I am. Normally I ask why on naked votes. :S Derp. Why did you vote her?In post 685, NSin wrote:Titus, are you not curious as to the reasoning behind my vote?
Why did you vote Flench without having read the thread?
Paper wagon. Gives people ability. To call other people mafia.In post 688, N64Lord wrote:It's a paper wagon, basically giving everyone on it a go ahead to put the others down as oppurtunist scumspects.
Out of the posts on this page his post was the most useless.
So can we lynch this now then?In post 691, Flench wrote: Stop tunneling Feel It unless you actually find something, there are more mafia left.
No they can't.In post 694, Titus wrote:@Slandaar, voting without reading the thread is dangerous. If town, scum can use that against you to discredit you.
But I am not. What does it show when I am town other than scum are going to discredit me? which also means we both know who the scum are when they start trying to discredit me thus my vote was genius.In post 694, Titus wrote: If scum, it shows you don't really give a damn who is lynched.
Nope.In post 694, Titus wrote: That post by Flench is really bad.
The problem is, if that's a slip at all, Feelit is also scum. I am not opposed to a Flench lynch but feelit is the more charismatic of the two and thus deadlier.
In post 132, Radioactive Wolf wrote:Hello EPM. Nice to be playing with you again.In post 122, evilpacman18 wrote:Right now I think everyone's reads are aimed in the wrong direction and people should stop recklessly voting.
...and I suspect you drew scum this time around.
That last post pretty much said close to nothing (not taking a clear position on the theo wagon is most notable). In particular, I don't like the sentence I quoted since I pretty much read it as a way of shutting down discussion.
Also, I can't help what kind of modding decisions Desperado's making and I'm certainly not going to alter my play style because of them.
2. Radioactive Wolf - Mafia - Lied in the above post to give a reason to vote, nobody called him out on it, idk why.In post 168, Radioactive Wolf wrote:Remember when I said EPM was scum?
I really didn't. You were dreaming when you read that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: sthar8
1) You are wrong. Voting without posting naturally leads itself to the argument that your vote is less valid because you didn't read the thread. It can be quickly dismissed. You can be painted as a player who doesn't need the whole picture to vote, which is dumb or scum. I don't think you are either, I just think you should keep that mind for the future.In post 695, Slandaar wrote:No they can't.In post 694, Titus wrote:@Slandaar, voting without reading the thread is dangerous. If town, scum can use that against you to discredit you.But I am not. What does it show when I am town other than scum are going to discredit me? which also means we both know who the scum are when they start trying to discredit me thus my vote was genius.In post 694, Titus wrote: If scum, it shows you don't really give a damn who is lynched.
Nope.In post 694, Titus wrote: That post by Flench is really bad.
The problem is, if that's a slip at all, Feelit is also scum. I am not opposed to a Flench lynch but feelit is the more charismatic of the two and thus deadlier.
Flinch made the post so you lynch him if you are lynching based on that; you always start at the source.