Starbuck wrote:Now it's turning into an argument about flavor instead of actual scumhunting? Coming from both KMD and Monkey, two people who I do consider very experienced at this game, bothers me a lot.
What is your definition of scumhunting and how does this not fit it?
Starbuck wrote:
Who's to say that Toy Story is not a classic? They are about to release a third one! Here's a good question for both of you, how long must a movie be out before it's considered a classic?
It released in 1995, just shy of 15 years ago.
Meh, it's more of a feel thing. It just isn't in the same class as what I assume to be Llama's idea of classics here. I don't know much about Disney, but even I can see how this doesn't fit.
Starbuck wrote:wikipedia stuff
I doubt any of that was written by Llama or that he used it when he made this setup.
Crazy wrote:
And Kmd, you were so quick to dismiss all flavor arguments earlier; why would you allow this one?
FoS
I can see the argument. Yeah, it's probably a bad idea to go in that direction, but really. Does Toy Story fit with the title of "Disney Classic"? I don't think it does.
MonkeyMan576 wrote:Can anyone besides Starbuck claim to be a movie after 1980(Don't give the actual title, just yes or no)?
I actually don't know.
------------
Still not really feeling Starbuckscum TBH, but I don't exactly have a huge town read. God, that sounds very fence-sit-like. Let's just say a slight town read.