Mafia 158: Titanium. Game over
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
You know how hard it is to find a 30kb avatar that's not over 100x100 frame that doesn't look like crap?
Well, not very. I'm just picky.
I agree with PM that the RVS is virtually useless. I've never once gotten anything of value out of it, it's best to start discussion right off the bat in a productive way. So I'll ask a couple of questions to each person who's posted thus far.
McStab: Do you feel it's best to pile on a player for a quick lynch to gain information as quickly as possible? Also, have you ever had productive results from the RVS stage at finding scum before? Details on the latter question if you don't mind.
PMysterious: Since you also don't approve of the RVS, what do you plan to do to steer conversation in a productive direction? Essentially, this is an echo of McStab's question as to what kind if scum hunting do you plan on implementing?
Eleison: What is it that you are trying by voting PM? What kind of information would you expect to gain from the wagon?
Maenara: Do you have any comments on the most recent interaction between PM & McStab? Obviously you have participated in RVS, do you have any experiences where it was a productive part of the day and not just a distraction?- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 11, Eleison wrote:Nothing drives a player to provide quality performance, opinions and information quite like being a small handful of votes from Lynching.
I can see the merit of a pressure wagon, but I prefer to save my votes for when I believe I've found scum. After all, a pressure wagon is pointless if the player is aware your vote holds no real suspicion.
I have another reason, but for the sake of obscurity, i'd feel more comfortable revealing that later.
I'll hold you to that.
Maenara: How is it that you don't like theory discussion but were perfectly comfortable wasting time with a silly pirate vote? This is why I don't like RVS, alot of players who participate in it get all bent out of shape when they are expected to actually get serious. In my opinion FoS is useless, if you really have suspicions convey it with a vote. FoS' and HoS' just show a lack of commitment to your reads.
Trying to get Eleison to elaborate on his motives is either panicked rolefishing on your part or reasonable pressure for answers. I'm leaning towards town motivations for you, because I agree that trying to hold secrets out loud this early in the game is not needed.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 14, evilpacman18 wrote:McStab are you scum?
However, these kind of questions really bug me. I mean, really? What kind of response do you really expect? Weird that you ask McStab specifically, why?
I'll have to look into you as well to see if you ask these kind of questions often as town. Because I don't really see any town motivations for such a useless question.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 17, Eleison wrote:You know what, Mae? Just for that, I'll keep it to myself. Try thinking about it, instead of blindly assuming stupidity. That goes for anyone really.
Or better yet, don't. It doesn't matter.
I don't think you're stupid. I think you're reaction fishing. I just don't see how you think it's beneficial on page 1 to openly state you have hidden motivations. It's like Mae said, if you have them, good. But openly saying as much is just putting a bullseye on your back no matter your alignment.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
I skimmed a lot of your previous games from the past year, none of them had you as scum. So that doesn't help me much. Maybe I wasn't looking hard enough. I do however enjoy your style as town. Very short and concise, I hate wall o' texts. So if you're one of the good guys I'm pretty happy.
But seriously, the only two answers you could possibly get from asking "Are you scum" are the obvious "No" or a sarcastic "totally". You gain nothing from such a question.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 28, evilpacman18 wrote:
Actually it's got some legitimacy to it. The point of the question isn't necessarily what people say in response it's how they say it. If someone answers it nervously or takes it too seriously, they're more likely to be scum, if someone treats it jokingly or sarcastically, they're more likely to be town. Punctuation, the length of the answer, whether or not they even respond to it, everything is an indicator of a certain mindset. It's nothing to base a read on, but it counts as something. I got town vibes from McStab's answer this time.
PM's alignment will reveal itself in time. No point in this now.
This is a very helpful piece of information for analyzing early reads, brings a new perspective to things.
In post 30, Jun wrote:
McStab, are you pressuring PMysterious to see if they are a PR role because they easily reveal their role? I can only sense scum motivations behind wanting to reveal roles so soon. Not sure if you have scumknowledge and are looking to gain towncred if PMysterious flips scum. IGMEOY.
Considering he just explained the reasons behind his desired wagon, I find this post very scummy. I got scumvibes from the initial McStab vote, but after his explanation I see why it could be useful. Also, did you really just say that you can see nothing but scum motivations from his actions, and then proceed to make an RVS vote totally unrelated to your actual suspicions?
In post 24, McStab wrote:HA
To elaborate. PMysterious responds terribly to pressure and reveals his role quickly. For example, in that game Evilpacman just described, I figured out PM was a PR based on his very first post. In other games, such as Mini 1361, I've found one of his scumpartners and him being scum based on his actions. Therefore, pressuring PM pays dividends. It is not an RVS.
RVS does help though. To point to specific results would be hard, because you could argue about exactly what constitutes RVS and how much it's impact is on the game. However, virtually anygame that uses it and then properly catch scum can be traced back to RVS at some point.
Although your pointed question-asking works, but I find it still results in the same end. Newbies trip up in either RVS or asking questions, and pressure is applied to determine if they are scum. Then, based off flips, PR results and associative links, more experienced scum are found.
Seriously, pile some votes on PM. I want him pressured; if he starts to fall apart, he's scum.
I like your explanations. I still think it's rather pointless to do a pressure wagon when it's blatantly obvious that the wagon isn't serious. But I'll bite for now. If only because I'm getting town vibes from McStab & Pacman.
Vote: PMysterious- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 41, Hiraki wrote:
your plan is so brilliant that it can't possibly have any flaws
it even sounds too good to be true
like
it's coming from scum
if anyone needs pressure
it's mcstab fyi
You know your suspicions are flawed when the reason you disagree with someone is that their logic makes too much sense. @_@
Anyway, your tells are wrong as well. It varies from person to person and the two spectrums are answering the question and not answering the question rather than how the person answers the question. If the person gives a straightforward answer (ala yes, no, simple one word stuff) then the person has averyslight townread. If the person dodges the question by trying to make a sarcastic answer (Well, I can't tell you that.) or completely ignores it, then the person has a slight(though greater than the town read) slant toward scum.
Also, reminding the person about the question invalidates most of this stuff as well. This is a tad bit overkill for something very minor in the end.
Evilpacman already helped explain why simplistic questions like "Are you scum" are useful for making early tells. But uh, way to reiterate his explanation in a way that makes it seem like you're participating?
Nowthisis juicy stuff for page two.
Let's go over the facts, theomoaner.
It's Page 1. You're correct. There's very little evidence to go off on, so how is this possible? Is it possible?
Could he perhaps be *GASP*
LYING?!?!?!
or perhaps *GASP*
TRYING?!?!?!
Either point doesn't matter because youclearlyidentified that both points aren't possible. So...he's scum because he's made an impossible threat?
oh....right...
we thought this one out.
Which is why it's important to hold people to their claims that they make in the early going so as they don't make townie looking posts early on and not follow up. Hence why I expect an explanation from Eleison later on as to why he has suspicions of PMysterious, and I expect PMysterious to elaborate on Page 6 what their reads are or risk being called on it.
Yes, my buddy from last game, you were perfectly clear! Flawless! It'd be impossible that someone would have a different view than us!
Seriously. What the fuck. Stop this pretty obvious buddying to McStab being a god.
I don't actually believe they were buddies in their last game. From what I read, they were at each others throats and McStab refused to believe Pacmans two-shot town cop claim that had nailed scum (which was true). If you read the actual game that was linked, you'd know that.
Why do I smell compromise on Page 1?
Compromise for what? I didn't like the PMysterious wagon at first, McStab explained to me how it could be beneficial for gaining information, so I changed my mind and decided to give it a try. I find it best to try and find town motivations as well as scum, so that you can have at least an idea as to who you can and can't trust. At the moment, I trust in McStab's logic.
In post 43, McStab wrote:Why exactly do you want pressure on me? Because I want to pressure PM?
You overestimate him if you think this plan doesn't work. I can cite specific meta examples if you so desire. Otherwise, stop trying to takeover leadership of the town with your needless banter and rhetoric, and start properly scumhunting.
Are you afraid of pressure being applied to you? If it's ok to use against PMysterious to gain information out of him, why would you be hesitant for it to be applied to yourself for the same reasons?
This helps me develop a more town vibe from Jun. As they were town in the newbie, and are mimicking a similar playstyle this game. But I'll still be keeping an eye out.
In post 51, NJAC wrote:In post 48, evilpacman18 wrote:Closed normal - the wiki has a list of roles considered normal. Any of them can appear with any applicable normal modifier. Setups are created by the mod, and approved for normalcy and usually balance by a small group of reviewers. There's no way to predict what might be in the game and trying to outguess the mod is generally a bad idea....
Thanks for the explanation, why exactly is that a bad idea?
Considering mykonian has ran games upwards of 50 players where at least half a dozen players were all Mimes, I'd say it's just a bad idea to try and outguess this mod in particular. A large normal can have a huge variety of standard roles, and I'm sure mykonian has thrown us a few curve balls on both sides of the fence to keep things interesting.
I am still in RVS, especially seeing as many players haven't even checked in yet. It's hard for me to really get a sense of who the real scum might be. I would rather FoS for now and just file away my note on McStab's behavior while I try out this RVS thing.
I don't think you understand what Random Voting Stage is. Because you're trying to participate in serious analysis of players behaviors but at the same time retracting saying "Oh, all of this is just RVS from me." So either you don't know how it works or you're purposefully backpedaling on the RVS thinking it's going to save your points from scrutiny.
Yes, why is attempting to guess at the setup a bad idea? I assume scum will be at an advantage, knowing what roles they have been assigned, and thus they have a bit of an advantage, as I learned from playing in C9++ or other formula balanced setups.
From my experience playing table top Mafia games, the rules generally say that there should be 1 Mafia for every 3 townies, give or take third parties or balancing needed for special roles. I don't know if that's the standard here, but if it were you can expect about 4 Mafia this game.
Additionally, I came up with another question. In the Newbie game, the IC recommended that lying/fake claiming is highly frowned upon in Newbie setups. What is the general "Large Normal Game stance" on fake claims, or anything else pertaining to Normal Game meta that might be useful for a new player to know?
I would most definitely lynch anyone who would be caught lying about having a power role. It's anti town at best and scum flailing at worst. In my opinion anyway.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 58, Hiraki wrote:
And I explained and even referenced his post at that point.SmashBard wrote:But uh, way to reiterate his explanation in a way that makes it seem like you're participating?
Uh, thanks for reading it?
Oh crap! He got me!Smash wrote: If you read the actual game that was linked, you'd know that.
Because the sarcastic point wasn't 100% correct, the completely serious part, which has nothing to do with the previous game, must be 100% wrong.
Holy shit, I'm fucked.
@Mod: Votecount Please--I want to know my odds
(Note to mod: NOT REALLY)
FFS. What is this shit Smashbard?
What the fuck is it?
Smashbard wrote: McStab explained to me how it could be beneficial for gaining information
Smash, earlier wrote:I still think it's rather pointless to do a pressure wagon when it's blatantly obvious that the wagon isn't serious. But I'll bite for now.
Why yes, I see how these two correlate perfectly.
how could i have missed that?
PreEdit:
You realize all I've said and all that the wiki will say are just opinionsSmash wrote:To the wiki I go!
right?
You're not really refuting anybody's points, you're just sarcastically blowing smoke out your ears everytime someone disagrees with you. Luckily for you I don't find that a scumtell or I'd vote you just for being a useless distraction.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
To Pirate Mollie: I would draw the conclusion because Hikari jumped to Jun's defense when Evilpacman tried to call Jun out as scum #1. I would not LIKE to draw that conclusion, as I actually find Hikari to be very town at the moment, if only abrasive. It's going to be hard to work with him to create a confirmed town lynching block later in the game because he's so anti-everyone's opinion other than his own. But that doesn't make Hikari himself, scummy in my eyes.
As I was trying to elaborate earlier via my phone, at this stage in the game it is going to be near impossible to lynch experienced scum. You have to catch their less experienced partners, then look at the interactions from the previous day, who was on what wagon, and try to draw correlations from the lynch as well as any information gathered through the night.
This may be a vote just based on not liking your play, but I just have a really bad gut reaction to you, Mollie. And in times like Day 1 where I don't have much to go off beyond my gut, I need to follow it.
Unvote. Vote: Pirate Mollie
To Hikari: I don't find Theo scummy at the moment because we share a genuine suspicion of Jun's play. If my gut is right and Jun is scum, it wouldn't make a lot of sense for Theo to just straight up buss a scumbuddy so early in the game like that. As he's trying pretty hard to get him lynched.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
I don't really have a tangible answer for that beyond the fact that your posts just give me a very nervous feeling that you may be the highest likely candidate to be scum. I know it's not much for anyone else to really go off of, but I just have a really bad feeling about you. I even fully admit that it could just be that I don't like your playstyle, but I don't know yet. All I know is that I feel you are extremely scummy. So I'm going against the vote I want to do (Jun) and going for the vote I feel like I should be doing (you).
Post #64 you refer to Maenara’s fade, which really doesn’t make a lot of sense no matter which way you spin it. Because either way you’ve insinuated, that he showed up with a fire and then faded out all within 21 hours of posting. There’s really no other way you can infer the term fade. Unless you someone have seen his haircut.
Post #66 Is where the real uneasiness from you started though, as you seem all too excited for that OMGUS, as if Maenara just handed you a tell on a silver platter or something, when OMGUS isn’t really indicative of anything town or scum.
In Post #97 you mischaracterized the exchange between Hikari, Evilpacman & myself. First, I wasn’t controlling the narrative, I was merely apart of trying to get us out of RVS as early as possible. Once that happened I ended up taking a step back when more abrasive attitudes started flaring up. Also, the portion of Hikari’s post you quoted as “mentoring” me was actually him referring to evilpacmans reads being wrong when it came to how someone answers an “Are you scum” question. Also, noting Hikari’s defensiveness when your immediate jump on Maenara for voting you is the definition of defensiveness, is unnerving.
I agree with post #100 when you say that town reads are useful for narrowing down suspects. But I also cannot deny Eleison’s point that openly stating town reads will only give the scum a better idea as to who they can lynch in order to demoralize the town by eliminating town leaders. That's probably my guess why guys like Eleison & Hikari are being as rough as they are, because it's sometimes better to be the unpopular town that knows what he's doing than being Mr. Super Town who's going to get shot Night 1. So if you’re the scum my gut is telling me you are, then I can definitely see why you’d be pressing Eleison so much to post their reads.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 199, Maenara wrote:We love you too, Hiraki.
But fine, the overwhelming consesus has persuaded me to believe that Pirate Mollie is probably just NewbTown. Even so, if there is a vig or something, I don't think Eleison or Pirate Mollie would be the worst possible targets. I'd honestly like to be rid of them, one way or the other, and if it so happens that they die instead of a more useful player, heh, who's complaining?
I'd be complaining quite a bit if the hypothetical Vig decided his ability was better served towards killing suspected newbtown rather than killing suspected scum.
In post 215, pirate mollie wrote:In post 180, Maenara wrote:
Why, then, do I vote for Pirate Mollie? Because she's bad for town. Like, terribad. In all seriousness, I don't get why she's allowed to continue to exist. She's slinging around accusations based on concepts she clearly doesn't understand,she was straight up lying, concerning me "fading", and she's trying to game the mod. It's just not something we should allow to continue. If not a lynch, I plead for any hypothetical vigilante or similar to put her out of our misery - I know that some might say that her flailing will allow us to determine her alignment on a later day, but all too often, on other sites, I've seen hordes of people with play so bad that one cannot possibly tell their scum from their town, because both are just that anti-town. She really is the typical VI.
And if not Pirate Mollie, then NJAC or Eleison. For the latter, a policy lynch would be appropriate, what with deliberately causing anti-town WIFOM with the hinting and all, as well as the theorycrafting. As for the former...
Look at his ISO. He is definitely not saying enough, chooses to defend a person he sees is under attack in order to establish later town-cred. When then accused of this, he keeps doing it in order to not attract attention by altering his play, but still defends himself against the allegations, before proceeding to... Vote for the person attacking his accusor, calling said person opportunistic and then being so himself?
Methink this is scum trying to establish some town cred for later use.
I know everyone hates considering the possibilities and "theorycrafting", but say there is a Vig. Why is it ideal that the Vig kill off town, even if they are newb/anti town? I'd think the Vig would want to do the same thing most nondoctor roles want to do, target scum. It's probably the best thing about being a Vig, the fact that you can take justice into your own hands and kill someone you suspect is Scum, even if the rest of the town doesn't agree with you.
Although I agree about NJACK. Just because you say "I'm not defending Jun", that doesn't 1) Automatically mean you are not defending him and 2) Doesn't excuse you to immediately follow that statement with yet another defense of Jun.
For serious though, It's the same principle as using the terms "But". You can't say "I'm not racist but," and then be allowed to follow up with a racist comment on not be called out on it. You can't say "With all due respect" and then tell the person they are a piece of crap and expect them not to get mad about it. You've been defending Jun. Period. Now whether or not Jun is really town your constant denial of your defense only to get right back into defending them is not only making you look scummy, but also making Jun scummy just by association with you.
first off why do you have jun in both your town and scum pile?
secondly, I did not "lie", to me it was a fade YMMV.
speaking of anti-town, it is anti-town to policy lynch and to ask the vig to take out a player whom you think might be town. I am noisy but I am notthatnoisy and I am seriously trying here. I haven't called anybody an idiot.
I like this post from Mollie. It reads more town than scum. So my weariness is starting to fade.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 249, Shinori wrote:In post 241, pirate mollie wrote:
eleison - nobody in their right minds would make such a spectacle of themselves if they were scum IMO. his scum buddies would be telling him to shut up by now cos he is drawing a lot of attention to himself and he really stands out.
You obviously don't know elie.
He does this stuff often, as in get attention on himself, and has done it as scum. Think this is his first game on Mafiascum so I wouldn't put it past this happening here.
Regardless I think from what I've seen from this meta, and granted I have to admit it's been mostly newbie games I've read, is that aggressive, standoffish play is rewarded here with town reads, which for the most part tends to be accurate. There's a lot of competitive people on this forum, so when someone is being overly aggressive one of two things happen.
1) Either they are so distracting and anti town that the majority of the town lynches them due to perceived over defensiveness, from which they usually flip town and the games proceed as normal.
or 2) People recognize that scum seldom take the risk of starting out as the lone wolf because situation #1 sometimes happens, so it's a risky scum gambit. And people begin to recognize that the aggressive player is just town trying really hard to win at any cost.
You may know Eleison better than I do, but at the moment I'm feeling like Eleison is edging on situation #2. Especially since they've cooled down quite a bit since their first flurry of put down posting.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Wow Shinori...you not only are basing your vote on Eleison on previous meta, but previous meta from a different site which may or may not reflect how players are expected to play here on Mafiascum?
Definition of lazy scumhunting.
Unvote. Vote: Shinori.
What are non-meta reasons why you believe Eleison is scummy?- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Based on individual ISO’s of each player who has posted thus far in this thread, so some of my gut reactions to certain posts at the time of their presentation may not be the same. I apologize ahead of time if this ends up getting long. If I get hard pressed for time I may split this up into reads concerning 3 players at a time going down the list because I want to avoid walls as much as possible so that people can easily read what I have to say.
But before I start, I want to bold this statement.Everyone needs to stop bringing up bad “low hanging fruit” arguments to defend themselves from suspicion.You are not getting any sympathy from me. This is my second SECOND game of Mafia on Mafiascum. The first being Newbie 1864, in which I was scum, and won. Go check it out if you want meta on me, and I will answer any questions you have pertaining to my play. This is what a responsible player is going to do in this game. Address concerns against them and, if town, will help redirect suspicions towards those who are actually scummy. I’m not going to fall to my knees and plead for mercy because I’m “low hanging fruit”. If I get heat on me, I suck it up and fight back as best as I can. That’s what you should all be doing too. Not falling back on “Sniffle, I’m just a newb and you’re picking on me! Sniffle sniffle”.
Dividizzle:
Post 231 was bad, but he retracted it so it tells me he’s more leaning towards new town than scum trying to cling to something that isn’t there. I like 281, as he sums up pretty nicely why NJAC is a prime suspect for scum. The wishy washiness from NJAC is bad, more on that later. I would like if he himself elaborated a bit more as to why he believes McStabs ISO is sketchy in 314, as it would help get a better idea what Divi’s state of mind is at this point. But otherwise…
Read So Far: Dividizzle is tizzle to the fe fye fo fizzle if you catch my drizzle? He hasn’t posted much. But from what he has I can tell he’s trying.
I have to go to my nieces first birthday party at the moment. But when I get home I’ll be finishing up as many ISO’s as I can. Eleison & Evilpacman are next.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Eleison:
Looked really antitown in the beginning trying to be Hiraki Jr, but Post 79 pretty much summed up why he was doing what he was doing in the early game, being abrasive in order to get reactions going.
Also, I want to bring to the front once again that it’s been stated HUNDREDS OF POSTS AGO that trying to guess alignment based off of previous meta when you’ve only shared 1-2 games with a person is going to get us nowhere. This even goes for Shinori & Eleison, you guys have both proven your point that the other player is super scummy all the time and likes to pull attention to themselves regardless of alignment. So unless you have an actual non-meta based case on one another, cut it out.
I understand why Eleison doesn’t want to share town reads, it makes sense if you are playing this game on your own and don’t know who you can or cannot trust. But I will say that I do not share that philosophy, as openly stating reads of who you think is town/scum is crucial in the early going as it helps us identify connections between players based off of flips that happen later.
I think there is at least one opportunistic scum on the Eleison wagon at this time taking advantage of an easy situation because it’s so simple to just say “He’s hiding information, must be scum!”. Or the much more ridiculous “He agrees with Mae, he must be scum!”. Unless you have a scumread on Mae, you can’t accurately say that Eleison is scummy for agreeing with him.
Post #147 definitely exposes Telo as scummier than most. More on that in the Telo ISO.
Posts #263 and #269 utterly annihilates Shinori’s case against him based on meta. So this, more than anything, solidifies my read on Eleison.
Read at this time: So Town he might as well be a metropolis.
EvilPacman:
I had a pretty solid read as Town for EvilPacman in the beginning as he was active, similar demeanor from his most recent town games and was able to answer my questions quickly and effectively. Post #78 is bad. Seems like he was trying to backtrack into going “Oh by the way, theo is scummy”. Probably leaning more null than scum on that, but it reads bad. He says he’s conservative with his vote, but he goes very quickly from not feeling Theo is scummier than Jun, to voting for him based on very little pushing from Hiraki, to unvoting him again and going back to Jun. Since then he’s went nearly a hundred posts without saying a thing of value. Which has really shaken my early town read on him.
Read at this time: Null leaning Scum that’s focusing too hard on early RVS play by Jun.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Of course I have more reads, I am in the process of trying to complete ISO's 3 at a time and it's really frustrating when my laptop keeps enacting a blue screen physical memory dump before I have a chance to save my progress.
But to quickly answer a question, no I am not considering triangulating with anybody. That would be too dangerous this early in the game as that means you have to have a great level of trust in someone you have nothing more than a gut read on with no evidence to back up your claim that they are town. Trying to triangulate this early is dangerous because it gives scum the chance to "confirm" themselves by just looking like trustworthy town and being apart of a block of players that won't lynch each other because they are too busy trying to lynch everyone else that looks scummy to the group hive mind.
Trust me on that one, I was scum in my last game, and nobody in the world who thought I was scummy stayed alive long enough to make a case on me. Nachomamma, Bodean and Myself in some ways created a town "block" and started voting people based off of bad process of elimination logic because gee, nobody in our protown block can be scum, right? When I was scum the entire time. Don't trust anyone to triangulate with you unless you are 100% sure they are town, it will be your downfall.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
To Pirate: If the goal of triangulation is to not form a block and rather just create conversation between three people, why can you not just...do that naturally throughout the game? I guess I'm just not understanding the purpose behind having a public/private 3-way conversation when there's 13 other players on board, most of which are guaranteed to be town that you're leaving out of the group scumhunting.
So Hiraki, you vote for Pirate Mollie just because their wagon is gaining traction? Not because she's like, your top scum read or anything? Weren't you the one pointing out towards me that you "Smell compromise on page 1?". More on that once I get to your ISO. But seriously, how do you brush away that kind of hypocrisy?- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Ok this process is taking forever and a day and it doesn’t seem to be helping anyone. I’m just going to read the ISO’s and post general thoughts down here, because I’m creating walls and I hate walls. I need to just trap my thoughts down into short, concise bullet points as to what my reads are.
Dividizzle: New Town. As far as I can tell I see genuine scumhunting coming from him, even if it’s not going anywhere.
Eleison: Town. His logic makes perfect sense, even if I disagree with it. Disagreements do not equal scumtells.
Evilpacman: Null. Leaning Scum. Started out really strong and has dwindled off into obscurity.
Hiraki: Lone Wolf Anti-Town. Isn’t contributing to the overall scumhunting process. Doing his own thing, active lurking. Not very useful at all, but not scum in my eyes.
Jun: I’m thinking town at this time. His reasons for town/scum reads are horrible, and wanting to guess the set up and wonder if it’s ok in this meta to lie about your role is also quite scummy. But I’ll take it as new town trying to figure out how Mafia works here for now.
Maenara: His playstyle is very annoying. With the whole kiddie talk and “me no likey” all over the place. Can’t decide if that’s distracting scum or distracting town. But from the actual content of his posts, I’m gonna say town. He points out the inconsistencies in other peoples arguments without necessarily trying to push cases on people like scum would.
McStab: I really liked his early game strategy to get discussion going by trying to form a PM Wagon. But since then he’s dropped off the face of Mafia. He has said it’s due to school, and I get that. But his first worthwhile post back is a random off the wall case against Dividizzle? From my previous game reads that had McStab in them he seemed to be more of a town leader and very aggressive scum hunter. This time is not the case, so I’m gonna say scum.
NJAC: Null leaning town. After rereading both his and Jun’s ISO’s I can see that his defense of Jun’s play is genuine. I still don’t like his insistence that he wasn’t defending Jun, but at the moment his ISO isn’t looking to me like opportunistic scum.
Crap...I'm failing really hard at making my thoughts concise. Fuck it, more ISO's coming your way.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Pirate Mollie: This ISO confused the hell out of me because there are several posts that I did not notice during my standard read through of the thread. He seemed horribly stuck on my listing 3 players as “low hanging fruit” for like, half a dozen posts and just wouldn’t let go for a long time. I guess I’m glad I missed those posts, because I’d probably be tunneling really hard on her right now if I saw those posts and how much she’s whining that I thought three new players were scummy. Considering I’m new myself. Objectively speaking, I want to say Pirate Mollie is town. The only real interaction I see that raises red flags for me is her desperation to get Slandaar to participate in triangulation, with Slandaar distancing very heavily away from Pirate. Which at a glance looks to me like Mollie is desperately reaching out to scumpartners to trick the town into believing that they are “triangulating” as pro-town dudes working towards the betterment of the town. But Slandaar doesn’t want to get caught up in any sort of connection with Mollie lest one of them get outed early on. Everything else makes me want to say town, but this whole desperation triangulation strategy is reading scummier and scummier to me as the days go on.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
PMysterious: A big fat null until more posts come out from him. Seriously, there is nothing on here that let’s me know a thing. If somebody makes a case of lynch all lurkers I’d suggest PMysterious so far. But other than that I got nothing.
Shinori: Probably the King of Anti-Town. Can’t say scummy at the moment anymore. Mostly because I think at least a new scum player would replace out for the sake of his team. But he actively, annoying tells us how much he has zero interest in this game and all he’s going for is trying to Eleison lynched. I take it back Eleison, Shinori is Hiraki Jr.
Slandaar: In isolation he seems like the most pro-town person to me thus far. His problem mostly at this point is Pirate Mollie. This is by far the most intriguing situation to me. Pirate Mollie seems town, but is buddying hardcore to Slandaar. Slandaar seems town to me, but asks a lot of questions without providing a lot of answers or elaborations on his own reads. A lot of this could be solved with a Pirate Mollie flip. Depending on Mollies alignment, that’s going to ultimately determine whether or not I believe Slandaar is town or scum.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Telo: Null to Anti-Town. Hasn’t posted much of anything. What he has posted is distracting. But his whole “It would be cool to randomly guess scum” seems like a new town post to me. Time will truly tell what I think of Telo.
Theomoaner: Seemed really scummy in the beginning due to a lot of weak scumhunting. But the more the day has gone on the more effort I see coming from Theo, being one of the only guys who’s caught a lot of slips from Jun and Pirate Mollie and stuck to them. That doesn’t change my reads on Jun or Mollie, but it certainly allows me to trust that Theomoaner is town.
Thurhame: Currently in the process of getting replaced. But regardless, his early wagon hopping on Theo and then pretending like every little thing he did was scummy seemed to be like the definition of fake scumhunting. This might be a bias read due to my read of Theo being town, but until we hear something from his replacement then I’m afraid I believe this slot is scum.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
So to paraphrase everything into one simple list, here's my reads.
Pretty Sure Are Town:
Dividizzle.
Eleison.
Hiraki.
Jun.
Maenara.
Shinori.
Theomoaner.
Nullreads:
Evil Pacman (Leaning Scum)
NJAC (Leaning Town)
Pirate Mollie (Leaning Town)
PMysterious (Just Null)
Slandaar (Leaning Town)
Telo (Leaning Town)
Pretty Sure Are Scum:
McStab.
Thurhame.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
I'm pretty sure you don't view anybody in this game as having any credibility at all. It's ok little Hiraki, you keep playing you're little one man mafia game like you're the only one who matters. Run along now little Hiraki, you're doing such a good job! Yes you are! Yes you are little Hiraki! Don't let those mean little mafia players force you to be useful, you're your own special little snow flake. Keep it up little guy!- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
You don't have to worry about this newbie "getting you" little Hiraki. You're a useless anti-town distraction, but you're town all the same. It's ok little Hiraki, I'll work twice as hard to make sure you don't have to do a single thing but bitch all game long. It's what you're good at after all.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 362, Hiraki wrote:Yes you got me again
I must be bitching in my posts rather than proving a point by being a sarcastic douche
In addendum, do not associate me with the word little.
I've had real life problems with that word, thanks. So I'm going to ask you to end it there now.
My apologies. I certainly do not want to bring up bad memories for you. So I am sorry for referring to you as little.
I am sure you will understand out of respect for this game that I will simply ignore what you have to say unless I see something of actual content. Because obviously our interactions are going to prove to be a detriment to actual scumhunting from now on.
In post 364, Maenara wrote:Smashbard, stop it.
Hiraki may be bitchy all around, but you are doing personal attacks on specific players. That's not cool. Attack people's playstyles as much as you want, but don't descend to this level. That sort of behaviour is far more childish than any "Me no likey" or grouchy snarkiness, and it goes against the spirit of the game. Yes, we need to be able to get people emotional, to make them slip up, but there are limits to everything. With all due respect, I think you've overstepped that particular threshold.
...and as for Eleison making sense; are we even reading the same game?
Understood. It is perfectly ok for people like yourself, Hiraki, Eleison, and others to make derogatory attacks against new players, about how we know nothing and are useless distractions, but not ok when one of us actually fights back against your abrasive and offensive play. Duly noted.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Since nobody else feels it's important, I'd like to point out that Pirate Mollie is at L-2.
Speaking of which.Unvote Shinori.
Mollie, if you are lynched and you flip town, who are some of your biggest scum reads at the moment? Are they or are they not currently on your wagon?
My list has you as null leaning town. So think of it as a dying wish. Who would you prefer we look into the most if you die today? Of course if I'm wrong and you flip scum none of this will be relevant. But I'm of the suspicion that your lynch at this time is based on policy and not anyone really feeling you're scum.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
To Pirate: Maenara answered that they had Jun in both scum and town piles because they didn't have a solid read and didn't know what to think of Jun. Post #184. Seems so long ago doesn't it?
As for my vote on Shinori, I didn't feel it was important to immediately unvote Shinori until all of my ISO's were finished. I only just started getting a town read on them after I read his ISO. Otherwise my vote before my reread was legitimately trying to pressure Shinori into giving better answers as to his Eleison suspicions. It failed horribly. But eh, not all pressure votes are successful. That's why I said near the beginning of the game I prefer to just vote for who I believe to be scummy. Because I suck at applying mere pressure votes.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 379, theomoaner wrote:In post 371, Smashbard wrote:Since nobody else feels it's important, I'd like to point out that Pirate Mollie is at L-2.
Why is this important Smashbard?
Do I really have to explain? I mean, I think it would be obvious. If you put someone close to a lynch it's only pro-town to let people know how far away they are from a lynch. That way anyone who is paying attention is aware "Hey, this person is this many votes away from death". That way lazy scum can't just quick switch and pretend like they didn't know Pirate Mollie was going to be lynched from their vote. Setting the proper expectations helps ensure a everyone is on the same page and prevents quick lynches without explanation.
Lots of self contradictions, such as this...
In post 241, pirate mollie wrote:...I am not trying to paint myself as a newb if anything my confidence is probably off putting to some people...
Why does a town player need to change their position/views or anything to the point where they have to contradict themselves?
The total kicker comes here though. I'll re emphasize it just to make it clear.
Changing position is fine so long as you are convinced by evidence that someone else presents to you that proves that your current state of mind is wrong. But in this case that didn't happen, and the whole "I'm a newb, but not a newb" contradictions that Mollie presented were certainly scummy to me at the time.
In post 336, pirate mollie wrote:
You name what amounts to a list of the newest players in the game here in your scummiest target list. Yet here we have a completely different list, and interestingly, two of the players on your original list haven't posted since. So just why are Telo and Thurhame not not scum anymore?
in post #241 I am clearly stating my approach to the game which is that I am starting from whom I think is town and work from there.
the people that I mentioned are not in my town pile so yes I want some engagment with them so I can get a read.also I think it is just good town play to look at the people who are not as active and are not asking to be subbed out cos you will often find scum there.
not sure what problem you are with this except that you seem to think that if I say newbs are low hanging fruit and then I soft fos a newb is a contradiction, when it isn't since I am not directly going after them, I am SOFT FOSSING THEM.
when I read posts I look for the motivation behind the posts (scum or town) and to see if it is consistent with the flow of the game.
(emphasis added)
I was mostly interested in why two players, who had not posted since Mollie had them as scum targets, were no longer scum targets. They haven't done anything to clear themselves after all, because they haven't posted (in case you missed that bit). This is either lazy scum hunting or fake scum hunting. Go on read it."...the people that I mentioned are not in my town pile so yes I want some engagment with them so I can get a read."
Up to this point I agree with you.
They haven't posted so why did she not still want to "engage" them? If that is the case then why have they gone from her "soft fossing" (whatever that is) or scum list?
But this part confuses me. You either are mischaracterizing the post you are quoting or you made a typo somewhere. Because here you are asking why Pirate Mollie would not want to engage Telo & Thurhame, when Pirate Mollie explicitly says that she would like to engage Telo & Thurhame to get a read. So I'm going to need some clarification here as to the kind of point you are trying to make.
Next is this..."I think going after newbs is a scumtell but I do not think that everyone who does it is scummy, town does it a lot."
This is nonsense with added vitamins. What it says to me is... "I'm not scum for going after newbs but anyone else who does is scum". It's just a massive self contradictory cop out, and is either only there because
1. Mollie is scum and is trying to backtrack on a fake scum hunt list. We obviously nedd to lynch
2. Mollie has been using "I'm a newb, stop picking on me" as smashbard pointed out, and the serious question then becomes why?
Sorry, that ended up being longer than I thought it would.
This is probably the most damning piece of evidence against Pirate Mollie. Because you cannot say going after newbs is a scumtell is town does it a lot. A scumtell by definition, tells you this is something scum will do, and you use it as a tool to out scum when they do it. So by saying town does it a lot, pretty much invalidates going after newbs as a scumtell at all. So it does very much look like Pirate Mollie was trying to phrase it in a way that says "It's ok for me to FoS all of you for going after newbs, but I can have newbs on my scumlist because I'm well...me?"
A lot of slips throughout today. Many of which I'd be willing to excuse as just speaking in a stream of consciousness and not necessarily paying attention to every detail of ones arguments, so contradictions may happen. But I certainly can't deny that a Mollie flip is probably going to give us the most amount of information at this point because Mollie has had interactions with just about everyone.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 386, Slandaar wrote:In post 382, Smashbard wrote:That way anyone who is paying attention is aware "Hey, this person is this many votes away from death". That way lazy scum can't just quick switch and pretend like they didn't know Pirate Mollie was going to be lynched from their vote.
Only applies when she is town.
But...
She isn't town.
?
Actually it also applies if Mollie is scum. Especially considering scum who may not be on the wagon and quickly jump onto the Pirate Mollie wagon as a buss to try and get towncred. Players are already leaping to the Wagon with little to no explanation. With so much as an unvote, vote two liner post, such as yourself. Hiding behind the wall of suspicion that Pirate has already built for herself doesn't immediately excuse suspicion from anyone on her wagon if she flips town. I don't like the feel of this lynch, but until McStab posts or Thurhame gets replaced I don't have any better suggestions.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 409, Jun wrote:In post 405, theomoaner wrote:I had Thurhame pegged as scum when he was in that slot, but he may have just been a bad player (or too busy like he said, stranger things have happened).
In post 407, dividizzle wrote:Looking at Thurhame's iso, he does focus pretty hard on two specific lynches without providing really any rationale. They both also happened to be fairly popular.
Guys, Thurhame is town. Believe me. We have bigger fish to fry at the moment. Like mollie and PMysterious.
This doesn't sit well with me at all.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Look guys, activity is pretty much faltering at this point. Nobodies coming up with any better ideas and what people are coming up with is either rehashing what's already been said about Pirate Mollie or grasping at straws at the Thurhame player slot.
I see a lot of complaints about lurkers. I don't want to suggest that we start lynching some of them because I'd rather lynch scum for sure. But guys like McStab and Evilpacman are normally very active, concise pro-town guys when they are town. They came into this game with a flurry, and now have done virtually nothing. I am down with either lynching them or piling on some pressure to force some content.
Guys like PMysterious, Telo, Shinori and NJAC are getting away with very little content. We can start putting pressure on one of them, but I don't want to start the whole "Low Hanging Fruit" fiasco again so maybe it's better to get rid of Pirate Mollie so that crappy defense can no longer be stated and derail the town.
Eleison & Maenara haven't posted in a while. At least, not anything that's helping moving the game forward.
The problem I'm running into with with is that we'll never get guys like Hiraki, Theo, Mollie, Slandaar and Numbers (the guy with numbers for a name) to come together to agree on anything. Dividizzzle and Jun seem to be the only ones who look like they are ready to compromise for the sake of moving the game forward. And even if we could get all of these people to come together for a lynch mob you only have 8 votes,that's including myself. Not enough for a lynch. But it may be enough to scare some people into participating so that we can get the game moving again.
When half the game is lurking, there's a problem. I wouldn't be surprised at all if most of the scum is hiding in the lurker pile because if anybody called them on it they could just jump in and say "What about these other half a dozen people who haven't posted?" and get an easy escape from suspicion and the need to be active. So let's lead by example.
Vote: McStab.
Evilpacman at least has an excuse saying he's got school work taking up his time. McStab on the other hand just continually prod dodges and then came in with a bad case on dividizzle that gained even less traction than the starting PMysterious wagon. This is very different from his normal town play that I have read, as he is normally very aggressive whether or not he is under suspicion. Also, someone else noted that he's been posting in other places around the board, but not here. I'm sure he'll come back in a day or two letting us know that he's gonna have to some catching up. I say we give him some incentive to read a little faster.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
I'd love to vote Pirate Mollie just to get the ball rolling and generate some interest in this game. But I feel Mollie is town, and if I'm going to willingly lynch someone who I think is town, I'd rather it be a lurker. So I guess we just stand here and wait for someone to change their minds. I've got no better ideas that doesn't amount to just "lol policy lynch". So what about you guys?
If someone can convince me that Pirate Mollie is really lying scum rather than just stream of consciousness town, I'll switch my vote. Until then, I guess I'm coasting like everybody else.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
My suspicion of you is in the specific phrasing you used. "I won't use my insanity as an excuse for scumslips". Town doesn't plan on making "scumslips". If you mean what you say and stand by your reads and suspicions you shouldn't have to have back up excuses for scumslips. You shouldn't be reading them as scumslips at all. Because if your logic is sound and you believe in what you are saying you will fight accusations of scumslippage and explain why what you said is indeed, not a scumslip.
The admission that you already know ahead of time that you're going to make scumslips pretty much by definition means that you will make a slip that will implicate you as scum. Which tells me right out of the gate you are trying to blend into the town, but already know you're going to slip up and make mistakes in your logic. Which reads to me like uncomfortable scum who is trying to just smooth over any mistakes he makes beforehand by jokingly saying "I won't use the insanity defense". What kind of defense will you use? Why do you need a defense at all? Maybe because you know you're scum.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 474, Jun wrote:
Hmm, good point. I retract my town read on Thurhame/numbers guy. He can be an unsure read for now.
Serious question here: What does it take in your eyes for someone to be declared scummy on Day 1? I'd like everyone to answer this question. Because your reads, Jun, as well as those of Dividizzle, NJAC and Telo, have been confusing me for a while now.
Players can making normally damning slips, that in almost any other environment would of gotten them lynched by now, and your reads don't seem to change much. Scumslips cause town reads to just become null instead of scum. Analysis that is late to the game like Telo's would be slammed as not paying attention in most games, but some of you read it as Pro-Town points.
I'm trying to gauge why some of you are being so...I dunno what's a nice word for it...difficult to work with? Pirate Mollie expressed earlier about wanting to form Triangulation teams but I really can't imagine triangulating with most of you people because I could dangle a Scum PM Role of another player in front of you and it feels like you'd still drag your feet to the wagon.
Cautiousness is fine, it's a natural town reaction that we all feel because we are not sure what's going to happen on the flip, and sometimes we don't want to see what's behind curtain #2. But overcautiousness, fence sitting, stalling and low confidence in your own reads is only serving to stall the game and allow half of us to lurk like crocodiles.
Some of those things can be scumtells, but for now I'm really just trying to get some of my fellow newbies to throw me a bone here, what's it going to take for us to come together in agreement on a lynch?- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
Spoiler Tags for giant wall post of annoyingness.
Spoiler:
TL;DR because I hate walls:
1) Your analysis would normally come under scrutiny because it's dated, as there really is no more traction to the Pirate Mollie wagon. So a lot of your case will be dismissed by most players because a lot of the experienced guys are already jumping on Numbers, and they want arguments for/against a Numbers lynch, not Pirate Mollie.
2) Fence sitting is where you don't dedicate a real opinion that helps to advance the game. When town is infighting over whether or not Player A or B is scum, and you go off in your little world and say Player F is scummy and lone wolf vote him, you're not contributing to advancing the game.
and 3) I'd love to lynch PMysterious, as well as any other lurkers this game. But you'll almost never find a set of players willing to lynch a lurker. Because there are more active players in the game who have more material to go off of, and it's easier to make a lynch on a scummy player than a lurker. Hence why scumlurking is such an effective strategy. Nobody will ever lynch a lurker unless they absolutely have to.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
In post 534, 10506670 wrote:In post 529, theomoaner wrote:The thing that is really baking my noodle here is that in the games I have played on this site I have hardly seen mention of the term scumslip, yet in Number-dude's two games on this site there is much disscusion of the term. I'm trying to decide whether this is why he doesn't understand the term, or whether it was clear from the references in the newbie game's as to it's meaning.
I think in one of his newbie games (1244) the meaning of "scumslip" is madeveryapparent, so I don't see how he would really have a different meaning from everyone else.
Oh no, I just did meta
Seriously theomoaner? This isn't intended as an attack on you personally, but you really need to pay a bit more attention to exactly what you're condemning. I had a general idea of what a scumslip is - it's something that seems to implicate the user as scum. If you had actually read my second newbie game (1253), you would have realized this from the Conman "scumslip". But my point is that my previous definition differed in theslight nuancethat both town and scum can scumslip*. It's a slight difference, but it really makes a difference in light of the accusations thrown at me.
Speaking of which, Slandaar, you are not responding at all to my numerous clarifications. You did, however, find the time to question Mollie about her unresponsiveness on me. I'm not saying that that's an invalid point, but are you /ignoring everything I've been saying?
*indicates my previous definition
You're still confusing scumtells with scumslips. Scumslips are when you say something that implicates you as scum. Scumtells are actions that you do that can be construed as scummy.
Here's some wiki entries for you so that you may finally understand that you are wrong, that you can't just change definitions to your liking to weasel your way out of suspicion, and hopefully you just surrender yourself as scum and allow us to move on to start finding your scum partners Day 2.
http://wiki.scumhunt.com/index.php?title=Scumslip
Scumslipping is something you say that gives you up as mafia, 100%.
http://wiki.scumhunt.com/index.php?title=Scumtell
Subjective tells that what you do is a scummy action. These are the things that town and mafia can both do.
Town and mafia do NOT scumslip. Only mafia scumslips. So anybody who's still stuck on this line of reasoning can be at the top of my scumlist. Be warned.- Smashbard
-
Smashbard Goon
- Smashbard
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: July 9, 2012
EBWOP: That's regardless of what my previous read on you was based on my ISO's. Only scum are going to continue stamping their feet demanding that town can perform scumslips. Because you're just looking for an easy excuse to get yourself out of any obvious mistakes you make to confuse us and make us more paranoid than natural that nothing that anyone says can be construed as a scumslip because "both town and scum do them". Bullshit. - Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard
- Smashbard