Mini 1161 - Neruzian Era Mafia (Over!)

[Faraday]

As tempted as I am to vote Faraday for his questionable choices in trouser-wearing, someone else has caught my eye.

Omg. he was a prick.

I think Quilford is very scummy.

[Faraday]

Not sure why it is weird. I skimmed, saw some stuff on the most recent page from Sloth and wrote a post. I had read page 1-2 yesterday morning but didn't have time to post, so I re-read everything to see if there was anything else I wanted to comment on.

Not sure why it's weird either, just seems like a very unnecessary thing to tell us.

[Neuky]

@Sloth

You've made it your early mission to question people about wagons. I assume you've done this for a good scum-hunting reason. I can't see it, but that's fine, as long as it's important to you.

Then there's this dialogue you had with Quilford.

Quilford, same question to you. What are your thoughts on RVS wagons?

He says:

They're fine, but I don't like people jumping onto them without offering at least a semblance of a reason.

You reply:

What do you think of the two wagons we have going right now? Did you purposefully refrain from joining one?

He says:

What wagons? I suppose I should clarify; I don't like it when people jump onto wagons without saying anything else in their post.

You don't let him off the hook:

There were two votes each on Vi and Empking.

But that's where it ends. The bolded part never got a response from him, and you just seemed to drop it.

[Faraday]

Baa baa black sheep have you any wool?

Also less importantly why do you think Vi's more likely to be a townie pressurising you rather than a scumbag trying to get an easy lynch?

[Neuky]

Ok - sense of humour restored...

In short (and I know it's a bit wifomy) - surely it would be too obvious? I thought Vi would have a better target if he was scum, as I had no votes at the time he voted me. It still looks to me similar to the play of Nachomamma, who was the IC in my last game. He pressured players he thought were not high profile enough for his liking.

[hiplop]

Hiplop, why criticize looker for an IIoA-ish post and then throw down an RV?

i wasn't criticizing, was just wondering why he'd put so much effort into quoting a bunch of posts, but then say nothing.

Unvote

vote:novote

[Faraday]

Hiplop who is scum?

[hiplop]

I have no idea :\

[hiplop]

how about you ?

[Faraday]

Haha. Vote quilford. He's scum.

[Vi]

Name calling from Vi? - I'm a bit disappointed if indeed that's what it is. (We could all do that, but it'd end up a bit of a barney..)

I do that to everyone; no offense is meant. You should be worried when I STOP doing that.

Anyway, as you are also online at the moment, what do you think of Sloth's comment on the shortened nights?

You're overstating it quite a bit.

What was the point of post 77?

---

Sloth - I see why you voted hiplop; I was asking why him over the others.

---

Hey pap-rat, before I forget to ask again, what's your avatar from?

---

hiplop, who's

Town

?

---

Unvote: Neuky
Vote: Quilford

(L-4)

Blatant of Faraday is indeed blatant and indeed .

[Faraday]

Neuky is town. (no one comment on this post for a bit, thanks.)

[Scott Brosius]

Still like my vote.

[Faraday]

YES WE CAN. With baa baa black sheep as our mascot.

[Faraday]

I should do productive stuff before I get accused of being a total fucking idiot.

Looker's first post is largely unimpressive, but he's hardly alone in that respect, it's just the fact it took so long to say fuck all made it stand out.
TS is townish too. Sloth too.

[Sloth]

@Sloth

You've made it your early mission to question people about wagons. I assume you've done this for a good scum-hunting reason. I can't see it, but that's fine, as long as it's important to you.

Then there's this dialogue you had with Quilford.

Quilford, same question to you. What are your thoughts on RVS wagons?

He says:

They're fine, but I don't like people jumping onto them without offering at least a semblance of a reason.

You reply:

What do you think of the two wagons we have going right now? Did you purposefully refrain from joining one?

He says:

What wagons? I suppose I should clarify; I don't like it when people jump onto wagons without saying anything else in their post.

You don't let him off the hook:

There were two votes each on Vi and Empking.

But that's where it ends. The bolded part never got a response from him, and you just seemed to drop it.

Because people started talking about something else. The questions about wagons were just to get people talking, really, like I've said before.

Also, Vi, he just read the scummiest to me at that point. Maybe it's just noobishness but his lack of any sort of opinion about the game is weak - however, I feel like his openness about his apathy is leaning towards a town tell.

UNVOTE: Hiplop
VOTE: Quilford

Get this wagon rollin'.

[pappums rat]

Hey pap-rat, before I forget to ask again, what's your avatar from?

Ulver's Kveldssanger.

I am lost on the Quilford case atm, I just don't see it.

[Faraday]

You don't find my case convincing? What parts are wrong?

[Quilford]

You don't find my case convincing? What parts are wrong?

You lack a case.

wagoning for the sake of wagoning?

This is exactly how I wanted to articulate my thoughts on RVS wagons. I dislike wagoning for the sake of wagoning.

What do you think of the two wagons we have going right now? Did you purposefully refrain from joining one?

...

But that's where it ends. The bolded part never got a response from him, and you just seemed to drop it.

I didn't realise two votes constituted a wagon; I thought that these people had just been random voted for twice.

Blatant of Faraday is indeed blatant and indeed .

Wait, weren't you just calling someone names for sheeping?


@Scott, how have you said nothing over the course of three days?
VOTE: Scott Brosius

[Sloth]

I dislike wagoning for the sake of wagoning.

In general, or just in the RVS?

[Quilford]

I dislike wagoning for the sake of wagoning.

In general, or just in the RVS?

In general.

[Vi]

Also, Vi,

[hiplop]

just read the scummiest to me at that point. Maybe it's just noobishness but his lack of any sort of opinion about the game is weak - however, I feel like his openness about his apathy is leaning towards a town tell.

Is there any reason you're still only talking about one person at a time?
You're asking a lot of theoretical questions but saying little to nothing about whether people are actually

scummy

.

Wait, weren't you just calling someone names for sheeping?

No, I was calling Neuky a sheep because... he is a sheep.

Unvote: Quilford
Vote: Scott Brosius

(L-5)
Paragon of activity.

[Faraday]

Cases are scummy @ quilford.

You looks like nervous scum though. Are you nervous scum?

[Faraday]

Vi how much are you enjoying this game so far?

[Quilford]

Cases are scummy @ quilford.

You looks like nervous scum though. Are you nervous scum?

I don't understand the first sentence and the second and third sentences seem to have been thrown in solely to annoy me.

What was the point of that post, exactly?