* = prod
Italics = confirmed role
Alive:
Dead:
Modkilled:
VC 3.0
Day 1 Starts
Vedith replaces Maverick1102
DarkLightA replaces 0x40
Aristophanes replaces Accountant
Day 1 Ends
Day 2 Starts
Day 2 Ends
Day 3 Starts
Code: Select all
[vote]playername[/vote]
Code: Select all
[unvote]playername[/unvote]
That's a fallacy known as the gambler's fallacy. Only scum would need to use fallacies to justify their vote.In post 4, Accountant wrote:VOTE: GuiltyLion
The last time we played together, you were scum. By logic, therefore, you must be scum now.
That's not the gambler's fallacy, it's the reverse gambler's fallacy. Only scum would lie about what fallacy Accountant committed.In post 5, 0x40 wrote:That's a fallacy known as the gambler's fallacy. Only scum would need to use fallacies to justify their vote.In post 4, Accountant wrote:VOTE: GuiltyLion
The last time we played together, you were scum. By logic, therefore, you must be scum now.
2017 is coming early this year lads!In post 1, shaddowez wrote:1) Days will have a deadline of (2) two weeks. Deadline extensions will be granted only in extreme circumstances, and will never exceed one (1) week of the total length of the day phase. Because of the Upcoming Holidays three additional days will be added to the timer for day one. This means the Day one deadline will be seventeen days to allocate for: New Year's Eve and New Years Day. Any other extensions because of holidays will be announced in public thread.
In post 7, GuiltyLion wrote:2017 is coming early this year lads!In post 1, shaddowez wrote:1) Days will have a deadline of (2) two weeks. Deadline extensions will be granted only in extreme circumstances, and will never exceed one (1) week of the total length of the day phase. Because of the Upcoming Holidays three additional days will be added to the timer for day one. This means the Day one deadline will be seventeen days to allocate for: New Year's Eve and New Years Day. Any other extensions because of holidays will be announced in public thread.
That is indeed the reverse gambler's fallacy, but you just committed the fallacy fallacy.In post 6, Ümläüt wrote:That's not the gambler's fallacy, it's the reverse gambler's fallacy. Only scum would lie about what fallacy Accountant committed.In post 5, 0x40 wrote:That's a fallacy known as the gambler's fallacy. Only scum would need to use fallacies to justify their vote.In post 4, Accountant wrote:VOTE: GuiltyLion
The last time we played together, you were scum. By logic, therefore, you must be scum now.
VOTE: 0x40
No, it's only the fallacy fallacy if I say Guilty must be town this game. Only scum would--oh, never mind.In post 11, BTD6_maker wrote:That is indeed the reverse gambler's fallacy, but you just committed the fallacy fallacy.In post 6, Ümläüt wrote:That's not the gambler's fallacy, it's the reverse gambler's fallacy. Only scum would lie about what fallacy Accountant committed.In post 5, 0x40 wrote:That's a fallacy known as the gambler's fallacy. Only scum would need to use fallacies to justify their vote.In post 4, Accountant wrote:VOTE: GuiltyLion
The last time we played together, you were scum. By logic, therefore, you must be scum now.
VOTE: 0x40
VOTE: Umlaut
In post 521, Maverick1102 wrote:V/LA until Monday eveningI'm working at Boardmasters festival and I'll be away from mobile coverage for quite a while. Sporadic posts if I get signal.
Serious or not serious?In post 19, eagerSnake wrote:FoS: Maverick1102. Scumteam identified.
As serious as one can be on the 19th post of the game LOLIn post 20, Accountant wrote:Serious or not serious?In post 19, eagerSnake wrote:FoS: Maverick1102. Scumteam identified.