Micro 658 - Frozen [Game over]

Aristophanes · Post Post #28 (isolation #0) » Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:22 pm

This is called an Egopost!
Possible V/la. Sorry to start the game this way!

Aristophanes · Post Post #135 (isolation #1) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:30 pm

In post 10, Parama wrote:VOTE: ARISTO

REVENGE

Hahaha good luck my friend! XD
You do know I didn't do anything and coasted to victory that game, right?

In post 6, Dunnstral wrote:OK guys I've drafted up a strategy

Elsa chooses one person to reveal to a night. That person should claim each day and eventually decide on a person to lynch. It's important that you don't go back on this decision once you've selected someone.

The rest of town decides if we lynch that person, or the person who knows Elsa.
If the person who knows elsa is chosen to live, and Elsa lives, they will be clear

So for today:

VOTE: No lynch

I agree that the one Elsa reveals to should claim their own role each day phase. We can then decide whether they are to be lynched or trusted.

@Fakegod
Can the Assassin's communicate with one another in private?

I almost want to NL in agreement with Dunn, which I did not intend to when I started writing this. I'll read on though before deciding.

Aristophanes · Post Post #136 (isolation #2) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:33 pm

In post 18, Postie wrote:
In post 7, Postie wrote:
In post 6, Dunnstral wrote:If the person who knows elsa is chosen to live, and Elsa lives, they will be clear

In post 0, FakeGod wrote:
There are two assassins and

they win if Elsa dies
.
[/i][/font]

But if we lynch one Assassin, they lose. We can do it!

@Fakegod
Does Elsa's reveal come at the beginning or at the end of the night phase?

Aristophanes · Post Post #137 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:40 pm

If at the end of the phase we can gamebreak(ish).

Elsa targets likely scum. The target (who knows who elsa is) claims that they were revealed to, and is then lynched.
If they are an assassin, we win. If they are town, the game continues with nobody else knowing who Elsa is.

"But if Elsa targets an Assassin, they just won't claim!" you say? Well then, given appropriate time and chances, Elsa will claim and we lynch the target who wouldn't claim.

Ideally any town will claim in their first post each day phase if they are the chosen one. This ensures Elsa won't out herself for no reason. If town do not do so it would be game throwing, should this be our final course of action.

Aristophanes · Post Post #138 (isolation #4) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:43 pm

In post 43, lane0168 wrote:Why is this guy yelling?

The Bold never bothered me anyway.

Aristophanes · Post Post #139 (isolation #5) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 4:47 pm

In post 53, Dunnstral wrote:As for the caps rage thing you need to let that go

Let the caps rage on!

Aristophanes wrote:The Bold never bothered me anyway.

I wish I'd read further first. That would have been perfect!

Aristophanes · Post Post #140 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:03 pm

I'll stop for now, but this variation kn Dunn's plan should be followed. It solves many of the problems brought up, and confirms we are neither lynching Elsa nor taking someone out of the NK pool for scum as "not elsa."

Aristophanes · Post Post #141 (isolation #7) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:03 pm

VOTE: NL

Aristophanes · Post Post #143 (isolation #8) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:11 pm

Thanks FG!

So, we do my plan people, and we win!

Aristophanes · Post Post #147 (isolation #9) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:23 pm

In post 144, Dunnstral wrote:That plan sucks

I don't think so. I think it's foolproof!

I thought you'd be here with me, Dunn. Why does it suck?

Aristophanes · Post Post #149 (isolation #10) » Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:32 pm

Fine, we lynch today. Then we follow my plan.

Aristophanes · Post Post #169 (isolation #11) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 5:24 am

Parama, that was awesome logistical work and I'm on board!

Who are we lynching today?

Aristophanes · Post Post #185 (isolation #12) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:32 am

In post 183, Postie wrote:That's some nice set-up spec who's scum

In post 184, Dunnstral wrote:I'm

VOTE: Dunn
Thanks for claiming!

Aristophanes · Post Post #187 (isolation #13) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:41 am

In post 186, Dunnstral wrote:town

Too late

Aristophanes · Post Post #189 (isolation #14) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:28 am

In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?

Anyone but Postie, Parama, Ari, Dunn.

I have no real preference beyond that.

Aristophanes · Post Post #199 (isolation #15) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:31 am

In post 197, Parama wrote:
In post 189, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?
Anyone but Postie, Parama, Ari, Dunn.

I have no real preference beyond that.
THAT THIS POST IS NOT BUNDLED WITH A DUNN UNVOTE IS BOTHERSOME
YES I KNOW THE ORIGINAL VOTE IS A JOKE VOTE
BUT YOU'RE SAYING NOT TO LYNCH HIM WHILE YOU LEAVE YOUR VOTE ON HIM
AND THAT BOTHERS ME A LOT

I thought about it tbh, but your vote was still on me despite our coordinating plans. I don't see any activity towards Dunn, so I don't see a reason it needs to be moved.

But sure.
UNVOTE:

I'll join you on Lane as long as we're not at L-1 or something.

Aristophanes · Post Post #203 (isolation #16) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 12:12 pm

I mean, D1 in this setup when everyone has to be kinda hush hush is really the ideal time for a PL. I've never seen a better reason to.
So I'm in.
VOTE: Lane

ASP would be the better choice in this respect, but I like this one better!

Aristophanes · Post Post #249 (isolation #17) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 5:30 pm

In post 237, Postie wrote:
In post 235, Dunnstral wrote:Somebody tell me

Are we going with aristophanes plan or no? I know we're not doing mine
This is the plan:
In post 155, Parama wrote:ANYWAYS HERE ARE THE RULES:

1. ELSA DOES NOT CLAIM UNLESS IN DANGER OF LYNCH

2. ALL NON-ELSA CLAIMS WILL BE LYNCHED. ALL TOWN WILL CLAIM THEIR TRUE ROLE

3. ELSA SHOULD TARGET SOMEONE THEY FEEL IS LIKELY TO BE SCUM

I believe this is a yes.

Aristophanes · Post Post #264 (isolation #18) » Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:23 am

In post 262, Parama wrote:IT IS ACTUALLY ANTI-TOWN TO LEAVE SOMEONE ALIVE AFTER THEY'VE CLAIMED ELSA

Aristophanes · Post Post #268 (isolation #19) » Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:57 am

In post 267, Parama wrote:IT'D BE COOL IF ASP AND LOHI WERE POSTING MORE BUT IT'S NOT NECESSARY EITHER

This is sarcasm, right?

Nvm, I'm just gonna assume it is.

Aristophanes · Post Post #272 (isolation #20) » Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:10 pm

In post 270, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: SirCakez

In post 271, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: lane0168

Why the Cakez vote first?

Aristophanes · Post Post #280 (isolation #21) » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:11 am

Why would you guys shoot ASP!?!?

I'm intrigued!

Aristophanes · Post Post #287 (isolation #22) » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:27 am

In post 286, Creature wrote:I think it would've been funnier if scum couldn't communicate with each other but they had to both target the same person.

I actually had this as my suspected NK theory. I was a Star crossed Vig in Jeanne ' Baccano Mafia and it was hard not to be obvious with kill choices. I was very bad at that. Would have been quite cool!

Also, sorry Lane...

Aristophanes · Post Post #308 (isolation #23) » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:34 am

I had a dream that I was the one who was revealed to, and that it was Postie.

This is why I don't let dreams give me reads!