Policy lynch.
Abarat: Days of Magic, Nights of War Mafia (Endgame)
- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 79, Regfan wrote:Most of his thoughts mirror exactly what I was thinking when reading the thread and like his line of questioning and push onto Shinori, comes across as him genuinely thinking he's stumbled across something worth looking into. Also find his meta reference to WF to be a town-tell.
It's okay. You're just playing badly. (No, the fact that his mind went to WF is not a town tell.)
He admitted my read made sense anyway, so I don't know why you're pretending he looks town based on some boring superficial stuff.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 92, Regfan wrote:See, I think you're wrong and am actually pretty damn sure you are in this case. I think the fact that he noticed his post looked like WF but didn't change or amend it (Which is actually super easy to do) is a town-tell and his Shmugen/Peta-town reads are what I was thinking when reading through and something that no one else had mentioned.
I think marblescum's strengths and weaknesses are such that 1) no, it's not supereasy to do (and I don't think townmarble calls it wifom) and 2) he could do that easy-peasy and 3) the peta-town read is naïve.
I'd tell you what I think of those six but I think I'm running out of post and Mina probably wouldn't like it if he used our last penalty-free post of the Day on answering it. Let's see if I can squeeze in some quick analysis:
I think Bella is- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
This was supposed to be our last post before replenishment...but instead it's our firstafter, because I'd just assumed the replenishment VC would be posted twenty-four hours after the last one. (CES will kill me for wasting it. )
We'll probably do a cycle of "CES posts four cryptic one-liners and votes, Mina writes one scattershot wall" each replenishment. If someone asks me something tonight, I'll leave my answers in the hydra QT for CES to post in the morning.
I-Llamarble
At the moment, I'm fine with our vote on him, in part because I know CES has been successful at reading him before, in part because I wasn't fond of Llamarble's first two posts (he seems somewhat image-conscious, the case on Shinori felt stretchy, and I didn't like "chesskid is a great wagon! Oh, but Seraphim and Shinori are scum together"), and in part because we're not yet in consensus on our other suspects.
In post 100, Llamarble wrote:In post 90, Minimum wrote:
He admitted my read made sense anyway, so I don't know why you're pretending he looks town based on some boring superficial stuff.
I don't think I said that, but yeah I could see myself as mafia going 'Okay I just laboriously gave birth to a post and the hardest thing for me to do this game is going to be making a decent postcount so let's just acknowledge the wifom to make it not a scumtell and post it.'
I'll town eventually though, so no worries.
Anyway, putting lots of votes on me isn't going to help me with operation think clearly.
My other half thinks your "easy but wrong" is either agreeing that our read makes sense or just meaningless "I should respond here" drivel, FYI. Also, since this was when we were the lone vote on you, I have no clue how that would cloud your thinking.
p-edit: Llama, instead of assuring us of how town you'll act eventually, just be townright now. I know it's a Catch-22 to attack you and then attack you more for defending yourself, but it seems like you're using more of your limited posts to discuss your town vs. scum meta than to play the game.
II-MoI vs. Bella
MoI is probably town even if he's gambiting, but I think he's telling the truth. (I think there's an obvious explanation for "At least one Day Aligned player," although I'd like to hear him clarify it.) All the speculation to whether it's a gambit is fruitless when he'd just revoke his claim before the day ends if so. MoI is always afraid of dying N1, so he'd be pretty stupid to spread misinformation and have town lose the game after his death as a result.
We're waiting on a few things before we share our reads on his pool of three(besides, after all the work CES put into being opaque and unhelpful, he'd kill me if I made our slot too transparent). However, the timing of Bella's vote for MoI initially bothered me; it was after he'd dropped a huge towntell but before it became obvious that the wagon was no longer viable.
BELLA, READ THIS! BELOW HERE!
Since you didn't fully read the post that you voted MagnaofIllusion for, I'm assuming you'll skim this otherwise.
In post 77, Bella wrote:That sounds par for the course. I'll be sure to remember this when you're proven wrong.
(Fwiw, I didn't even read that part of your post on account of noticing the insult you aimed at me. Nice try, though.)
i. Why did you vote for MagnaofIllusion in your first post?
ii. You said before that you voted him without even seeing MoI's claim. Have you read it yet? What do you think?
iii. Are you voting MagnaofIllusion because you don't like him, or do you actually believe that he's scum? The part where you taunt him for being wrong seems to imply you think he's misguided town.
iv. Do you have any thoughts on people in the game whoaren'tMagnaofIllusion?
III-AGar
So just checking: first you thought Magister Ludi was scum because of his weird question. Then he explained himself (adequately, IMO). Are you still voting him because you don't think the ICs would actually be helpful? I'm not seeing how a technicality like that is alignment-relevant.
IV-OnceAndForEver
i. Whose alt are you?
ii. Why the over-the-top reaction to Regfan's post? Was it because you got a really strong town read on him?
iii. Fun fact: Faraday told me after the first Abarat game that hito doesn't like the miller role. What do you think about that?
V-Untrod Tripod
The only thing that stands out to me is this:
I'm having a hard time seeing chesskid as town from his interactions with MoI, but I'll let it slide for nowsince we're apparently frying other fish at the moment.
This attitude is one of my pet peeves. What's stopping you from attacking chesskid if you really want to? It's not like this is deadline and it actually matters who's getting the most heat from the loudest voices in the town?
VI-Nuwen
Start posting.
(Yes, that was worth a giant purple header.)- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 143, Regfan wrote:Also please don't encourage CES with his Llama read.
Really, Regfan? I'm going to be the bigger man here and just say that if you stop trying to turn my hydra partner against me, I'm sure we can play this game with aminimumof baseline references.
In post 145, Llamarble wrote:You can characterize "you voted me so I'm going to tell you you're wrong" as meaningless drivel if you like. I don't like when people vote me so I usually tell them to go away and put their vote someplace more productive.
Vapid drivel would've okay, not good, but still okay. Meaningless drivel is a scum tell.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 191, Llamarble wrote:People calling me scum:
I have decided to ignore you, at least for the time being. Scum probably would realize zero chance of lynching me anyway and mess with somebody else, so people on my wagon who know me aren't too suspicious, though they will be if they stay on my wagon once I've towned.
I can totally get you mislynched with this replenishment bullshit.
Regfan wrote:I'd appreciate if we didn't rush any lynches today though because the longer this day draws out the better it is, plus there's a decent chance that Fate/I won't make it much deeper into the game.
OR
we nail 'marble before the sun has set and we're rid of replenishment nonsense forever.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
My other half doesn't like it when I post my actual reads (although I am supposed to tell you that you should all put more votes on RedCoyote, because this will totally persuade you), so I'm just going to answer the questions I missed:
I mentioned the miller thing to throw OAFE off-guard, but to be honest, I'm not confident that it's incriminating. This was months ago, and unfortunately, I don't remember what hito's objection was to millers (it had something to do with Mafia theory) or how adamant he was against them. I can't find the chat log. Faraday asked me a cryptic question in Abarat about whether hito had ever spoken to me about his thoughts on player expectations (Something like that? I can check the cache files when I get home)--that I asked him about after the game. And I just remember the answer had something to do with him disliking millers.
That said, after the first game in this series, I could definitely see hito throwing one in, either as an in-joke or to mess with people's expectations (and OaFE is claiming to be only a partial miller, now).
OaFE, since you ignored me on millers, here's another question for you. Did you read the first Abarat game?Did any of your scumbuddies?
In post 133, OnceAndForEver wrote:I am not that new, this is not my main. Regfan is the IC smart guy, of course I have a townread on him, learn to read.
In post 136, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Minimina wrote: ii. Why the over-the-top reaction to Regfan's post? Was it because you got a really strong town read on him?
I have a question about this Mina … what was your motivation in asking this question?--
Of course I know Regfan is the IC. I was being part snarky, part checking if maybe you didn't realize the guy you were kissing up to was the IC. (to be honest, when I read Regfan's first post, I kind of went, "Hmm, he sounds tow--never mind ," for a split second, so it was entirely possible). The tone of OAFE's fawning post to Regfan bothered me, and I found it slightly scummier because he was telling us he liked someone we already knew was innocent.
--
In post 136, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Minimina wrote: MoI is always afraid of dying N1, so he'd be pretty stupid to spread misinformation and have town lose the game after his death as a result.
So Mina … how do you possibly extrapolate that line of thought?
I thought it was clear I meant you would retract your claim before the end of D1 if you were gambiting town (unless you wanted me to murder you after the game). Otherwise, the truth might die with you, which could potentially screw the town over. Therefore, people should stop wasting their breath debating it.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 268, RedCoyote wrote:Sounds like a waste of two perfectly good players. I hate that notion with a passion. If everyone played with that mentality, we'd get nowhere fast.
It's okay; we actually just don't have any reads but don't want to admit it.
In post 270, Fate wrote:"I can temporarily stop looking evil" reeks of Tailor/Lawyerish bullshit role.
That'd just ran into flavour problems, generally.- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 280, Seraphim wrote:However, generally I don't like voting for millers D1,
This stance makes no sense. Ceteris paribus you should always be more willing to go after claimed negative utility roles.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Looked over a few ISOs, and just some stuff that stuck out:
Hey, 4nxiety. I know this is late, but why did you vote petapan in your first post of the game?
Hey, Shmugen.
In post 110, Shmugen wrote:I'm torn on Shinori. Am I really just thinking he's too new and would pull those sorts of extreme reactions? Some of you have townreads on the slot, why so?
Could you be more specific? Are you calling those extreme reactions scummy?
Hey, Karen. So do you think that all the major wagons right now are on scum? You don't think there are any townies who are being unfairly maligned?
Hey, Seraphim.
In post 309, Seraphim wrote:
Your stance makes no sense. Well, it sort of makes sense in regards to other "negative utility roles" but a claimed miller who claims immediately is no longer a negative utility or is at least severely nerfed in its purpose of fucking investigative roles up. Obviously, anyone who investigates a claimed miller is stupid as fuck. So that leaves us with a player who, for all intents and purposes, is just immune to investigations and has as much chance as flipping scum as anyone else.In post 292, Minimum wrote:In post 280, Seraphim wrote:However, generally I don't like voting for millers D1,
This stance makes no sense. Ceteris paribus you should always be more willing to go after claimed negative utility roles.
On day 1, there generally isn't any commanding reason to lynch someone but it is used to achieve reactions, so lynching a miller for being a miller is pointless. Your stance seems to be a sort of policy lynch, which can be harmful on D1. Now, if the miller plays in a very anti-town or scummy fashion, he might be worth lynching anyway, but I'm adopting a wait-and-see approach.
So to paraphrase:
Seraphim: OAFE is really scummy, but I don't want to vote him because I don't like lynching millers on D1.
Minimum: That doesn't make sense. Shouldn't you be more willing to lynch a harmful role on D1 thanlesswilling?
Seraphim: Your stance doesn't make sense. Advocating a policy lynch of millers is wrong!
There was no need for a lecture about why policy lynches are Very Bad, and D1 is Very Useful for Testing Reactions. My vote isn't on OAFE right now, so obviously this slot isn't advocating a miller policy lynch.
You didn't answer the question in the slightest. Whether claimed millers are also "negative utility roles" is irrelevant. (I think anyone would agree that they're a net detriment even if they claim--millers are less likely to get NK'd and and guaranteed never to be confirmed innocent by a cop investigation--but that's beside the point.). Here's what you said about OAFE:
In post 280, Seraphim wrote:My second choice would be OAFE. There has been some awful postings from that guy and the miller thing, while not incriminating, does not look good for him. However, generally I don't like voting for millers D1, which is why Llamarble takes precedence.
So that implies that you'd vote OAFE over Llamarble if you didn't have a policy against voting millers on D1. Um...why?
(While you're at it, you could also explain how something can simultaneously "not look good for him" and be "not incriminating." The phrasing reads like subtle undermining.)- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
After some discussion...
VOTE: AGar
CES says that Llamarble is an extremely suboptimal D1 lynch, for the record. We aren't confident he's town by any means, but by D2, his alignment will be a lot more obvious. (Yes, I know that Minimum was voting Llamarble before, but that was at a different time and served a different purpose.)
Llamarble voters who get special badges of dishonour:
Agar wrote:Llamarble looks way worse to me, everything about his posting just screams scum trying to just cause confusion instead of trying to actually do anything productive.
What does that even mean? How is that an actual scumtell, and how exactly does someone go about "trying to cause confusion instead of trying to do anything productive"?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Llamarble wrote:Llama wrote:
I havent' actually read most of the posts in this game yet, but once I do I'll post a list of reads.
Yeah, this isn’t Llama Town.
Yes, I know I called MoI town for his claim, but this is a horribly lazy excuse to vote someone (omigod, you admitted that you're not caught up with the game! Clearly, you're not Llamarble town, so let me make you the leading wagon, now). What makes me paranoid is that your AGar vote was equally half-assed and opportunistically timed.
KarenDelibird, could you explain why you think there shouldn't be votes on Bella or MoI? (Your slot hasn't mentioned reads on either player.)
Flash, just checking. How much of the posting so far has been chamber and how much Nexus? Have you been discussing things as a hydra at all? Also, why do you think Llamarble is a good lynch?
In post 317, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Ok .. my problem is the ‘leading to a loss’ line of thought. No-one is going to forget that I claimed my Informed status Day1 regardless of my flip. Hell … I don’t see how everyone getting a mass case of amnesia regarding my information the second I die would mean a loss given these players are still in the game and can be scum-hunted normally.
I thought I'd made it clear, but I was referring togambitingtown MoI (i.e., lying about scum in petapan/chesskid/Bella). If all three are town, then you dying before you say, "Guys, I made up that bullshit about the Wisdom of the Spires!" might lead to us chain-lynching the three of them and subsequently losing. Which is why I'm saying you'll retract your claim before today ends if you're gambitting? I'm not sure why you keep pursuing this, or what alignment-relevant information you expect to get in response.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 323, Flash wrote:The agar wagon is still really bad.
Yes, but I think there's a decent chance he's scum despite that.
@Seraphim, I think the fully worked out fake claims part of the set-up makes that type of consideration fairly null.
As for lynching Llamarble, he said it well enough himself and I'll just point out the Replenishment PR. (Recent push on him is also based on silly stuff.)
In post 327, AGar wrote:How is causing confusion in any benefit to the town? It isn't. How does it benefit to the scum? Less coherency in a town leads to far more inaccurate reads, far more clutter to sort through and far more opportunities for a player's slips to be covered up.
It would benefit the scum but that really is almost entirely theoretical. Scum don't randomly decide to try and cause confusion and 'marblescum certainly wouldn't.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
I. Shmugen
@Chamber - I'm calling Shinori's reactions extreme, flinchy, like someone going through exaggerated motions to not fall on ice. I believe it to be scummy in this instance, but my gut is whispering that it also screams newbie and maybe I'm getting them confused, but my gut's track record on mafiascum is abysmal.
This is a Mina/CES hydra. Anyway, something niggles at me, and I'm not sure if it's cognitive dissonance or just clumsy writing:
I'm torn on Shinori. Am I really just thinking he's too new and would pull those sorts of extreme reactions? Some of you have townreads on the slot, why so?
The first sentence in that quote expresses doubt in your Shinori scumread. The second sentence says you think he might be newbie town overreacting. But the third sentence is asking people why they have townreads on him? Or is the second sentence implying you think he's scum faking it (as a newbie)?
Also, if you're "torn" on Shinori, what makes you want to vote him over your other suspects?
(A viable wagon means one likely to get the person lynched, not one on a person you suspect. Did you misspeak?)
II. Flash
I didn't ask because your hydra seemed dissonant, but because I wanted to know if Nexus had any input at all. Out of curiosity, what's the source of the disagreement on Staeg?
III. MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Hey Minamum ... you don't get to throw stones about NOT sharing full reasoning behind votes when you keep referring to how your partners wants to keep things on the Down-Low regarding your reads ... Just an FYI
Leaving aside the ad hominem fallacy (whether I do something has no bearing on whether it's scummy whenyoudo it)...no, those aren't remotely related. I'm not attacking you for not giving full reasoning behind votes. I'm attacking you for givingshittyreasons.
You quoted one sentence of Llamarble's and said he'd never say that as town. I found your reaction completely overblown given that I don't think falling behind during the first RL days of a game is that uncommon. And the timing and presentation of the AGar vote had a similar feel (although in that case, I thought your attack was more justified): a weak point with little conviction against the whipping boydu jour. From my POV, those votes look either like lazy bussing or opportunism. Hence why they break my brain when I have no clue why you'd fakeclaim.
So are you going to defend your reason for voting Llamarble as somethingotherthan shitty?
IV. AGar
In post 327, AGar wrote:In post 320, Minimum wrote:
Agar wrote:Llamarble looks way worse to me, everything about his posting just screams scum trying to just cause confusion instead of trying to actually do anything productive.
What does that even mean? How is that an actual scumtell, and how exactly does someone go about "trying to cause confusion instead of trying to do anything productive"?
Chides me early D1 for voting someone over a misunderstanding.
Doesn't understand a post I make.
Votes me.
wheeeeeeeee
For the record, you're not being voted for that post alone (although it definitely played a part).
(Also, don't provoke me. Had it not been for the posting cap, I would have been a bitch in response to "LOL, you clearly haven't read my post, you illiterate dumbass, because I explained why I kept a crappy vote on Ludi." It was pretty clear I read your posts but didn't buy your Ludi suspicions.)
How is causing confusion in any benefit to the town? It isn't. How does it benefit to the scum? Less coherency in a town leads to far more inaccurate reads, far more clutter to sort through and far more opportunities for a player's slips to be covered up.
Ergo, "scumtell". Or, more accurately, reasoning for a vote. Scumtell implies that it's something that is directly telling of scum on a consistent basis. I think this isn't consistent for all players (this is also fairly common behavior in VIs to simply post inane bullshit that only clutters the thread), but a player like Llamarble - who isn't a terrible player - behaving in this manner does not sit well with me at all, enough that I'm willing to lay the vote down there.
Myself has ninja'd me on this one. In theory, someone "posting to confuse" has a detrimental effect on the town. Butwho the fuck actually does that?
No, seriously. Who goes, "Whee, I'm going to post actively and change my mind a lot, because this way the town will be less coherent!" Never mind that this is a ridiculous characterization of Llamarble's posting style, since he's playing like a rational human being, not spamming the thread with orca pictures.
Read his posts - he keeps posting shit like "Well I know this in my scum meta but LOLOL FUCK IT!" or "I'm not actually reading this game, but HURR BE MY READS."
How does that help ANYTHING stay clear? It's pretty much intentionally trying to inject WIFOM into every turn, because when a player is self-aware of a meta, you have to worry about them manipulating it. This is ten times worse because now it's "Is he fooling us into thinking that he'd manipulate his own meta as scum, but just wants us to bite on that hook and semi-clear him?"
These are plausible reasons to suspect him, but why do you think Llamascum's motivation for using WIFOM or self-meta is "distract the town from scumhunting by being confusing", as opposed to "look more town"?- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
@Seraphim, "full PMs".
In post 343, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why is that again? I know in White Flag Mafia CES never floated anything of this sort of thought process … we wanted Llama scum dead right form the start.
If I had Llama read with the same degree of accuracy here as I did then, then I'd get him lynched. The point of being letting him live is that over time I very probably will be certain as to his alignment (my confidence in that regard is probably also more of a recent thing). Not to mention that replenishment guarantees that he can't do his town mass posting thing.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 402, Nuwen wrote:When I said "rank and file together now pip pip" I was interested in who would respond along the lines of "RIGHT HO GUV'NOR" and move their vote. The cuntface IC was all like NOOOO one or two posts after though, so now I can't even tell if people are just echoing his words/playing accordingly ("In fact I'd rather people be voting their stronger reads") or responding in earnest.
Are you sure it was Regfan that ruined it and not its inherent stupidity?
P.S. both Flash and Minimum should be town reads. You can get rid of chesskid of RedCoyote if you don't want to have too many; they don't really make sense anyway.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 457, Llamarble wrote:Hey Mina, what did being an informed townie in original abarat entail?
...it is a townie that is informed? I.e. it knows something specific about the set-up.
Unvote, vote: UT- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 465, Regfan wrote:Minimum, explain UT to me? He's really null for me.
UT lurks as scum; UT giving up on chesskid and voting AGar when chesskid was just as viable a wagon is very questionable; both his points against 'marble are silly and not stuff scum would actually go for.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Correct play is probably not to send anyone. I think it's a fairly safe bet we won't have 2 suspects we find suspicious enough that sending the least suspicious of the 2 away will be beneficial (and the roleblocker flip only adds to that).
P.S. Two-in-One's relevant ability is Transcendental, so sending them wouldn't be any good either.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 578, Regfan wrote:CES, who's scum? (PS: I was originally right about Llarmable!)
Tierce. RC and AGar are lesser suspects.
P.S. Being right for the wrong reasons is nothing to be proud of. You realize 'marble agreed with me that your town tell on him was invalid, right? And that dude is not shy about calling things he does town tells.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 592, MagnaofIllusion wrote:On one hand it's basic SK-Tracker interaction that anyone should understand that the Commexo would shoot Once. Then he 180s and says it makes sense that a Hider would hide behind such an obvious Nightkill target. But wait, OAFE wasn't an obvious Nightkill target.
He makes plenty of sense as nightkill in retrospect; I don't think that necessarily means Llamarble would've avoiding hiding behind him and OAFE still wasn't an optimal nightkill the way Quilford said.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Minimum is scum trying to keep Day from lynching his partner in the three!
Do you actually think this sounds the least bit realistic?- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 604, Nuwen wrote:The Minimum's reads are all over the place. Yesterday it was scumhunting on a wagon it was voting for too. Chalking up to hydra non-communication and want that slot to start signing its posts, please. I don't ask for this sort of thing very often.
I'll scumhunt wherever I want, especially D1. There's no lack of hydra communication and we won't be signing our posts (that'd be silly anyway; you really should have no problem telling the two of us apart.)- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
A much less flippant response to Nuwen: CES prefers that hydras present a unified front and speak as one voice for two people. To respect his wishes, I'm trying to reduce all the "wes" and references to personal (rather than hydra) reads. A good rule of thumb: if the post is too short to have a distinctive style, it's probably CES.
I'm not sure why you think signing our posts would be informative (this slot hasn't contradicted itself in reads, even though the writing style changes). Do you trust yourself to read a particular head?
In post 592, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 577, Minimum wrote:That's just the basic Tracker-SK interaction?
In post 588, Minimum wrote:Hiding behind a scum read without a breadcrumb is really dumb. I know 'marble found OAFE's claim credible; hiding behind a town read is totally valid here.
In post 590, Minimum wrote:OAFE was neither, so that's fine.
Hey look ... Minimum's contradicting himself!
On one hand it's basic SK-Tracker interaction that anyone should understand that the Commexo would shoot Once. Then he 180s and says it makes sense that a Hider would hide behind such an obvious Nightkill target. But wait, OAFE wasn't an obvious Nightkill target.
Nope.jpp. Scummy Cognitive Dissonance ho!
Minimum is scum trying to keep Day from lynching his partner in the three!
...yeah, okay. This is a dumb case and you should feel bad for making it.
Protip: catching scum isnotcombing through someone's posts to find two sentences that you quote with made-up context, and then screaming, "CONTRADICTION. SCUM! YOU'RE BUSTED."
First of all, we actually weren't expecting OAFE to die before his flip on D2. Is there a reason that you decided to omit this relevant quote (which makes it pretty damn obvious Minimum never called OAFE "an obvious nightkill target", just speculated on why he died):
(Emphasis mine.)(OAFE wasprobablyshot by the Commexo. Trackers being quite capable of catching SKs and all.)
The follow-up quote was pretty obviously an answer to Quilford's "Why the SK?"
Second of all, even if CES really thought OAFE was the obvious NK, maybeLlamarblewould have thought differently. OAFE was under a lot of suspicion and still somewhat lynchable. Llamarble might not have realized that the tracker claim made OAFE a riskier hider choice. It's possible he tried to confirm a popular suspect whom he personally read as town. (Personally, I don't think there's enough information to be sure either way, but that's beside the point.)
Third of all...how the fuck is this even remotely a scumtell?
It's just null speculation over night actions. Whether or not the theory makes sense has no relation to our alignment. It's not like Minimum claimed hider who'd hidden behind OAFE (well, assuming he didn't die), and then said something like, "OAFE was obviously going to be killed by the SK last night."
Did you actually believe that post when you made it, Magna?- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 648, Hinduragi wrote:In post 647, Minimum wrote:Oh, the above post was CES, by the way.
To be quite honest, I've stopped caring by now.
I'm not sure if I've trolled you or trolled myself.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
I'm really disappointed that Untrod Tripod replaced out, because I think his alignment would have been a lot clearer if I'd wrangled more information out of him. Most of the problems I have with him are based on things he didn't clarify.
But I just wanted to bring up a couple of points against the slot (obviously, Tierce can't defend against them, but at the very least this might motivate people to keep a closer eye on her).
I already mentioned this:
In post 129, Minimum wrote:V-Untrod Tripod
The only thing that stands out to me is this:
I'm having a hard time seeing chesskid as town from his interactions with MoI, but I'll let it slide for nowsince we're apparently frying other fish at the moment.
This attitude is one of my pet peeves. What's stopping you from attacking chesskid if you really want to? It's not like this is deadline and it actually matters who's getting the most heat from the loudest voices in the town?
Hs next post completely ignored me, never followed up on his chesskid and AGar, and just asked Llamarble a throwaway question. Given how unlikely he made it sound that chesskid was town (for nebulous reasons he never explained), it was weird to drop a read like that and never follow up on it. Furthermore, why didn't he attack me again?
I was annoyed at the time, checked back...and saw chesskid and AGar both had only one vote each on them. Chesskid actually hadtwodue to Strain. (Granted, Fate was pushing AGar, but still, UT clearly was talking out his ass by throwing out a chesskid scumread but acting like it wasn't worth pushing because of group consensus.)
After some discussion, we decided to hold off for a few days and see if he'd lurk while under no pressure rather than call him out.
I'll take Bella's word that the lurking was fairly null, but his last post was also terrible.
unvote, vote Llama
I'm still having a really hard time looking past him trying to start inculcating a scum read on Nuwen before she posted anything. Also his interactions with MoI came across to me as him trying to sneakily set up some discrediting of the claim, which doesn't seem very town to me at all.
The timing of this vote was horribly scummy, and looked like he was going, "Look, I mentioned Llamarble's name before, so I can explain jumping onto this wayon!" Except his question at the time was just a weak half-hearted prod, and a terrible reason for a vote. It's totally valid to suspect someone of being the most likely scum on your wagon out of PoE, particularly if you think she's lurking.
Also, the MoI thing seems like talking out of his ass. I just reread Llamarble. The only points he ever makes about MoI areagreeing that people in the pool are good lynches. He sure as fuck never "sneakily discredits" him, other than one post where he sort of vaguely consider others' opinions that it's a gambit.
Never mind that the "doesn't seem very town to me at all" is super oily, and that he still doesn't mention chesskid in that post.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Nice try. You aren't going to get me to continue a wall-off with you, even by baiting me.
Why? Because firstly, I'm obviously not getting lynched today. Secondly, because you're getting nightkilled long before endgame, so it doesn't make a difference what my read on you is.
But you realize that since all three are dead, it's totally irrelevant whether Llamarble hid behind Nacho or OAFE, right? So it's not muddying anything, just a difference of opinions. Seriously, you should have just accused Minimum of IIoA or something.
CES can answer the question about SKs if he wants, although I don't think it makes a difference.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 667, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 664, Minimum wrote:Nice try. You aren't going to get me to continue a wall-off with you, even by baiting me.
Why? Because firstly, I'm obviously not getting lynched today. Secondly, because you're getting nightkilled long before endgame, so it doesn't make a difference what my read on you is.
But you realize that since all three are dead, it's totally irrelevant whether Llamarble hid behind Nacho or OAFE, right? So it's not muddying anything, just a difference of opinions. Seriously, you should have just accused Minimum of IIoA or something.
CES can answer the question about SKs if he wants, although I don't think it makes a difference.
So to summarize ...
1. You'd don't feel you can actually refute what I'm saying so ... disengage.
2. You know I am Town. That I approve of.
3. You know you will not be Nightkill since you are scum but know I will so are banking on people not caring about my reads. Noted.
4. You want to keep trying to minimize the fact that CES's statements were objectively scummy and hope by dismissing things as a 'difference of opinion' it will go away.
Glad we could come to an agreement that I'm Town and you aren't.
...um...
...you...do realize there's a guaranteed serial killer in the game, right?
Let's just say I'm gettingA Storm of Swordsflashbacks in more ways than one.
If there's a quote you'd really like a defense to, point it out. But this exchange isn't productive.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 687, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Why is AGar town, Regfan?
For ISOing.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Him having genuine beliefs is not much of a town tell when those genuine beliefs aren't related to in-game events (the Bella stuff falls under this too) and the Llamarblepush is very fakeable (let's not exaggerate how genuine that sounded; I remember you being far more reasonable in that regard D1).- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 691, Tierce wrote:With Staeg flipping Informed, I could see Informed being a feature of the town as well--which would make this whole situation make sense from non-gambitting townMoI. Can I stop reading your posts now?
Didn't you just call the notion that MoI could be policy lynch gambitting ridiculous?
What makes you think either Flash or I jumped on RC as a result of the slip wossname?- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Just ignore Regfan, MattP - he's just a big revisionist meanie bo beanie. ("AGars Llarmable push still coming across as somewhat townish"ismore reasonable than the silliness you've been peddling today, Regfan.)
In post 695, Tierce wrote:I did, and Staeg's flip makes it being-an-actual-MoI-town-role more likely. I'm working through puzzle pieces, and these two match together--the gambit would be ridiculous, and it would make sense for town to have an Informed role.
You didn't give other reasoning, afaict (and as far as I've read). Am I wrong? If so, how?
Including the "non-gambiting" disclaimer is weird if you were rejecting that possibility out of hand (and your intended meaning would've been clear from the context regardless.) On a related note, MoI's claimed role seems to be closer in spirit to a Knowledgeable Townie than the Informed roles of Abarat 1 since the latter just knew things about the set-up without any reference to specific players.
Flash's delayed vote and call for me to sheep him don't really work as "hey, a slip!"; Flash and I are too cool for that sort of stuff regardless.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
In post 761, Regfan wrote:This wagon is on town. Fairly damn positive of that. Someone needs to unvote it before some idiot comes and hammers it.
Hmm. Tempting.- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
I already looked into that, Shmugen. Their thing is a Transcendental ability and as such sending them wouldn't do anything.
In post 845, Nuwen wrote:Low risk/reward is a waste of a perfectly good mechanic.
But it's not a good mechanic. This seems like the only pro-town use of it.
Death to Tierce.- Minimum
-
Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
- Minimum
-
Minimum Goon
- Minimum
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 16, 2012
Let me just post this as I was writing it when the thread get locked:
In post 891, RedCoyote wrote:Did Nuwen's vote to send Bella push you over the edge? What I'm trying to get at is I don't understand why you didn't vote to send MattP earlier. Was this a hydra thing? Or would I be way off base in assuming you did this to prevent a longer debate over who/if to send?
It wasn't anything deliberate; I just somehow didn't.
RedCoyote wrote:The ends justify the means in lynching correctly, wouldn't you agree? I mean, why even make this point? Maybe I could understand if you then followed this sentence up with, "Here's what I think is really bad..." or something like that.
Otherwise I see this more like someone attempting to position themselves in a certain way after Tierce flips how you know she will.
I mean, there's a motivation behind everything.
Don't think it's quite that simple. I think I'd have to be a bit more certain of Tierce's alignment before I'd consider not calling people out on that point.
RedCoyote wrote:Everything y'all say just rubs me the wrong way. Why is a Shmug vote pointless?
Actually, let me rephrase that. How do you know a vote on someone is pointless before it has been put out there and attempted to be sold to the player base?
Anxiety is not a high profile player; he didn't give a shred of reasoning; it's the only vote on him; there hasn't been much in the way of anti-Shmugen sentiment going round - I don't think you can reasonably expect the vote to be anything but pointless.
Vote: Tierce - Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum
- Minimum