This seems to be a very good rule to be abused =P. Create PT against 1 person and Create PT against any combination for 2 people. That should be like 8 + 8C2 = 8 + 26 = 34 PT.There is no limit to the number of topics you can create.
~Realeo
This seems to be a very good rule to be abused =P. Create PT against 1 person and Create PT against any combination for 2 people. That should be like 8 + 8C2 = 8 + 26 = 34 PT.There is no limit to the number of topics you can create.
is this an OMGUS?In post 39, Chip Butty wrote:I'm reading Realeo as Town, but I'm pretty certain Sick is scum.
I think the reason sickofit is so keen to get us out of RVS has something to do with a meta.Why are you so keen to get us out of RVS?
Not that kind of talk. If people are going to be inactive or whispering in their PT while my government are blocking me accessing Quick Thread, I am for one also asking to get rid of the RVS ASAP =p (It's seriously boring =P)What's your favorite movie, song and color?
I have a theory, but the theory is (1) not conclusive (2)normally, I would be glad to explain it, but explaining the theory will be synonymous with [redacted] (3) who the hell picks up read from RVS?In post 48, BNL wrote:Also, a hunch that I'm town? I don't think I've posted anything AI up to that point.
Uh uh, no.
this wasnt my point. youre smart enough to know that.In post 65, Chip Butty wrote:There you go, Sick - analytical enough for you?
agreed. we wont beable to find mafia and out them if we dont post in the main game thread.In post 70, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:guys i understand you're excited about the neat infinite neighborizer mechanic but for now, we should be carrying out most of our discussion in public. Good reasons to form a hood are to tell someone something you don't necessarily want to out to everyone, and so early in the game there really shouldn't be much of that.
agreed. we wont beable to find mafia and out them if we dont post in the main game thread.In post 70, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:guys i understand you're excited about the neat infinite neighborizer mechanic but for now, we should be carrying out most of our discussion in public. Good reasons to form a hood are to tell someone something you don't necessarily want to out to everyone, and so early in the game there really shouldn't be much of that.
I see. Possible WiFoM but a good pint nonetheless.In post 79, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:this postIn post 74, ReallySick wrote:agreed. we wont beable to find mafia and out them if we dont post in the main game thread.In post 70, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:guys i understand you're excited about the neat infinite neighborizer mechanic but for now, we should be carrying out most of our discussion in public. Good reasons to form a hood are to tell someone something you don't necessarily want to out to everyone, and so early in the game there really shouldn't be much of that.
on another note,
explain your townlean on chip, cuz im not getting any specific town vibes.
~Sickfelt likea townpost to me. making early mechposts early tends to ping me but the self-awareness as well as just the nature of the question is what i like. reads as a town aligned player to me. could definitely be wrong on this one, it's a gut feeling based on one post.In post 20, Chip Butty wrote:I just want to clarify, and I know SOMEONE will jump on me for this, but it is a genuine question about the mechanics:
If werevolves have no factional NK, and only kill Town through lynching and vengekill resulting from lynching, can't Town actually peacefully co-exist with werewolves indefinitely, as long as we never lynch? I mean, with no NK, they pose no threat to Town unless we lynch.
-Ariadne
not neccesarily.In post 84, JaeReed wrote:Also, wouldn't not voting in order to co-exist be playing against win con?
In post 85, ReallySick wrote:not neccesarily.In post 84, JaeReed wrote:Also, wouldn't not voting in order to co-exist be playing against win con?
If town needed more time to discuss a lynch, i might be an interesting concept. Since this game is in testing (I think) they may change this mechanic.
~ SickIn post 86, ReallySick wrote:IMO scum usually seem more confortable and laid back... so the joking could go either way as a scum or town lean, just depends on the person... meta-ing him now...
I dont like it or even Murdercat in general. Look at his ISO... its not a towny ISOIn post 90, JaeReed wrote:What do you think about Murder trying to direct conversation towards BTD in 72?
i get this alotIn post 89, JaeReed wrote:Sick I've noticed looks scummy to me in general
It got discussion started which is what i wanted, and even though it may be a little thing it is the biggest thing ive caught so far.In post 89, JaeReed wrote:but disliked Sick deliberately being overly reachy with the vote reasoning on Chip
I dont like this post it rubs me the wrong way. He could be scum trying to blend in.In post 84, JaeReed wrote:Nahdia hydra so far has been pretty much on my line of thinking which means I like them for town as well.
In post 89, JaeReed wrote:Also disliked the whole hunch on BNL being town thing, but I am assuming that is linked to some kind of thought process that the person wagon'ed in RVS is usually town?
Huh?In post 89, JaeReed wrote:I liked BNL's 48 for town.
Town doesnt need to be cautious IMO. Scum needs to blend in more than town does.In post 61, Chip Butty wrote:So, I'm being a little more cautious.
*deflects conversation away from himself*In post 67, Chip Butty wrote:Sick, do you know Real's reasoning for thinking BNLP is Town? Could one of you explain it please?
I can't. It's dumb and has something to do with something else.Sick, do you know Real's reasoning for thinking BNLP is Town? Could one of you explain it please?
If I am right, this is sarcasm right?No-one is expecting a conclusive theory out of RVS. That shouldn't stop you from posting it.
You two heads need to discuss this among yourselves - as far as I can see, Realio is saying we can't pick up reads from RVS, while Sick is insisting that we do. personally, I agree with Sick on this.
Called it "very small tendency to town" read.In post 106, BNL wrote: So you weren't townreading me ("hunch")
1. Good argument, they are 2 different thing.1. You (Realeo) continue to tr BNLP, but you can't say why and you admit the reason is "dumb"? And what is this "something else"? You seem to be saying you were concerned he was at L-2. Why? That's not such a big deal in RVS. He's not going to be quicklynched. Why did you find it "compulsory" to announce you weren't going to vote him to L-1? Why not just say that, rather than you had a hunch he is Town? Those are two different things.
I can explain it but I can't explain it to you. I would like to keep it for a while and sickofit agrees with me that we should keep it for a while.2. It just looks weird that you are not backing away from your "hunch" but you can't explain the basis of it.
General observation. You're not expecting me to keep tally right?I've got to say, that takes the biscuit as one of the most bizarre posts I have ever seen in a game of Mafia. But, okay, Realeo - can you be more specific and point out just which midnight (in which specific timezone?) posts were so "shitty"?
Meh, it's a harmless question.[...] you accuse me of this [...]
Thank you. We just wait for another hydra's vote so we can see everyone's stand.[...]VOTE: Really Sick
I think people has less incentive to chime in when no one's head is in the express line of the guillotine.If he had nothing to worry about at L-1 like you said, why would that change anything?
What do you mean?In post 191, Chip Butty wrote:Note: Townslip...In post 187, ReallySick wrote: first of all, i think they would have found an easy broken town win if there was one. i believe there may be a Wolf PR that might prevent this strategy from working.
Interesting.In post 201, MURDERCAT wrote:I've only played with sick but I find the way he throws around random accusations with not a lot of reasoning to be extremely scummy. I also know it's NAI for him.
Hmm? I dot understand what you are saying?In post 226, ReallySick wrote:sickofit, why are you signing up a game where people are so not impatient?
i dont think so, i believe BTD is scum still.In post 277, Chip Butty wrote:I suspect wolf!D&A picked the fakehammer and thought Town!BTD didn't pick the fakehammer and thus that his seer claim is genuine. So she fakeclaimed to get a real hammer before the fakehammer came to light. She even called for a realhammer.
And who leapt in to carry out that claim for a realhammer? MC, who forgot that karnos had unvoted.
Also, it was D&A who questioned BTD on the Cop v Seer thing...again, trying to secure the realhammer before the fakehammer came to light.
Prob MC second wolf.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: D&A