[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13440798 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1057 YABM Mafia (Postgame) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #41 (isolation #4) » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:52 pm
Postby Looker »
Sniping is when people post before you get a chance to submit your draft (because you're multitasking). MegAzum just pm'd me and said VOTE: Enchant is also scum. This bastard thing is weird - it's like they're just giving us the game.
There's a lot of traffic happening between us. For some reason, she's insisting on putting one letter in every pm - I think it's some type of joke. I have 17 unopened ones, but the last ones I've opened spelled out "profe". I'll probably get to it in the morning.
Post
Post #98 (isolation #8) » Fri Jul 15, 2022 1:26 am
Postby Looker »
In post 53, ceejayvinoya wrote:I think it would be more interesting to choose the elim from one of the players Looker gives us, see how they flip, and then act accordingly.
Post
Post #116 (isolation #9) » Fri Jul 15, 2022 12:22 pm
Postby Looker »
In post 108, Bambi Jay wrote:If that was the case Looker would still be voting there. They changed to voting Gibus because they claimed like 20 PMs with 1 letter each said so. I doubt that is reliable. Sounds more like a joke to me. Looker will have to reconfirm that claim.
It was a joke. I don't think it would be allowed for the mod to cheat and tell you who the scum were before the game starts.
In post 114, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:I'm confused about Lookers claim and the wagon on me.
I thought his first post seemed like a joke but everyone seems to have taken it seriously and looker has done nothing to correct that.
Do you feel like scum is taking advantage of the joke to flashwagon you
Post
Post #129 (isolation #11) » Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:23 pm
Postby Looker »
Why hasn't your vote changed since knowing it was a joke
Did you know it was a joke beforehand and didn't care? Were you using it as a way to avoid posting your own suspicions? Were you using it as a way to line up miselims?
Also, in your experience, do scum post more than town in most games or is it the other way around?
Post
Post #130 (isolation #12) » Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:25 pm
Postby Looker »
Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
Post
Post #133 (isolation #13) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 1:29 am
Postby Looker »
I asked my questions in bad faith with the assumptions that you were scum that had the answers to the questions you asked. I thought you voted because you knew my targets weren't scum and were preparing to elim me after elimming one of my 'targets' today. Also, you're lurkier than Drapion, have an older account than Drapion, and didn't question Drapion after he sheeped you after insinuating that that's what I should do. And, yes, I would have found 53 suspicious whether Drapion followed or not.
I find it hard to believe you thought the mod gave me all the scum before game start, especially after 22 - 24.
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
Post
Post #151 (isolation #19) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 12:38 pm
Postby Looker »
In post 135, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's true that I didn't really believe that you were told who the scum are, but I just couldn't dismiss that entirely in a bastard game, so I was thinking the names you were mentioned were probably significant in some other way.
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
You literally tried spelling out my name.
VOTE: Looker
Are you saying that 130 is untrue?
@ProfessorDrapion
I don't understand your point and would like to discuss.
In post 114, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:I'm confused about Lookers claim and the wagon on me.
I thought his first post seemed like a joke but everyone seems to have taken it seriously and looker has done nothing to correct that.
Do you feel like scum is taking advantage of the joke to flashwagon you?
@GoldfishOnTheMoon - What is your opinion of each player that jumped on your wagon?
ProfessorDrapion is desperate - yes, opportunistic - and can't explain their half-formed case against me. I'm curious why they're so much more paranoid than the rest of the player list. Especially after coming out immediately with an unsolicited miller claim (which they followed with telling Bambi to cease discussion of it). Weird.
In post 205, bugspray wrote:ngl it seems like scum salty for being pushed for a bullshit reason
Maybe.
The main reason I think their wolf though is they are trying to lie about something they know they did and then claim it was “voting” when that wasn’t even what was said.
In post 207, ProfessorDrapion wrote:You know upon further re-read they did say “voting” but the previous question I had was that Looker’s fake claim what was the point of it. So my main concern is why did he even bring me up in his fake claim.
Spoiler:
In post 108, Bambi Jay wrote:If that was the case Looker would still be voting there. They changed to voting Gibus because they claimed like 20 PMs with 1 letter each said so. I doubt that is reliable. Sounds more like a joke to me.
In post 114, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:I'm confused about Lookers claim and the wagon on me.
I thought his first post seemed like a joke but everyone seems to have taken it seriously
In post 116, Looker wrote:It was a joke. I don't think it would be allowed for the mod to cheat and tell you who the scum were before the game starts.
Drapion's paranoia continues to concern me
I was initially unsure who the "salty scum" in bugspray's 205 was - but I guess bugspray and Drapion are in sync
Drapion is contradicting themselves
In post 208, ProfessorDrapion wrote:He also lied about the mod responding to him and is now doing so gambit with the “oh wonder what wolves be doing in scum chat” shit which doesn’t honestly seem like a town thought.
Post
Post #222 (isolation #35) » Mon Jul 18, 2022 12:28 am
Postby Looker »
In post 221, ceejayvinoya wrote:Looker is, well, weird. i don't know what to make of that fakeclaim. It could maybe come from town but it sort of dragged on for too long before they claimed it was a joke and by then I'm not really convinced it helps.
VOTE: Looker
Post 22, my second post in the game, says it's a joke. And it dragging on for so long is due to how long it took everyone to post in thread.
In post 223, Looker wrote:I think if you take a snapshot of my wagon, you find scum for this game for future reference. In the interest of informative dichotomy, VOTE: bugspray
Bro the fact you are still ignoring me, ain’t addressing shit at all and still are accusing me of being scum only by shade and aren’t even voting or pressuring me just makes me more inclined to keep my vote on you as you’ve done nothing to change my mind on you being a wolf.
So for future reference, don’t ignore people when they are talking with you.
Are you saying you're scummier than ceejayvinoya and bugspray?
I did address you - I roped you into the joke because you referenced me in Post 46
In post 221, ceejayvinoya wrote:Looker is, well, weird. i don't know what to make of that fakeclaim. It could maybe come from town but it sort of dragged on for too long before they claimed it was a joke and by then I'm not really convinced it helps.
VOTE: Looker
Post 22, my second post in the game, says it's a joke. And it dragging on for so long is due to how long it took everyone to post in thread.
Which I had suspicion by that claim and stated exactly why I didn’t like it and you still refuse to address why you mentioned me.
There's a lot of traffic happening between us. For some reason, she's insisting on putting one letter in every pm - I think it's some type of joke. I have 17 unopened ones, but the last ones I've opened spelled out "profe". I'll probably get to it in the morning.
In post 108, Bambi Jay wrote:If that was the case Looker would still be voting there. They changed to voting Gibus because they claimed like 20 PMs with 1 letter each said so. I doubt that is reliable. Sounds more like a joke to me. Looker will have to reconfirm that claim.
It was a joke. I don't think it would be allowed for the mod to cheat and tell you who the scum were before the game starts.
In post 114, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:I'm confused about Lookers claim and the wagon on me.
I thought his first post seemed like a joke but everyone seems to have taken it seriously and looker has done nothing to correct that.
Do you feel like scum is taking advantage of the joke to flashwagon you
Welcome, Sara
You said it was a joke when goldfish had heat I believe.
And the mod message thing is a lie because I refuse to believe my name was actually spelled out in your DM’s because of some things that was said previously.
In post 135, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's true that I didn't really believe that you were told who the scum are, but I just couldn't dismiss that entirely in a bastard game, so I was thinking the names you were mentioned were probably significant in some other way.
What role would have a soft guilty pre-gamestart?
@ceejayvinoya - In what way did you assume the names were significant?
Post
Post #247 (isolation #41) » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:22 am
Postby Looker »
I also think it's noteworthy that I never said the entire wagon was scum, yet in 233 that's what you said (after calling ceejayvinoya "another townie", which is also interesting). And, in your reads list, you have me as scum with two other players. Are you saying that there are three scum?
Post
Post #266 (isolation #42) » Tue Jul 19, 2022 6:24 pm
Postby Looker »
Majority of the posts are from me, Drapion, and Bambi - would anyone else like to play
(This is what I meant about players not posting if no one engages them)
In post 135, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's true that I didn't really believe that you were told who the scum are, but I just couldn't dismiss that entirely in a bastard game, so I was thinking the names you were mentioned were probably significant in some other way.
What role would have a soft guilty pre-gamestart?
@ceejayvinoya - In what way did you assume the names were significant?
Post
Post #286 (isolation #43) » Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:23 pm
Postby Looker »
In post 268, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Didn’t get a chance to get on my laptop yet.
I charged it yesterday so I should be able to respond to it today.
Bluff?
In post 272, hellbooks wrote:maybe this is a reading comprehension failure but i dont think it says anywhere that what meg did (in your Joke World) was against the rules
either way i think its odd that you're going this far to justify joke
I think it's odd that I have to go this far to justify RVS. But, I mean, what else is there to talk about when no one posts.
In post 273, ceejayvinoya wrote:Is this another post made in bad faith? This is a bastard and I wouldn't know every game mechanic and role out there.
At that point on you could be anything from a day 0 alignment cop of some sort or an informed given info on some players for some reason.
No, I made this post after looking through the wiki for roles (bastard included) that would know alignments before the game started. I didn't find anything, so I asked for help.
In post 274, Bambi Jay wrote:At this point I'm thinking maybe Jester now if Looker is so adamantly going against the grain and not claiming their real role?
At what point did we agree to claims D1?
In post 280, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Why the hell do you have Looker as town?
Name 1 Townie thing they have done.
Name 1 townie thing anyone has done.
Spoiler: Also
In post 210, Looker wrote:What does a town thought look like to you?
I'm starting to think the litmus test for "town" is hidden affiliation/alignment, because there's very little consistency or transparency otherwise.
In post 133, Looker wrote:I asked my questions in bad faith with the assumptions that you were scum that had the answers to the questions you asked. I thought you voted because you knew my targets weren't scum and were preparing to elim me after elimming one of my 'targets' today.
This is actually a bit more reasonable after thinking about it, though it would probably backfire once you confirm that it was a joke.
Looker is, well, weird. i don't know what to make of that fakeclaim. It could maybe come from town but it sort of dragged on for too long before they claimed it was a joke and by then I'm not really convinced it helps.
VOTE: Looker
Noncommittal, inconsistent, contradictory. I wish more players would read through this slot's iso.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #48) » Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:06 pm
Postby Looker »
Though I think not voting bugspray is highly contradictory. It's hypocritical to wagon me for an RVS joke but not bugspray or drapion for unlikely claims, especially after suspecting Bambi Jay for an unlikely claim. It's just really inconsistent.
Post
Post #316 (isolation #49) » Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:12 pm
Postby Looker »
I don't think it's a waste. I think bugspray is negative town utility that is either scum (which we would see through D1 elim) or "yeetproof IC" (which we should see through D1 elim and then lose them N1, in which case we wouldn't be losing anything because bugspray does not contribute)
do we let you slip into the shadows until the heat dies down...?
". I guess bastard game = bastard mod. 
