... Beeeeecause there's no need to say the same thing twice? There was absolutely not harm to town from making Venrob flame out like that. No one was mislynched, no one really embraced any terrible logic.In post 99, DCLXVI wrote:Since you appear to like refuting me pasch, why did you not respond to post 94 when commenting on post 87?
he*In post 101, DCLXVI wrote:So everything is ok cause nothing bad happened...
That is such a non sequitur response.
My argument is that Saki WAS trying to make something bad happen and is therefor scum. Just because she didn't succeed doesn't mean that what she did was not scummy.
In post 100, Paschendale wrote:Now answer why your attack on Saki isn't equally applicable to you?
To clarify even further. Did venmar do anything to deserve getting lynched? No.In post 96, DCLXVI wrote:To clarify, I made my vote on venmar serious because he did what I saw as the first scummy action of the game.However, it certainly did not deserve a quicklynch which is what Saki was trying to push.In post 17, DCLXVI wrote:Confirm vote venrob (this is now a serious vote)
venrob*In post 103, DCLXVI wrote:In post 100, Paschendale wrote:Now answer why your attack on Saki isn't equally applicable to you?To clarify even further. Did venmar do anything to deserve getting lynched? No.In post 96, DCLXVI wrote:To clarify, I made my vote on venmar serious because he did what I saw as the first scummy action of the game.However, it certainly did not deserve a quicklynch which is what Saki was trying to push.In post 17, DCLXVI wrote:Confirm vote venrob (this is now a serious vote)
But then you will probably ask, why did I vote him? Good question. That would be because he did the first thing that could be categorized as scummy and I was calling it out in an attempt to get out of RVS which I'm not terribly fond of.
Saki was actually advocating him being lynched and implying for more votes on someone who is at L-3 is basically saying you are good with a quicklynch.
I believe I also mentioned that we should be careful of running people up and making them claim which also shows my intent of not wanting a quick wagon.
Yeah, should have checked but I just chose to guess.In post 102, Saki wrote:he*In post 101, DCLXVI wrote:So everything is ok cause nothing bad happened...
That is such a non sequitur response.
My argument is that Saki WAS trying to make something bad happen and is therefor scum. Just because she didn't succeed doesn't mean that what she did w as not scummy.
Yes. I explained my reasons for wanting him gone from the game.In post 103, DCLXVI wrote:In post 100, Paschendale wrote:Now answer why your attack on Saki isn't equally applicable to you?To clarify even further. Did venmar do anything to deserve getting lynched? No.In post 96, DCLXVI wrote:To clarify, I made my vote on venmar serious because he did what I saw as the first scummy action of the game.However, it certainly did not deserve a quicklynch which is what Saki was trying to push.In post 17, DCLXVI wrote:Confirm vote venrob (this is now a serious vote)
But then you will probably ask, why did I vote him? Good question. That would be because he did the first thing that could be categorized as scummy and I was calling it out in an attempt to get out of RVS which I'm not terribly fond of.
Saki was actually advocating him being lynched and implying for more votes on someone who is at L-3 is basically saying you are good with a quicklynch.
I believe I also mentioned that we should be careful of running people up and making them claim which also shows my intent of not wanting a quick wagon.
In post 108, ZZZX wrote:To be honest you guys over pushed van way too much
you should feel bad
also well just fyi van reactions were more noob town orianted than scum
You don't want this out of your game?In post 62, Venrob wrote:Bye, and i hope you have a terrible game. Also before I go I will say one last thing: IM FUCKING TOWN YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES.
This is rolefishing. I like my vote where it is.In post 64, pwnz wrote:VOTE: VenrobIn post 25, Venrob wrote:by my count i'm l-4. stop voting me or i will dayvig you. If i'm defensive thas cuz i don like retards voting me because i made a fucking joke. get a fucking sense of humor or leave me the fuck alone.
Venrob should have to claim after making the dayvig joke, or kill one of us before he dies.
I feel like RVS is largely a joke just like you do Venrob, but it really translates like you're serious.
I don't feel as though Paschendale has done anything scummy. Care to explain your vote?
Seems town to me.I also think post 106 makes him look townIn post 79, Saki wrote:if this was a serious voteIn post 71, DCLXVI wrote:vote:saki
I'm going to go with a leap of faith and say venmar/radioactive is more likely to flip out as town rather then scum (the ragequiting not his reaction to my RVS vote)
vote:Saki I think there was one scum on the venmar wagon and he fits the bill with his insistence on getting him lynched quickly.
Second choice would be pwnz.
I find many things wrong with 'scum on venrob wagon'
1. why me? noctan pushed avidly.
2. what of the people that pushed the wagon but didn't vote?
3. why pwnz?
4. why do you not wait for the replacement to say anything before townreading?
and for the final question. I was pushing venrob because I like feeding trolls
Agressive, needless. Accuses Saki of tunnel vision for one statement that he made in post 51 then agrees with the wagon on venrob but quickly changes his mind. Then leaves for awhile before coming back with a question for task. This has been his game so far - not caring, not participating, not giving reads, nothing. I would think town would be more motivated to scum hunt and at least get some discussion going. It's worse than lurking - it's participating with no content.In post 49, pwnz wrote:What everybody else gets to RVS and because I'm late to the party I have to make a serious vote on page 2? Deal with it.
Why scum for pwnz? I agree with the rest, except maybe that DC is only leaning town and hardly strongly town, but I really don't see a solid lean for pwnz either way.In post 114, Baezu wrote:So far, my only reads are:
Saki town
Task null leaning scum
pwnz scum
Nights town
DC town
Pasch null leaning town
Everyone else, not enough info yet.
Please let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of those reads.
Wait, this is your whole reason? And it's worthy of a strong scumread? Huh?In post 116, Baezu wrote:pwnz - comes in late. says he forgot about this game (translates to - "i don't really care" imo). Then posts this:
Agressive, needless. Accuses Saki of tunnel vision for one statement that he made in post 51 then agrees with the wagon on venrob but quickly changes his mind. Then leaves for awhile before coming back with a question for task. This has been his game so far - not caring, not participating, not giving reads, nothing. I would think town would be more motivated to scum hunt and at least get some discussion going. It's worse than lurking - it's participating with no content.In post 49, pwnz wrote:What everybody else gets to RVS and because I'm late to the party I have to make a serious vote on page 2? Deal with it.
I know Venrob pretty much screwed him, but I do want him to have a chance to redeem himself before we lynch him.In post 122, NoctanNights wrote:It'd be pretty ironic if Radioactive Wolf were a werewolf.
