Funny. DBK admits he was wrong in a post and he becomes a town read for it. I do the same thing and I'm a mild scum read.. Does it make sense? Nope.
My first vote was RVS.. You didn't have a problem with my second vote, but now apparently you bring that up. My third vote was an accidental misunderstanding which pinged a scum radar enough to warrant a vote.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
I agree that the way he went about it (tone, vocabulary) sounds more town than not, but you can't write him off as town for doing something that scum is capable of as well. So was it simply the action of admitting a mistake or the way he did it that gives you the town impression?
Why have you not responded to my case on you, or any of my posts, if I'm still your scum read? I'd think you'd like to show others why I'm scum based on this.
In post 161, Horus wrote:
I like this wagon, but I'm wary because I've heard a lot of quiet agreement that fuzzybutternut is suspicious, but there's been no movement on that front - which is rather odd.
How are the Zionite-wagon and people's responses to fuzzybutternut's suspicious behavior interrelated? What effect does your wariness have on your intentions with regards to the Zionite wagon?
Because I only have one vote, so I have to prioritize my suspects - Zionite was at L-1 at the time, so jumping on his wagon would have been a substantial move and would have necessarily meant letting fuzzy off the hook for the day. I was not (and am not) prepared to do that. Zionite was arguably a counterwagon to fuzzy, so the implication here is that the Zionite wagon may have sprung up as an excuse for scum to scumread fuzzy while voting for someone else who they superficially deemed more suspicious.
I am still wary of Zionite, but still think fuzzy is the better wagon. I'm kind of doubting that they would both be scum right now, based on the relationship between their wagons.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into." –Jonathan Swift
"Never ignore a gut feeling, but never believe that it's enough." –Robert Heller
Funny. DBK admits he was wrong in a post and he becomes a town read for it. I do the same thing and I'm a mild scum read.. Does it make sense? Nope.
My first vote was RVS.. You didn't have a problem with my second vote, but now apparently you bring that up. My third vote was an accidental misunderstanding which pinged a scum radar enough to warrant a vote.
Funny how you immediately try to defend yourself when I say that you are
If the town response to a vote on you without reason is to ignore it, doesn't that mean the town response to a vote on you with copious amounts of reason is to acknowledge it?
Oh, and if Malakittens is my scumbuddy in your read, how do you explain the vote on me back on 53, and the extended amount of time that vote remained there? I find it hard to argue the second vote on someone is a bus vote.
Funny. DBK admits he was wrong in a post and he becomes a town read for it. I do the same thing and I'm a mild scum read.. Does it make sense? Nope.
My first vote was RVS.. You didn't have a problem with my second vote, but now apparently you bring that up. My third vote was an accidental misunderstanding which pinged a scum radar enough to warrant a vote.
Funny how you immediately try to defend yourself when I say that you are
probable
scum. Town doesn't do that.
You don't even get the point of my question, do you?
In post 293, Zionite wrote:Can you at least give me an ETA of when you'll even acknowledge a case on you exists Fuzzy?
ETA? do you know mollie?
Fuzzybug is probs town
Mala, I asked because your reaction was jumpy and it seemed bad from my perspective and I remember that you tend to be a little jumpy and reactionary as scum
could get behind the Mala/Rach scum-team I think I just need to hear from HD
