Besides that, I'm getting a vibe that 1. d4 is the move to play in this match.
I concur with SensFan. It wouldn't be good to start off with a lynch, at least for now. Perhaps later when Black equilises (if it does).
It's the Alapin Variation. I played against that in one of my earlier games on the site. However, I can't help but seeing that you're trying to make it look as if you do not know about it when it seems to me that you do. Just a hunch.Pesco47 wrote:Suggesting silly moves the new scum tell for this game?
c5 isn't exactly a great move for the bN. I would playmove Nc3instead
EH...thanks to you, I saw another route for White to take. If Black plays Qe7, White plays Nb5 (not take their Queen), which could be dangerous for Black. However, Black could simply play Kd8...so once again, I'm still got my mind made up on this one.SensFan wrote:Really? I think that Black's best answer to 6. Qe2+ is 6. ...Qe7, which leads to 7. Qxe7+ Bxe7. Black would be idiotic to let us pin their Bishop imo.
I've already stated it right here, the argument against case 2.Indigo Heron wrote:If we DO end up pinning the bishop, which is what most probably will happen if we play Qe2, and we move Qe3, we waste tempo freeing up our lines, and Black will attempt to control the centre via d5, or move via Nb4, or Nf6 (I would've played d5 if I was Black). By then, Black is much more developed than White, and now White's Queen is in danger of attack.
Apparently, our playing styles are very different.Gorrad wrote:We should CERTAINLY not move our queen from the current spot. By moving the queen, we garuntee the unpin you claim to be trying to avoid. Not to mention that a castle would be far from impenetrable at this point and that our queen would be undefended if we allow it to, as you say, "run riot".
If White plays Qc4 now....Goatrevolt wrote:Qc4 gets met with d5, slamming the door in the face of our queen. Indigo, can you explain how we get a pawn from it? I don't see the move sequence that results in us picking up a pawn.Move Qb5
The whole point of White playing Qc4 is to force Black to play d5, steadily stripping away his pawn defence. After d5, White follows up with Qb5+. Black can either reply with Bd7 or Qd7. I won't explain this step thoroughly, or Black will get a forewarning of what is happening.The Central Scrutinizer wrote:Maybe you can explain why you're still voting Qc4.
Really? If Black plays Qb8...I'd be shouting for joy (in a way).The Central Scrutinizer wrote:What I see as the two most likely lines of 10. Qc4:
10. Qc4 d5
11. Qb5+ Bd7
11. Qxb7 Qb8
And then what have we accomplished? In order to even make our queen relevant again we have to move Qa6 first, which is a wasted move. Or we could queen trade, if you think going up a pawn is a fair trade for letting black develop while our position stagnates.
10. Qc5 d5
11. Qb5+ Qd7
12. Ne5
Which was suggested as a positive line by someone, but I don't see it ending well for us.
Well, I call it trying to take advantage of Black's position. I also don't like the fact that you are trying to avoid casualties, when White can take hold of the game. Casualties have to be accepted to gain an advantage.On the contrary. What is supposed to happen if we go down this step is not much further ahead than move 12. Take a good look at it.
12. Ne5 Qxb5
13. Bxb5+ Bd7
At which point we could play suicide chess, as I surmised might happen.
Nope. I was looking more at Nxd7 Nxd7, but I'll take a look at Bxd7 Nxd7...14. Bxd7 Nxd7
And the optional
15. Nxd7
For extra TCS wrist-slashing goodness?
What on earth are you talking about here? I don't understand. You seem angered that we won't follow your suggestions (if they actually are suggestions). Are you trying to mislead us somewhere?Or...
14. Bc4
Oh, no, wait, they played 10. ... d5. So we move Bxb5+, or run the hell away.
How else does this line end? Am I just expecting the most moronic? What do you guys think, if you're thinking at all?
Where were you when I posted posts #343 and #344?!Lawrencelot wrote:Why not just take the pawn after Qe5?
*chess tag removed*
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qe5 O-O
11. Qxf5
*/chess tag removed*
After black's next move here, we'll most likely have to retreat with our queen, but that's no disaster as we're a pawn ahead.
Bd2, I don't know. It attacks a protected pawn, but it does allow us to castle.
If that be the case....Pesco47 wrote:Case 1: Qc4
*chess tag removed*1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qc4 d5
11. Qb5 Nd7
*/chess tag removed*
I don't see it ending well for us down this route. The queen gets trapped into permanently running while they get plenty of attacks in.
Equally good alternatives to Ng4 are a5, or Re8, or Bd6. However, if you intend to continue down the Ng4 line...which is BAD...Case 2: Qe5
*chess tag removed*1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qe5 o-o
11. Bc4 d5
12. Bb3 Ng4
*/chess tag removed*
This looks like a fine position to ask 'Would you like to resign?' That d5 is a brilliant move and we get screwed over this badly.
Now this isn't half-bad. This was one of the moves I considered, but I favoured the more aggressive Qc4. Black and White's chances are pretty much equal from my PoV. Both sides seem equally developed, and both sides have attacking chances.Alternative : Bd2
*chess tag removed*1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Bd2
*/chess tag removed*
How about this one?