Micro 50 (Vengeful Game Over)
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Let's say that N is right that 2 minutes makes up the time for a red light. If you passed the red light and you got to the hospital, it'd still be around 2 minutes before they got you in care.
So there's two solutions at the end:
A) Take the risk, birth will probably be less painful with medication--might get hit by a car though or pulled over after you get to the hospital, which I'm also assuming is close
B) Pull over and call the hospital. I'm pretty sure an ambulance would get there at the same amount of time. The risk factor is gone however there's still a risk that the person will give birth painfully and incorrectly in the car which could cause disease.
In the end they have equal risk and circumstances.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Could be that everyone knows it's sarcastic.In post 48, Om of the Nom wrote:I like how anybody has yet to question my read on guille lol.
Not sure.In post 53, guille2015 wrote:Zoro: Is N scum?
Still deciding between Om and N. Pretty sure in my Natural read--but it's a tad bit risky.
N is overall scummy--but that could just be him.
Om on the other hand has decided to answer just around every question in this game sarcastically.
I can understand if you give one sarcastic answer to one serious question.
But that's the only thing he's been doing. It's scummy due to the frequency.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Your counting skills are exquisite.In post 55, N wrote:So, Zoro, you think everyone is scum but you?
There's a difference between "not taking the game seriously" and answering every question so far sarcastically.Om wrote:I tend not to take the game seriously as a whole anyway, since my main goal is to have fun in a non-destructive way.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
What are you trying to say?
You've been trying to incriminate me on the basis that since I gave a sarcastic answer that therefore I'm going against my argument with Om. My answer hasnothingto do with Om. My answer refers to me. I. Om's answer refers to him. He.
What you are trying to do is push the fallacy because I did it once that I'm as bad as Om who has committed the crime multiple times. Considering my answer was to put you toward the correct answer and Om's answers conceal his true nature--they are nothing alike.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
EWBOP: The posting style is exact as well (lowercases the start of the first sentence and continues on with correct capitalization).
The question must be asked though, just out of curiosity, why do you have 2 alts right after you started? And don't try to bring up any lies. We can't talk about your ongoing games but we can certainly see them.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
I've told you multiple times. If you don't get it now, you don't get it at all.N wrote: I want to know what is means.
You mean you're doing something that's inherently in your town meta and expecting us to believe that you've never acted like that when you're scum?Om wrote:In fact the fact I'm not taking the game that seriously is probably reason enough to call me town.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
Just for kicks.
Leaning with Om for death here. Not sure who I want dead first though.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Really?In post 88, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 87, N wrote:My vote's already on you, isn't it?
My vote isn't, but at this rate it will be soon.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
See that?
That's a clear question. If you asked that in the beginning, this little debacle would've been over with.
So far this is what you have asked:
N wrote:Hang on, what are the two things that are different in this situation?
N wrote:So you're saying Om is answering everything sarcastically and you're flaunting a sarcastic answer in my face? And that this is hugely different and therefore Om is scummy?
N wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is what "there's a difference between answering something sarcastically every time and flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game" means.
Wait a minute! That looks like the same question as asking what the post, which is just about quoted there means! I must've totally been at fault here!
Hmm.In post 74, Zoroaster wrote:You saw that I quoted something with that right?
That just MIGHT have something to do with it.
Let's put our thinking caps on.
If I didn't, which I didn't, put quotes in 65, do you think it'd be smart to realize I was addressing you at...I dunno....
Post 64?
Post 65 is a clarification of Post 63 since you brought up the point, in Post 64, that you're asking what questions in the game required a serious answer.
Let's try to use those thinking caps again!
Why do you think that means?
!
It means that not all questions required a serious answer but some questions did and Om gave a sarcastic answer to those ones.
Now here's the fun part:
Shit! The logic matches up to what he said before Post 65! What a coincidence!Zoroaster wrote:There's a difference between "not taking the game seriously" and answering every question so far sarcastically.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
I give up.
There's absolutely no way you could've deduced that without reading 100.
65 was an afterthought due to reading post 64. It referred to the point that not every question required a serious answer but Om was giving sarcastic answers for every question.
This is the last time I will speak about it.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Do you think this will really fix anything?In post 104, Om of the Nom wrote:Did I ever ask you to re-ask all those questions you wanted me to answer seriously?
Since if not, you go do that and I'll answer them seriously.- Zoroaster
-
Zoroaster Goon
- Zoroaster
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 203
- Joined: September 25, 2012
Not really.In post 106, Om of the Nom wrote:Well it'd get you to shut up and actually focus on scumhunting. - Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster
- Zoroaster