Mafia 42: Italian - Game over!

BabyJesus · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:41 am

vote peacebringer

BabyJesus · Post Post #24 (isolation #1) » Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:28 am

halo freak wrote:
Rules:

10. No Swearing

this rule could cause problems.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #38 (isolation #2) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:51 am

Jabroni2000 wrote:
Random vote: BabyJesus

You're in this? f#cking masonlyncher.

unvote, vote Jabroni2000

BabyJesus · Post Post #39 (isolation #3) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:53 am

Pooky and TonyMontana also on the list.

BabyJesus · Post Post #41 (isolation #4) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:21 am

TonyMontana wrote:I unvoted you

not gonna matter, guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 7:24 am

can we focus on lynching jabroni pls....

BabyJesus · Post Post #61 (isolation #6) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:15 pm

Vesuvan wrote:Oh I'm gonna
kill
someone for that.

And
Unvote
, Not at all random
Vote: BabyJesus

f'n schtick stealer

BabyJesus · Post Post #66 (isolation #7) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:38 am

PeaceBringer wrote:I am changing my vote. Pooky as much as I despise your play and find you no good for town I got an ax to grind.

unvote, vote monty

this is not helpful

BabyJesus · Post Post #69 (isolation #8) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:04 am

vote Lying Brian

may as well put some pressure on....

BabyJesus · Post Post #76 (isolation #9) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:39 am

LyingBrian wrote:
d8P wrote:The last two posts make me very happy about where mine is.

Fritzler wrote:Yea, me too.
did you guys want to actually discuss something? what are our options for day 1? mass-claim? random lynch? following BabyJesus? c'mon, think for yourselves! just b/c i'm willing to apply pressure on somebody does not make me scummy.

following BabyJesus usually works out great for all involved....

BabyJesus · Post Post #88 (isolation #10) » Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:02 am

Flying Dutchman wrote:Good morning all.

This bandwagon on Lying Brian looks like pure crap to me.... I'm better off with

OMGUS Vote: Pooky

I'm always up for a Pooky bandwagon...

:bitter:

BabyJesus · Post Post #102 (isolation #11) » Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:09 pm

JSexton wrote:
Gonzo wrote:Let's lynch someone already! Let's see somebody swing!

unvote, vote: Gonza
for bloodthirstiness.

Did you think we were having tea and crimpets??

BabyJesus · Post Post #107 (isolation #12) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:20 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ROFL!

jabroni wrote:I don't buy into the Brian bandwagon.

Thus, I vote: Pooky

unvote

vote Jabroni

So let me get this straight, what exactly does not buying the Brian wagon have to do with joining the Pooky one? *Looks at connections, hmm there are none!* Brian hasn't accused Pooky and Pooky hasn't accused or voted Brian! Your statement is misleading at best and downright BS at worst. Why are you trying to make a connection between the 2 bandwagons like Pooky accused Brians or Pooky came out with information on Brian and Brian innocent must mean Pooky guilty? The only relationship that actually exists is that Pooky's being "randomly bandwagoned"(this means all pooky bandwagonners signed on with basically random, omgus or metagame reasons, nothing based on actual information) at a time when the momentum was moving very quickly into a Brianwagon, could it be that this is a diversionary wagon raised by some of Brian's scumbucket buddies?

Scum love to join bandwagons with crapreasons, Jabroni's post is so very evident of this. I can find no better candidate for lynch, PB please get your head out of your ass in regards to voting me, it'd be a damn shame if you vote me regardless of the scummy as hell actions of some other players around here.

holy crap, defensive much?

unvote, vote pooky

Pooky only gets THIS defensive when he is scum....

BabyJesus · Post Post #109 (isolation #13) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:34 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:more lies.

*points BJ towards Civil War/Greek Myth*

Should I have just let myself be run up on crapreasoning?

if you were being run up, sure. But THAT defensive over one or two votes....nah, I like my vote on you.

BabyJesus · Post Post #113 (isolation #14) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 6:42 am

Fritzler wrote:
unvote, vote: jabroni

fritzler protecting pooky....interesting.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #123 (isolation #15) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:58 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Iammars, simulposting sucks, it's day 1 and if you guys really want to play bandwagon into claim over and over until we're out of roles and the mafia is laughing all the way to the bank, then that type of play would be valid. But frankly jumping on with a crapreason like that is still suspicious as Crunk.

Is this where you put off claiming as long as possible so you can get a plausible role fake down?? LOL.

I will be voting Pooky until he claims....should be interesting. He'll probably fake doc though.

BabyJesus · Post Post #125 (isolation #16) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:26 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Whatever. We need to get through day1 somehow and if you guys would rather play bandwagon to claim instead of looking at suspicious people, feel free to just pile on and string me up.

I'm not going to play the stupid random bandwagon-claim game with you guys because it's pretty stupid and a waste of my time, I came here to actually vote according to my suspicions and what other people do, not "hey why not?" let's wagon him!

You guys can go ahead and lynch me.

You won't get a claim out of me with a random bandwagon.

I'd give you guys some extra advice on what to do after I get lynched, but frankly a town that's wants to play randomwagon won't really need it so I'm not going to waste my time to type up any for you.

Good luck.

awesome. Refusing to claim makes me pretty sure you're not the doc or the cop, and with you now having a greater likelihood then anyone of being scum, I'm happy lynching you.

BabyJesus · Post Post #127 (isolation #17) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:32 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Your refusal to use logic and constant spewing of crap only slightly annoys me now, I somewhat expect you to play crappy like this.

I could almost say I'm disappointed.

please explain how I am refusing to use logic....

I'm voting you because your defensiveness with very few votes seemed suspicious to me.

Last time I saw a guy utterly refuse to claim, he was scum.

Combine the two, and I like my vote even more now. Hell, if you like I'll claim along with you.

BabyJesus · Post Post #136 (isolation #18) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:59 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Actually Jabroni, your vote on me was the only one to mention brian. There's a damn big difference between jumping on a bandwagon while mentioning brian and what every1 else did.

Seal it!??

I'll call BS on that PB, tell me what games I've been unhelpful to the town in where I was town, hell you list them out and link them and if I can't find more that apply to YOU, then I'll ask for a replacement in all my games with you so you can get someone who'll be more helpful than me, heck maybe they'll even follow you around like sheep.

Don't expect me to defend myself against general broad statements like he's unhelpful as town usually so we should lynch him and never let him get a chance to be town.

I'm really tired of your BS frankly.

I'm not voting you because you are generally unhelpful. I am voting you because I found your initial defensiveness unusual. Your actions since have done nothing to convince me you are town, so my vote stays. I don't know if you're scum or not. But you have yet to convince me.

BabyJesus · Post Post #149 (isolation #19) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:53 am

Pooky, maybe give me a good reason to NOT vote you....why should I believe you are pro-town? All you're doing is is "Wah, wah, craplogic, Pooky bandwagons suck"

It's day one, so of course there's an element of randomness in any bandwagon.

BabyJesus · Post Post #155 (isolation #20) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:54 am

ah heck...Pooky is contributing. Maybe I look scummy now (lol), but I'm gonna switch gears.

unvote, vote flying dutchman

His only post this game was the OMGUS vote on Pooky. I think with the runup on Pooky and the back and forth, we've established a couple decent voting records, which will be helpful once we start learning some alignments.

BabyJesus · Post Post #166 (isolation #21) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:50 pm

PeaceBringer wrote:
vote mason lynching Inhim

this is not helpful

BabyJesus · Post Post #172 (isolation #22) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:34 pm

LyingBrian wrote:so, am I allowed to vote now, or am i going to be bandwagonned again?

hi

BabyJesus · Post Post #194 (isolation #23) » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:23 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can't wait for the republicans to call Jabroni out for Flip Flopping

is there a "bash Bush" thread somewhere?

BabyJesus · Post Post #197 (isolation #24) » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:35 pm

Jabroni2000 wrote:You don't really need to make one. The guy practically bashes himself.

lol...

"Americans should be prudent in their use of energy during the course of the next few weeks. Don't buy gas if you don't need it." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1, 2005

This quote convinced me to stop stockpiling gas in my garage....

BabyJesus · Post Post #206 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:07 am

can we focus on lynching Flying Dutchman please....

BabyJesus · Post Post #217 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:14 am

hmmmm

BabyJesus · Post Post #221 (isolation #27) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:33 am

I think I'll stay on flying dutchman for now....

BabyJesus · Post Post #224 (isolation #28) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:17 am

awesome....

why isn't flying dutchman dead yet....

BabyJesus · Post Post #229 (isolation #29) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 8:51 am

LyingBrian wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:awesome....

why isn't flying dutchman dead yet....
because the town decides who to lynch, not you

BabyJesus · Post Post #265 (isolation #30) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:43 pm

unvote, vote Lying Brian

BabyJesus · Post Post #269 (isolation #31) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:09 pm

TSAGod wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
unvote, vote Lying Brian
Any reason?

no one seems to want to go Flying Dutchman .....

BabyJesus · Post Post #282 (isolation #32) » Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:03 am

Zippy wrote:hi

hi gb

BabyJesus · Post Post #321 (isolation #33) » Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:29 am

Monty wrote:
d8P wrote:I smell a rat. Just did a search for cowardly reporter and found zip, zero occurences other than references to this game. Looking at the wiki, it takes all of two clicks to get to it. I think Illumina checked the wiki for an appropriate role and found this.

Illumina wrote:The only problem with claiming is that it makes me a major target
Not true. I think you forgot about this when you went looking for a claim.

vote: Illumina
The reporter role is pretty powerful if used wisely. If you get a report on a scum, and they don't know it, they're caught if they try to claim townie... Not as powerful as a cop, but if you don't think the scum will want this ability out of the way you're fooling yourself.

so is "reporter" like a watcher....

interesting....

BabyJesus · Post Post #322 (isolation #34) » Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:31 am

for the record, I do not believe Illumina....

Better hope the scum do not have a mafia doc, if trying to vig him is all the proof you need...

BabyJesus · Post Post #336 (isolation #35) » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:11 pm

Illumina wrote:I will hide tonight, then.

Each night, my role lets me either investigate someone to see if they're home or not (I assume this constitutes whether or not they make night choices) or hiding to avoid night kills. I'm obligated to post any information I find from my investigation, and I can't hide two nights in a row.

who did you investigate last night.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #339 (isolation #36) » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:36 pm

Jabroni2000 wrote:My roles not on the wiki either.

I think the mafia doc is just a chance we have to take.

I've seen mafia docs/un-nightkillable types several times. I've never seen a cowardly reporter.

Ability to dodge a vig kill != confirmation of being a cowardly reporter.

BabyJesus · Post Post #340 (isolation #37) » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:38 pm

also, for the record, he hasn't bothered to post his N1 results yet....

BabyJesus · Post Post #354 (isolation #38) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:00 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:how would he have known TSA didn't make any nightactions then?

this wagon is ridiculous, just let a vig take a shot at him instead of theorizing if the mafia have doctors to protect them or a GF who is immune to nightkills, we'll trip him up over information later(either he actually can investigate, or he'll have to out mafia members or guess)

now let's lynch jabroniscum[/img]

interesting.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #366 (isolation #39) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:34 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:Let's do this - vote for Jabroni.

X

BabyJesus · Post Post #374 (isolation #40) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:34 pm

Jabroni2000 wrote:All right, I'll claim then.

I'm a Searching Mason. Every night i submit one name to the mod. He tells me if that person is mason or not. If he is, I get the names of all the masons and can discuss with them the next night.

Last night I checked out BJ- he is
not
a mason.

Don't really know why I got strung up in the first place, but whatever. I claim when asked.

Because people are hesitant to lynch scum Illumina

BabyJesus · Post Post #375 (isolation #41) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:34 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
Illumina wrote:I'm obligated to post any information I find from my investigation.
The time taken for this to happen is why I don't believe him.

I agree.

BabyJesus · Post Post #376 (isolation #42) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:35 pm

SSB! wrote:checking in. will need to do some reading/skimming. tdoss notes?

we're lynching Illumina. tia

BabyJesus · Post Post #384 (isolation #43) » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:14 am

Illumina wrote:Sorry, it's been an unexpectedly busy day.

I investigated Darquiel (before TSAGod replaced him) and he made no night activity.

he already claimed his night action...but only after significant prodding. That's what doesn't add up with his "I must reveal my results" claim.

BabyJesus · Post Post #403 (isolation #44) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:32 pm

I still think Illumina is scum.

BabyJesus · Post Post #426 (isolation #45) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:22 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
Vesuvan wrote:
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:one game where a GF was able to do this.
Mafia Vengeance (Misetings). Godfather also roleblocker.

Hate to say this, but agree with BabyJesus.
Then again, being a godfather and a roleblocker still wouldn't give you the information you'd need to pull off a fake "is X out of his house or not" every night. In order to properly fake that claim, he'd have to be a godfather who knew he was proof against nightkills and also be an investigator, or be scum buddies with an investigator.

or since he is "hiding" 2 out of 3 nights, just manage to not guess the doc or cop every 3rd night, and we'd never know.

BabyJesus · Post Post #427 (isolation #46) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:22 pm

Jabroni2000 wrote:Vig him tonight. If he dies, then he was scum. If he lives, then we can reopen the discussion tomorrow. What is so hard to understand about this?

so who should we lynch....back to Pooky?

BabyJesus · Post Post #430 (isolation #47) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:42 am

Blackberry wrote:Hmmmmmm, I'm very tempted to switch my vote to Gonzo.

How come NOBODY has responded to my post about me claiming?

on this, if you have info that will affect who we lynch, sure. Otherwise, I say no. Don't give info to the scum to let them know whether targeting you is worth it or not.

BabyJesus · Post Post #434 (isolation #48) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 am

StevieT92 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Jabroni
You seem kind of assuming, and I've never seen town do that. I don't know if you're stupid or trying to maybe mislead the town.

I assume things as town alot...

BabyJesus · Post Post #438 (isolation #49) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:22 am

SSB! wrote:checking in. will need to do some reading/skimming. tdoss notes?

this guys takes a long time to catch up....

BabyJesus · Post Post #449 (isolation #50) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:34 pm

Vesuvan wrote:You said it would only take 1 vig to test Illumina. That either requires vig claim now or vigs knowing who other vigs target.

I took it as assuming there's at least one vig in this game...

I'd agree...seems a safe bet :shrug:

BabyJesus · Post Post #455 (isolation #51) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:23 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
Vesuvan wrote:Probably important to point out: this new Jabroni wagon is the scummiest action all game.

Unvote, Vote: JSexton

Actually, that's a good point.
unvote

Vote:Jsexton

interesting....out of all the people that voted jabroni you single out jsexton...any reason why, or just a bandwagon hop?

BabyJesus · Post Post #461 (isolation #52) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:29 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
Vesuvan wrote:Probably important to point out: this new Jabroni wagon is the scummiest action all game.

Unvote, Vote: JSexton

Actually, that's a good point.
unvote

Vote:Jsexton
interesting....out of all the people that voted jabroni you single out jsexton...any reason why, or just a bandwagon hop?
(shrug) The way he jumped onto a bad bandwagon, (lynching someone who might be a confirmed mason tommorow seems like a pretty bad idea)makes him look suspicious;
I tend to be more suspicious of the people who eagerly jump onto bad bandwagons without giving a good reason.
Honestly, some other people on the bandwagon look just as bad, but meh, we've got to focus pressure on someone if we're ever going to get anywhere.

See, the bolded part is EXACTLY what jumped out at me with YOUR post, lol....

BabyJesus · Post Post #462 (isolation #53) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:30 pm

Although I don't like the Jabroni train at all, I'm pretty sure we can find a couple scum on it...

Like Pooky for one

BabyJesus · Post Post #470 (isolation #54) » Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:41 am

BabyJesus · Post Post #475 (isolation #55) » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:08 pm

unvote, vote fritzler

BabyJesus · Post Post #496 (isolation #56) » Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:50 am

Fritzler wrote:ex-queeze me, summy?

you've been known to add things. That doesn;t fly here, guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #516 (isolation #57) » Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:51 am

nice...

vote pooky

....

BabyJesus · Post Post #532 (isolation #58) » Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:49 am

pooky is the play today....

BabyJesus · Post Post #553 (isolation #59) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:09 am

why isn;t pooky dead yet?

BabyJesus · Post Post #564 (isolation #60) » Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:04 am

JSexton wrote:
I don't get BabyJesus's hardon for Pooky at all. Is there a running joke I'm missing?

Residual bitterness from MTG game...

BabyJesus · Post Post #570 (isolation #61) » Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:28 pm

Illumina wrote: Also, most importantly, I didn't survive because the mafia failed to kill me - we were having a vig test the veracity of my claim. Was that an innocent typo, or were you not aware of that play?

interesting......

unvote, vote gonzo

worth running him up for that

BabyJesus · Post Post #585 (isolation #62) » Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:18 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:Woah...sorry I haven't posted today, I forgot about this game until just now.

After a read-thorough, I like the gonzo bandwagon. I was wondering about him a little yesterday, too. I'll just
fos:Gonzo
him for the moment, because this bandwagon is moving rather quickly, but that might turn into a vote soon.

hi

BabyJesus · Post Post #606 (isolation #63) » Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:09 pm

unvote , vote LyingBrian

BabyJesus · Post Post #650 (isolation #64) » Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:46 am

Gonzo wrote:I'll just
Vote No Lynch

I have no clue who it is and I don't want to join any bandwagons.

And to those of you who still wish to kill me, I'd like to make a motion at the bloodthirsty nature.

And now for the news that the
Mod
should read.
I'll be on vacation for 10 days following the 18th, so someone should probably replace me.

Merry Christmas to you all! And try not to lynch anyone on Christmas.

no lynch on day 2?

BabyJesus · Post Post #656 (isolation #65) » Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:49 pm

can we go back to lynching pooky....

BabyJesus · Post Post #658 (isolation #66) » Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:07 am

d8P wrote:*cough* You're voting LyingBrian, bj.

hi

BabyJesus · Post Post #660 (isolation #67) » Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:01 am

d8P wrote:Er... hi? Were you really asking permission?

what?

BabyJesus · Post Post #662 (isolation #68) » Sun Dec 18, 2005 12:04 pm

d8P wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:can we go back to lynching pooky....

BabyJesus · Post Post #666 (isolation #69) » Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:08 am

Fritzler wrote:I say we lynch LyingBrian.

I am on board with this plan.

BabyJesus · Post Post #668 (isolation #70) » Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:32 am

Fritzler wrote:I see nothing that can go wrong with this plan.

I mean, BJ and I support it.

BabyJesus · Post Post #672 (isolation #71) » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:03 am

halo freak wrote:
Vote Count

6 LyingBrian (d8p StevieT92, Baby J, Vesuvan, Pooky, Inhim,jajsoccer)

6
5 Gonzo (
BabyJesus
, inHim, PeaceBringer, zu_Faul, TSAGod, Iammars)
1 Inhim (Flying Dutchman)
2 Zu Faul (Yosarian2, Fritzler)
1 No Lynch (Gonzo
1 Flying Dutchman (PeaceBringer)

13 votes to lynch

fixed

BabyJesus · Post Post #674 (isolation #72) » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:41 am

PeaceBringer wrote:baby jesus get your butt over to packment and approve a registration and update the dune game signup. TIA.

who is skippy?

BabyJesus · Post Post #690 (isolation #73) » Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm

unvote, vote Pooky

He has a scum tell, and I have seen it.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #692 (isolation #74) » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:52 pm

Fritzler wrote:
unvote, vote: pooky

awesome

BabyJesus · Post Post #697 (isolation #75) » Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:49 am

d8P wrote:BJ: Care to share? I would like to judge for myself.

If it's a real tell, it kind of spoils the game (so it might be a good idea to let him know about it). Or do you prefer hollow victories?

Nah, I want to keep it to myself so I can bust him in other games...

I've played with Pooky as scum in several games now (Werewolf and Magic the gathering come to mind), there is one thing he did there I noticed he did here. I didn't see it the few games he was a good guy.

could be wrong, yes, but I am more and more convinced Pooky is the play.

BabyJesus · Post Post #702 (isolation #76) » Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:39 pm

Zippy wrote:i think i am in this game...

hi....

we are lynching pooky...

BabyJesus · Post Post #711 (isolation #77) » Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:27 am

inHimshallibe wrote:Wow, people are seriously taking the focus away from LyingBrian and zu_Faul.

Noted!

so inHim is protecting pooky....

very interesting that pooky has disappeared....

BabyJesus · Post Post #716 (isolation #78) » Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:12 pm

StevieT92 wrote:BabyJesus: Claim the tell, or we can't lynch him. You cannot just lynch someone on 'I am saying we should lynch him, but I can't tell you why'

your defense of him is noted....

suffice to say I have seen something from pooky that leads me to be 80% certain he is scum. Am I 100%? no. I'm not trying to hide a cop investigation here, I'm just saying from playing several games with pooky, I'm willing to bet this game he is scum.

BabyJesus · Post Post #717 (isolation #79) » Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:14 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Analysis of the Bandwagon:

bj wrote:unvote, vote Pooky

He has a scum tell, and I have seen it.....
This is where it starts, a basically indefensible attack on Pooky that has no substantial evidence behind it at all. Why were you voting elsewhere if you spotted a "tell" on Pooky?
.

I've thought all game long I've seen your tell. Its just a question of how much I want to pursue it. I saw it early on, and if you review my posts, I have expressed suspicion of you all game long.

BabyJesus · Post Post #721 (isolation #80) » Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:08 pm

jajsoccer wrote:I'm not going to vote for Pooky unless someone tells my why I should.

Because he is scum, and in this game we are trying to lynch scum.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #723 (isolation #81) » Fri Dec 23, 2005 2:06 pm

jajsoccer wrote:You haven't convinced me that he is scum. I'm not going to lynch someone just because you claim to have seen a tell. That may be good enough for some people, but unless you give me more, I'm not buying it. I'll vote for him if I you tell me what the tell is so that I can evaluate it for myself, or if I see signs of his scummyness. I'm not going to accept your tell on blind faith.

ok, guy. We'll rememeber how you defended scum tomorrow.

BabyJesus · Post Post #729 (isolation #82) » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:19 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
jajsoccer wrote:You haven't convinced me that he is scum. I'm not going to lynch someone just because you claim to have seen a tell. That may be good enough for some people, but unless you give me more, I'm not buying it. I'll vote for him if I you tell me what the tell is so that I can evaluate it for myself, or if I see signs of his scummyness. I'm not going to accept your tell on blind faith.
ok, guy. We'll rememeber how you defended scum tomorrow.
And we'll remember how you used vauge threats like this to bully everyone into voting for pooky.

when pooky comes up scum, I'll look pretty good...

BabyJesus · Post Post #730 (isolation #83) » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:22 am

Pooky, if you're so innocent, why don't you just claim....

BabyJesus · Post Post #735 (isolation #84) » Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:48 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
BJ wrote:Pooky, if you're so innocent, why don't you just claim....

BJ from Norse Mafia wrote:This may come as a shock to you, but sometimes it is better to HIDE THINGS from scum.

except that you are scum here....

BabyJesus · Post Post #738 (isolation #85) » Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:21 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:You´re wrong about that and you have nothing to back ur BS argument up other than a ¨tell¨ that is wrong and you can´t share with us.

Also, note that the first sentence quoted PRESUMES MY INNOCENCE with the ¨if you´re so innocent¨ clause, I´m pointing out what you´ve already stated in another game, you can´t rebutt this with an accusation of scumness in me because your first statement is based on my innocence, frankly your presumption and your rebuttal are contradictions and you´re committing what we call a ¨logical fallacy¨(more commonly known as spouting BS and puffing smoke in the air, quite a common scumtactic)

Pooky = scum

BabyJesus · Post Post #740 (isolation #86) » Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:06 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:nice logic there

BJ = scum

see I can do it too!

BabyJesus · Post Post #743 (isolation #87) » Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:00 am

If you all MUST know, I don't have a "tell" on pooky. I have a game related reason to believe he is scum. That is why I need him to claim. I'm not a cop with an investigation, but it is pretty compelling evidence, depending on his claim.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #745 (isolation #88) » Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:10 am

LyingBrian wrote:
vote: BabyJesus

skimmer.

BabyJesus · Post Post #749 (isolation #89) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:24 am

Fritzler wrote:
unvote,vote: lyingbrian

attempt to swing momentum away from Pooky is noted....

BabyJesus · Post Post #753 (isolation #90) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:00 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wow PB and BJ, for 2 people who've contributed both close to nothing to this game in terms of helping the town find scumbags, you 2 sure are full of yourselves.

Keep trying to bully people into voting based on no evidence and ur gutshot feelings.

Makes you 2 look like geniuses.

Claim? I HAVE evidence you are scum, skimmer. No claim just makes you looks more guilty. If you want, I'll spill my evidence after you claim, and the town can decide....

BabyJesus · Post Post #756 (isolation #91) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:46 am

Monty wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wow PB and BJ, for 2 people who've contributed both close to nothing to this game in terms of helping the town find scumbags, you 2 sure are full of yourselves.

Keep trying to bully people into voting based on no evidence and ur gutshot feelings.

Makes you 2 look like geniuses.
Claim? I HAVE evidence you are scum, skimmer. No claim just makes you looks more guilty. If you want, I'll spill my evidence after you claim, and the town can decide....
Did this evidence come from a parrot?

SurE, NoT that It matters wheN or wherE the parrot spiLled the info.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #757 (isolation #92) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:51 am

Fritzler wrote:
unvote, vote: pooky

If bj honestly has evidence we should hear this out.

yes....as I said if pooky claims, I will tell my info, then we can decide....he may be just a townie...I simply received a "clue".

BabyJesus · Post Post #762 (isolation #93) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:11 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wow, now the tell turned into a clue?!?

I'm a cop.

You want results?

this could be true. Tell me your N1 view.

BabyJesus · Post Post #763 (isolation #94) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:34 pm

Actually, scratch that. I re-read the pm. Pooky is not a cop. He killed Coron N1. I am a tracker. Which, btw, is why I HIGHLY doubt Illumina is a "cowardly reporter", and if you peruse my statements, you will see I expressed doubt and suspicion on him for that.

I thought I remembered Pooky visiting COron the night he died, but the message clearly states Pooky killed him. Pooky might have claimed vig, but not cop.

confirm vote Pooky

BabyJesus · Post Post #764 (isolation #95) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:37 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
Monty wrote:
d8P wrote:I smell a rat. Just did a search for cowardly reporter and found zip, zero occurences other than references to this game. Looking at the wiki, it takes all of two clicks to get to it. I think Illumina checked the wiki for an appropriate role and found this.

Illumina wrote:The only problem with claiming is that it makes me a major target
Not true. I think you forgot about this when you went looking for a claim.

vote: Illumina
The reporter role is pretty powerful if used wisely. If you get a report on a scum, and they don't know it, they're caught if they try to claim townie... Not as powerful as a cop, but if you don't think the scum will want this ability out of the way you're fooling yourself.
so is "reporter" like a watcher....

interesting....

bump

BabyJesus · Post Post #765 (isolation #96) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:38 pm

BabyJesus wrote:for the record, I do not believe Illumina....

Better hope the scum do not have a mafia doc, if trying to vig him is all the proof you need...

bump....

BabyJesus · Post Post #766 (isolation #97) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:43 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wow, now the tell turned into a clue?!?

I'm a cop.

You want results?

I'd like to hear your results btw....

BabyJesus · Post Post #768 (isolation #98) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:00 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok so mebbe I lied(like you've never done THAT before), heck I didn't think a shooting death would look very nice at all on my record.

I'm your vigilante, I'll kill myself tonight if you guys want(don't waste a lynch on me)

Also if I'm scum, how do you explain the fact that there's one shooting death on n1 but none on night 2? Did I just decide to quit the killing business after knocking out my good friend Coron?(ok so I had a vendetta to settle with coron, he has a long history of being useless, so I vigged him, then I didn't see any better targets so I didn't kill last night)

Vigilante is a very very unlynchable claim for 2 important reasons:

1) There's almost always a vigilante in a large game thrown in to make the game go by faster than 2 dead per day/nightcycle, there's usually not more than 1 because moderators r scared of making the game go by too quickly. Usually there is EXACTLY one vigilante, and if he isn't me, then he can shoot me at night, there's no need for a vigilante to counterclaim BECAUSE HE CAN DO IT BY BLASTING ME TO DEATH AT NIGHT(why waste a lynch on me when our vig will do it if I'm not the vig?)
2) If you guys really think I'm scumbag and am beyond salvation, I will carry out my duty and shoot myself so that you guys can get an extra lynch, I'm not happy about carrying this out but if you guys honestly believe I am a hindrance to this game, then make a note of those who believe this and I will commit the coup-de-grace myself at night and give you guys an extra lynch.

There is honestly no reason to lynch me at this juncture.

BabyJesus · Post Post #770 (isolation #99) » Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:04 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:dude I'm promising you guys that if you guys honestly think I should be caput, that I'll shoot myself.

If I'm lying then you'd notice tommmorrow and lynch me anyway!

If we honestly think you're scum, why would we give you another night to kill someone?

Anyway, I held up to my end. Pooky claimed cop, I spilled my info. People can make up their own minds. Like I said, I'm no cop, I don't get guilty/innocent.

I think we have a very interesting voting track history if Pooky DOES turn out to be scum.

BabyJesus · Post Post #778 (isolation #100) » Thu Dec 29, 2005 2:55 am

Zippy wrote:
Monty wrote:Do we want to hear babyjesus' other investigation before we finish off pooky?
i would...

why?

BabyJesus · Post Post #780 (isolation #101) » Thu Dec 29, 2005 3:23 am

Monty wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Zippy wrote:
Monty wrote:Do we want to hear babyjesus' other investigation before we finish off pooky?
i would...
why?
I'm guessing because there's a good chance you'll be a target tonight...

I suppose...I'm not a cop, so if they target me that just lets the cop continue to live, so thats good...I have to get lucky and view whoever is doing a kill....

Anyway, my other view was just Peacebringer not doing anything.

BabyJesus · Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:43 am

Fritzler wrote:
Vote: Lying Brian
unless BJ has more info for us.

nothing yet....

BabyJesus · Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:45 am

I followed inHim btw...

BabyJesus · Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:46 am

StevieT92 wrote:
Vote Illumina
I think that the doubt cast on your claim by BJ is worth another glance at, I will analyze more later.

I'd be happy voting there if nothing turns up...

BabyJesus · Post Post #793 (isolation #105) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:52 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
Actually... while I'm not exactly certain, I think I might have spotted a screw-up in BabyJ's claimed activities here... which, combined with his role not doing what a tracker usually does and logical fallicies regarding his claimed actions last night...

Vote: BabyJesus

huh? what logical fallacy? I followed inHim. Mod hasn't sent me any info yet. and what does a tracker usually do...

BabyJesus · Post Post #795 (isolation #106) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:31 pm

Vesuvan wrote:The "logical fallacy" is the bit I rambled on about you not having followed the person you think is lying about his roleclaim on either night on which you had an opportunity to do so. Instead you followed InHim last night and "cleared" Peacebringer (MAFIA) the night before. Then we have the gap in logic of allowing someone you knew had killed someone on night 1 (rare for a vig) to live to make it to day 2.

The inconsistency in the claimed ability is that Trackers do not usually get to see what someone has been targeted with. They see that person X (being followed) targeted person Y, but not what person X did to person Y. This part is not "hard evidence" as not every mod follows the same conventions, but it's another point that doesn't sit right.

I didn't follow Illumina because if he IS mafia, I didn't think they would use him to do the killings.

BabyJesus · Post Post #797 (isolation #107) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:36 pm

Vesuvan wrote: The inconsistency in the claimed ability is that Trackers do not usually get to see what someone has been targeted with. They see that person X (being followed) targeted person Y, but not what person X did to person Y. This part is not "hard evidence" as not every mod follows the same conventions, but it's another point that doesn't sit right.

So....what? You think I'm serial-killer buddies with Pooky and just decided to throw him under the bus? This makes no sense.

BabyJesus · Post Post #798 (isolation #108) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:40 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:I didn't follow Illumina because if he IS mafia, I didn't think they would use him to do the killings.
And of course, there's no possible way you would have seen him doing his reporter thing instead of killing people

This is what I meant by a "logical fallacy".

I assumed he would "hide at home" or "not be the one killing", and I would just see him doing nothing. He's out in the open. He's not a threat to the town at the moment, IMHO - as well as a likely cop target. I prefer to go off the radar and catch someone that we're not expecting.

BabyJesus · Post Post #801 (isolation #109) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:14 am

I'm curious who, if anyone, Illumina followed.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #810 (isolation #110) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:33 pm

Vesuvan wrote:Quicklynching
is
a bad idea, but let's remember that Blackberry=town => Fritzler=town and save ourselves the time and effort of chasing our tails over that particular matter.

Also, on re-reading day 1 and the events leading to Fritzler's lynch, I'm fairly sure BabyJ is lying about his roleclaim.

Are you for real???

Now I'm wondering if there IS a cult that can recruit in this game, trying to cast doubt on a confirmed watchman ? Seriously?

Please bump leading up to the fritzler lynch wtf you think I was lying about. Go ahead and bump the numerous times I voted Pooky D1 while you're at it.

BabyJesus · Post Post #814 (isolation #111) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:31 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
I'm referring to his "trap" which led to the lethal bandwagon on Fritzler.

If he knew Pooky was scum, but not which sort of scum, that would be a stupid move for a townie to make. This is beyond the improbability of a townie BabyJesus letting Pooky live to see night 2. I've seen how BabyJesus acts when he has information that indicates (and with a lesser degree of certainty than his claimed info here) that someone is scum when he is town, and he doesn't change directions to lynch someone else that readily, let alone when the "reason" to do so makes no sense.

I DIDN'T know he was scum. He could have been a vig. I didn't know for sure until he claimed. But keep spinning, guy. And, pray tell, what game was it where I had an investigation and acted differently? Hell, I can;t even remember a game recently (thats not ongoing) I even had a cop-type role.

BabyJesus · Post Post #815 (isolation #112) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:33 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Iammars, simulposting sucks, it's day 1 and if you guys really want to play bandwagon into claim over and over until we're out of roles and the mafia is laughing all the way to the bank, then that type of play would be valid. But frankly jumping on with a crapreason like that is still suspicious as Crunk.
Is this where you put off claiming as long as possible so you can get a plausible role fake down?? LOL.

I will be voting Pooky until he claims....should be interesting. He'll probably fake doc though.

bump for dumbass Vesuvan

BabyJesus · Post Post #817 (isolation #113) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:33 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Whatever. We need to get through day1 somehow and if you guys would rather play bandwagon to claim instead of looking at suspicious people, feel free to just pile on and string me up.

I'm not going to play the stupid random bandwagon-claim game with you guys because it's pretty stupid and a waste of my time, I came here to actually vote according to my suspicions and what other people do, not "hey why not?" let's wagon him!

You guys can go ahead and lynch me.

You won't get a claim out of me with a random bandwagon.

I'd give you guys some extra advice on what to do after I get lynched, but frankly a town that's wants to play randomwagon won't really need it so I'm not going to waste my time to type up any for you.

Good luck.
awesome. Refusing to claim makes me pretty sure you're not the doc or the cop, and with you now having a greater likelihood then anyone of being scum, I'm happy lynching you.

bump for dumbass Vesuvan

BabyJesus · Post Post #818 (isolation #114) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:36 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
Jabroni2000 wrote:Vig him tonight. If he dies, then he was scum. If he lives, then we can reopen the discussion tomorrow. What is so hard to understand about this?
so who should we lynch....back to Pooky?

so,since no one would follow me to Pooky, I had to move on....but he was not forgotten.

BabyJesus · Post Post #819 (isolation #115) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:36 pm

BabyJesus wrote:Although I don't like the Jabroni train at all, I'm pretty sure we can find a couple scum on it...

Like Pooky for one

oh, hey look, I keep mentioning Pooky D1.

BabyJesus · Post Post #821 (isolation #116) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:40 pm

SO, basically Vesuvan is saying I pushed Pooky all day, then gave up when no one would follow me there, then immediately returned to Pooky the next day....

Then I forced Pooky into a bad role claim, he admitted he lied, and ended up I was right.....

O wait, thats right V, I'm not "confirmed". Keep spinning.

BabyJesus · Post Post #822 (isolation #117) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:44 pm

Fritzler wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Jabroni2000 wrote:Vig him tonight. If he dies, then he was scum. If he lives, then we can reopen the discussion tomorrow. What is so hard to understand about this?
so who should we lynch....back to Pooky?

so,since no one would follow me to Pooky, I had to move on....but he was not forgotten.
Why did you claim day 2 then when suspicion left pooky and not day 1?

Seriously?
Because outing everything D1 when I could hopefully get another view the next night seemed good. Dying N1 = bad. If Pooky was scum, and I was targeted, there were TONS of clues you could back to. There was no need for a full claim D1.

BabyJesus · Post Post #823 (isolation #118) » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:45 pm

I gota say, I'm really interested in why Vesuvan is trying to hard to discredit the watchman.....

If InHim ends up being a cult leader of some sort, you can bet he was recruited. Wish the mod would pm me the result.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #824 (isolation #119) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:08 am

finally...

InHim = no action last night.

Still waiting for Illumina to check in.

BabyJesus · Post Post #826 (isolation #120) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:48 am

LyingBrian wrote:@BabyJesus...

you only know that inHimshallibe didn't TARGET somebody last night, right?.. so he could still have another role like
roleblocker
, cult leader, cop, etc., right?

Yes, I know he didn't target someone last night....which kinda rules out cop, doc, roleblocker, cultleader, etc... that requires him to target people. He could be mafia, and just not the one that did the kill last night, however.

BabyJesus · Post Post #829 (isolation #121) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:31 am

Illumina wrote:Sorry for the delay. I investigated Flying Dutchman, and saw him go to Nanook's house and watch for a while, never going inside. (Though I couldn't see what he saw). Then he went back to his house where he stayed the rest of the night.

interesting.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #834 (isolation #122) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:08 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
And, pray tell, what game was it where I had an investigation and acted differently? Hell, I can;t even remember a game recently (thats not ongoing) I even had a cop-type role.
London Mafia II: you didn't have an info role, but received very similar - but less reliable - info that said that one player killed another and promptly got that player lynched.

How'd that work out for me?? O yea, I got the doc lynched there. Gee, I wonder why I would show a little more restraint.

And how the hell would I know if Pooky would vig someone N1? I certainly would.

BabyJesus · Post Post #835 (isolation #123) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:11 pm

Fritzler wrote:So if we buy Vesuvian, BJ and Illuminai could be scum trackers from opposing groups? hmmmmm.

Opposing scum groups + vig + sk = not enough kills, guy.

And there's nothing to "buy" from Vesuvan. He's trying to discredit a confirmed tracker on extremely weak evidence. I would not at all be surprised to learn he was either 1) turned/recruited, or 2) a scum mason (which I have the unfortunate luck to have been a victim of before)

BabyJesus · Post Post #837 (isolation #124) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:21 pm

Vesuvan wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Vesuvan wrote:
And, pray tell, what game was it where I had an investigation and acted differently? Hell, I can;t even remember a game recently (thats not ongoing) I even had a cop-type role.
London Mafia II: you didn't have an info role, but received very similar - but less reliable - info that said that one player killed another and promptly got that player lynched.
How'd that work out for me?? O yea, I got the doc lynched there. Gee, I wonder why I would show a little more restraint.
Actually, you got the person who made the kill lynched - it just happenned to be a doc who had a drawback. The misplay in that lynch wasn't yours..

Well no shit, of course I got the guy who did the kill. My point is he wasn't guaranteed scum. And it wasn;t Day ONE there either.

And you're also escaping the fact that I DID push Pooky very hard D1. Bu I'm not fully outing myself D1 when the fucking doc is dead. Different games, different situations. But keep trying, I think we're learning at least one person who is scum here.

unvote, vote Vesuvan

This has gone on long enough.

BabyJesus · Post Post #843 (isolation #125) » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:06 pm

Fritzler wrote:
JSexton wrote:Vesuvan: Are you really trying to say that investigation roles should out themselves day 1 if they find probable scum? Especially when a doc is dead? I mean, he crumbed the hell out of Pooky, and bought himself another night to track without worrying too much about getting nightkilled. And, worst case, if he is? We can see who he pushed for D1 and lynch accordingly.

I really don't see what's so scummy about BJ's actions. Hell, if he'd come out D1 with that accusation, I think I'd more suspicious than I am right now.
no he's saying he shouldn't have given up on Pooky like he did, and switched to me.

Since the doc was dead N1, that is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

Seriously, at this point I'm more and more convinced Vesuvan is scum somehow.

BabyJesus · Post Post #845 (isolation #126) » Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:08 am

Flying Dutchman wrote:
Vote: Vesuvan

Very well.

do you have any info for us?

BabyJesus · Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:41 am

inHimshallibe wrote:
LyingBrian wrote:@inHimshallibe

are you trying to say you did have an action last night?!?

@BabyJesus

care to enlighten us?!?
I did have an action last night, yes. The only reason I'm not voting BabyJ is because it'd be right up his alley to try and get someone to bluff, and then trap them.

If you did have an action, then it didn;t involve you leaving your house? The response I got said I spent a cold wet night, then went home after an eventless night....

not a trap here. What was your action?

BabyJesus · Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:01 pm

BabyJesus · Post Post #855 (isolation #129) » Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:35 am

Zippy wrote:something is amiss between inhim and babyd...

vote inhim

BabyJesus · Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:42 am

Fritzler wrote:You're scummy because you stay up and kill people at night and rape puppies.

male puppies or female puppies?

BabyJesus · Post Post #888 (isolation #131) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:38 pm

Fritzler wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Fritzler wrote:You're scummy because you stay up and kill people at night and rape puppies.
male puppies or female puppies?
Both. That reminds me, there's this kid at my school who had sex with his dog, and is constantly made fun of for it. Today he walked into english, with a scar and some kid said "What happened, did your dog fight back this time?" It was quite possibley the
funniest

DISTURBING
thing I've ever heard.

fixed

BabyJesus · Post Post #905 (isolation #132) » Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:34 pm

very well.

unvote, vote Lying Brian

BabyJesus · Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:39 am

LyingBrian wrote:well BabyJesus is scum or not paying attention!.

why, did I miss something?

BabyJesus · Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:42 am

BEWARE THE PARROT

BabyJesus · Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:44 am

has LB gone back to chew on something??

:feral:

BabyJesus · Post Post #966 (isolation #136) » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:35 am

someone needs to do a list ranking everyone from most to least GG-like....

BabyJesus · Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:40 am

bitter zippy has made an appearance i see....

BabyJesus · Post Post #997 (isolation #138) » Tue Jan 31, 2006 3:26 am

is LB dead yet....

BabyJesus · Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:31 pm

Flying Dutchman wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Zippy

For being silly, swearing, to get us some information, and not the least of all: To finally try to finish this day.

Who said we were trying to lynch silly swearers? Who said that? Who the fuck said that? I thought we were trying to find scum!! I guess the fairy fucking godmother climbed out of her piece of shit pumpkin and changed the rules!!! You slimy little communist shit, twinkle-toed cocksucker just signed your own death warrant. Out-fucking-standing. I will vote you until you fucking die. I'll vote you until your asshole is sucking buttermilk.

vote flying dutchman

BabyJesus · Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:42 pm

halo freak wrote:Due to Zippys outburst he has lost the right to vote for today and so will have to stick with FOSs etc.
.

good call, we have people not participating, lets keep one of the active guys from voting. That'll show em.

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:22 am

is zippy allowed to proxy his vote?

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:19 am

I have a parrot....

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:26 pm

TSAGod wrote:
Monty wrote:Stop thE Needless, TIme wasting NonsEnse pLease...
Is there a reason for this? I hate the less than two vote bandwagons. They require so many claims.[/sarcasm]

Really - why?

i agree, it is way to early to be claiming sentinel.....

BabyJesus · Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:05 pm

Zippy wrote:hi

fos

i don't think non-bolded fos' count

BabyJesus · Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:23 pm

LyingBrian wrote:
LyingBrian in post #598 wrote:so what possibilities explain why we only had 1 kill last night? (backup doc,
roleblocker
, ?????)

LyingBrian in post #825 wrote:so he could still have another role like
roleblocker
, cult leader, cop, etc., right?
just in case you guys still want to lynch me...

this is also why i FOS'd BabyJesus... he quoted me in post #826, so i figured he must've seen the color tags... (when i originally wrote the posts i used black, and changed it to blue for this post), which is why i mentioned it in the next post to give him a hint in case he missed it...

sorry, no, I don't look inside posts for stupid hidden color tags. Why the hell would I do that?

BabyJesus · Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:06 am

unvote, vote LB

BabyJesus · Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:30 pm

O RLY

BabyJesus · Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:11 am

LyingBrian wrote: BTW, IF i do live through today, i'm going to block BabyJesus...

good call.

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:20 pm

JSexton wrote:
Anyone have results for us? We've got Illumina and BabyJesus as reporter and tracker, right? Maybe today can last less than a month...

I'm sure it will GB...

today we are

strenously voting Zu Faul

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:41 pm

TSAGod wrote:BJ...which one was zf.

d8P

BabyJesus · Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:22 pm

Zippy wrote:
vote zu faul

thought lyin brin was going to role block you...

he did not....

or he was lying about being a roleblocker...

BabyJesus · Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:41 am

zu_Faul wrote:Ha, the day before I had to lurk for a week, nice timing, scum.

you have another explanation what you were doing at the house of the guy who died?

BabyJesus · Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:28 am

Monty wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
LyingBrian wrote:@BabyJesus...

you only know that inHimshallibe didn't TARGET somebody last night, right?.. so he could still have another role like
roleblocker
, cult leader, cop, etc., right?
Yes, I know he didn't target someone last night....which kinda rules out cop, doc, roleblocker, cultleader, etc... that requires him to target people. He could be mafia, and just not the one that did the kill last night, however.
and another...

how would a tracker not be targetting someone at night?

:shrug:

I have no idea....this would be something for the mod to clarify... It's pretty ovious I AM a tracker, as I have handed you both Serial killers AND mafia scum on a platter.

BabyJesus · Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:50 am

Agent 47 wrote:
Vote BabyJ

Odds are if he's tracker, he's the other mafia tracker.

don't make me bust out my grenade

BabyJesus · Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:20 pm

Fritzler wrote:
vote: bj

sorry bj.

You want to lynch a confirmed GGRP, that's on you

BabyJesus · Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:03 am

JSexton wrote:Your logic sucks. We know there's two different mafia families. We know there's a dead mafia tracker from the Giulani family. You handed us a SK and Giulani mafioso, but no one from DeBello, who still has a tracker alive, assuming the mafias are symmetrical.

In all likelihood, you're the DeBello tracker, and giving us opposing scum was a great way to 'confirm' yourself. You slipped up with InHim and his lack of targets, though. Oops! We appreciate your help in finding scum, though.

vote: BabyJesus

SKIMMER!! If I "slipped up", then why would I lie about InHim. This was NOT a slipup dumbass. That came straight from the mod.

BabyJesus · Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:19 pm

JSexton wrote:That's an excellent point. BJ, who did you track last night, and what did they do?

fos

If you think I'm scum, and lying, why would you bother asking, You and fellow scum Monty just think I'll make something up....

BabyJesus · Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:30 am

Monty wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
JSexton wrote:That's an excellent point. BJ, who did you track last night, and what did they do?

fos

If you think I'm scum, and lying, why would you bother asking, You and fellow scum Monty just think I'll make something up....
Well, if you're town, wouldn't it be helpful for that information to be out there?

:bitter: