Ankamius wrote:If the entire goal is indoctrination, why wouldn't they take the chance earlier on Menae (Palaven's moon) or any other time you meet a reaper?
Because the Reapers didn't know that Shepard was actually capable of finding a machine that could destroy the Reapers
I mean, according to IT, we don't know if the Crucible can stop the Reapers. We do know that it hasn't been fired yet though, according to IT once again.
Ankamius wrote:I'm talking about the specific mass relay paths.
But there's a problem in that logic too. When Shepard uses a Mass Relay, this is especially apparent in ME3 (don't quote me though--I'm not willing to check, it might be another game) where it shows that Shepard has to use one Mass Relay to get to another Mass Relay to get to another etc. until he reaches his final destination.
I don't think the Mass Relays have a certain path that they HAVE to go where the others are connected because I'm pretty sure that'd make some mistakes in the beginning lore. They're just tools to help with FTL--like the wind in Wind Waker. You don't have to stay to the current of the wind directly, but can't go in the opposite direction.
Ankamius wrote:If the goal is indoctrination, why the flying fuck would every reaper beam you get hit by in any other part of the game result in instant death?
I, myself, have found two conclusions for this.
First, it's Harbinger. The guy you made macho angry in ME2. Would killing Shepard really be satisfying or would trolling the fuck out of him be better?
I say B. But then again, this is a small point because yknow. The only thing that kind of amplifies this point(and again I'm not willing to check) but I'm pretty sure Harbinger says multiple times in ME2 "leave Shepard to me" or something to that effect. Again, I may be wrong but my gut is telling me I'm right on that point.
Second, bad writing. I'm not going to say "Bioware is god!!!11!1!" for the Indoctrination attempt. It's total shit and it's a very risky and not needed idea. It's creative, but BAD creative. If you have to make your bad in order to make it good later, there's a problem with your way of thinking. You could add the point that EA is supporting them financially and you get a shitty ending for a better one later.
There were also rumors flying around about the whole "lol EA rushed them so they'd have to make paid DLC later" which kind of picks up on the ending point with the little DLC hint.
in any case, I just found Part 2(:40 and onwards mind you) as a nice morale booster before hell is probably going to be razed with the whole EC DLC.
Edit2: I don't believe I attacked your Point 2 to my best ability, so let me add some more.
Ankamius wrote:If the goal is indoctrination, sending him to sleep early and making the rest of the war in his mind would be a far better solution rather than trying to KILL him until the very last part of the game.
Indoctrination isn't like bloodbending(lol korra reference)
You have control over the person's body but you can't just say "LOL KILL SELF SO YOU DIE HAHAHAHAHA"
and it's also the point that ME3 is an indoctrination attempt, the last attempt being with Harby's beam and such
so they didn't really have total control over him to do this anyway