[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5353920 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 241 -- Chain of Command -- Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #41 (isolation #6) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:57 pm
Postby Elyse »
How do you know it was a reaction test?
And do you seriously think that I opportunistically jumped on a RVS WAGON?!?! As if it would go anywhere? Saying people are scum for something done during RVS is great for reactions. I find that scum are often jumpier and react like ETL did (zomg do you actually think I'm scum for that?????) but it could just be playstyle. That's why I don't put toooo much merit into it.
Please. If this was a serious wagon, your argument would have legitimacy. But it's not.
Post
Post #45 (isolation #7) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:15 pm
Postby Elyse »
In post 42, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Except I wasn't all "ZOMG DO YOU ACTUALLY THINK I'M SCUM FOR THAT?????" I asked if you really thought it made me scum. I wanted to know how you would justify your reaction.
And of course it was a reaction test. Why wouldn't it be? What possible gain is there other than seeing who would jump on it screaming, and I quote:
I know you weren't screaming in all caps. I never said you were. Nice misrep though? Any type of reaction to that is scummy. I would expect you to ignore it. But, as I said, you seem to be a more cautious player so I could see that coming from you as town.
And I dunno why you self-voted. I thought you were just having fun because you basically hand-picked this playerlist.
In post 43, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:How are you now saying "I was reaction testing the reaction test"? I mean, if that's the case, why didn't you recognize what I was doing?
In post 41, Elyse wrote:How do you know it was a reaction test?
Because self votes are either done at the beginning of RVS when they're null, or it's in reaction to something later in the game, at which point it's dependent on the context. This was neither. Simplest answer was a reaction test to get us out of RVS.
In post 41, Elyse wrote:
Saying people are scum for something done during RVS is great for reactions. I find that scum are often jumpier and react like ETL did (zomg do you actually think I'm scum for that?????) but it could just be playstyle. That's why I don't put toooo much merit into it.
RVS is just another part of the game. No one is excused for their actions because "lol RVS". Scum can be caught during RVS too, and in fact, they have.
Ummmmmm....I don't really understand that in response to what I said. I never said people are excused for their actions in RVS.
Post
Post #65 (isolation #8) » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:44 am
Postby Elyse »
In post 47, Bulbazak wrote:
No, you're scummy for opportunistically jumping on an easy wagon for policy reasons and then backpedaling when called out on it by simultaneously saying "It was a reaction test." and "It was an RVS wagon.".
IT WASN'T SERIOUS. WAGON HOPS HAPPEN ALL THE TIME DURING RVS. It helps to move the game along. And hello, it just did.
In post 47, Bulbazak wrote:
You saw an opportunity pushing the self vote reason, and you leapt at it. Calling it an "RVS wagon" is just a way to excuse yourself of your actions.
Wisdom already explained this better than I can, but it was a reaction test, and you need to reevaluate your formulation of reads if you think I was seriously trying to lynch ETL there.
In post 47, Bulbazak wrote:
Do you mean to tell me you put people at L-2 all the time without any intention of lynching them?
In RVS I do, yes. And don't even say "RVS doesn't excuse your actions" when people wagon for no reason in RVS all the time.
In post 47, Bulbazak wrote:
Then why are you trying to excuse your actions by calling it "an RVS wagon"?
Oh. I thought you meant that I said things that occurred during RVS didn't count. Yes, scum can be caught during RVS, and it can be useful (barely), but bandwagoning to L-2 is not something that is scummy at all. Especially considering that is was obviously for reactions and I asked why the number of votes to lynch was higher than normal.
Wisdom <33333
Yay thank you for giving me a solid town read. I agree with you here. UNVOTE: VOTE: Bulbazak
P-edit:
ZOMG I'M PUTTING HIM TO L-2 I MUST BE SCUM!!!111!1!!!!11
I thought you said it was a reaction test? That's a serious reason to vote.
By serious I mean a vote with reasoning and intent to lynch. A reaction test is not a serious vote, in my opinion at least. I think you are now arguing semantics and you should stop.
In post 65, Elyse wrote:
WAGON HOPS HAPPEN ALL THE TIME DURING RVS.
True, but as soon as someone gets 3 votes, RVS is effectively over. A wagon with 3 or more votes is a serious wagon.
Also, while wagon hops may happen all the time during RVS, the people doing the hopping will always be questioned for their actions.
Is that a rule? Nope. Wagons can go to L-1 during RVS. It's not like the first two reasonless votes are okay and the next one is "STOP! YOU ARE SCUM! YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE A SERIOUS REASON!" What are you even pushing here?
In post 65, Elyse wrote:
and you need to reevaluate your formulation of reads if you think I was seriously trying to lynch ETL there.
You put her 2 away from lynch. What were you trying to do to her if not trying to get her lynched?
Reaction test. I feel like a broken record. The vote number doesn't matter. I could put her at L-1 for reactions. I've done it before. She wasn't getting lynched on page freaking 2.
Also, why the claim so early? And why me or 50 shades?
I'm not too clear on the setup. Does the lieutenant have to be town or are PRs meaningless to alignment?
Post
Post #195 (isolation #16) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:40 pm
Postby Elyse »
Sakura is probably the second scum.
Look at her ISO.
She votes for Bulb, then quickly to Flammus, then Antihero and says she's not moving off Antihero because she "trusts Nacho's read". This is on a slot that has only posted prod-dodges and replace-out posts by that point. I find it very suspect that she abandons her own reasons for votes and goes with someone else's because it "fits his scumplay to a T".
And this is the slot that has only posted prod-dodges and replace-out posts
.
I understand Nacho saying that Antihero is scummy for being lurky, but as I already stated, it seems to be non-game related. If mastin calls me scum for this, so be it I guess. I don't really care since it's dumb anyway.
Post
Post #203 (isolation #18) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:07 pm
Postby Elyse »
I feel like you are smart enough to have your own opinions. But I digress.
It's easier for scum to latch on to what other people say and ride with it rather than form their own opinions. I feel you are competent enough to come up with your own opinions as well.
Post
Post #266 (isolation #21) » Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:14 am
Postby Elyse »
In post 247, mastin2 wrote:They tie into the others. Elyse shows a contradiction in mindset between 29 and 35, and then contradicts it again in 39, and AGAIN in 41. Yet once MORE in 45. To some extent in 65 and 81, though these get progressively weaker as time goes on. (133 is the last.)
You talk big but you have yet to actually show any proof besides quoting my ISO. (?)
In post 247, mastin2 wrote:
She's been changing her story the whole time, growing increasingly desperate to get the attention off of her as the lie she's told has grown. All from a vote that was already bad.
When it actually
works
and people get off of her, it slowly begins to fade out of her iso, but lingers until the subject is dropped entirely.
How have I changed my story at all? I told the truth and have been the whole time. And I don't understand how the bolded is scummy. I don't know what "it" is but why would I, as town or scum, consistently bring up something that makes me look scummy? What you're saying just isn't true. It doesn't make sense for me to keep talking about something that makes me look bad (as any alignment) when it's being dropped entirely.
Now this is assuming that my vote on Bulb was actually bad and scummy, which it wasn't.
Post
Post #332 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:22 pm
Postby Elyse »
In post 328, Wisdom wrote:mastin just feels like that scum that is good with words and nobody suspects. He keeps saying things without explaining them and nobody cares to ask him to do so. Like his recent "flammus is scum if wisdom isn't", which is completely baseless but nobody is going to care about.
His concern about not wanting the day to end feels fake as he doesn't really try to interact with anyone.
I completely agree with this. I feel like we're on the same wavelength.
I've addressed things to mastin but he hasn't responded to them, despite saying no one is asking him anything. And that's such a stupid excuse anyway. It's your job to persuade people on your suspects and convince them why you're right. It's not anyone else's job to get that info from you. Do it yourself or shut up. It just seems like a convenient excuse to avoid giving reasons for your horrible, horrible reads.
In post 247, mastin2 wrote:They tie into the others. Elyse shows a contradiction in mindset between 29 and 35, and then contradicts it again in 39, and AGAIN in 41. Yet once MORE in 45. To some extent in 65 and 81, though these get progressively weaker as time goes on. (133 is the last.)
You talk big but you have yet to actually show any proof besides quoting my ISO. (?)
In post 247, mastin2 wrote:
She's been changing her story the whole time, growing increasingly desperate to get the attention off of her as the lie she's told has grown. All from a vote that was already bad.
When it actually
works
and people get off of her, it slowly begins to fade out of her iso, but lingers until the subject is dropped entirely.
How have I changed my story at all? I told the truth and have been the whole time. And I don't understand how the bolded is scummy. I don't know what "it" is but why would I, as town or scum, consistently bring up something that makes me look scummy? What you're saying just isn't true. It doesn't make sense for me to keep talking about something that makes me look bad (as any alignment) when it's being dropped entirely.
Now this is assuming that my vote on Bulb was actually bad and scummy, which it wasn't.
In post 328, Wisdom wrote:mastin just feels like that scum that is good with words and nobody suspects. He keeps saying things without explaining them and nobody cares to ask him to do so. Like his recent "flammus is scum if wisdom isn't", which is completely baseless but nobody is going to care about.
His concern about not wanting the day to end feels fake as he doesn't really try to interact with anyone.
I completely agree with this. I feel like we're on the same wavelength.
I've addressed things to mastin but he hasn't responded to them, despite saying no one is asking him anything. And that's such a stupid excuse anyway. It's your job to persuade people on your suspects and convince them why you're right. It's not anyone else's job to get that info from you. Do it yourself or shut up. It just seems like a convenient excuse to avoid giving reasons for your horrible, horrible reads.
Post
Post #391 (isolation #31) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:16 am
Postby Elyse »
If Wisdom is ever in danger of actually being lynched, then yes, I will provide a bunch of reasons and whatnot, but I don't need to right now. You are looking for reasons that aren't there.
And how is saying "I can be convinced of ETL-scum" scummy? People say that all the time. It means that I can see where Mollie is coming from but want more reasons.
Post
Post #395 (isolation #32) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am
Postby Elyse »
No, it's actually
I want mollie to give better reasons for ETL-scum
. Mollie is a very helpful/good player if she's on your side, and I feel like her avoidances of the Sakura and Bulb wagons are strange. She would rather go for a non-present lurker, and I dislike her vote on Wisdom. Her elaborating on ETL will help me determine my read on her as well, since right now, it's leaning scum.
And it's pretty fucking stupid for me, as scum, to ask for reasons and just sheep them. It might avoid accountability but I'm also a mindless sheep whereas Mollie can back up her reasons.
Post
Post #399 (isolation #33) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:28 am
Postby Elyse »
Usually I can tell it's you because you don't capitalize but I could be wrong sometimes.
I do agree that ETL is scummy but I think she hasn't really caught up with the game yet so unless you have something that is irrelevant to that she gets a pass for now. That was my whole point of asking you for more stuff on her.
And yes I've been saying Bulb scum since his ridiculous vote on me at the beginning and his play has been consistently scummy since then.
Post
Post #446 (isolation #34) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:30 am
Postby Elyse »
@ETL
I'm not defending you. You're leaning scum for me. But it's similar to people suspecting Antihero for lurking when there were obvious RL issues. Same reason I'm questioning the scumreads on you.
First, you ignore my post in response to you.
Second, you don't question Wisdom's townread on you and instead question his townread on me when *admittedly*, you have been lurky and scummy. The question should be how he can say anything about
In post 469, Elyse wrote:Why didn't you ask both? Why didn't you respond to my post?
Because I wanted to see what he had to say about you first. As far as responding to your post, I'm not sure what I was supposed to say. You explained yourself and it made sense. Am I supposed to acknowledge every post every one makes? If it makes sense, then it doesn't necessarily need a response. I'm going to poke at things that don't make sense to me.
If it made sense then why did you ask Wisdom how he could be certain of my alignment? It doesn't fit.
See? You continue saying nonsense that only stupid people would say. Why the fuck would any scum in this game kill you? Not only you're the scummiest person, but you're not a PR and you're the lowest rank. No way scum are ever touching you. You know this perfectly well. Yet you act like you don't. You're not stupid, so you're scum.
The rest of your post are repeats of the bullshit you have said earlier, so I won't bother. You're scum and you need to die right now.
This. So much this.
@Fitz
Bulb is scummier than Sakura. I still think Sakura is scum and not just dumbtown like others seem to think. In the game I played with her previously, she was town and dug herself into a hole pretty quickly. She seemed upset and said it was unlike her; she just couldn't get into the game. Here, she doesn't care at all and just seems to blindly follow others. She has pride in herself as town, and I feel like she wouldn't as scum because her scumhunting isn't genuine anyway.
Also, this whole RVS thing is literally retarded. For the millionth time, being the third on a RVS wagon that is going nowhere is not opportunistic. I wasn't voting her for serious reasons. Even if you don't believe it was a reaction test (which it was), then you at least have to realize "Self votes are scum!!!" is NOT an acceptable reason that I would actually use to jump on a wagon.
Post
Post #772 (isolation #49) » Sun Oct 20, 2013 5:11 am
Postby Elyse »
@Bulb and mollie
Stop. This isn't helping.
Bulb you're being stupid. Mollie is not in any sort of "paranoid" state and you wanting to "talk to Nacho" is silly. You should be able to convince more than just Nacho you are town,
if you actually are town.
Mollie, stop fueling his fire. He's scum desperately trying to avoid being lynched. He's riling up emotions.
hey wisdom
who can read sakura like a fucking book?
<<<<this guy
who thought sakura was scum in monks and masons in the dead thread when she was horrendously and obviously town?
you
I know you have the tendency to tunnel.
And I know you get under her skin.
But if you try to scumread someone who I can read well and you can't read worth a shit, we're going to get into this horrible shitfest instead of just rolling the game together like we usually do. Please, please, please leave her to me.
Is this what you want me to comment on? I don't know what to say. I think Sakura is town now but I wasn't going to let mollie's read affect that just because she can read him "like a fucking book".
Post
Post #776 (isolation #50) » Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:39 am
Postby Elyse »
^^LMAO
Also, Bulb, YES I HAVE PLAYED WITH MOLLIE. NOW THAT I'VE SEEN HER SCUM AND TOWN GAMES I LIKE TO THINK I CAN READ HER PRETTY ACCURATELY. She's town. And she's not paranoid. And it's silly to try to only talk to ONE player. That's my point.
Post
Post #781 (isolation #51) » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:11 am
Postby Elyse »
In post 779, Bulbazak wrote:Once a wagon has 3 or more people, RVS is essentially over,
NO IT'S NOT.
I don't know where you got this from, whether you pulled it out of your ass or copied it from someone else, but it's not true. You keep trying to paint me as scummy by breaking
your
rules when they aren't everyone else's.
And I'm not going to quote mollie's posts to show why she's not this paranoid lunatic. Sure, she might be a little nervous committing to a wagon and such as most players are, but she's not in a state that you can't talk or reason with her.
As far as silly versus scummy, I've already explained why your play is scummy so now it's just silly to me.
In post 779, Bulbazak wrote:Once a wagon has 3 or more people, RVS is essentially over,
NO IT'S NOT.
I don't know where you got this from, whether you pulled it out of your ass or copied it from someone else, but it's not true. You keep trying to paint me as scummy by breaking
your
rules when they aren't everyone else's.
RVS is a tool to help us start scumhunting. If a wagon has built up to that level, people are obviously scumhunting. RVS
is not
some mystical other section of the game. It is part of the same game, and scum can and will be caught during this time. And I'm getting fed up with this growing trend of "You can't call me out on that. It was RVS!" Bull crap. I can and I will, and if you can't understand the basics and purpose of RVS, don't blame me for calling you scum when you hide behind RVS like your own personal shield.
You didn't respond to my point.
Bulbazak wrote:
In post 781, Elyse wrote:
And I'm not going to quote mollie's posts to show why she's not this paranoid lunatic.
I never called her a lunatic. Now you're putting words in my mouth. If you want to tell me that she is not paranoid, you're going to have to show me why you're thinking that. Otherwise, quit buddying up to her.
I know. You implied it though. And I'm not buddying up to her, just calling out your scumminess.
Bulbazak wrote:
In post 781, Elyse wrote:
Sure, she might be a little nervous committing to a wagon and such as most players are
She's not nervous committing to a wagon. What gave you that idea?
Well she unvoted you and then revoted you and that's the only paranoia I saw. I also see she's paranoid of you being town but has come to the conclusion that even if you're town, then you're useless. What other paranoia is there?
Bulbazak wrote:
In post 781, Elyse wrote:
but she's not in a state that you can't talk or reason with her.
Are we even reading the same game? She's shut me down every single time. Seriously, this buddying of yours is ridiculous.
No she hasn't. You have been belittling her and not trying to talk to her. And again, I'm not buddying to mollie. If I was, it would be more subtle than this.
Bulbazak wrote:
In post 781, Elyse wrote:
As far as silly versus scummy, I've already explained why your play is scummy so now it's just silly to me.
Post
Post #834 (isolation #54) » Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:00 am
Postby Elyse »
@Fitz
If you are treating Bulb's claim like a PR (saying we should give PRs a free pass for today), then why the hell is your vote on an actual claimed PR?
Post
Post #899 (isolation #57) » Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:56 am
Postby Elyse »
In post 890, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I dont like fitz anymore. Will explain after work but his posts on this page and last page are whats pinging me.
Funny. I actually like his posts on these pages either.
Although I dislike ThAd. And not just because he wants to wagon me. I feel like he wants to keep both Wis and Bulb alive to create conflict. Either both are town or one is his buddy and ThAd knows that it's only a matter of time before his buddy is lynched. It's a cop-out.