>described as democratic
>implying left/right isn't
chesskid3 wrote:Spend .5B on a socialized system LOL FASCISM LOLOLOL to take care of the poor in terms of food shelters etc etc and prepare them for jobs in the military.
Spend .5B on orphanages that are run like military schools that also turn unwanted children into great soldiers.
Outlaw Condoms
spend 2B developing a chemical extraction rig and build them where large chemical pockets are
Spend 1B Building lots of factories for weapons of war.
Pass a law where 10% of the 18-35 year old population each year for the next 10 years spends a year in militrary training. 1B to fund
Spend 1B on general improvements
Spend 1B on upkeep
JDGA wrote:Drench wrote:Also, it would be appreciated if I could know what general upkeep will cost, so that I may delegate funds more accurately.
JDGA wrote:So then there were 18.
yay~
lol @ people obsessing over Cybele as if she were LLD or something
And now it's back to watching, loling, and waiting for 10B to arrive.
Research Internet to use Google to look up the Alt-code for the pound symbol
inspiratieloos wrote:I'm pretty sure I've read it in a book somewhere, by an author who prides himself on knowing useless facts like that (could also have been 3:1 come to think of it). I'm also pretty sure I've heard a quote somewhere from either a French or British PM from around the time before WW I.
Getting help would be useful, but then she'll probably start a nationwide draft and beat you guys that way... That should cripple her economy (and the nuke research) quite thoroughly though.
Drench wrote:Propose alliance with the Calamity Isles.
Dedicate $10bil (fuck yo british pounds) to improving and increasing oil mining. In particular, that huge region I have unmined need to get un-unmined. Um.
Taxes down to 110%.
$6bil on improving defence force and increasing numbers.
$1bil on the foundations of a space project.
In post 4944, izakthegoomba wrote:"The court declines to disregard this part of the statement, because although it may not contain absolute proof, it is still of use to the jury.
In post 4959, Cybele wrote:Jesus, Drench. For the most part these are kids (or young adults, etc.) and, durrr, none of them are exactly lawyers. Accept that there are gonna be a lot of inaccuracies and approximations.In post 4950, Drench wrote:my god so much not-how-law-works
Why?
Because it's a fucking game, not a court room simulacrum.
Drench wrote:it's not a case of keeping it from becoming a legal clusterfuck, it's simple things like public evidence