[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8549670 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 664: The Walking Dead S2E1 GAME OVER - Mafiascum.net
Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
45 posts
• Page 1 of 1
knightmare
knightmare
Goon
knightmare
Goon
Goon
Posts: 312
Joined: February 19, 2016
Post
Post #11 (isolation #0) » Sat Nov 26, 2016 9:49 pm
Postby knightmare »
VOTE: Elmer Bugs FTW
Excited to play in one of these games. I skimmed a few of the previous ones in the series while waiting for this one to go out so I think I've got a good feel for things.
Post
Post #20 (isolation #3) » Sat Nov 26, 2016 10:13 pm
Postby knightmare »
I guess I'll do RQS so others have something to read whenever they join the thread.
1) I was looking for a small game to join and I like the theme.
2) I don't know anyone here so can't really say.
3) Any roles that return negative results.
Post
Post #25 (isolation #5) » Sat Nov 26, 2016 10:21 pm
Postby knightmare »
@Jin - those are a few examples. Or like Gamma said, a bus driver. Godfathers, millers, etc. Basically anything that can screw up or provide false investigative reports.
@Gamma - based on what you say I'd think they wouldn't be a good choice then, no?
Post
Post #40 (isolation #6) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:00 am
Postby knightmare »
In post 34, Gamma Emerald wrote:My posts are:
Filler
RQS
And me saying you might be a good player.
How is any of that super scummy? The filler is iffy but I won't deny that it's filler.
I would have expected her to have posted by now. If she has indeed comfirmed she would probably have a post of some-kind. Unless she is lurking scum.
(Have I got gender right?)
Post
Post #61 (isolation #9) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:52 am
Postby knightmare »
In post 59, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Yes. His posts are not sitting well with me but I can't put my finger on why yet.
Ok. I think I have a general idea of what you mean but I don't know what's normal for them. The comment I referred to as pandering kind of pings for me.
@Creeps - which is exactly why I'm asking you. So?
Post
Post #68 (isolation #12) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 11:08 am
Postby knightmare »
In post 66, SirCakez wrote:I think I get where BBT is coming from on Gamma
More specifically?
@Creeps - I don't like that you're not giving me a straight answer. I also think your reason, if legit, is NAI for ArcAngel. Confirming without posting doesn't mean anything. Maybe they're busy and confirmed because they got the email notification.
Post
Post #74 (isolation #14) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 12:48 pm
Postby knightmare »
I've made a few comments now and questioned Gamma over something specific already. If that's not it then I'd prefer you to explain so we can get some actual discussion going.
Also fwiw @Jin - I agree with Cakez here. What page of the thread we're on is irrelevant. You can generate content by offering up your own thoughts or pushing others for their's. Continuing RQS is what doesn't yield AI type posts.
In post 70, knightmare wrote:That's a cop out. Read back a page if you can't remember something you posted a couple hours ago.
Why do you think someone confirming but not posting is more likely to be scum?
Because I am half-crazy half of the time.
I am willing to guess that it was that he (or she) lacked any contrubution when she revealed to have read her role PM. I had a feeling that she is active elsewhere (I guess) so my mind went to a scum PT.
If that's your support evidence you should probably verify that first
Post
Post #82 (isolation #17) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:44 pm
Postby knightmare »
I generally don't have any bad thoughts about the Gamma wagon as I can see why it's there to some extent. One of his explanations was awkward imo. I'm not bothered by BBT pushing it either because I don't think he's being totally serious. Still would like Cakez to answer me.
Post
Post #89 (isolation #18) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 3:14 pm
Postby knightmare »
Meh that's a bit too broad of a brush stroke if you ask me. You're generalizing meta from different players in a different game and trying to apply it here as an absolute truth. Definitely a stretch.
Better question: if you think Jin is downplaying early reads, do you think there's worth while content ITT so far? And if so then what and what have you taken away from it?
Post
Post #97 (isolation #21) » Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:57 pm
Postby knightmare »
In post 95, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm of the same opinion as was stated previously: she confirmed without posting which is suspicious.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. Unless they're posting elsewhere or it's like unwritten site meta that it's a scum tell I would call it NAI
Post
Post #135 (isolation #24) » Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:55 pm
Postby knightmare »
I didn't have real bad feelings about BBT before but the hammer kind of screws that up. There was a VC on the same page and Joshz put him at L-1 right after the mod posted it
Joshz looks bad for poor content
Jin approaching "why me" scum tell territory
Gamma pushing bad angles for scum reads
Angel is AWOL
2/4 of those are scum imo unless BBT comes back guilty or something. Gamma/Jin should never be scum together
Post
Post #198 (isolation #35) » Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:47 am
Postby knightmare »
lol do you usually shit post?
Firstly, the meta of your previous slot holder means absolutely nothing to me. Now that you are here I want you on record.
Why should I assume your vote on me was role related when your given reason was "I looked coached" which is obviously 1) bad reasoning & a huge assumption on your part and 2) have already proven that wouldn't be the case.
Post
Post #200 (isolation #36) » Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:48 am
Postby knightmare »
Oh, and in case it wasn't obvious the vote is to make you accountable for your push.
I asked you for specifics as to what gave you that impression but instead of answering to let me see your POV you just drop your reason but keep the vote.