In post 2, Om of the Nom wrote:I like how I can recognize all the names on this playerlist.
I like how I recognize one name on this playerlist.
Speaking of which.
In post 2, Om of the Nom wrote:I like how I can recognize all the names on this playerlist.
In post 18, 2birds1stone wrote:MM is mishmash, right? I've never posted in Mish Mash.In post 11, Staeg wrote:Oh, if we're talking about whose names I've seen around the forums, I kinda know everyone but chrimi. And now that I think of it, I played in a MM game with 2b1s.
Interesting...
In post 17, 2birds1stone wrote:Vote: Om of the Nom
Last game, I was scum with him, he knows my scumplay.
This means that scum-me would never vote him, it'd be very scummy of me to do so.
Woo, I'm conftown.
I think Om of the Nom is playing to his town meta.
Unvote: Om of the Nom
Awesome, that's two conftowns one page in.
Vote: Psyche, for sheeping a wagon on conftown.
In post 27, 2birds1stone wrote:Sorry, misworded. I was scum, he was town.
My points still stand.
Hmmm, Staeg is now demanding conftown status? That's... that's not very towny.
Unvote
Vote: Staeg
In post 29, Om of the Nom wrote:Why can't I be the confirmed town here? I was the victim of a possible scum slip.
In post 31, Om of the Nom wrote:2b1s could have made a scumslip by trying to link himself to me using incorrect information.
In post 61, Psyche wrote:Ooh, this guy has theoretical background.
The three pages complete write now will only serve as fodder for pareidolia - the biased perception of vague and trivial stimuli as significant — that will lead to further pareidolia, and maybe something more later on.
Om's a really nice guy, but your buddying (+1, Psyche!) seems less harmless. So far, you give off slightly more scummy vibes. But I don't think buddying is a valid scumtell anyhow (everyone, not just scum, seeks political capital in this game, and often unconsciously), so I'm probably just rationalizing an emotional uneasiness with your posts, which may or may not be a valid source of knowledge.
Blah, blah.
tl;dr: I got nothing, but I'ma make somethin'.
In post 65, Om of the Nom wrote:@2b1s: No, Chrimi doesn't normally act like this, but the games I'm playing with him are ongoing so I can't say much. However, meta side his posts are lackluster and full of nothing. Discussion has already started happening and he has provided nothing to further it.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi
Also "buddying" basically means acting in a certain way to another player to try and get them on your side.
@Staeg: You basically just did the exact same thing.
In post 70, Om of the Nom wrote:Oh wow, I wasn't expecting it to be this easy.
Calling it now, 2b1s and Chrimi scumteam.
Nice OMGUS btw.
In post 117, Om of the Nom wrote:Besides how was I even supposed to know that was a serious question and not you trying to troll me?
In post 139, Om of the Nom wrote:Wait, yes he is confirmed. Mafia need to pick which players are up for nomitation for D2, 2b1s wasn't here for that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Psyche
In post 152, Om of the Nom wrote:It's a gut read my friend.
In post 172, Om of the Nom wrote:But you're both equally scummy in my eyes.
In post 0, SpyreX wrote:12.) If you do not post for the equivalent of a full game day (at least six days long) you will be modkilledat the end of the day. Further, you will be blacklisted from any future games using the BaM ruleset. Keep in mind that there are no replacements for flaking in a BaM ruleset game. Other circumstances requiring replacement are up to the mods discretion.
In post 188, Prolapsed Brain wrote:I'm not lurking. I'm BUSY.
In post 199, Om of the Nom wrote:So wait, do we want a No-Lynch (from deadline) or not?
In post 211, kuribo wrote:anyway, having read this game, I am literally happy with lynching anyone but Staeg.
In post 249, Psyche wrote:I don't think I'll be in another nomination game again, either.
NomGambit?
I don't have as low an opinion of 2b as you seem to, and nor do I find him scummy. I actually find Staeg a better lynch than him, but you know. Nomination.
I feel like settling for an Om lynch. What do you think of him?
In post 283, Psyche wrote:In post 282, Staeg wrote:I'm still here. Ish.
Aside from the obvious reason why you would do this if he's town - what if he's scum? What has he done wrong by sacrificing himself to bring his partner to 3-p lylo?
How does his sacrificing himself improve his chances of his partner getting to LYLO? Regardless of his alliance, his play has been poor. More importantly, it has been infuriating. If it weren't for his last post, I'd think he was just terrible town, but now it's impossible to think so. He is scum and there's no doubt about it.
In post 293, kuribo wrote:it was staeg's idea to nominate you yesterday, wasn't it?
In post 319, Psyche wrote:Maybe you should continuefinding scumwith your totally arbitrary vibe system, but once you locate scum, look for a real case that makes enough sense to get him lynched. The case might not be why you're voting for the scum, but it'll be why others do.