*Puts in personal collection of threads*
*sleeps*
*dreamvotes*
*wakes up as grumpy killjoy*
My vote on roflcopter? Good! That will terminate your rofling!
post-ninja edit: Fine, whatevs for now.
In post 214, malpascp wrote:In my point of view, both claims are true. It's too much of a coincidence for BC to fakeclaim before I did. So if I somehow flip, then BC will be confirmed town miller. Voting for him is stupid, unless you think we are both fakeclaiming. Will reread and make reads later.
In post 218, Darthe wrote:Avoiding base responses and metagame here I think the recent miller discussion is scummy bullshit. It doesn't matter whether they are town or not, what has happened in previous games based on each of your limited experiences, or how you perceive it. Two millers is extremely unlikely but possible. Two fake claim millers on D1 is a shit gambit for mafia and a waste so very unlikely as well. One miller and one fake claim is much more likely and so probable. Because of the nature of the role neither can be allowed to live til endgame regardless. In essence, pick which one you think is more scumtastic and place your vote where your mouth is. The rest is a continued WIFOM and scummy.
In post 310, Tazaro wrote:In fact, IF malpascp is scum, the only attempted benefit of his miller claim that is see is -> neutralizing the negative stigma of BLOODCOVENANT's claim, which makes sense if malpascp wants to protect a scum buddy in BloodCovenant.
In post 310, Tazaro wrote:@drmyshotty, If we lynch one of them first, though, it should be malpascp, for the information that malpascp's flip would give to incriminate BC, in my view.
In post 335, Rob14 wrote:Plus he's yet to acknowledge my point that mal didn't see the first miller claim before claiming, because he knows his theory doesn't stand up to that.
In post 126, Darthe wrote:In post 118, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 112, Darthe wrote:In post 74, curiouskarmadog wrote:why wouldZabtown"distance" himself from someonehe doesnt knowis scum?
why would anythingBC(you)towndo "implicate" Zab?
these two terms are not sitting right with me.
waiting on an answer from Zab
alsounvote
This post struck me as odd. Consistent defense of Zab and prohawk pings for that as well. Seems like mafia attempting to psuedo-bus, I bet two of the three shift opinions quickly close to lynch.Vote Zab. We will see.
what exactly seems odd? "opinion shift"? you mean me unvoting my random vote?
Bolded above.All are an effect called priming where the individual places words or terms in such a way that it reinforces an opinion. So this leaves two options. You either feel definitively that these two people are town (hence putting it in their name) or the more likely one in five pages is that you aremafia with one of them at least and are attempting to sway us with the subconscious reasoning of free association.
In post 396, drmyshotgun wrote:So yeah:Tazaro, Darthe, MALPASCP.
Should there be a Vig, do your job. (hint: choose one from the above list!)
In post 415, Darthe wrote:Taz seems odd but idk him so maybe he is just an odd ass person.
In post 461, Demon Core wrote:Last time I post was on Page 6 or soand I'm now forced to claim?
Guess I better catch up now that my role is f@#king useless. That's what I get for trying to lay low.
I hate this damn role.
In post 473, ProHawk wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: zabriel
No reason to call his bluff Day 1. Back to theotherscum.
In post 508, Darthe wrote:predicted: dcore flips town, zab and prohawk are LLL and flip scum.
In post 500, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 479, ProHawk wrote:Completely agree, don't counterclaim until later in the game. That way in the off chance he is telling the truth about being cop, we don't mis-lynch him and scum would be forced to kill him.
I would like to point out that you are far too certain about this. No suspicions about the claim whatsoever? Prohawk is a very legitimate lynch if not DC. Prohawk is not at all playing to his town self. (#IusuallyDontDoMetaCases)
In post 507, roflcopter wrote:In post 501, AngryPidgeon wrote:If we have a vig, vig Darthe.
vetoed
if there is a vig, vig one of the miller claims (preferably bc but really they've both got to go) or risk being consumed with a righteous fury
In post 509, Tazaro wrote:In post 508, Darthe wrote:predicted: dcore flips town, zab and prohawk are LLL and flip scum.
So, in a nutshell, you're telling us you won't hammer that person who's closest to being the lynch.
In post 540, Rob14 wrote:In post 538, curiouskarmadog wrote:I know that fuckfaces...my vote was already on him....god dammit.
same goes to you Rob...why was it protown to point this out?
We're at L-2, then.
Thought it was an honest mistake at first, not a gambit, but I wasn't going to point it out at first because DC could have revealed. Then Random McFuckFace showed up, so I thought the whole operation was kind of blown wide open anyway. There was no longer any reason to not point out the mistake (which I thought it was).
Seriously though, who are you njoseph and why did you just give away a gambit in a game you're not in? Where's the banhammer again?
In post 544, curiouskarmadog wrote:who cares if it was a mistake?
In post 548, curiouskarmadog wrote:if you are town,
in the future, if you see someone making a "mistake"..especially someone who have been playing over 5 years, before you jump in to express how on top of the game you are, take a moment, and see what happens. do you see the value of what I trying to do, be it a small chance, was still a chance?
In post 564, drmyshotgun wrote:njoseph being Tazaro's alt increased my hatred for the player dramatically.
In post 640, Tazaro wrote:YOU are going to be SO interested in my claim.
In post 660, curiouskarmadog wrote:OK time to reread
also, I have info too (went back and forth about saying this)...it is only the slightest bit useful (at this point in the game) in regards to two people...well...maybe more depending on what Taz claims.
In post 666, curiouskarmadog wrote:first I am also a jack of trades with two one shot abilities (sort of confirms rob's claim)
one was a tracker, which I used. this person did not target zab last night. do not want to say who...yet. I would like to see who you said first...if you name this person, than you are lying. I will claim after, for this person can confirm if I am lying or not.
the other..I will keep to myself. (I would provide if it "countered" anything currently in the game)
In post 693, Rob14 wrote:CKD ... If he's anti-town, then he's on the mafia team