[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13728675 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1077 | True Love at Grandpa's House | Game Over! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #23 (isolation #1) » Wed Apr 12, 2023 1:46 am
Postby biancospino »
Ok, VOTE: Andante.
Actually I don't think a scum would say that. This is really a vote for your lover.
Just to confirm, "pretty sure" means something quite relevant happened in yuor PT, yes?
From this it looks like Vander is your lover, you may want to correct me if that's not the case. Otherwise voting/unvoting your lover, with no valid reasons attached to the unvote, looks very bad. It looks like you want to put on a show that you are considering wagoning your lover, which would be -EV for scum to do, while arbitrarily not actually doing it
Post
Post #85 (isolation #3) » Thu Apr 13, 2023 9:09 pm
Postby biancospino »
She's saying that votes for her are from scum hoping to flame up a flashwagon so she can self-hammer (since by that time she was saying her partner was maf) -- as opposed to votes to Bub, which had better logic. Totally different situation you see, it's not like Bub is sussing his Lover too.
Post
Post #93 (isolation #6) » Fri Apr 14, 2023 5:41 am
Postby biancospino »
In post 49, Andante wrote:
also, the votes flying my way has me thinking we're a T/T pair cause if yall think about it, scum know their lover, and they know their partner's lover. scum will want to vote in any of the 4 that aren't a scum pairing to get 2 town out... just saying
here Andante muses that the vote she gained make her think she is t/t. Those were 2 votes btw.
In post 64, Andante wrote:
lol I tr my lover and umlaut is definitely town here, this game be easyyyy oooh this bub wagon... interesting
What do you think about the wagon in terms of bub's alignment?
mehh haven’t had time to put much thought into it yet tbh
Here she does not make the same assessment, in light of Bub gaining not 2, but 3 votes.
In post 72, Andante wrote:
they probably have better logic than the votes going my way, cause if I really am a T/T pair, throw votes my way so I can self hammer
When confronted, she sais this. It's unclear what she means exactly, but looks like -- as I've said already -- she's saying that the votes to her were supposed to create a fast wagon so that she could quickhammer herself before changing idea about her lover.
The problem with this is that... it doesn't explain what the difference with the Bub situation is exactly? Bub also do not tr his lover, so that should be really the same
this makes me laugh cause just last night I told my lover I don’t think I wanna vote out you/bub
why thou. If you're town and actually confident about your lover, you're essentially saying you've solved the game already. Wrongly may I add, I'm also confident about my lover's towniness you see.
this makes me laugh cause just last night I told my lover I don’t think I wanna vote out you/bub
why thou. If you're town and actually confident about your lover, you're essentially saying you've solved the game already. Wrongly may I add, I'm also confident about my lover's towniness you see.
Why can't you both be right?
Andante's unwillingness to vote Bub suggests she has a solve of she/her lover & Bub/Vander town. Which I think is wrong.
Post
Post #148 (isolation #9) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 1:30 pm
Postby biancospino »
In post 142, Andante wrote:
so I'm wrong in thinking my lover is town, and you're not wrong for thinking your lover is town? what kind of logic is this??
The kind of logic you get when you misread what I've written.
You don't want to vote Bub. So you must think that B/V is likely t/t. You also think you are in a t/t pair. And you see, there are only two t/t pairs, so my belief to be in one myself is incompatible with that.
If you're town there is a clear way in which we can both be right about our lovers, and in that world you should be accepting of a Bub vote
Post
Post #171 (isolation #11) » Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:59 am
Postby biancospino »
Enchant agrees that I may sing, so.
Didn't you find strange how I've parked my vote on Andante, unvoting Bub in the process, and proceeded to nag her to vote Bub? Nobody would put Bub at E-1 in an Andante game! Enchant came to me with a proposition to move my vote so that maybe someone would compensate and put Bub back at E-2, so we could do an extended quickhammer.
Post
Post #176 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 17, 2023 5:43 am
Postby biancospino »
Yeah, Enchant may be unreadable but is not a bad player. They come toward me asking to coordinate a quickhammer, that's no way it's scum fretting to off a t/t pair; for if we do such a thing and it's t/t there's no defence that saves us.
You may make the argument that he may be scum doing a convoluted bus gambit to get locktowned, but first of all wether or not it would be worth is very dubious, and second if you are making that argument than B/V is s/t anyway
Oh, right, why would town make such a blunder? Town is very interested in pairs... yet scum knows two pairs from the onset. But this is one of the few errors scum could actually make if Umlaut is scum with bub.
Post
Post #221 (isolation #18) » Tue Apr 18, 2023 2:43 pm
Postby biancospino »
In post 219, chad thunder wrote:
biancospino and Enchant are probably town/town with how they went about the Bub wagon. Enchant conspiring to quickhammer a scumbuddy would be hilarious though
Bub Bidderskins
biancospino
Andante
chad thunder
Bub Bidderskins
biancospino
Andante
chad thunder