Open 528: The Room of DOOM! GAME OVER
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I don't know about scum, but I certainly like it.In post 18, Skelda wrote:
I'm sure scum quite like it.In post 16, YamiNoKira wrote:Now, then... hello, Brian Skies! Fancy meeting you here.
So if I did this...
VOTE: Skelda
...you would like it?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
In post 20, YamiNoKira wrote:
Eh... why?In post 19, Dessew wrote:I don't know about scum, but I certainly like it.
This is the reason. Especially the beginning and the end.In post 17, Skelda wrote: I think if all Masons survive the night and we lynch town, it would be ideal for them to step forward as that would lower of suspect pool considerably. But anyway, like I said, we don't want to get ourselves in the situation of only one or two Masons alive so the Mason role can be fakeclaimable, so I agree, if we are about to lynch one of the Masons, step forward but do not drag your Mason partners into it. And all Masons should be breadcrumbing their roles now...- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I don't like how Skelda was fishing for Masons in his post I quoted. Yeah, sure, all of them should breadcrumb, so scum can easily find all of them... I didn't like his questions, either, but the answers pulled the trigger. Since it isn't clear for you Skelda: your vote on me was pointless, because you stated your intention to unvote. Never announce that you're pressuring somebody, it's stupid. Also, I don't see why would JKLM act so indecisive as scum. And you initially mention lynching him, but doesn't call him scummy, but later you correct yourself that you meant voting. If there're some votes on him, then what? And now he's your top scumread, because he's voting his top scumread. This is my case.
"I don't know about scum, but...": I wanted to be a little theatrical.
I like Kira, he's asikng a lot, and then states, too. Not afraid to get engaged with players, very enthusiastic. He's making a really big deal out of activity. It's okay that you want to use all our time until deadline, but calling out somebody only because he made only one post (his RV) in the first 24 hours of the game is way more than necessary. What past experience do you have with mafia?
Brian: care to explain #21?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Sorry, I didn't specify. I meant: please explain why you found the quoted part so scummy that you didn't RV as you initially intented.
Also, if you know Kira from EpicMafia, then what did you ask this?:In post 38, Brian Skies wrote: @Yami: Are you an alt account? Do you play on other forums?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I showed that my RV turned into a serious vote.In post 65, YamiNoKira wrote:
Now answer the other part: why did you state that you liked my bw on an RVS vote?In post 62, Dessew wrote:"I don't know about scum, but...": I wanted to be a little theatrical.What possible motivationdid you have to post that?
Votes aren't for expressing suspicion.In post 66, Skelda wrote:And also, I see now that my Dessew vote was a little useless, but it did its job of expressing my mild suspicion of Dessew, which still exists to a certain level. In the future, I will not announce plans to unvote since clearly that doesn't accomplice much.
...In post 69, Skelda wrote:
Page one or page 30, there was legitimate discussion, which you promptly ignored.
Does it bother you that much? It was page 1...YamiNoKira wrote:That's all you have to say? I know we just started, but really? Nothing else?
Eh.
That isn't fair. Those were taken out of context. In the second I was trying to explain the first's admittedly poor wording after you all attacked me because of it. I've given my explanation for this many times and I'm getting tired of repeating myself.Skelda wrote:not only do I not suspect Dessew much anymore
which is it? Isn't it a little early for contradictions?Skelda wrote:I don't suspect Dessew any less
You should focus on scumhunting more than trying to look town.In post 72, JKLM wrote: Honestly all of yesterday here is mostly a blur so I'm not sure what I was trying to say, other than that it was a bad feeling I had for dessew. As I said it was mostly to see a reaction. Of corse, someone Valle me out on it an I just said it was pressure. I've found in my experience, if someone points out the flimsiness of your pressure vote, it's better to admit it was pressure and fail at giving said pressure than To get people to think you're flimsy scum,
Especially I you want to be pro town.
Yes and you find me scummy, because...?In post 73, Brian Skies wrote:
If I find something that seems scummy to me or something that just doesn't seem right, I'd rather put my vote on that than RV. Your quote caught my attention and I didn't like it.In post 64, Dessew wrote:Sorry, I didn't specify. I meant: please explain why you found the quoted part so scummy that you didn't RV as you initially intented.
Also, if you know Kira from EpicMafia, then what did you ask this?:In post 38, Brian Skies wrote: @Yami: Are you an alt account? Do you play on other forums?
Content=/=PostIn post 74, JKLM wrote:^what Brian said about content. Word.
I don't see your point. Where do you want to get with this?In post 75, JKLM wrote: It would make sense that scum like to cut off RVS as early as they can as THEY want to make the bandwagon, whether it be for bussing OR for mislynching early on. As I've said it's merely a conjecture of mine but it doesn't make it not true. That statement doesn't make it true either though, so I'm kinda testing that conjecture out for myself I guess. Would be happy to hear your opinions on it, as to whether I'm way off or something like that.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Yes, it did. I found something scummy. And we've got a misunderstanding here, I like the overall bandwagon. The more people we have, the more I like it. And with the expression part I mean, that you can express your suspicion by posting, by voting you put pressure and show commitment etc.In post 82, YamiNoKira wrote:
Woah. It did? Why did that happen? Why didn't you actually say that instead of just saying you liked me bandwagoning?In post 81, Dessew wrote:I showed that my RV turned into a serious vote.
Actually, I would say that they are. Yes, they are used to get people lynched, but if they aren't for expressing suspicion or pressure, than no one would be voting until later in the Day when you actually have someone you want to get lynched.In post 81, Dessew wrote:Votes aren't for expressing suspicion.
You know, it's scummy as hell to threaten with Lynch all Lurkers.In post 83, YamiNoKira wrote:VOTE: Mutleyddmc
I have a feeling you're just baiting me, but I need something more from you than RVS right now. I'm not opposed to Lynch all (Active) Lurkers.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Hiraki:
I see your point about my read on JKLM. I don't get the "what changed?" part. FYI: I have two finished game on this site, one ongoing (if this one doesn't count), and I have played irl a lot, too. It might change your read on me, idk. Also, why are you voting Skelda, exactly? I'd appreciate a little more detail.
Everything's been said about them by others. And I've also given an explanation. Actually, I've said that I'd give an explanation, too.In post 88, Skelda wrote:Dessew, if your random vote on me changed to a legitimate one at that wierd post, why? I had like two posts at that point.
I also dislike the eh and ellipsis on my posts, Dessew. Is that seriously all that you have to say?
What is it supposed to mean?In post 98, Skelda wrote:Hopefully if JK's replacement is town he/she will prove him/herself as such, since this does not change my JK suspicion particularly.
Just want to tell that I lol'd. "He hasn't done anything scummy, except what he has. Oh, and that's what he mainly has done."In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote: This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure).- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Yeah, I got it. I absolutely agree with you.In post 109, YamiNoKira wrote:
Yeah, yeah, that was horrible wording. But being scummy and having scum-motivation are two different things, and it's the latter that I'm not convinced of (despite the former being true).In post 108, Dessew wrote:
Just want to tell that I lol'd. "He hasn't done anything scummy, except what he has. Oh, and that's what he mainly has done."In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote: This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure).
Also, I forgot to answer Hiraki's question about my #9: I just didn't understand. I mean he did vote, that vote could have stayed, and be his RV. Tbh, I don't understand the people who refuse to RVS, but his vote&unvote made even less sense.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I got that it was a joke. I just don't get why that vote couldn't stay.In post 112, Hiraki wrote:
You don't even think it could've made a little bit of a joke from previous experiences?Dessew wrote:Tbh, I don't understand the people who refuse to RVS, but his vote&unvote made even less sense.
Counter-overreact? And it was page 1, as it was said earlier. (Or your post was at page 3, whatever.) Now you shoud complain about inactivity, but then it was stupid.In post 116, Skelda wrote:
I know, but I was bringing it up again because Dessew seemed to counter over-react. Plus, as far as I'm concerned, it is scum-motivated to ignore discussion. That is why I was so suspicious of JKLM.In post 115, Hiraki wrote:
How is that grasping at straws? Yami admitted that he was over-reacting to one post before you posted that.In post 113, Skelda wrote:This was the post was referring to.
I forgot to post about Masons:
If masons and scum are all breadcrumbing, then such a breadcrumb doesn't really mean anything. But it can be picked up, that's why I think mason shouldn't breadcrumb. I haven't metaed you, Hiraki, have you played this setup frequently?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Care to explain?
You did actually post, so I guess we can't complain, can we? Well, I do.
Yes, breadcrumbing can't harm if it's done subtly enough, but that's really hard to do, I guess.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
It's absurd, but it could work. We can only lose a little possibility to find minor scumtells at the end of the game (normally only mason and scum would breadcrumb), but we can save our masons (put them in smaller danger), and they can prove their innocence. That's cool. I iso'd you, you weren't that scummy, my vote stayed on you after #140 only because I couldn't find a better place for it, but now since you came up with an idea that is probably actually helpful for town, it doesn't make any sense to keep ot there whatsoever.In post 142, Skelda wrote:
If you the Masons won't be capable of it, here's an idea: everyone could breadcrumb, with the Masons telling each other their breadcrumbs. Would that work?In post 140, Dessew wrote:Care to explain?
You did actually post, so I guess we can't complain, can we? Well, I do.
Yes, breadcrumbing can't harm if it's done subtly enough, but that's really hard to do, I guess.
UNVOTE: Skelda
VOTE: Viera
Hi Kubbs!- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Brian, Brian, Brian...In post 81, Dessew wrote:
Yes and you find me scummy, because...?In post 73, Brian Skies wrote:
If I find something that seems scummy to me or something that just doesn't seem right, I'd rather put my vote on that than RV. Your quote caught my attention and I didn't like it.In post 64, Dessew wrote:Sorry, I didn't specify. I meant: please explain why you found the quoted part so scummy that you didn't RV as you initially intented.
Also, if you know Kira from EpicMafia, then what did you ask this?:In post 38, Brian Skies wrote: @Yami: Are you an alt account? Do you play on other forums?
I don't see how it could make mason easier to find.In post 145, Brian Skies wrote:
Bread-crumbing for the sake of protecting the masons won't work unless everyone is extremely competent. You are talking about two teams of two mafia and a team of three masons. The difference in numbers will just make it easier to sniff out the masons.In post 142, Skelda wrote:If you the Masons won't be capable of it, here's an idea: everyone could breadcrumb, with the Masons telling each other their breadcrumbs. Would that work?
I hope we get some real contet, too.In post 154, Metal Sonic wrote:@mutley me and you townbloc y/y?
[line][/line]
Hello everybody! The players here seem to all be posting like sirs:- perfect punctuation, long sentences and posts.
I know of three players in this game personally: Mutley, Saki and Stubbs. Everyone else seems to be a stranger at this point in time. No worries! We can all be friends!
It has come to my attention that Saki has replaced out -- "Fallen into a trapdoor" I see. I'm sorry to burst your bubbles but Saki has merely changed his mask: the "trapdoor" was none other than a fitting room. I'll leave you guys to ponder on what a riddle I am trying to insinuate.
Now. It seems that it is still in the early stages in the game, so I am going to have to formulate some reads.
Unfortunately, this will mean that a majority of the players are Null, as there are no significant happenings or events as of yet.
I am going to put Stubbs and Mutley pre-emptively in my town pile because I WANT THEM TO BE TOWN.
If they really are town, they will be great assets towards our goal and we 3 will lead the town to victory.
It's just lame.In post 159, Viera Assassin wrote:In post 158, Skelda wrote:This game has 6 pages, read them and post your reads.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
Red is a replacement, so the hypocracy part of Hiraki's isn't valid. Also, Red seems to think that random votes are more important than they actually are. I'd really like to hear a little more about his read on Hiraki. Hiraki could clear things up about his Skelda-read, to.
I like MS's case on Hiraki, it's logical. He doesn't over-emphasise it, though, actually says that his read can change.
Brian, last time you found the quoted part scummy, and I'm asking you about your reasons.
If I understand well, Red said that Vierareplaced in, so probably wants to actually play the game and not lurk. Even if Viera and Saki are the same person, it's still logical to think so, because people make alts to trydifferentplaystyles, if I understand it correctly.
I will reread this part a little more thoroughly, I will move my vote after.- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I found MS's post town, because he said that it's weak, he doesn't stick to his reads, he's flexible. The first point became basically an argument about the meaning of phrases, and if I get correctly what he mean by the pushing part, then it's just fine.
Skelda-vote: I meant, I wonder if the experiment has ended.
ns: Are (/were) you scumreading Hiraki because others are (/were) not?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I'm unsure about my reads, I'd maybe go with a VA lynch. I though if MS was scu, he would've just found a major "towntell" for Hiraki, so yes, he's most likely town. I'm losing certainity in my Skelda-read, though.
Could somebody explain why a player would make an alt only to do the exact same thing with two accounts?- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
- Dessew
-
Dessew Mafia Scum
- Dessew
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: June 14, 2013
I completely forgot to move my vote.
UNVOTE: Vierra
VOTE: Skelda
This lynch is fine.
All I have are a buch of null- and townreads. MD is the only one who's a little off, I'd really like to hear more about his readlist.
Saki's answer to my question was fair, I guess, although, I still don't like all the unfunny jokeposts. It shows that he's reading, but isn't posting content.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew
- Dessew