Death's Diner -Game Over-

[Amrun]

VOTE: Slandaar

No way is Bro scum -- I stand by that.


If there were no dethy shenanigans, I would be voting zmuffin right now.

[Slandaar]

Your post is very pretty I congratulate you on your presentation.

I can't really be bothered arguing with you its inherently pointless but good job at suggesting I as scum would decided to just come into today purely to try and lynch townyou on wifom, just nonsense honestly, its clearly strictly better to 1v1 without a plan which is 100% based on the use of wifom. Insults my intelligence but then you do need to argue it from your POV ... I respect that.

[zMuffinMan]

Unvote

don't let another day end before the lurker squad has at least checked in and given their current reads/thoughts

he is l-3 atm

[4nxi3ty]

BROseidon (1) - Slandaar
Slandaar

(3)

- BROseidon, Titus, Amrun

Not voting (7) - Rift Adrift, StubbsKVM, Baezu, Mac, PeregrineV, oriole, zMuffinMan

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
(expired on 2013-09-14 12:59:40)

[Rift Adrift]

I still don't know why in God's name I'm alive. Scum SHOULD have killed me.


Slandaar, you never corrected that. GP never corrected that. MS never corrected that. It's pretty much a certain statement that ROFL had an innocent.

The usual answers to that question sound something like "because I'm sooooooo on the wrong track".

[Baezu]

I'm on phone right now...semi v/la but I just wanted to comment on who I think is scum outside the dethy:

{PV, Mac, Stubbs}. I will post more once I'm near a computer.

[StubbsKVM]

Hold off on massclaiming.

I need to check something with the mod.

[Rift Adrift]

We didn't mass claim.

[StubbsKVM]

I know, but Slandaar was asking for it.

[Rift Adrift]

We're probably not going there today. That was brought up on the much-abbreviated day 3.

[Baezu]

Hold off on massclaiming.

I need to check something with the mod.

This post is strange

[StubbsKVM]

Probably.

No answer yet though.

[StubbsKVM]

Okay here goes.

I'm also a Chocolate zombie. I didn't believe Nati's claim, because I thought 2 town Chocolate zombies would be overpowered in this setup.

I ate Slandaar's brain last night. He claimed to have had an innocent and a guilty result. So either he was lying or he was going to die.

Slandaar was a rolecop. Which means he was lying and is the dethy's scum.


VOTE: Slandaar

[Titus]

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

[zMuffinMan]

i can see some reasons that makes some sense given some of the things stubbs said d2 (asking for nati's win con, talking about how nati's claim doesn't make sense given the rest of town power) but i want to see stubbs address titus's questions.

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum.

in the "rare event that slandaar is not scum", stubbs and BRO are scum. i sincerely fucking doubt they'd out another scum just to get rid of slandaar when he was already likely to be lynched.

slandaar is scum.

[Rift Adrift]

Yeah, Slandaar is scum.

I still want this day to go on for a bit so we can talk about who else is scum.

I think mass claim should wait until tomorrow though. Does anyone disagree with that?

[BROseidon]

Mass claim tomorrow sounds good.

[Baezu]

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

[Rift Adrift]

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

It sure looks like you are claiming scum here. This is a logic fail of epic proportions.

If it was scum's goal to salvage the rolecop abillity before Slandaar was lynched...WHY WOULD EITHER SLANDAAR OR STUBBS ANNOUNCE IT IN THE GAME THREAD??

[BROseidon]

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

It sure looks like you are claiming scum here. This is a logic fail of epic proportions.

If it was scum's goal to salvage the rolecop abillity before Slandaar was lynched...WHY WOULD EITHER SLANDAAR OR STUBBS ANNOUNCE IT IN THE GAME THREAD??

There are not enough l's and o's to indicate my response to this post.

[Rift Adrift]

If I am missing something obvious, please enlighten me.

[BROseidon]

No, I just found your response hilarious. Baezu is the one who missed the obvious shit.

[BROseidon]

If scum were conserving their rolecop, why would they announce IN THREAD "hey, rolecop?" Towncred?

Seems like a pretty shitty way to go about it.

[Slandaar]

I like the idea of extending the day before we lynch BRO!

Hold off on massclaiming.

I need to check something with the mod.

Massclaiming right now is what needs to happen holding off seems terribly scum motivated.

We didn't mass claim.

Obviously, please ensure you interpret the tense of the post correctly.

I know, but Slandaar was asking for it.

Yes Good response ensure Rift knows I want massclaim!

We're probably not going there today. That was brought up on the much-abbreviated day 3.

This is a scumpost pure and simple.

Hold off on massclaiming.

I need to check something with the mod.

This post is strange

A little, but its OK.

Okay here goes.

I'm also a Chocolate zombie. I didn't believe Nati's claim, because I thought 2 town Chocolate zombies would be overpowered in this setup.

I ate Slandaar's brain last night. He claimed to have had an innocent and a guilty result. So either he was lying or he was going to die.

Slandaar was a rolecop. Which means he was lying and is the dethy's scum.


VOTE: Slandaar

Nice scumclaim Stubbs clearly there isn't 2 town chocolate zombies.

I know I am the town MVP but come on this is getting a bit silly now the lengths you scum will go to to get rid of me.

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

I like this post very much! I agree, lets lynch Stubbs!

VOTE: Stubbs

[Slandaar]

i can see some reasons that makes some sense given some of the things stubbs said d2 (asking for nati's win con, talking about how nati's claim doesn't make sense given the rest of town power) but i want to see stubbs address titus's questions.

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum.

in the "rare event that slandaar is not scum", stubbs and BRO are scum. i sincerely fucking doubt they'd out another scum just to get rid of slandaar when he was already likely to be lynched.

slandaar is scum.

You are in for a surprise... or not.

Yeah, Slandaar is scum.

I still want this day to go on for a bit so we can talk about who else is scum.

I think mass claim should wait until tomorrow though. Does anyone disagree with that?

Yes I do! Massclaim now is what must happen!

Mass claim tomorrow sounds good.

SCUMPOST

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

Fantastic post, Stubbs lynch is a go!

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

It sure looks like you are claiming scum here. This is a logic fail of epic proportions.

If it was scum's goal to salvage the rolecop abillity before Slandaar was lynched...WHY WOULD EITHER SLANDAAR OR STUBBS ANNOUNCE IT IN THE GAME THREAD??

Please stop claiming scum Rift it makes the game too easy

I like Slandaar as the deathy scum. However, we should cover our bases in the RARE event that Slandaar is not scum. This should be done before the massclaim as massclaim gives Slandaar the convinent out of checking the most guilty player and say "Whoops my reads were obviously wrong".

Stubbs''s Post is just awkward. Why didn't you CC nati during all that time Nati was the focus? Why didn't you say it's possible there is a town chocolate zombie AND I am the town chocolate zombie? Your claim comes after the fact. Why?

Also, why wouldn't you take my ability as you are a prime candidate for a mislynch?

Instead, you take Slandaar's ability to probably save the rolecop for the scums in case the deathy tells you to go to hell? I Do Not Like This.

Agreed. And now it seems even worse that you held on to that piece of information until now. If you had cc'ed, then it may have been believable, but now?

And why didn't you out the possibility that there was such a role as chocolate zombie when most of the votes on Nati were due to the fact that we did not believe that role existed for town?

I could believe that you are a chocolate zombie as well, but I do not believe that you're aligned with town.

VOTE: Stubbs

It sure looks like you are claiming scum here. This is a logic fail of epic proportions.

If it was scum's goal to salvage the rolecop abillity before Slandaar was lynched...WHY WOULD EITHER SLANDAAR OR STUBBS ANNOUNCE IT IN THE GAME THREAD??

There are not enough l's and o's to indicate my response to this post.

This post is laughably bad, how is BRO not dead yet?

If scum were conserving their rolecop, why would they announce IN THREAD "hey, rolecop?" Towncred?

Seems like a pretty shitty way to go about it.

Uh Stubbs is lying. Scums goal isn't to survive any longer as they knew they lost when they saw I am town so they set a new goal; to lynch me. Its slightly embarassing but I think you may achieve your goal!