Mini Normal 2159 | Cinder Block Mafia | Game Over!
-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Be a leader not a follower.In post 32, SJReaver wrote:I don't even remember signing-up for this game. Sorry if you think my post is bad, but given people are still posting things like 'this is the fourteenth post,' there isn't exactly a high bar to reach.
Thank you for the info though, Walter.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Assume the setup is 10-3.In post 30, SJReaver wrote:We don't know anything about the set-up?
No idea how many mafia there are, if there are more than two factions? No idea what roles people might have?
This is weird. I don't like it.
If we Lynch 3 mafia and the game doesn't end. Panic.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
1. Every game that has or will ever exist.In post 15, ItalianoVD wrote:1. What is your mafia experience?
2. What is your play style strength(s)? Weakness(es)? Do you know?
3. In your opinion, what is the most important thing to look for while scumhunting? While townreading?
2. Strengths? Physical, I will bench press all of you.
Weakness?.........weakness????
3. Most important to look for scum when scum hunting I would think. I don't townread anyone ever so that's not relevant.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Can we add this to the list of fallacies or scrub it from the wiki? This isn't a thing.In post 50, callforjudgement wrote:The first player who caught my attention was SJReaver (newbie greeting tell in #13), but they've done it before as town (Newbie 2020).-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
36 really should have said, stop rolefishing. So fair.In post 50, callforjudgement wrote:My biggest concern, though, is with RCEnigma. #36 and #37 look like the sort of posts made by someone who is trying to be hard to read, for whatever reason. #36 is just a straight-up "help a newbie" post; such posts are generally good for the game, but townies tend to answer them as a side thought while doing something else, whereas scum tend to realise "ooh, this is something I can answer without giving anything away" and just answer them, betraying the fact that they aren't really thinking about the game more generally. #37 is an incredibly guarded answer to RQS questions, and the first time I've seen such questions actually produce alignment-indicative answers.
37 doesn't really matter, I have seen it produce alignment indicative answers previously but that was a newbie game and I think you're all big boys and girls.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
What if I told you I've already caught 2?In post 96, geraintm wrote:Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Don't bullshit a bullshitter. Which posts were SJR giving away information pre post 50? Much less by post 27.In post 119, callforjudgement wrote:Because that sort of post is more scummy from someone who has a lower post count. It doesn't matter much if one individual post is being guarded/defensive if the rest of the ISO is giving away information. It does matter if the majority of a player's posts are being cagey and the rest of the ISO isn't there.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Fact checked by RCE.In post 135, geraintm wrote:
We lynched a townie day 1In post 101, Not_Mafia wrote:
We just played together in a game where I caught scum day 1In post 96, geraintm wrote:Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Doesn't answer my question, but let's go deeper anyway.In post 152, callforjudgement wrote:#30? #32? #22? Even #13? These are the posts of someone who talks too much, not the posts of someone who doesn't talk enough.
Did you read these posts as alignment indicative one way or the other?-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
It was actually even easier than that tbh. As I'll explain in my tell all book later this day phase.
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Then the long and short is you scumread multiple sjr posts but not 27 because it's not indicative if the slot has other scum indicative posts.
But it also is indicative if that same post is made by a slot that has other scum indicative posts...but less of them.
From your pov.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Mostly to see if my I initial read on your slot was accurate.In post 163, callforjudgement wrote:Instead, you look at what people post, and think "why is this person posting about X? why is this person not posting about Y, when they apparently had the time to post about X?" Then you work out what reads a player must have in order for their actions to make sense, and if their apparent reads don't match their stated reads, perhaps there's scum there.
I can agree on the above and this is ironically pretty close to what brought me to that read.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Err if you want to see a game scum was caught page 1-2 and lynched day 1 I can oblige.In post 188, geraintm wrote:I am 100% sure I can go through every single game on this site and find someone on day 1 claiming they have caught scum that by the end of the game will be true. but they don't get lynched....
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
1000 is bigger than 100 and that's good enough for me feller.In post 216, SJReaver wrote:A sign of intelligent life. (Thought it’s Reaver, not Reaper)
The very nature of percentages means that there’s no way I could be over 100% scum. That I claim to be more than that suggests I’m either a liar, an idiot, or both. Either way, you don’t want someone who can’t handle basic math in elo.-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
The Implication frog was making was that Nosferatu looks scummy for establishing a counterwagon (presumably frog would believe on town) but Frog would be the wagon Nosferatu is pushing pressure away from, making Nosferatu scummy for diverting from scum onto town.In post 270, callforjudgement wrote:RCEnigma is probably the most likely scum on the Walter wagon (#256 looks a lot like a post-justification of "why this wagon, not that one?"), although this isn't all that strong a tell.
Scum doesn't theater like that and I don't believe nos/frog to be partners. Also don't believe frog suggests he's scum being wagoned away from.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Not by implying to the thread that they are partners....I would imagine.In post 280, SJReaver wrote:How does scum usually theater?-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I could be wrong about everything I've said here. But it would be silly of me to think I am.In post 281, ItalianoVD wrote:
Why not? Could you be wrong there?In post 279, RCEnigma wrote:...and I don't believe nos/frog to be partners.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Frogs take was wild. For reasons stated in a follow up post.In post 316, geraintm wrote:everyone is probably town, it isn't a very wild take at all...-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
It wasn't great bait. Even my vote wasn't serious.In post 313, SJReaver wrote:RCE is the only one who took my bait and I town read them. It makes me sad.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I think my problem with this game is all of the surface level accusations that are surely to go nowhere. Some of them might even be on scum! But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.
Nos I think you reducing Frogs case down to unintelligible babble is disingenuous at best. But the strong reaction to a weak case concerning.
What's more concerning is your attention being directed at frog and not the following votes on a wagon that you should recognize doesn't hold much weight.
What's up man talk to me, what's got you bothered?-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
The voters on YOUR WAGON.In post 335, Nosferatu wrote:
IM VOTING someone on a wagon that doesn't hold much weight like what the fuck am i readingIn post 323, RCEnigma wrote:What's more concerning is your attention being directed at frog and not the following votes on a wagon that you should recognize doesn't hold much weight.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
It's Raya, literally the only person to vote scum for sure this game.In post 326, geraintm wrote:
?In post 323, RCEnigma wrote:But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.
I see not mafia is being their normal day 1 self too
VOTE: CFJ-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
In post 369, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Neither means still a possible suspectIn post 350, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
And I assume neither means neutral or null ?In post 349, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m doing Creature style reads this game, deal with it
ItalianoVD
callforjudgement
Gamma Emerald
BananaCucho
SJReaver
Not_Mafia
geraintm
Raya36
Frogsterking
Nosferatu
RCEnigma
sordros
WaltertheDunce10
Linethrough = townread, italics = not exactly a townread but don’t want to vote there
FYI I will probably work on tuning my reads soon
I am feeling like this will be a PoE game for me FYI
@RCEI would be intrigued because it implies there is a scum you’ve caught by now.In post 364, RCEnigma wrote:
It's Raya, literally the only person to vote scum for sure this game.In post 326, geraintm wrote:
?In post 323, RCEnigma wrote:But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.
I see not mafia is being their normal day 1 self too
VOTE: CFJ-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Nope, Walter could be scum sure. NM town. 1 scum within cfj.In post 392, geraintm wrote:I still don't get this. raya has voted for not mafia, callforjudgement and walter. are you saying you are 100% sure scum is within those 3? as you follow with a vote for callforjudgement, I assume this is what you meant.-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
This was more of a mark for death than a reaction test.In post 459, Nosferatu wrote:
the dayvig is one of the most forced and troll reaction tests there areIn post 454, BananaCucho wrote:
It's poor form to cut someone else's reaction test short thoIn post 453, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn't explicitly point it out for some time
but Yeah I always knew it wasn't real, so with the newer playerbase for this game I figured it would garner some interesting reactions
Didn't end up being the case, very little seemed to come from it and everyone took it at face value.
almost no one actually does it unironically lol-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Big fan.
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
What does this even mean?In post 511, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Weird though we get a scum then a fan post and before that Nm with a vote on a person who just replaced in-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I would have preferred this not be explained. But +1.In post 513, Frogsterking wrote:
(added bold)In post 511, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:hmm
I am not sure about it being hard to imagine, but I think for you the possibility of nos being town is far fetched. from 488.
Not sure I agree that sarcasm is weak.
Frog, Could you elaborate on why you think there are 4 scum?
Agreed with gerain on italiano's post on frog.
K, Gerain, you are saying it is how you play D1s.
497 seems towny, but then there seems to be a self-counscious statement with 'Have I explained myself well enough."
At least that is how I see it.
Weird though we get a scum then a fan post and before that Nm with a vote on a person who just replaced in.
I feel like no one looks very townie and from what little I know about the range this setup could be there are probably three or four scum. If the setup is balanced so that there are four scum against extra prs for town that could explain the general lack of towniness.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
By projecting themselves onto the leading wagon. It can appear "natural" since there aren't any previous reads or stances to double back on.In post 532, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
yes because its totally me choosing to be inactive by subbing into a slot... do you feel that ive been inactive since subbing in?In post 529, Nosferatu wrote:
inactivity followed by empty statements saying "this is scummy/towny" are scummyIn post 521, Tayl0r Swift wrote:whoops did not mean to hit submit there. sometimes im a bit premature.
407 (nos) uh calling you scum is scummy? by self voting as town arent you necessarily playing against wincon?
413 (gamma) in what world is a self-vote not scummy?
436 (banana) hmm odd timing depending on flips this could be an attempt at a counterwagon?
VOTE: cfj
how exactly would you expect scum to play? by catching up and offering thoughts?In post 525, RCEnigma wrote:Damn. I really wanted my cfj read to be right, but Taylor is playing pretty on par with how i thought scum would rep in.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I highly doubt GB runs 4 scum but 9-4 normals aren't unheard of. They just suck.In post 530, Nosferatu wrote:also 4 scum is kind of insane for 13 players?-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
If cfj is scum I'm gonna shoot myself in the foot because I think I can make a pretty good case there. With that said I can make a good case for anyone not named sjreaver, frog, or Nosferatu.
But I agree the game is stale, I've fallen out of love with it and it's gone nowhere since I've stepped back. I kind of expected that.
VOTE: Italiano-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
Yeah Gamma, it's not rocket surgery OR brain science!In post 643, Frogsterking wrote:
Explain to me how we will lynch three players on D1 and I will.In post 620, Gamma Emerald wrote:Helpful scumplay is still scumplay
Why do you think it’s worth keeping active scum alive?-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I see all of this as pointless since cfj isn't a wagon you entertained at it's height. Pushing this angle now is counterintuitive.In post 644, Raya36 wrote:
I think the flaw is the wifom you've attached to it and looking at it from our point of view.In post 639, callforjudgement wrote:(PEDIT: re #638)
The reasoning should be correct regardless of my alignment. If you think there's a mistake, please point it out so that I can re-evaluate my reasoning.
I agree that it points towards me as town, but that's hardly a reason not to mention it in thread! Of course, it's harder to be objective about something when it points to you as town, so it's possible I have some confirmation bias here (i.e. "this correctly predicts me as town, so it's more likely to be correct"), in which case it's especially important that you point out any flaws in my reasoning! But "this reasoning benefits CFJ and CFJ is making it" is not a reason to ignore it or consider it invalid.
First, I have seen scum wagons sit around in a similar gamestate before. It's not nearly as common as town wagons but this doesn't entirely mean you're town.
Looking in from my point of view I see a player indirectly explaining why they must be town based on the gamestate. One way I can see it is this player is scum and for whatever reason (unhelpful scum mates, avoiding defending of scum mates, etc) has decided to defend himself but in a way that on face value doesn't appear to be a self defense. If someone else pointed it out it would appear more towny but the fact that it was you indirectly defending yourself adds wifom.
Of course I could also see it as town simply making an observation which would allow someone else come to the conclusion that it could point to them being town.-
-
RCEnigma
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
I get that. But one of your two scumreads has been close to elim for a few days now and you kinda just....opted to ignore the wagon as a whole until now. Which is cool, looks weird, but it's cool.In post 647, Raya36 wrote:cfj is one of my scumreads... and this was just an observation I made that supports that-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
This followed by the cfj vote in the very next post sent off all my alarms.In post 381, ItalianoVD wrote:Aight I think Frog is scum and it looks like the interaction between him and Nosferatu is scum theatre. Frog’s reason is weak and forced. Nosferatu’s reaction to that weak forced case also seems weak and forced. That’s why my vote is there and will probably stay there. You voting for yourself is never a good idea imo.
I’m feeling a little off about callforjudgment. Very townie. Very beautiful and perfect posts. The best posts in the history of our country. You’ve never seen posts like these before. So beautiful.
Frog touched on my issues with the cfj slot in a minor capacity and Taylor caught 1 point by pushing cfj's stance on nos.
Slots don't get wagoned for being townie and I have doubts of the validity of your scumread here.-
-
RCEnigma Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: June 18, 2018
No one's convinced me that Walter is scum. But I feel like Italiano can flip red by virtue of being outside of my townreads.In post 678, Tayl0r Swift wrote:why this vote? ive really seen nothing so far to indicate you had suspicion of italiano, and this isnt a major wagon, so why join here? seems like now that theres a little momentum on walter that you come in and start a counterwagon. interesting.
I'd like to flip all of Italiano, cfj, taylor, gamma, Raya, banana today and then reevaluate after.
-
-
-
-
-
-