hung out in forever.
you saying that I was bragging about spotting your first post in rw is weird to me cos I immediately jumped off cos of the timing of your crumb it was perfect. in my eyes it feels like it shld be obvs that I think better of your deflection of suspicion off of you, but for whatever reason it isn't in yours?
I don't think you are crazy for your drrog suspicion but I need more info. it just seems if you wanted to be partners you would be trying to sort me out more than what you are doing.
I told you in our pt that I could see etl as scum cos of how different she was in the game she linked. I am trying to work with you but I am unsure of you and you are keeping me at arm's length. it seems like you made that decision right off the bat and are sticking to it without trying to resolve it. this looks suspicious to me! but I am trying to give you space and try to see things from your perspective and I don't understand how you are missing that.
I don't think us hanging out IRL is worth visiting for in game reasons, though maybe my reads on you are weird because of that.
I bragged about it as a joke because you brought upthree other casesthat I didn't recognize or understand (serene, desp, and pie).
I wanted to be partners. I still do. I haven't NOT tried to sort you out. I have only called out something as weird. I HAVEN'T MADE A JUDGMENT CALL ON YOU YET, JESUS CHRIST.
In post 381, ika wrote:In post 379, pirate mollie wrote:@ ika - I don't ignore you cos I think you are a VI cos I don't. I ignore you cos you have said that you don't care about anybody else in the game but yourself, you play for you and you only. you have admitted you play selfishly, you don't try to work with anybody and to me that says you are not a team player even if you are on my team. I am leaning town on you in this game but I don't put lot of trust in your gameplay for those reasons.
given the fact i have tried to improve on that but most times it seems like it yeilds no results is why i default back to it
In post 447, Antihero wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bob
yeah, i think that outside ETL, reck/mollie pair has the best chance of alltown
not lynching that
In post 503, droog wrote:In post 499, xRECKONERx wrote:you+droog always not voting makes me feel very ick about your team. I don't feel like scum would dive in when there are townies lurking/not contributing/sitting on the sidelines.
yeah but we're not a team.
i have almost 0 say on what kagami does
not sure i like this implication
speaking of lurking, mollie where did you go?
have not heard much from you since before the anti lynch
give me a sounding board
is reck normallly this inscrutable
In post 166, Kagami wrote:Thing about ika-scum is that there aren't a lot of viable pairings for him.
I don't see all the ladies so quickly picking up partners if one of them was scummates with him, andI don't see him being scum with anti here for obvious reasons, leaving only ika-AA9 and ika-reck.
In post 433, xRECKONERx wrote:I just realized how it may be a good strategy for mafia to pair up.
In post 448, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:That is a weird progression from yesterday. I asked for your impressions of mollie /reck convo and you say nothing until that...
?
In post 486, Kagami wrote:Well, that makes things easy. Ika's probably right that it's double gentlemen.
You're also uncritical of his interactions with your own pair, while ascribing no less suspicious interactions as scummy toward mine.
You were strong townreading me and strong scumreading me in the hopes of getting me to leave.When I hinted that I might, you doubled-down.
VOTE: Reck
In post 491, Kagami wrote:I thought it was you-bob =\
In post 494, Kagami wrote:You're sure mollie is town?
I think anti was obliged to propose to ETL, but I don't think the same is true for mollie.
In post 500, Kagami wrote:I wanted to sort out droog. I had figured scum were non-paired for a while.
In post 516, droog wrote:ftr anti spoke to me 3 times
i suspect he talked to the people he knew and this analysis is a waste meh
im too tired for this but mollie is anti the kind ofp layer who would ignore or yell at teammates
In post 527, droog wrote:Heh you just said that to me cause I did it to you
I'm assuming then you don't think anti can be used to help us choose the last one?
In post 529, droog wrote:kagami's been in the qt a bit.
i could summarize but i dont see the need
kagami is going through last-second paranoia that it is you after all mollie
which i read as a )very) week towntell
she didnt like reck's post on etl which i guess i will dig up for kagami
since he's got something irl thats distracting her
i have no idea why everyone says you make no sense
youve explained yourself more than kagami and reck at least
again -- why i think you're town.