Open 506: Pick Your Power X/Y, Game Over

[Deckard]

VOTE: Your Troubles Will Cease

My Troubles Will Cease!

[Deckard]

I dream of electric sheep.

[Deckard]

Interesting first post Stryker. Ah, the famous Podrick Payne.

Afraid of the RVS?

[Deckard]

Policy lynch.

Serious vote then? If so, what are the reasons you want Belisarius lynched?

[Deckard]

Policy lynch.

Serious vote then? If so, what are the reasons you want Belisarius lynched?

And what would you have concluded from more extra votes in the RVS?

Facetious vote. Also I wanted to see if anyone would react to a second vote on someone.

Wouldn't that be against the spirit of the game, quoting private pm's? There is not much point discussing why someone chose 1 over another numbers imo

Excuse me? Discussing the game mechanics = content. What else could we discuss at this stage? You clearly have an opinion on it. Why do you want to change subjects?

[Deckard]

EBWOP: (Something went wrong in the quote)

YTWC: "And what would you have concluded from more extra votes in the RVS?"?

[Deckard]

[quote="In post 38

Mind rephrasing that?[/quote]

Since it was obviously a test fishing for reactions, what would you have concluded from anyone agreeing with you and voting Bel? Would you have a better picture of that person's alignment?

[Deckard]

I seriously have to preview my posts before posting.

[Deckard]

My vote on you is RVS. But the content that followed is indeed interesting which gives me a slight town read on Siveure for initiating it and a slight scum read on Stryker because he somewhat didn't want to continue the discussion and didn't want (and still doesn't?) be involved in the RVS with putting down a vote.

I don't really have an opinion about picking certain numbers. Siveure reviewed older games and gathered some interestings statistics but I don't see 1 as a scummy choice by itself.

[Deckard]

Appears to like the RVS than relevant discussions but doesn't want to get too involved in it either.

What about you getting involved too and give your opinion on what has been said so far instead of just jumping on a wagon?

I have an actual reason for voting Stryker.

Some rudimentary PoE is only part of that.

What is your PoE based on exactly? Game mechanics or content?

[Deckard]

Am I not allowed to be?

What is the point of RVS?

[Deckard]

this looks REALLY opportunistic. fos: cade

you do realize how bad this looks right?

and where has stryker "actively attempted to shut down discussion"? are you talking about the number argument flip? i would hardly say that qualifies. this looks like lazy scum/bad town play right here, and i'm leaning towards the former. your pseudo-lurking doesn't help you much.

I noticed this. While I agree that Cade's vote looks scummy (complaining about a lack of content/involvement while Cade himself hasn't contributed anything, go figure ...) I don't think for a moment that YTMC's vote is opportunistic or scummy.
PPP has a good case on Stryker. I don't think anyone could have another case on Stryker, PPP covered everything possible and that shows the lack of Stryker's posts. Posting like that is either stupid or scummy, or maybe both.

[Deckard]

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Belisarius

Null. Not a lot to analyse but said he was going to catch up later

[#144]

.

Mutleyddmc

Null leaning scum. Hasn’t contributed anything relevant yet and is not acting in town’s interest.

Smudger

Null. Seems to have a town read on Siv

[#83]

or maybe I’m misinterpreting it but then seems to backtrack

[#151]

.

Your Troubles Will Cease

Null leaning scum. The scum bit is purely based on gut, which I don’t like but can’t ignore at this stage and based on

[#30]

&

[#44]

which seriously reeks.

Siveure DtTrikyp

Leaning town. Credits go to Siv for getting us out of the RVS that early and I don’t believe for a second that Siv would risk to start theorizing about the draft as scum while he has pucked such a high (and unique) number. Could be WIFOM but I’m not really buying that.

pieceofpecanpie

Leaning town. Clear cut case on Stryker

[#84]

and one of the most interesting posts of the game regarding draft theory and scumhunting

[#97]

.

Alabaska J

Leaning town. He is active and his posts makes sense. Especially

[#145]

which sounds townie.

Xdaamno

Null. Needs to post more.

TMTOLBTWNTOF

Null. I don’t really get TMT’s reads but it seems they are meta related so I have no opinion on that. Seems to insist he think Sakura is town though.

Crimml

Null. Only one post in which she said she would catch up.

Cade

Null leaning scum. Only one post

[#64]

which is a very opportunistic vote on Stryker. While I agree that Stryker looks scummy, Cade hasn’t provided anything else himself.

Stryker

Null leaning scum. Showing no initiative at all. Firmly disagrees with Siv about the Draft WIFOM but doesn’t want to debate further

[#31]

.

Sakura Hana

Null. Hasn’t contributed much either. Seems she is playing like Mutley without the stubbornness and anti townbehaviour.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

UNVOTE: Your Troubles Will Cease
VOTE: Mutleyddmc

I don't like Muttle's behaviour and I much prefer voting for him than to leave my RVS vote on YTWC though I have a slight scum read on him too, but based on gut as you have read above.

[Deckard]

Hey, what about me starting the theorizing to lock it away from my stupidly high number?

IMO this would be foolish, and from what I have read you don't seem foolish. The possibility is there, but it's too much WIFOM.

Deckard's read on Smudger: Null but points out something scummy

At the time nobody mentioned it. But now that I have shared my "surface" reads lol, people start to notice. It is contradicting to say the least. Contradiction isn't always scummy, and I'd like to hear more from Smudger on the subject.

Deckards reads are all too null. If you are going to post a list of reads dont make all of them null, its pointless surely. Scum has been found

I tried to cover each player. Of course I have a lot of null reads, not everyone has been active and posted content. Is that some kind of OMGUS reaction without the vote that goes with it because I find your one liners annoying and not helpful? Even there, you aren't helpful. Why no vote?

[Deckard]

Null leaning scum because of the ammount of posts/contribution. Can't say much more about players with only one or two posts as everything can change if they put the effort into it. And that's what I did. Don't expect a wall from me though.

[Deckard]

There is always a point and it made you write more than one line in post #170, how can it be bad? Hehe!

[Deckard]

Welcome to the new players. Quite busy right now but I'm surprised to see I'm a scum candidate? I didn't put Sakura at the end of my list on purpose. Copy/paste issues most likely. If I flip town (though I intend to catch up and defend myself if needed), it doesn't mean Sakura isn't scum.

[Deckard]

Can some people unvote and give me some time to catch up later before stupid town or scum jump on my wagon and hammer?

[Deckard]

This is madness!

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Deckard