Why not??
VOTE: MeowMix
In post 51, havingfitz wrote:In post 30, MeowMix wrote:actually I was trying to not attract attention to it deliberately to see how other people were gonna react to it
I had a good chuckle IRL if that means anything to you
You wanted to see the reaction of people to your not trying to attract attention?
I think think that's bs.
VOTE: MeowMix
In post 82, unseencamo wrote:Auspicious, what is your read on MM?
In post 85, fferyllt wrote:@auspiciious Why do you say MM will be a tough read later?
In post 97, MeowMix wrote:what's interesting about it? I see it as a bit non-committal, but at the same time I'm not exactly easy to read either, so it's a fair reaction to have
I'm more curious about 81. austriloious, what do you see in fitz's 3 posts that pop out as scummy to you?
In post 108, Otolia wrote:
Another post that I don't like even thought I'm agreeing with the opinion overall (on the noob part, on the fact that Day1 focus are tougher to read further in the game) however I don't see why any townie would agree so easily to lynch someone. As far as I'm concerned, if you want to lynch someone you vote for him or you openly express your intentions. Being clear and limpid to read is paramount to good VT play : going with the flow (agreeing but remaining rather passive) is a good disguise.
I wasn't too much happy about the first bandwagon but after seeing the aforementioned by Meowmix, I consider it's worth a shot. After the next vote-count mine will be on Meowmix.
In post 114, havingfitz wrote:
@auspicious...what about my vote on MeowMix do you find suspect? And how are you differentiating suspicions or not wrt the USC and Super votes on MeowMix?
I agree with goodmorning that auspicious' post 84 deserved comment. I don't like it. For one...he's OK with a lynch on the person he suspects me for suspecting.
@auspicious...is the part of your scum read on me that isn't gut/intuition solely based on my suspicions/vote on MeowMix?
So VOTE: auspicious
Hemming and hawing around suspecting me, not willing to commit to a vote (on me or anyone else ftm), and his post 84. His reasons for rationalizing his tacit support to a MM lynch are just one big cop out.
In post 115, Syryana wrote:
This is the most self-deprecating post I've seen in quite some time. This posts boils down to "I'm not sure, I'm not that good, I'm not sure, my reads are purely based on gut." Seems like a pretty easy way to slide by without having to justify your reads. You, sir, now have my attention.
The scumteam is MeowMix and Manfred. Auspicious is the serial killer. Manfred and Auspicious are interchangeable, but I prefer Aus as the SK simply due to his "I'd rather lynch scum today" and pointing out that there is a serial killer in the game.
In post 126, Superdeclan wrote:
In post 66, auspicious wrote:However, Super's and havingfitz's votes on Meow don't look good at all.
doesn't feel right. Why are me and havingfitz votes on mm wose then USC or Syryana?
In post 81, auspicious wrote:I actually read DCLXVI's vote as town, and I'm thinking roughly the same thing as he is in regards to who's scum (havingfitz). I don't necessarily see it for the same reasons he does, but I think he's town all the same.
so you just think 666 is town because he voted the same person as you?
then why weren't you voting him if you think he's a good lynch? Worried you'll lose your scumbuddy?
The bolded say that you KNOW mm is town. I see this as a scumslip
The slip at the end really warrants a vote. I now belive that Auspicious is scum and he might be wifoming about mm
UNVOTE: MM
VOTE: Auspicious