Mini 1475: War in the Middle East Mafia (Game Over)

Purpkin · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:02 am

VOTE: saltnpeppa[/n]

purpkin is best hydra

Purpkin · Post Post #5 (isolation #1) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:02 am

i am fucking terrible

VOTE: saltnpeppa

Purpkin · Post Post #14 (isolation #2) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:46 am

If you can come up with a compelling reason why that's going to move the game forward, I'd be happy to.

Purpkin · Post Post #17 (isolation #3) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:58 am

In post 16, waynegg wrote:Ok Purpkin, I'll answer, but first you lay out your whole strategy so it's just as transparent as an act of good faith...

I have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Purpkin · Post Post #18 (isolation #4) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:58 am

But seriously, it what universe is the answer to that question relevant to the game?

Purpkin · Post Post #19 (isolation #5) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:59 am

Purpkin · Post Post #22 (isolation #6) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:05 am

well that didn't take long

In post 21, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 20, waynegg wrote:You're asking me to explain my play so you can decide if you want to participate or not, and I'd imagine so you structure your answer accordingly.
No, I'm really wondering why you consider something so obviously off-topic to be an appropriate talking point.

Purpkin · Post Post #24 (isolation #7) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:07 am

RQS is shitty, and it's even more shitty when you're not even talking about mafia in it.

Purpkin · Post Post #27 (isolation #8) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:20 am

In post 25, waynegg wrote:RVS, now that's shitty. Overplayed, expected, and leads to bad lynches later on from those who think they're an RVS fucking guru.

Irrelevant to this situation as we're already not doing that, and it's a false dilemma to suggest that what you're doing is the only alternative.

waynegg wrote:Hostile resistance to an innocuous question noted.

That the question is innocuous is not relevant. That the question is

useless

is, as my (or anyone else's) response to it would not vary dependent upon their alignment this game. My refusing to answer is infinitely more interesting than that by definition.

But go ahead and tell me straight out what you're passive-aggressively trying to imply by your last sentence, notably that my response is somehow scummy in some way, and exactly why that is.

Purpkin · Post Post #39 (isolation #9) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:43 pm

VOTE: Wayne

serious vote is serious

Purpkin · Post Post #43 (isolation #10) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:04 pm

Mara placed that vote.

But it's an RVS wagon before that vote; who cares how busy it is?

Purpkin · Post Post #56 (isolation #11) » Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:59 am

In post 54, Amrun wrote:In reality, I thought I voted for waynegg but failed at life. You're super town for noting this. I would totally think I was scum for this if it wasn't me.

This is a really weird reason to call someone town, as is the expectation that one has to give full credence to both RVS and RQS (which, as you can see, I did not do)