[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13781915 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 877 | 09:12 | It's Over! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #66 (isolation #4) » Mon May 22, 2023 1:44 am
Postby The Bulge »
In post 65, implosion wrote:
Actually Umlaut's play reads as possibly from scum to me. The specific question they asked Bulge of "how serious was your vote" feels kind of filler. I feel like it's pretty obvious that e-1 in post 35 on someone who has made one post is not supposed to be serious, and I'm not sure what Umlaut expects to get out of an answer to that question.
Post
Post #67 (isolation #5) » Mon May 22, 2023 1:46 am
Postby The Bulge »
In post 61, Dunnstral wrote:
I'm looking at redFF's posts on site and they seem to try in games. Like they have thought put into their posts. And in this game I am instead getting a trolly vibe which doesn't match with what I am seeing. What is up with that?
i mean there's not much to go off of in the first two pages for any serious content
Post
Post #69 (isolation #7) » Mon May 22, 2023 1:55 am
Postby The Bulge »
would love for red to chime in. im not ready to call him scum for the hammer, it didnt seem all too serious and given the gamestate idk if its even AI. but without a comment from him at this point the game will continue to stall and that pushes him right off the fence between trolling and antitown.
In post 61, Dunnstral wrote:
I'm looking at redFF's posts on site and they seem to try in games. Like they have thought put into their posts. And in this game I am instead getting a trolly vibe which doesn't match with what I am seeing. What is up with that?
i mean there's not much to go off of in the first two pages for any serious content
In post 69, The Bulge wrote:
would love for red to chime in. im not ready to call him scum for the hammer, it didnt seem all too serious and given the gamestate idk if its even AI. but without a comment from him at this point the game will continue to stall and that pushes him right off the fence between trolling and antitown.
You seem to disagree with me in your first post here but then you come to the same conclusion anyway. Or are you seeing this as different from what I'm saying?
i didnt disagree with the content of your post i just thought "what is up with that" was a silly question with an obvious answer. like i wasnt sure what was so confusing about a nonserious vibe in the gamestate we had here d1
Post
Post #163 (isolation #14) » Sat May 27, 2023 2:15 am
Postby The Bulge »
In post 128, Umlaut wrote:
Just spent way too long on other tasks and need to spend the rest of my day doing my actual job but will swing by just to answer 124: I think lurking is pretty much the dominant strategy as scum in a game where no one is doing anything, the exception being maybe someone who has a reputation for hyperposting (and most likely already knows that).
do you think red is likely to be scum or is it more policy?
In post 61, Dunnstral wrote:
I'm looking at redFF's posts on site and they seem to try in games. Like they have thought put into their posts. And in this game I am instead getting a trolly vibe which doesn't match with what I am seeing. What is up with that?
i mean there's not much to go off of in the first two pages for any serious content
In post 69, The Bulge wrote:
would love for red to chime in. im not ready to call him scum for the hammer, it didnt seem all too serious and given the gamestate idk if its even AI. but without a comment from him at this point the game will continue to stall and that pushes him right off the fence between trolling and antitown.
You seem to disagree with me in your first post here but then you come to the same conclusion anyway. Or are you seeing this as different from what I'm saying?
i didnt disagree with the content of your post i just thought "what is up with that" was a silly question with an obvious answer. like i wasnt sure what was so confusing about a nonserious vibe in the gamestate we had here d1
I don't think the "obvious answer" was ever given
thats just the thing with obvious answers
my point is you're comparing red's play in normal games and red's play in maybe the slowest moving game ive ever seen and not considering the difference that makes in how serious one can really be, esp on page 2
yea idk what the scum motivation would be to post like asri did on p6, esp w the way theyve been posting so far this game. its an incredibly soft read for me too but at least its something to replace the big foggy
Post
Post #178 (isolation #21) » Sat May 27, 2023 5:38 am
Postby The Bulge »
that's true, and my intent isnt to explain red's actions on his behalf, i know that can be frustrating. im offering my understanding of the situation, why it doesnt strike me as odd or even necessarily scum-motivated. sometimes you have to do it for the bit. red's response to the situation (43, 79) leads me to believe in my hunch that it was nai trolling. im not defending him as town, and if i were taking this game more seriously i wouldnt be defending his actions at all but it made me chuckle and shake my head. he's a nullread for me atm but im not sure the lolhammer will ever factor into my read of the slot.
Post
Post #194 (isolation #24) » Sun May 28, 2023 6:24 am
Postby The Bulge »
In post 192, implosion wrote:
I think it's perfectly possible for red-scum to claim VT here.
I'll probably hammer at... some point. unexpectedly. or maybe just if the day still seems dead later, i'm really lazy about voting/hammering sometimes.
perfectly possible sure but its a big missed opportunity
Post
Post #196 (isolation #26) » Sun May 28, 2023 7:03 am
Postby The Bulge »
im thinking umlaut bc his play has seemed somewhat informed. like if a townie is trudging thru mud to figure out the game, umlaut is riding on paved roads. he's making more sense of things than i think the game thread has to offer, if that makes any sense. also like implo said a lot of where umlaut is going in terms of questioning and providing insights strikes me as obligatory.
partner could be asri? not sure who else i'd put there, meg seems unlikely and i read everyone else as town.
In post 196, The Bulge wrote:
like if a townie is trudging thru mud to figure out the game, umlaut is riding on paved roads. he's making more sense of things than i think the game thread has to offer, if that makes any sense.
Can you show an example of this?
cant really find any particular posts, its just the vibe i got from umlaut's iso. admittedly looking at it today im not feeling it quite as much
Post
Post #251 (isolation #31) » Fri Jun 02, 2023 6:54 am
Postby The Bulge »
here's my understanding of what's happened so far today. asri cast some pretty blatant shade on dunn and then tried to pull a "i never
actually said
you were scum!" which is bs. but at the same time i see what asri is seeing in terms of dunn (and to a smaller extent meg) overreacting to the shade. meg's contributions dont strike me at all as a defense of dunnstral. i also see meg's point about asri's potential paranoia/backpedalling, but i think it could apply somewhat to dunn's defensiveness as well, so i do see what asri is getting at there.
I don't like that they were pushing that red needed to die just for quick hammering. I believe that is an easy stance for scum to take yesterday. Their thoughts on who mafia is today is not fully clear to me.
why didnt you say anything about it til now? this is the first time youve mentioned umlaut
Post
Post #340 (isolation #41) » Sat Jun 10, 2023 6:31 am
Postby The Bulge »
if it wasnt clear my solve for most of this day has been umlaut/dunnstral. the two have not interacted a single time this game (look at their isos together)
Post
Post #359 (isolation #50) » Sat Jun 10, 2023 8:03 am
Postby The Bulge »
In post 358, Dunnstral wrote:
Bulge I already responded to you about Umlaut and I showed how what you are saying (that I never interacted) is not true - and I showed where I interacted and how it was not true, and then you dropped the point.