[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6362562 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null ROAP! 1! 2! LOW LANDS WENT DOWN! this was Micro 413 btw - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #95 (isolation #30) » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:56 am
Postby TierShift »
That's true, on the condition that there's actually stuff to talk about. I don't think I could have got anything alignment-indicative out of you with the information present and that we'd rather talk in circles. That's why I waited to see what the new guys had to say. And they still haven't done shit, although TTH is givong me badfeels. I should move my vote there.
VOTE: tth
Tth, what's your opinion on fuzzy?
Dessew, whose entrance (tth or eek) looks scummier to you? Why?
Post
Post #99 (isolation #31) » Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:25 pm
Postby TierShift »
In post 96, Dessew wrote:And I suppose you're wrong here, you could've got info about me. There is usually a point where it can be "talking in circles" as you said, but we were far, far away from that point.
What are you trying to say? Do you think I'm being dishonest or do you just have a different opinion?
In post 118, TierShift wrote:I'm sorry, is this an attempt at interacting with me and understanding my behaviour or just applying your shitty scumtells?
Neither. Reading your posts from the first few pages is giving me an understanding of your behavior and I haven't applied "scumtells" anywhere.
The picture I'm getting of your behavior is that you like to use buzzword-loaded rhetoric, probably in an attempt to sound authoritative. That can come from someone of either alignment and I'm not here to judge for that by itself, but I expect this attitude to carry over into the reads. The confident veneer seems to go away when it comes to your reads because they're all an inch deep. You can drop jargon in places like, "You can get newbscum vibes even from something an experienced player is doing." and "Why is fuzzy null? He has some content." but when it comes to the vote, you have a justification of "badfeels" and there's a lot of fogginess surrounding the droog and Dessew read.
If I'm wrong about any of this, please feel free to correct me. You didn't correct me on my previous assessment though, so I don't think I am.
All right. I've never heard that I like to throw buzzwords around and I don't think I'm doing so. I also do not want to sound authoritative, but I want to make my opinion known. My reads are somewhat foggy because some players started off as scummy but turned around for me and vice versa. I think I have a pretty good grip on my reads atm.
I shall respond to your previous accusations.
In post 117, TellTaleHeart wrote:At the risk of being accused of OMGUS, I think there's a good chance TierShift is scum as well.
In post 95, he's obviously reviled by my entrance and My Milked Eek's entrance. I would guess that it's because it doesn't show any clear direction or decisive action. That is, after all, the most notable contrast between the flow of the game and both of our entrance posts. When fuzzybutternut shows this similar lack of gumption, TierShift is surprisingly unfazed. In post 51, he categorizes Dessew's vote based on fuzzybutternut's comment as an overreaction. Why are the scumtells unevenly applied?
Your posts were full of nothing except maybe asking a question. Fuzzy gave reads, at least. I don't think I'm applying scumtells unevenly.
The read on droog is also troubling. In post 69 he accuses droog of "fencesitting" without discussing what fencesitting he thinks is taking place or the implications it has on droog's alignment. So, why is he drawing attention to it? I can only conclude it's to suggest droog is scum without actually making an explicit accusation. I can't think of any town motivation for that.
this is awful, accusatory shit. I can draw attention to anything I want just for people to notice it. You attaching scum motivation to that has no basis at all.
In post 96, Dessew wrote:And I suppose you're wrong here, you could've got info about me. There is usually a point where it can be "talking in circles" as you said, but we were far, far away from that point.
What are you trying to say? Do you think I'm being dishonest or do you just have a different opinion?
I'm not trying to say anything, I
am
saying that you're being dishonest.
Riiiight, I'm lying for disagreeing with you. uh-huh.
Post
Post #179 (isolation #46) » Mon Nov 17, 2014 3:01 am
Postby TierShift »
I came in here tk make a post about how I've seen Eek passively lurk as scum before and how he knows I can read him well probably but now that goes out of the window.
Post
Post #180 (isolation #47) » Mon Nov 17, 2014 3:07 am
Postby TierShift »
In post 146, Dessew wrote:[ Uh-uh, that's not what I posted, duh. There's no way town would have asked me if I'd ever drawn scum before and then thought to themself: "yes, I tried what I could, it was a good job, I'm gonna phone my mom, maybe she'll be proud of her little son." No. What you did wasn't satisfactory because I weren't interested in my alignment and that's because you're scum.
Go cry in a corner. I said I would have researched you if you'd kept up the newbscum attitude and you haven't. Stop pretending like asking you about your previous scumgames was scumhunting or trying to be so.
I can link you to tons of cold meta analyses I have done as scum (probably more than town) if that makes you not have a stick up your butt.
Post
Post #182 (isolation #48) » Mon Nov 17, 2014 3:19 am
Postby TierShift »
In post 147, TellTaleHeart wrote:So I'm assuming that you also think Dessew and droog are scum for their Princess Bride re-enactment in the first two pages.
In my case, goofing off in the first few posts was scumtell. I had yet to read the thread and I had no desire to at the time but I saw the picture Eek posted and wanted to poke fun at it. Not giving content in the first two posts is a scumtell, that's your point.
That's ... what did you call it?... "awful, accusatory shit."
I never said this!
But it doesn't look like you are misrepping on purpose, so here goes: why you gave me badfeels was your question to fuzzy why he was townreading me, as the only thing you did. It looked like something done on purpose, an attempt to cast doubt on me, without stating so. I thought you'd probably use it to attack me later, which you did.
Post
Post #183 (isolation #49) » Mon Nov 17, 2014 3:22 am
Postby TierShift »
In post 147, TellTaleHeart wrote:No, you did more than simply "draw attention" and you acting otherwise is disingenuous. You attached a word to it that has a negative connotation: "fencesitting." But you only went halfway there, you didn't actually accuse droog of being scum. Why?
I drew attention to something scummy droog was doing, right. I publicly announced droog was doing something scummy. I liked my read on dessew better, if you're asking why I didn't vote him.
In post 179, TierShift wrote:I came in here tk make a post about how I've seen Eek passively lurk as scum before and how he knows I can read him well probably but now that goes out of the window.
Unfortunately for you I have the better track record of reading you.
Read TTH's posts I linked. If necessary I'll reply in detail, but at work right now.
Do you even know what TTH's point was?
It was that I was using 'trying to sound authoritative' and that that attitude didn't carry over into my reads. It was not the fact that I was being superficial.
So, do you think I've been trying to sound authoritative and that I used buzzwords to that extent? And that my reads don't match up?
he's somewhat playing as a tiertown and not as a tierscum
What would you expect from tierscum that you're not seeing here and what makes you think tiertown?
I'm seeing the headless tierchicken again. Not as strong as months ago, but it's in your posting. Expected tierscum style: a bit more collected and cool. At 50 posts, this is not the case.
Meh
[
there's some attention span issues in your play that bug me. I'd list specifics but that'll have to wait until I'm home.
Do that for sure.
And why am I superficial? Because my reads don't have much basis?
Post
Post #219 (isolation #56) » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:19 am
Postby TierShift »
Oh shit it's just 5 hours to DL
I'm down for either an eek lynch or a fuzzy lynch
I'm hoping somewhere that eek is still going to make sense
But i feel good lynching him anyway VOTE: eek