you have half a page to obvtown yourself. go \o/
Mini 1537: ATTACK ON TITAN (Game Over!)
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
yep \:D/In post 10, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I am excited as fuck for this game. Hope Tammy and Pieguyn are town as well so we can crush the scumteam into a billion tiny pieces.
I am town. Are you town, Pie?
let's completely own the shit out of this game together :3-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I trust F-16 will be able to read Tammy when she does post. so she can go into the townblock on the condition that if she's scum I'll take her out of the townblock o/In post 23, Kazekirimaru wrote:Tammy hasn't posted yet?
inb4 I just townbloc'd the 3 scum
on a serious note, it's not a serious townbloc-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
flavor doesn't determine alignment, which means that especially given annie's alignment in series was left unresolved annie's alignment in game could be just about anything
however roles should come from flavor and I'd expect smth like miller would
@F-16:what made you sure on Bert-town? especially considering you said you don't trust early miller claims especially from someone like him. I still don't get the "weak" and there's still a chance annie as a character could be outright mafia based on the statement about flavor. did I miss smth 0.0-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
oh lordIn post 69, BROseidon wrote:I don't like the way you're pushing the Annie flavor based on the anime when the game's based on the manga, with Annie's alignment in the manga being incredibly clear. It's like you're simultaneously trying to write-off the flavor while using it to potentially position an attack later.
you're scum aren't you
this reminds me of how you jumped on Varsoon in imperishable night early game with a sketchy reason and iirc completely ignored everything else
I haven't seen the anime or read the manga .-. so I didn't know any of this, nor was I paying attention to exactly what this game was based off of, nor did I know this bc no one brought up the manga. so you're kind of right in that I'm not really paying much attention to the flavor, but I'm using what I'm picking up of it to try to figure out stuff
what makes you think I'm familiar with the manga?
holy shit you really are scumIn post 69, BROseidon wrote:wtf is Mykonian's read list.
vote: BRO-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
why are you trying to discredit smth that might break the game?In post 99, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why are you so sure there's a third?
And, really? A game-breaking aspect of the setup that was missed by four different people? Unlikely. I find this all too hard to believe.
if you're town I'd expect you would take more of an interest in smth like this. the fact you wouldn't be more interested in this feels skeevy as fuck. I don't buy that you think there might not be a 3rd (there were 2 claims with only like 3 or 4 people actively discussing it and some of the people still haven't even posted it yet), and it feels like scum damage control. this seems like typical scum who's afraid of automatically losing
what does this mean?In post 115, Paschendale wrote:Pie's tone worries me, too. Looks like a lot more assurance than is really warranted.
so you accuse Plum for being non-committal and then you epically fail at committing to a stance on the "weak" discussion. your logic is contradictory as fuckIn post 115, Paschendale wrote:Brian seems towny. Plum seems extremely non-committal. I do not find that trustworthy.
I'm not really sure what to make of all this "weak" discussion. It might be legit, but it also might be a lot of rolefishing.
also makes sense how you don't want to take a stance on smth that might result in an auto-loss for you :>-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
^ thisIn post 123, Kagami wrote:
ughIn post 119, pitoli wrote:Just a friendly reminder: Character flavor does not determine alignment, and the game is not breakable by flavor. Additionally, scum factions have been equipped with safe fakeclaims. Thanks!
K, I still think bert is town, but my assumptions were false. No conftowns
even if there's no conftowns Bert is town as fuck
get out of my head. I get the feeling that Kaze is feeling apprehensive about this whole "weak" discussion bc he's scum and doesn't want to auto-loseKagami wrote:I don't think he's fakeclaiming. I was just pointing out that with scum getting fakeclaims, it's no longer completely impossible that he's scum, as was my initial proposal.
124 feels like indignation that scum information (that they have fakeclaims) has been leaked by the mod.
vote: Kaze-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
so your apprehension about breaking the game was just bc you don't like breaking games?In post 132, Kazekirimaru wrote:No. Town or scum I'd be rather upset if there was some aspect of the setup that would break the game. I came here to play Mafia and have fun. Breaking games is not fun.
if so, what happened to your skepticism about it being "too unlikely to be true" and not thinking there's a 3rd weak player? as far as I could tell that's why you didn't want to continue with this path. I'd like an answer for this plz
you also don't seem to have a problem with "confirming" two townies here
which is kind of off from someone who apparently doesn't like breaking games. what's going on 0.0In post 109, Kazekirimaru wrote:Would you like to confirm this, Bert? If this is all true, I'll be on my merry way with two confirmed townies today.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
wow nice discredit. still doesn't change the fact that you jumped on me early game for a sketchy reasonIn post 154, BROseidon wrote:1) You suck at reading me.
also I'm 1/1 on reading you, so this isn't even correct. the only completed game we have together is imperishable night and although you did fool me D1, I came around to it on D2. so that's a blatant fucking lie
this is a blatant strawman. it's not bc you made an early pressure move, it's bc the early pressure move you made was shit and it p much exactly matches up with how you played in imperishable night. your jump on Varsoon in that game was an early pressure move, but it was bad bc the reasoning for it was sketchy as fuck. what's different about this?In post 154, BROseidon wrote:2) I make early pressure moves regardless of alignment
I was sheeping what everyone was saying about the flavor bc if everyone agrees about it then it's probably true. I had no way of knowing whether said flavor was BS or not, and from what people are saying it doesn't appear to be BS in the first place.In post 154, BROseidon wrote:Were you just sheeping BS on your flavor comment, then?
why are you assuming I knew said flavor was BS when sheeping it? like you apparently think that I'm scum who was deliberately sheeping BS?
this is exactly why your push on me sucks. first, you said I was scum who was writing off flavor while positioning for a flavor based attack later, citing the differentiation between anime and manga to back it up. but in order for this to the case, I have to be familiar enough with the flavor to know the difference in annie's position between anime/manga, and know which one this game is based off of. this assumption comes straight out of thin air and I don't see at all how the fuck you felt comfortable making an assumption like that. not to mention someone said your idea that the game is based exclusively off the manga is incorrect to begin with. when I told you I don't know the flavor, you completely dodged me. instead you left your vote on me and continued the push, despite one of the underlying assumptions behind your push was demonstrated to be unequivocally incorrect (game being based on manga), which in this case fked up a lot of your reasoning. and now you accuse me of sheeping smth that's BS, which makes the assumption that I knew it was BS. which is the same thing. why would you make an assumption like that consideringI just said I don't know the flavor?
tl;dr: you assumed smth that is completely false and there was no reason for you to assume that. your reason for voting me is entirely fabricated and not coming from a legitimate thought process. your logic is contradictory as fuck and the way you're trying to completely dismiss me with these terribad illogical arguments is, guess what? scummy as fuck. die :>
vote: BRO
and one more thing. go back and look at all your illogic in NY167. you discredited, misrep'd, and strawmanned all over the place. this is the same shit. if I apparently "suck at reading you" as you say, then why are my arguments against you incorrect? you still haven't given an explanation why. good luck ~-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can you explain why you thought there wouldn't be a 3rd weak player? bc I can't look past it and how it seems like damage control. and I'm not sure I buy that such a large amt of apprehension comes from "I don't like breaking games"In post 144, Kazekirimaru wrote:I kinda thought I addressed the point. My skepticism obviously just kinda disappeared after Bert showed up.
also, what are your thoughts on Pasch and BRO?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
if you believed there was another weak player why you'd be skeptical of Kagami for doing the same thing? did you think there wasn't a 3rd weak player?In post 167, Kazekirimaru wrote:I didn't say I thought there wouldn't be. I was asking Kagami why she was assuming there would be. There's quite a difference.
Scum and town, respectively.
go back look at my massive wall about BRO try again. till then, explain BRO town?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
why do you think he'd always do the most obvious strategy? this is the same guy who stole a weak neighborize and suicided on his partner just to give her a ridiculous amt of towncred. it's obvious BRO would NOT necessarily make the obvious scum play all the time and I could totally see him doing this for the towncredIn post 171, Kazekirimaru wrote:Bro pretty much disassembled the entire "We can find the scums based on the Weak modifier" idea that was floating around. If he were scum, he would have let the town indulge that poor avenue of thinking and probably try to score some mislynches off it rather than argue against it. I'm not voting Bro. He's town.
it's a big deal bc he's relying on incorrect arguments, discrediting, strawmanning, etc. and isn't actually answering any of my questions about him. he thinks he can just brush my suspicion on him off by doing nothing and no one will call him on it (which is p much what you're doing). his engagement of me is full of loaded questions that make assumptions that I know the flavor, despite the fact I'VE ALREADY SAID I DON'T. p much my last paragraph and tl;dr explains everythingPlum wrote:Pie, I'm not seeing anything Bro is saying that you don't like as a big deal. Likewise vice versa.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
exactly, which is why him doing that is null at best. the fact that he did this isn't a scumtell, but it's not a towntell either. I also think that the "all weak = town" got destroyed as soon as mod threw that scum got fakeclaims, and it prob would have been brought up anyway when discussing lynch options. so him bringing it up now probably didn't do anything 0.0In post 174, Kazekirimaru wrote:Occam's razor. I'm not going to assume he'd purposely destroy a perfectly good mislynch outlet in some sort of next-level plot because he played well as scum in game X. If that's the way to win the game, all scum should just claim scum in their first post and vote their partners from the get-go because next-level WIFOMsandwiches. You're confbiasing.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
hiIn post 177, Paschendale wrote:Pie is still scummy, but was my second choice vote while typing my first post.
care to answer my questions? 128
also looking back you were agreeing with kaze who never even explained his notions on F-16 or me. why do you think we're scum?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
myko stop voting F-16 and sheep me onto BRO
he was scum v. me in this game. in that game the game was in MYLO on D3 (there were 7 people alive with 2 scum), although we didn't know it. BRO as scum had got lynched on D2 and the two remaining scum were his partners (zmuffin and GIF/Nacho hydra). I pegged one of the scum, had the other scum as my 3rd, but then got manipulated onto my other scumread who wasn't scum on the basis that it wasn't XYLO and lost the game bc of that.
the point is, BRO knows I get sidetracked easily, and he also knows that I don't back down often, based on a 1v1 I had early game v. Varsoon (this was also where I referenced him making a sketchy jump early game). so that kind of defense is exactly what I would expect from scum-BRO in this kind of situation. "oh look, pie's making an early push on me. I'll just completely brush it off, then respond with some aggression so that he backs off and goes to look elsewhere! I don't even have to address anything which will give him a foothold to make a better push on me, so that I get to avoid an early game push from him. and no one will notice how I'm not actually answering anything at all bc of all the towncred I get by pointing out the flaw in Kagami's plan." ok mb that was exaggerated a bit but you get the idea-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=32587In post 188, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Pie, I am not convinced that BRO's assumptions about whether you know the anime = scum. He is null for now. I'll go through his other games to see how he opens his attacks as town or scum. That should shed a better light on his affiliation. Can you link the games you have played with BRO? Pasch is leaning scum.
that's the only one. he was scum I was town
also it's not just the fact he made that assumption. it's how his "engagement" with me was nothing but a bunch of loaded questions that made said assumptions. it's bad enough he made said assumption (especially after I told him I didn't know flavor) but then he used it to come up with a bunch of fake reasons to throw blame at me and get me off him. there's also how he blatantly ignored the fact that another assumption he was making was incorrect. IMO it makes way more sense in the context of my above post. unless that's what you meant-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 256, BROseidon wrote:1) My reason for jumping on you wasn't sketch. Yeah, early game isn't going to have to most evidence, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to sit around and wait for someone to stumble. I'm going to press something minor and get pressure moving.
except it's not bc you made the assumption that I'm familiar enough with the flavor to do smth like that, when there's no basis for that assumption. I could see smth like "oh I would have expected everyone in this game to watch the anime", but yours was based off the fact that I KNEW the manga and p much everything about the flavor. let me break down your argument for you:In post 256, BROseidon wrote:3) What's different about this is that my reasoning was fine. You awkwardly postured around Bert's claim. I attacked you for it.
so what are you trying to imply by this statement?In post 69, BROseidon wrote:I don't like the way you're pushing the Annie flavor based on the anime when the game's based on the manga, with Annie's alignment in the manga being incredibly clear. It's like you're simultaneously trying to write-off the flavor while using it to potentially position an attack later.
"I don't like the way you're pushing the Annie flavor based on the anime when the game's based on the manga, with Annie's alignment in the manga being incredibly clear."
you're implying that I am scum who is deliberately pushing the annie flavor based off the anime when the game is based off the manga. however, in order to do this, I have to know the annie flavor in between the game and the manga in the first place. this is bc no one had been discussing the manga AT ALL
"It's like you're simultaneously trying to write-off the flavor while using it to potentially position an attack later."
again, suppose I was scum and I was doing this. then again I would have to know annie's alignment in the manga. there's also the idea that mb it's just me but in USA at least I get the feeling there's not very many people who even read manga, so I srsly don't get where this assumption comes from at all
there's also this one
"when the game's based on the manga"
which was demonstrated to be false, although idk if it was intentional. although I really don't care atm
In post 256, BROseidon wrote:4) BS = Brian Skies, obviously. You missed that part, which is super suspect, give that he's the one who said Annie's alignment in the show was ambiguous, which you then worked off of. The fact that you then didn't catch me referring back to that point indicates a lack of solid trajectory, aka scum trying to bullshit reasons without understanding what those reasons are
WOW MASSIVE DERP LOL. ok it makes more sense nowIn post 256, BROseidon wrote:6) I didn't dodge that you didn't know the flavor; I tried to work out where you got that idea from, and tracked it back to BS (Brian Skies, so you can't misrep me again on this. You then COMPLETELY MISSED THAT.
the last sentence is the most random ass assumption I've ever seen. the fact I didn't catch you referring back to that point indicates I'm not aware that BS = Brian. you're assuming that this comes from a scum motivation (BS reasons), rather than showing WHY it comes from a scum motivation as opposed to smth else (not realizing BS = brian). I can't really explain this any further beyond the fact I didn't know BS was referring to brian skies as opposed to bullshit. however, bc you didn't explain why, I get the feeling you knew I didn't have any explanation and were just trying to paint me as scummy
nope. let me quote again for referenceIn post 256, BROseidon wrote:5) I didn't cite a difference b/w the manga and the anime,
your point was that I was pushing the annie flavor based off anime when the game was based off manga, and annie's alignment in the manga was clear. it's suspicious bc the alignment I'm pushing re: annie is apparently entirely different from what it should be. you are clearly differentiating between annie's aligmnent in anime (ambiguous) vs. manga (clear).In post 69, BROseidon wrote:I don't like the way you're pushing the Annie flavor based on the anime when the game's based on the manga, with Annie's alignment in the manga being incredibly clear. It's like you're simultaneously trying to write-off the flavor while using it to potentially position an attack later.
AHAH THIS IS A BLATANT CONTRADICTIONIn post 256, BROseidon wrote:I assumed that the anime hasn't gotten as far as the manga, so that someone watching only the anime might not have known how that arc would have ended.
if you assumed that someone watching only the anime wouldn't know how the arc ended, then where did you get the idea that I knew how it ended as indicated by the fact that you pushed on me for misrepping the flavor?
sry but you just got caught so fucking hard >w<
nope. I JUST SAID that, bc you're a strong scum player, that kind of play is null coming from you as opposed to a towntellIn post 259, BROseidon wrote:"He's scum because he's a strong scum player, so he'd make that sort of play as scum."
if you're not trying to brush me off then what's the point of statements like this:In post 274, BROseidon wrote:Wtf I respond directly to you, ask you questions, and keep the pressure on you, and you turn around and say that I'm trying to brush you off?
I find statements like this to be generally defensive bc by saying what I'm going to do next and painting it in a scummy light ("play off") you're trying to manipulate me into not responding or otherwise giving a response that isn't the natural continuation from your arguments. it also comes from a scum motivation in that you don't want me to give said natural response and thus continue the 1v1 further. so yes, you are trying to brush me off. it's the same deal as you completely dodging my arguments when I first pushed on you. no, I'm not going to let you cover it upIn post 256, BROseidon wrote:You're now going to try to play off that you didn't realize BS=Brian Skies in my previous post, and that you forgot that he was the one (and only one before you) who first said that Annie's alignment in the series is ambiguous.
oh no I'm really scared someone save me from the big bad BROIn post 274, BROseidon wrote:You're my main focus now.
fuck that. while I can see this very reasonably coming from a town POV, this also feels defensive. it also fits with all the other statements you've made from a scum POV in that you're trying to manipulate me into not continuing the 1v1 with you-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
or for anyone who's watching you can just look at this part
get off your wagons and vote BRO with me already
AHAH THIS IS A BLATANT CONTRADICTIONIn post 256, BROseidon wrote:I assumed that the anime hasn't gotten as far as the manga, so that someone watching only the anime might not have known how that arc would have ended.
if you assumed that someone watching only the anime wouldn't know how the arc ended, then where did you get the idea that I knew how it ended as indicated by the fact that you pushed on me for misrepping the flavor?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
YES I KNEW IT AHAHA
wanna vote BRO with us?
inb4 you're scum buddying me like you did to Varsoon @_@-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
elaborate plzIn post 311, zMuffinMan wrote:i'm not really reading bro as scum for individual posts. it's more a body-of-work thing and the underlying tone in the way he responds to things-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
the point is if I was willfully and knowingly posturing around Bert they I would HAVE TO BE FAMILIAR ENOUGH WITH THE FLAVOR TO KNOW ANNIE'S MANGA ALIGNMENT, SINCE NO ONE HAD BROUGHT UP THE MANGA AT ALL. YOU WERE THE FIRST TO DO THAT. THERE WAS NO REFERENCE OF THE MANGA BEFORE YOU BROUGHT IT UPIn post 329, BROseidon wrote:When what I pointed out was that you were using it as a tool to POSTURE AROUND BERT. You're focusing in on my flavor accusation, and not the fact that you were posturing against Bert.
So why don't you address that point.
I don't call Brian BS, I call him Brian. I get confused and I basically go "wait what" every time someone calls him BS . as I said, if you really are town, feel free to not believe it. but the way you're pushing on this makes me think you knew I wouldn't have a good answer for this question, and are trying to paint me as scummyIn post 329, BROseidon wrote:Especially given that after you admitted to sheeping on flavor, I traced that thought process back to Brian. Which would imply that you would remember that Brian had given it to you, which would in turn indicate that your trajectory is falling apart somewhere, given that you couldn't remember that your flavor trajectory started with BS.
except it's the next step I'd take as town. you're not explaining WHY said action comes from a scum POV, as opposed to a town POV. you're not countering anything. you're trying to box me inIn post 329, BROseidon wrote:It's me pre-empting what your next step as scum would be, and me countering it before you make it.
your posts are manipulative as fuck. you're trying to stop me from attacking you back.In post 329, BROseidon wrote:Oh yes, I don't want a 1v1 with you SO BADLY that I'm intentionally antagonizing you and counter-walling your wall.
THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL CONTRADICTION AND YOU KNOW IT. THE CONTRADICTION IS, YOU WERE MAKING PUSHES ON ME THAT ONLY WORK ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT I KNOW THE FLAVOR, WHEN YOU STATED JUST NOW YOU WERE ASSUMING THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO HAD WATCHED THE ANIME BUT NOT THE MANGA AND THEY WOULDN'T KNOW HOW IT ACTUALLY ENDED. DON'T FUCKING TRY TO WRIGGLE OUT OF THISIn post 329, BROseidon wrote:It's not a difference between the texts; it's an assumed level of progression (Annie appears to be a good guy, then it's ambiguous for a while, then it turns out she's pretty clearly evil). I assumed that the anime is somewhere in that middle phase, whereas the manga is obviously further along.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
wow you're joking rightIn post 334, BROseidon wrote:Other than in the post that says "this game's flavor is based on the manga [and other things that I assumed were roughly the same]
first off, you were the first to discuss the actual content of the manga. second off,that's not at all what it says and you know it
more like I wasn't paying attention to exactly who was saying what about the flavor bc I was sheeping the majority consensusIn post 334, BROseidon wrote:So you just forgot where you got your idea of the flavor from? Like, it's fine if you don't call him BS, but to then NOT REMEMBER THAT BRIAN GAVE YOU THE IDEA OF FLAVOR, AND THAT I WAS CLEARLY REFERRING TO A SPECIFIC PERSON seems like a little much.
AND SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR MANIPULATIVE RESPONSES. YOU WERE NOT "CLEARLY REFERRING TO A SPECIFIC PERSON". YOU ASKED IF I WAS "SHEEPING BS". I INTERPRETED IT TO MEAN SHEEPING SOMETHING THAT WAS BULLSHIT. IS THIS REALLY SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND
In post 334, BROseidon wrote:It comes from a scum POV given that your initial posturing comes from a scum POV (there's no reason for town to posture like that around a miller claim), and that you've manipulated my words in a way that I wouldn't expect town-you to do. Call it burden of proficiency if you'd like.
it's a contradiction bc you were assuming there were people who watched anime but not hte manga and thus wouldn't know the whole story. however, where did this assumption go when you wanted to accuse me of posturing? your actions don't match your wordsIn post 334, BROseidon wrote:Wat.
That's not a contradiction.
Other people weren't using it to posture a future attack. You were.
also you still think I'm posturing, despite the fact that your initial assumption that the game was based off the manga is wrong?
if you're town I don't get why the hell you don't wanna let go of smth that's been flat-out proven to be incorrect. you're scum and you keep coming back to this like just by bringing it up you can crush my whole case against you. you really haven't provided adequate answers for any of my points. instead you keep going back to this and the whole "BS" thing. I've explained how all my actions make sense from a town motivation, and you just ignore it and twist my words around.
I'm done arguing with you. at this point you're just twisting my words around, and it's p obvious you're scum so idgaf. until you can come up with some actually legitimate points, I won't be responding to any more walls, as there's no need to
now I need lots more votes on BRO. let's lynch the fuck out of this-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
^^^^ this is why BRO is scumIn post 352, BROseidon wrote:So you're saying townies don't lose their train of thought?
Um...
I lose my train of thought a lot more as town than scum; I normally have an agenda as scum, which makes it easier for me to track what I'm pushing and I. I'm working on aligning my town game more to that, since it's annoying to read in my ISO that I've noted something, but not remember why I've noted it :/
where'd this stance go when he was pushing me for supposedly forgetting about brian skies? if townies supposedly lose their train of thought, why would be apparently be so surprised at me "forgetting" that?
it's complete fucking BS and we need to lynch the fuck out of this before I go any more insane-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I don't know. I haven't read the past 5 pages in detail yet. doing nowIn post 336, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
What are your thoughts about Dan?In post 325, pieguyn wrote:get off your wagons and vote BRO with me already-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I don't like how he doesn't explain much at first although unfortunately it's prob just playstyle and there's nothing to do about itIn post 336, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:What are your thoughts about Dan?
I didn't read 22 as a relatively serious post and figured it was questioning to get out of RVS, whereas 46 was way more serious. so idk what the hell is up with his read on you. it feels playstyle based but I do think it's a reasonable read from a town POV. I agree with most of his other reads and I think his thought process behind the way he went about questioning people was legitimate. however, idk if he can fake as scum. currently null with a really slight town lean floating somewhere between null and null-town
says the guy who is STILL bringing up "posturing" despite the fact that it's been literally proven incorrect, due to the fact that the game isn't exclusively based off the mangaIn post 413, BROseidon wrote:I'm using him using it to obfuscate my point and turn the attack on me to push. He misinterpreted my point, used that against me, and then didn't back off on it, instead trying to keep it as a point against me.
this logic is contradictory as fuck
and if I'm apparently so obvscum why is he questioning this?In post 415, BROseidon wrote:Again, are you asserting that there's 1 scum in {me, Pie}
agree with this and yet he claimed I was using this exact reasoning against him (when I wasn't) and that it was bullshitIn post 424, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
And how is it any different from town dropping a line of questioning because they want to figure things out and take a step back? Your answer seems to be "it looks like town, scum try to look like town, so it is scum."In post 422, BROseidon wrote:Scum motivation behind dropping a line of questioning is that it allows one to appear like they're trying to figure things out without having to push anything too hard.
go look at imperishable night and how zmuffin pulled this kitten shitIn post 477, BROseidon wrote:Holy fucking shit. I've explained everything. I've run through my logic in a way that makes sense. I tried to lay things out for you, and you kept sidestepping the issue. I explained things multiple times, so sorry not sorry for pointing out that you're being dense. I don't fucking care if it's intentional or unintentional, you can go fuck off.
I'll be back tomorrow. Kagami+F-16 make me want to punch a kitten.
probably not alignment indicative, but just saying ~-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I'm completely against the F-16 wagon
F-16 is one of those players who can town it the fuck up. if he's town, I'm sure he'll do this sometime during the game. if anything his frustration at the wagon on him feels genuine so I'd argue he's done it already. also I think all the accusations on him are p much playstyle based. yes, every single one. I'm not entirely familiar with his style but that's the feeling I get from him 0.0
this is also smth I'd expect from F-16-town although idk if he can fake as scum. from what I can tell, F-16 tries to look at all things objectively. if there's no pattern he doesn't hesitate to point it outIn post 407, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I originally thought there was even more to gain because I believed that town and scum would react in alignment indicative ways and thought I could establish patterns hence the analysis of every player in the game as opposed to just the ones that were playing.I realized as I finished the analysis that there were no set patterns and the only information I could gain was an insight into how the players in the game reacted to a miller claim and compare and contrast with how they did here.
Kaze what the fuckIn post 476, Kazekirimaru wrote:Eh? Why are you talking to your supposed scumread like he's a townie?
do you srsly think this is alignment indicative? I accused you of doing the same thing in AA:MFA iirc
I also hate the timing on this. is it a coincidence this came up when the BRO wagon was picking up steam?
about the weak claims: scum probably got a fakeclaim with the weak modifier in it. so they'd know what it meant that way and it feels like a more elegant solution than the mod just going "hey guys weak means this". however, Bert is town as fuck even without being "confirmed" via the "weak" shit and IMO the way Kagami went about it was town motivated. even if she's somehow scum it basically blew the game wide open and led everyone (or just me) to get a shitton of strong stances early on which is pro-town and way better than usual.
@Bert, F-16:what are your thoughts on Tammy? IMO there's smth off about her. however, idk how to read her personally at all
@F-16:do you think you could play like this as scum?
@anyone:does anyone know how to read Kaze? if so what are your reads on him?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I rarely defend people so I don't have much experience with defending someone. my point is if F-16 is town we'll be able to knowIn post 525, Tammy wrote:This feels like an odd defense.
no I literally have no idea if he can fake it or not. it's playstyle related cause it's based off my impression of the way he plays. he seems like he tries to be completely logical and objective, and he also relies extensively on meta to confirm/deny reads. I'm not completely familiar with his playstyle, but that's the feeling I get by being in the game with him. I'm not 100% sure, explicitly becuase idk if he can fake it. also his reaction to the wagon on him looked town as fuck, although mb I'm biased bc I generally react similarly when I get wagonedIn post 525, Tammy wrote:How familiar do you think you are with his playstyle, and why would you not think he could fake this as scum but think the above arguments are just playstyle related?
NOIn post 553, zMuffinMan wrote:(less sure about BRO - he actually might be town :/)
WE'RE NOT LETTING HIM GET AWAY
LYNCH BRO WITH ME
at least explain what's giving you reservations-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
quit trying to write me off with false logicIn post 572, BROseidon wrote:The fact that I was incorrect about your knowledge of the flavor doesn't change that you still postured around Bert's claim.
yeah you were incorrect about that but you were ALSO incorrect about what the game was based off of in the first place. and you still haven't explained how I was posturing nor what makes you think my actions were scum motivated as opposed to town motivated, despite the fact I've explained the motivation behind my actions several times
wow overdefensive muchIn post 574, BROseidon wrote:I would say puppy but I'm a dog person.
it was a joke and I explicitly said it probably wasn't alignment indicative
OH NO YOU DON'TIn post 576, BROseidon wrote:And I don't want to anymore because F-16 and Kagami are better leads now.
DON'T YOU FUCKING WALK AWAY FROM THIS
YOU KNOW YOU'RE CAUGHT AND YOU'RE WALKING AWAY SO THAT NO ONE SEES IT
YOU DON'T GET TO IGNORE MY POINTS JUST BC "F16 AND KAGAMI ARE BETTER LEADS"
DIE
DIE
DIE-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
1. made a jump on me with a sketchy reasonIn post 588, Mafia Theory wrote:Also, an equal rundown on the Pasch wagon and the BRO wagon.
2. when pressured, uses false logic, strawmans, misreps, etc. and thinks he can just brush suspicion of him off
3. when I showed it was false he stuck to it and is still preaching it instead of admitting he's wrong
4. his actions blatantly don't match his words. he was working on the assumption that people don't know flavor but then threw this out the window to say I was "posturing based on flavor". when pressured claims that had nothing to do with it even though it blatantly did. there's also his idea that "townies lose their train of thought" which he apparently forgot about to say that I forgot where my flavor assumption came from, which he also painted as scummy even though it's not. when pressured about this he covers it up by redacting it to "but you forgot his NAME" even though I didn't
5. AND NOW HE'S WALKING AWAY AND TRYING TO SWEEP THE WHOLE THING UNDER THE RUG BC HE KNOWS IF HE CONTINUES HE'LL GET CAUGHT
and the big one is:
6. thinks I'm scum bc BS shouldn't be capitalized-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
here's where I'm currently at btw
town
Brian Skies
Bert
Kagami
Pieguyn
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
null-town
zMuffinMan
Tammy
null
ActionDan
Plum
mykonian
scum
Kazekirimaru <- indignation and apprehensiveness about possibly breaking the game + jump on counterwagon when BRO wagon was picking up steam. when pressured, claims it's confbias on my part with no explanation
BROseidon <- yeah
Paschendale <- his pushes are weird as fuck. looking through his ISO I also realized he never even explained his initial scumread on me (funny how it matches BRO's) and idk what exactly is up with his read on BRO. however, I'm having reservations bc he seems to be legitimately skeptical of plum+kagami. need more data here-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
@Pasch:
can you explain what was with your initial scumread on me and F-16? you were agreeing with Kaze who didn't explain either of them. also, what does bolded mean?In post 115, Paschendale wrote:Agree with Kaze's notions on Pie and F-16 in post 48. Pie's tone worries me, too.Looks like a lot more assurance than is really warranted.
also, can you walk me through your read on BRO in more detail? I get your initial scumread of him but then around 500 it feels like you were starting to have reservations based on your questioning and responses to him. can you explain how your read on him changed over time plz?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
so I'm confbiasing bc he's town ok. what makes my case on him wrong? as it is you're not giving me anything besides "he's town", making this logic circular.In post 619, Kazekirimaru wrote:
You're confbiasing by tunneling a townie. Now be nice. ^^In post 616, pieguyn wrote:where and how am I confbiasing?
feel free to knock my case on him down if you want but just saying "he's town" isn't gonna cut it-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
care to explain how?In post 627, Kazekirimaru wrote:Like I sad before, reading your correspondence with him reminds me of our arguments in Ace Attorney.
Speaking of which, you should really try to cut back on this habit.
also why are you townreading him? the only explanation you gave was early game which I argued and then you thought we're both town bc it feels like AA:MFA. why do you think it'd be different if BRO is scum?
also why should I cut back on a habit when I was 3 for 3 on my scumreads that game and the 4th scum was someone who I was scumreading before Nat townread him?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
why are you having good feelings about him?In post 632, Kazekirimaru wrote:I'm townreading him because I am. It's good feelings. :3
also
why do you think the argument would sound different if BRO is scum?In post 425, Kazekirimaru wrote:Pretty sure both Pieguy and Bro are town because their argument sounds a lot like the argument Pie had with me in Ace Attorney mafia when we were both town.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
do you srsly think scumhunting is a towntell? it's easily fakedIn post 645, Paschendale wrote:As for Bro, he does look to be scumhunting. He's not just setting his sights on one or two targets, but is analyzing quite a few people.
remember why he was defensive? it's cause I was pushing him hard right out of the gate. I had the upper hand bc he had just came in and as a result we got an insight into his true motivations early on. he's still being defensive as fuck by OMGUS'ing me hard the moment I come back into the thread (610), not to mention he stopped the push on me when I was gone with no real reason behind it by saying Kagami/F-16 were better leads and that he wasn't interested in putting up a case on me. the point is BRO stumbled hard and hasn't done anything really town since then to make me question my read on himIn post 645, Paschendale wrote:Early on, it looked like he panicked for a while and just went super defensive, but he's moved past that. I see town motivated analysis. I don't necessarily think he's right on all of his reads, like the strength of his scumread on you or his townread on Plum, but it doesn't look like lies to me. From either of you.
why Kaze? you were dead set on Kagami or at least Plum so where did Kaze come from? you were clearly townreading him based off thisIn post 645, Paschendale wrote:I think you two should stop fighting with each other and help me lynch Kagami. Or Kaze or Plum. But mostly Kagami.
so why all of a sudden do you wanna lynch him? it feels like you're scum trying to work out a mislynch knowing I'm scumreading KazeIn post 500, Paschendale wrote:As noted above, some of you see it, too. Bro and Plum do.Kaze could if he checked his ego a little.Make scum pay for trying to trick us.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
do you think he can't fake as scum?In post 654, Kazekirimaru wrote:While Bro is some amount of abrasive as both alignments, he is more intense and confrontational as town. Also, he uses more smilies as scum. >.>
(See 1475 and 1515 for reference)
also, where in my argument with him was he being intense and/or confrontational?
ALSO YOU BROUGHT UP 1515 AND REMINDED ME THAT EVERY TIME I PUT EFFORT INTO GAMES I JUST LOSE
DIE
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
my reads haven't changed from hereIn post 609, pieguyn wrote:here's where I'm currently at btw
town
Brian Skies
Bert
Kagami
Pieguyn
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
null-town
zMuffinMan
Tammy
null
ActionDan
Plum
mykonian
scum
Kazekirimaru <- indignation and apprehensiveness about possibly breaking the game + jump on counterwagon when BRO wagon was picking up steam. when pressured, claims it's confbias on my part with no explanation
BROseidon <- yeah
Paschendale <- his pushes are weird as fuck. looking through his ISO I also realized he never even explained his initial scumread on me (funny how it matches BRO's) and idk what exactly is up with his read on BRO. however, I'm having reservations bc he seems to be legitimately skeptical of plum+kagami. need more data here-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
what exactly is your read on Dan?In post 521, Plum wrote:Of the two, Dan seems hella more scummy than Bro.
also, does anyone have reasons for Plum being scum that's not related to Kagami? too lazy to look through the thread and check sry-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
wow nice scum argument againIn post 731, BROseidon wrote:Because I wouldn't expect F-16 to be so dense as town, and then try to use obfuscation to get under my skin.
this is the THIRD TIME he's pulled this shit. first on me, then on Kagami, now here. IME these kinds of arguments come way more from scum bc they're a convenient way to throw blame around based on smth that, when you really think about it, actually falls apart . and it's also a nice way of discrediting to boot bc he's implying the people he's up against don't have as much skill as they're supposed to. in practice these kinds of judgment calls are harder to make and only come after much more effort bc people are more inclined to question this kind of call. when someone consistently does weird things you're more inclined to believe they really might just be off for whatever reason as opposed to immediately reaching the conclusion they're either dumb or scum. however, this kind of reasoning apparently applies for ALL THREE OF HIS SCUMREADS
can't win so you're dropping it? come on, I'm your "main focus now" so what are you going to do, ignore all your fake scumreads on the basis they're too dense so you don't have to do anything controversial that'll reveal your alignment? plz noIn post 733, BROseidon wrote:I'm probably just ignoring F-16 and Pie for the rest of the game, ftr.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can someone who can read mastin tell me what was so terrible about his entrance posts?
@Kaze:I kind of get you but I'm not sure if that's arrogance or if he's just being verbose like he usually is 0.0 iirc he never said he was explicitly going to walk in and save the slot awesome tits sause, he said F-16 thought he would. is there smth I'm missing here
inb4 BRO/F-16/Pasch scumteam and we wagoned all three fking scum earlier-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
zmuffin T_T
also I'm feeling relatively comfortable with kaze town now. his recent efforts in the flavor discussion invalidate my idea that he was apprehensive about breaking the game and his fake case on mastin reminds me of how he was poking at TNE (?) with weak reasoning in AA:MFA and feels town motivated
kaze if you're scum I'm going to be so fking pissed
-
-
-