Mini Theme Game Queue

team rocket queen · Post Post #7401 (isolation #0) » Sat Mar 07, 2020 12:51 pm

/in fairly

team rocket queen · Post Post #7403 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:44 am

/out fairly

team rocket queen · Post Post #8214 (isolation #2) » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:55 pm

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:Royalty

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:A Royal Wedding

/in silent star 3

team rocket queen · Post Post #8234 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:19 pm

In post 8214, team rocket queen wrote:
In post 8213, Hectic wrote:Royalty
In post 8213, Hectic wrote:A Royal Wedding
/in silent star 3

/in silent star 3: royalty

team rocket queen · Post Post #8274 (isolation #4) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:33 pm

In post 8273, Primate wrote:/In hectic if there are slots

best to assume that there are slots

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:
Number of Players:
13

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:There may be other bastard elements.

1 team rocket queen
2 isis
3 pookythemagicalbear
4 kanna
5 ydrasse
6 alisae
7 thegoldenparadox
8 skitter30
9 morning tweet
10 gloria cleary
11 taylor swift
12 hopkirk
13 gypyx
14 flea the magician
15 infinity 324
16 gamma emerald
17 primate
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?

team rocket queen · Post Post #8289 (isolation #5) » Tue Nov 17, 2020 12:45 am

In post 8276, Kanna wrote:/out silent star. have fun, everyone!

mmm. i am sorry if i caused this. was thinking about the number of players being a bastard element, and trying to encourage more people to join to find out. if it was a bastard element one would assume that the listed number of players (13) would still be important, so would those who joined after be combined into hydras with those who had joined up to 13? or should this possibility be discounted because:

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:
Hydrae:
No

if not hydrae would the players beyond the first thirteen be event-related replacements to the first thirteen? would an event-related replacement be required to have the same alignment as the player they were replacing due to this:

In post 8213, Hectic wrote:No mid-game alignment changes.

or would this be a potential loophole used to fool the unsuspecting?

intention was certainly not to discourage someone i very much looked forward to playing with again from playing +(