Title Fairy: Abuse of Mooglepower!

[shaft.ed]

because you shit all over it.

astoot works on so many levels

[populartajo]

you really like that word, dont you?

[shaft.ed]

you really like that word, dont you?

i think it sums up RC in two syllables

[Papa Zito]

you really like that word, dont you?

Vastly underrated.

[vezokpiraka]

I think Ass is as good as astoot.

[Ythan]

Reaper Charlie
Ass

[populartajo]

I think I like

astoot.

Second.

[TDC]

Relevant?

[Ythan]

I already nthed asstoot but if astoot is the compromise I can

nth

that too.

[Andrius]

RC: Why are you so proud of being so...yeah? I mean, lets look at it this way: This is actually a title about how much you ruin everything good. About how we can't have nice things because you shit all over it.

And you want a title for that?

(Thought it was appropriate.)

Seriously though, I'm against giving him a title for something that we, as a community, frown upon. That'd be like giving whoever-the-hell-it-was who posted a dead baby the title of Baby Killer.

In light of Osama's death, I'd give him

Asshole

due to Team America. That's about it.
Because Oman speaks the truth, and giving him a title that basically says "Hi I'm RC and I ruin everything I touch" is not what this is about.

[VP Baltar]

This thread could probably be used more wisely than it currently is.

[zoraster]

Reaper shouldn't have a title if that's the road we're going down.

The only reason that people seem to want to give him a title is to punish him for his bad works. That in itself should be disqualifying. It's fine to take the piss out of someone for something dumb they have done, but this feels less that and more like it's attempting to be corrective and punitive in nature.

As proof of that, when RC actually seems to want it, people turn around and don't want him to have it anymore. Understandable, but that's not really what titles should be for.

[populartajo]

zoraster
Premature Assassination

[ReaperCharlie]

No, Andrius. It is not a title that says "Hi, I ruin everything I touch." It's a title that remarks on a number of different and diverse things, namely:

a) my propensity to run bastard games
b) my propensity to not warn people that said games have bastardly elements
c) a word play where the word "Reaper" is substituted for something that I do, and am
d) the way in which I respond to criticism of bastardliness, i.e. denying it exists
e) a modified quote from a game I play and love, Mass Effect

Which is why it's so perfect.

That said, I also like "Bastard" which Flay said last page... but "Ah yes, Bastard..." ties in to who I am in more ways.

@ Oman: Why am I proud of being so... yeah? The answer is, obviously, because I don't think I am so ... yeah. Or something. Which is exactly why the title fits. Now of course, I don't expect to ever get a title, because I don't see you giving widely-agreed-upon titles to anyone else (see: Sotty7, MagnaofIllusion, Percy, ZachRulez, etc), which kind of defeats the purpose of having this thread in the first place... so why should I get one?

All I'm saying is, if you ever get around to it/even want to give me one, that'd be the one I'd want:

Ah yes, "Bastard"...

Anyway, I'm done discussing it. If things ever happen and I get it, great.

And if Oman never gets around to it, well, hey, I'm not the first.

[gandalf5166]

Only a, b, and d are all negative behaviors that shouldn't be rewarded with a title.

[Xalxe]

c) a word play where the word "Reaper" is substituted for something that I do, and am

Are we talking about Raper here?

[TheButtonmen]

Only a, b, and d are all negative behaviors that shouldn't be rewarded with a title.

Why?

[TheButtonmen]

RC: Why are you so proud of being so...yeah? I mean, lets look at it this way: This is actually a title about how much you ruin everything good. About how we can't have nice things because you shit all over it.

It's really not though, this would be

This. I think just

Bastard.

works fine.

And I would argue against it but

Ah yes, "Bastard"

was the suggested title and it perfectly showcases his disagreement about what constitutes a bastard game.

It's funny, it's mafia related, it's not a pun and it's based off a well known series of events (just look at this thread).

This is pretty much as good a titles as has ever been suggested during your reign as TF imo.

[TheButtonmen]

It helps to make finger quotes when reading "Bastard".

[gandalf5166]

b) my propensity to not warn people that said games have bastardly elements

d) the way in which I respond to criticism of bastardliness, i.e. denying it exists


you don't see these as douchebaggery at its finest?

[Empking]

Ah yes, "Bastard"

- Seems to tick all the boes to me. I have to agree with TBM on this.

[AlmasterGM]

RC's title proposition is equivalent to a suggestion of "troll" for chesskid or "VI" for shotty.

[Faraday]

CHESSKID for chesskid*

Nth Ah yes, "Bastard"

[TheButtonmen]

b) my propensity to not warn people that said games have bastardly elements

d) the way in which I respond to criticism of bastardliness, i.e. denying it exists


you don't see these as douchebaggery at its finest?

What does this have to do with the title thread and why aren't you just taking it up with RC via PM?

[gandalf5166]

Because. When people were suggesting titles for shotty's horrible playstyle, it was agreed that people shouldn't be rewarded for playing badly. So why should RC be rewarded for modding badly?