Nacho has asked me to develop my reads for discussion in our QT.In post 5970, Ms Marangal wrote:Thor, Iso yourself. Nacho has made a town-case on F-16
I don't care what Nacho's independant reads are until we reach that stage, my purpose here is to develop mine and I refuse to read the game to do so, and think I get better reads via interaction anyway.
I think seeking that info lies along the path of madness. Also, potential replacement.In post 5980, Generic wrote:Has anyone found out why bert and cephrir were forcibly removed from the game? They were two people I had suspicions on and suddenly they are out, it feels off.
I lean you scummy.In post 5983, zMuffinMan wrote:ok. where are you at with your read on me?casso wrote:you still didn't get around to telling me how Nacho and I hadn't discussed you.
You still didn't get around to telling me how Nacho and I hadn't discussed you.
With Norklaz being Llama I'll second that question. Town Llama is not a laid back Llama in my experience.In post 5987, KoreanBBQ wrote:You seem so laid back and apologetic in these two posts but why...
When the question is 'why should we lynch them' then no, no it isn't.In post 5988, goodmorning wrote:So you think "I want to lynch them" isn't a strong enough stance in and of itself? I disagree.
To toss back your odd double standards at you again.In post 5988, goodmorning wrote:I'm not looking for spiffy here. I'm looking for "in some way useful, even if only vaguely."
He offered his opinion on an action and expressed his belief of what alignment it meant the player in question was. To a certain extent, that is the core definition of 'useful' in a scumhunting sense.
Why is it he can call something out without a well defended stance equates to him being scummy, but Muffin does the same and you're...just sorta fine with it. I feel like the issue is deeper explanation and I really think you are applying two different standards in how you approach it.
With Titus' reply to this now, I'd like to see that addressed between the two of you.In post 5988, goodmorning wrote:Games I watched:
N1408 - reasonably active, reasonably informative
Games I was dead in:
O496 - probably the most active person alive after her replace-in, also did most of the setup spec work
Games I was alive in:
O526 - despite replacing in and being lynched D1, had 100+ posts. Granted that D1 was pretty long, but only 5 people posted more.
I will say, at least for me, active and lazy are two different things. I am an active poster, but I am a lazy poster.
To the best of my awareness no one particularly 'fools' me as scum.In post 5989, Gunslinger wrote:Nacho, Thor, SH, who fools you as scum? I doubt you both are scum but I would expect scum to go onto the next high town wagon cuz deadline.
On the same note, I also am unaware of anyone who claims I can read them highly accurately as well.
I do seem to have people agree that I do not have bad reads.
My scumhunting quality appears to hold on a certain level, and though I adjust tells for given players I don't really have custom methods on anyone either. Just as I am apparently hard to meta, I also don't really meta back.
I am sure Nacho has a list on both sides dozens of names long though. So, I think you'll be wanting his answer.
ow much of the thread have you read, and how much do you intend to read?