Mini #381-Werewolf: Cancelled


User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:33 am

Post by Jack »

vote:Lowell


Seems poor reasoning to me as well. If two watchmen claim there's a 50% chance one of them will be killed that night (only one doc).

Also, he voted me :p
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:50 am

Post by Jack »

The werewolves have 1/7 chance of getting the doc while the watchman would have a 1/9 chance
of having a
50%
chance
of identifying the killer.

If the watchman doesn't claim the werewolves have a 1/8 chance of killing doc and a 1/8 chance of killing watchman, and the watchman has the same chance as before, correct?

unvote:Lowell


It does seem like a good idea for the watchman to claim. Claiming increases the chance of the werewolves getting the doc by removing the chance of of them killing the watchman. It also increases the towns chances of lynching a werewolf this round.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #22 (isolation #2) » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:10 am

Post by Jack »

Hmm here's the way I see it though. Werewolves choose from 8 players. They have a 1/4 chance of killing a player with a power role. If watchman claims, they have a 1/7 chance. Isn't that fairly significant?

As for the doctor being so much better, it says "50% chance of identifying the
killer(s)
. ID'ing both the werewolves would be pretty sweet.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #38 (isolation #3) » Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:37 am

Post by Jack »

Well, Elias doesn't give a reason, he just states his opinion repeatedly. Coolbot states why he disagrees, although I don't see why a small chance at preventing a kill is better than a smaller chance at ID'ing a killer.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #40 (isolation #4) » Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:25 pm

Post by Jack »

Wouldn't the doc have to prevent 2 kills to make the game longer?

We have 11 now. So the progression with no prevention would be 11-9-7-5 (lynch or lose). With one kill prevention it would be something like 11-9-8-6 (lynch or lose). Not terribly advantageous.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #49 (isolation #5) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:07 am

Post by Jack »

Vote:StallingChamp


Whatever man, that last sentence doesn't even make sense. Are you going to dick around like last game?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #58 (isolation #6) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:53 pm

Post by Jack »

Dude, how can you call it an obvious false when last game you posted the mod's pm identifying the mafia?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #64 (isolation #7) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:41 pm

Post by Jack »

CoolBot wrote: What game did all this happen in?
Mini 373: doomsville.

All water under the bridge really, but I was reminded of it right away when he claimed mafia.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #71 (isolation #8) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:26 pm

Post by Jack »

Green Crayons wrote:
Unvote: trabony
. Curious how that read through is taking forever, though.

Vote: StallingChamp
. I always vote people who say that they're scum. Always. I can't count the number of times scum have done it, and it has become a golden rule for me to put my vote on whomever does it. Congradulations, there's your conversation starter.
You have any past games to back that up? I'm guessing yes but I'd like to be sure you're not just making that up as an excuse to put the 4th vote on.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #89 (isolation #9) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 5:36 am

Post by Jack »

Hmm no I agree with Green Crayons

unvote


Stalling is very suspicious but I see no reason to end the day this early. In fact Lowell's 5th vote with no reason attached makes me more suspicious. Isn't 4 enough to push for a claim?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #92 (isolation #10) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 6:46 am

Post by Jack »

Yes and then he claimed that was a false claim...lowell was saying time to claim a "real" claim.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #116 (isolation #11) » Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:09 am

Post by Jack »

CoolBot wrote:Where did I say voting SC was proof of innocence. All I said was that a vote was not scummy by itself. And there is no point to delaying the lynch, since scum will be laying low by now, waiting for the inevitable to happen. SC's stunt basically ended any usefulness to be had from this day.
bah, I don't see that at all. You seem in an awful hurry to get this day over.

Why isn't there any usefulness to be had?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #127 (isolation #12) » Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:51 am

Post by Jack »

lol if that was true it would be the perfect cover wouldn't it?

@Lowell--if they were going to claim I think they'd have done it by now.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #144 (isolation #13) » Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:21 pm

Post by Jack »

Vote:perfect62834


No posts?? This person is playing right?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #153 (isolation #14) » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:01 am

Post by Jack »

Err perhaps he voted him because he thinks that "the idea of a confirmed innocent power role" scares coolbot? That seems pretty obvious.

I need to re-read.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #155 (isolation #15) » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:06 am

Post by Jack »

perfect62834 wrote:I thought almost that exact same phrase for why he voted him before I read that post...that is probably why he voted him.
Where were you btw?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #157 (isolation #16) » Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:23 pm

Post by Jack »

I said it wasn't OMGUS, I can't imagine why you thought it was. I'm sure Lowell can explain his reasoning far better than I can, I was just pointing that out.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #161 (isolation #17) » Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:34 am

Post by Jack »

Echo419 wrote:I don't think scum would be particularly more scared of a confirmed power role than a secret one- they both have an equal chance of finding the scum, right? It would simply narrow down the possibilities for the doc.
And another thing- how CAN we confirm the watchman? He's the only investigative role, so he can't be confirmed that way, and we have no other power roles than could reveal something like that. Even if thw watchman does come out, he'd be counterclaimed by scum, likely resulting in the deaths of both, or at least a good deal of confusion.
Well that would be pretty awesome wouldn't it? Lynching a scum is easily worth lynching a watchman, and we'd only have a 50 percent chance of lynching watchman anyway.

So yeah, watchman can be confirmed by claiming because no werewolf worth his silver would counterclaim.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #169 (isolation #18) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:04 am

Post by Jack »

Elias_the_thief wrote:just so everyone knows, I didnt say say the top quote. Just clearing that up. Im not sure who actually did.
'twas Echo.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #185 (isolation #19) » Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:41 am

Post by Jack »

huh.

vote:Coolbot
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #188 (isolation #20) » Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:23 am

Post by Jack »

I think he's a werewolf. Along with either you or Conflux.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #203 (isolation #21) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by Jack »

Echo419 wrote:
Vote: Lowell
Echo419 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lowell
Echo419 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lowell
What the christ?
Vote:Echo419
[/b]
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #204 (isolation #22) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:31 pm

Post by Jack »

I find Conflux suspicious because of his hammer vote and then "unvote" round one, and general lurking.

Echo and Coolbot have persistantly persued Lowell and voted him over the watchman claim thing, even though I've said throughout I agree with Lowell on this...I don't see why they aren't voting me. Personally I find Lowell to very townie. They were also all over the StallingChamp lynch (granted several other people were as well) and he turned out to be town.

Echo has also voted Lowell 3 times in a row which is odd.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #206 (isolation #23) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:45 pm

Post by Jack »

Still, why were you voting Lowell based just off the watchmen thing? That doesn't make sense to me. It just looks like you think you can get him lynched from that.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #212 (isolation #24) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:19 am

Post by Jack »

Why are you voting me Coolbot?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #215 (isolation #25) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:14 am

Post by Jack »

Not a fan of randomizing...would be weird to have to start from scratch with someone on page nine.

I guess I just want to know if I was right or not.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #217 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:11 pm

Post by Jack »

So wait. Lowell proposed a plan. You voted him because of it. He was innocent.

I agreed with Lowells plan. You vote me?

That makes no sense. I also find it suspect that you seem eager to have Lowell modkilled.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #224 (isolation #27) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:04 am

Post by Jack »

Sounds good to me.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #229 (isolation #28) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:29 am

Post by Jack »

Who were the werewolves?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #232 (isolation #29) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:43 pm

Post by Jack »

haha oops. No wonder you were against Lowell's plan lol
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #236 (isolation #30) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:54 am

Post by Jack »

Echo419 wrote:Sweet, we would've killed 2 watchmen in 2 nightkills.
Unless I'd decided to claim...see, it was a good plan!

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”