Oman wrote:Faraday's totally has merit. Does Mistaken on this Account reference something that I'm not getting?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Gandalf wrote:I don't get it. Is it intentional that MoI's suggestion makes no grammatical sense? Because other than that, I can't find out what's supposed to be funny about it.
It’s a take-off on the old phrase ‘mistaken on all accounts’, which means the person is dead wrong. As has been discussed Faraday has, especially of late, been known to botch posting in a Alt. Thus he’s mistaken for posting on this account (the Faraday account).
This post by Gandalf does signify that it’s probably too subtle for some of the MS audience to get …
i literally need to start a driving blog, please remind me
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
gandalf5166 wrote:AbsoLUTEly nothing. He's actually an incredibly effective scumhunter.
Really think so? Funny, I don't see him being nominated left and right for his Glork like abilities.
What usually happens, IMO -
Chess claims people are Obv-scum based on Gut.
When he's wrong it rarely is brought up.
When he's right he usually gets lynched because he's about as convincing as a brick and spends his time railing in the Dead QT that everyone is a moron for not listening to him.
Being a good scum-hunting isn't just saying X is scum ... its actually sealing the deal.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
obviously inb4 you go off like a good little puppet and get a list of games where I was lynched
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
I never complained about his ability to be read. I read VIs accurately most of the time.
I don't like the attitude with which he approaches the game nor his arrogance considering how random he tends to vote most of the time.
Parama wrote:if chesskid gets a title I might as well leave this site forever because THAT'S PATHETIC.
WE DON'T GIVE NOTORIOUS VIs TITLES THAT REWARD BAD PLAY. THAT JUST MAKES THEM EVEN WORSE.
ugh.
Can we add a "no hissy fit ultimatums in the Title Fairy thread" rule to the opening post?
Chesskid3 can be very readable if you get past your handicap of "everyone must play like me".
EBWOP: and when CK is town, people should just shut up and lynch who he says
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
Parama wrote:if chesskid gets a title I might as well leave this site forever because THAT'S PATHETIC.
WE DON'T GIVE NOTORIOUS VIs TITLES THAT REWARD BAD PLAY. THAT JUST MAKES THEM EVEN WORSE.
We don't?
When did this change?
Routine day with a dirt cheap brush
Then a week goes by and it goes untouched
Then two, then three, then a month
Then the rest of your life, you beat yourself up