Chevre wrote:Xalxe, you seemed to be worried by my vote's presence. I think I shall keep it on you a bit longer.
...
Cyberbob, I have to agree with your stance on iamausername's Post 92. Why in the world would Xalxe want to dictate why she herself was scummy? That being said, iamausername, you need to explain why you believe Xalxe to be scummy.
Er...Xalxe actually did answer iamausername's question. Xalxe, why would you do that?
1) Okay.
2) First, I’m a guy. Second, how did I dictate how I was scummy? If I did (bear with me, it’s been a bit since I read this, remember) it was to prove a point I’m sure.
3) What question? Why wouldn’t I answer it?
That being said, I don’t get this Chevre wagon---oh, wait DGB started it. Never mind, I get its baselessness now. Carry on.
Runner wrote:Runner wrote:I don't see the cases on Gorrad and Chevre here, can anyone help?
No one wants to step up? All I'm seeing is 1 line of nothing and a big vote on one of these 2. Honestly, these 2 are the ones making some sense here.
Dear Runner,
I like you. I don’t know why. I think you remind me of myself. I’ll help you out here.
The attitude of 90% of the players here is BWHAHAHAHAHAHA CASES STFU N00B I’M EXPERIENCED.
So yeah. Enjoy
Love,
Xalxe
Katsuki wrote:Works for me.
Unvote, Vote: Chevre
Hey, Katsuki! Remember that one game...we were scum together...you posted just like this...yeah.
Post 164 of chevre’s is way too long. But I like it.
Dear nocase’s post 167&8: Please stop sucking. You live up to your name. That’s illegal.
Chevre wrote:farside22, yes, I honestly now do think my vote could be relocated. I just keep forgetting to do so, but I will not forget this time.
Unvote. Vote: Jerbs
Bullshit. Bullshit bullshit bullshit. Bullshit.
I like this wagon. Let’s see if it survives until page 12.
iamausername wrote:
Chevre wrote:That being said, iamausername, you need to explain why you believe Xalxe to be scummy.
If you say so. I'm actually not so suspicious of Xalxe any more, his response when I asked him to produce a case on himself looks more like a town response.
As for where the suspicion came from in the first place, here is Xalxe's first post in the thread:
Xalxe wrote:Kublai Khan wrote:Deadline added to OP (5 weeks).
Also, Xalxe PMed me that he will be V/LA until 1/23 (Sunday).
But since I have no school today, I'm here for a bit.
So, thoughts on the 4 pages so far:
nocase and InHim: WTF? Don't fakeclaim post restrictions. Had I been around, I'd have voted nocase instantly. I still haven't really seen reasoning behind the fakeclaims.
DGB: DEAR GOD NOT AGAIN--er, hey there, how you doin?
Korlash: Nice to see you again. I really mean that I knew you existed and then disappeared, so hi.
Dutch one: I really, for your sake, hope you can keep up with this shit. It gets crazy fast.
Chevre: is there anywhere better your vote could be right now?
SpyreX: could you explain the Gorrad vote?
P-EDIT: DGB, I'm camping 2 hours away, hence v/la.
"Had I been around I'd have voted nocase instantly" - What was stopping him from voting nocase here? He says himself that he hasn't seen any reason for nocase/inHim's fake PRs, so if they would have earned a vote when they were made, why don't they earn a vote now?
Also, he asks Chevre if there's anywhere better he could put his vote, but Xalxe isn't using his vote at all, so maybe he should remove the plank of wood from his own eye.
In terms of why not now, he’s not being as dumb anymore. He would’ve gotten the vote earlier because the PR was full of shit. Now, we realize it was “a way to start the game.” I still don’t like him, but hey, he’s not today’s lynch for now.
Oh noes, the chevre wagon is dying!
Holy crap, I read all that. So then...
VOTE: Chevre
I would like explanations on their votes from the following players:
-Katsuki
-werewolf555
-iamausername
-curiouskarmadog
Failure to answer will result in bonus scumpoints. Answering for them will result in scumpoints for both.
If there are any questions I missed, or any important points that need to be brought to my attention, speak now.