also,
MUTINYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In post 29, Phallacy wrote:In post 27, kabooooom wrote:
cos it was rvs.
but sure, if you want me to vote a player..
vote: phallacy
happy?
You didn't answer my question.Whydid you decide to vote the mod for RVS, and not a player after the game had already begun?
In post 31, Phallacy wrote:You're still dodging. Why did you want to? Just answer the fucking question.
In post 33, Phallacy wrote:
I asked a simple question that he's now dodged twice. I'm frustrated by that and find it arrogant, rude, and scummy.
I want to know why he specifically avoided interacting with anyone on the playerlist
Instead of giving me a direct answer, he makes a flippant half-assed response, and then you jump to his rescue.
In post 29, Phallacy wrote:In post 27, kabooooom wrote:
cos it was rvs.
but sure, if you want me to vote a player..
vote: phallacy
happy?
You didn't answer my question.Whydid you decide to vote the mod for RVS, and not a player after the game had already begun?
In post 31, Phallacy wrote:You're still dodging. Why did you want to? Just answer the fucking question.
In post 33, Phallacy wrote:er.... I'm not angry that he voted the mod?
I asked a simple question that he's now dodged twice. I'm frustrated by that and find it arrogant, rude, and scummy.
I want to know why he specifically avoided interacting with anyone on the playerlistafterthe game had already begun and the whole joke about voting the mod in confirmation/pregame had run its course. Instead of giving me a direct answer, he makes a flippant half-assed response, and then you jump to his rescue.
Strange indeed.
Still waiting on that answer, kaboom.
In post 41, Bins wrote:In post 34, tn5421 wrote:I'm not here to rescue him. I find the fact that you're jumping on something so stupid to be quite a strange thing to do. You also assumed I was coming to his rescue when all I did was ask you something. Even if I could have worded it better.
I don't think it's stupid. Why is it stupid? RVS-ing the mod defeats the purpose of RVS. You should RVS a player to create discussion... the point of RVS.
In post 45, Bins wrote:In post 43, kabooooom wrote:In post 41, Bins wrote:In post 34, tn5421 wrote:I'm not here to rescue him. I find the fact that you're jumping on something so stupid to be quite a strange thing to do. You also assumed I was coming to his rescue when all I did was ask you something. Even if I could have worded it better.
I don't think it's stupid. Why is it stupid? RVS-ing the mod defeats the purpose of RVS. You should RVS a player to create discussion... the point of RVS.
and you think just throwing a bunch of votes here and there will lead to discussion on is own?!
Yes.
What if I was an experienced player who had said that?
In post 54, Bins wrote:So you're saying you do agree that RVS helps discussion and your vote on the mod was for that purpose?
Forcing town to replace out generally causes the % chance for town to win to go up, which IMO isn't a very smart move on the part of the scumteam.
In post 61, Phallacy wrote:kaboom: trust me when I say that Phallacy has more experience than 3 or 4 of you combined.
In post 67, Bins wrote:My only real problem with Phallacy's play isn't his aggressiveness, but that he didn't accept "cos it's RVS" as an answer. Especially since I cleared up that there really was no other answer.
In post 70, Phallacy wrote:In post 67, Bins wrote:My only real problem with Phallacy's play isn't his aggressiveness, but that he didn't accept "cos it's RVS" as an answer. Especially since I cleared up that there really was no other answer.
Because it's not always "just RVS". I wanted to see how he would respond to further probing.
In post 71, Phallacy wrote:In post 66, Doogal121 wrote:slightly scummy
This is also a great reason to put someone at L-3 in a game with 3 antitown players.
In post 73, Phallacy wrote:Except I think kaboom is scum. So.. why would I unvote?
If you admit freely that you are not an expert at scumhunting and repeatedly find yourself at the end of a rope on D1,kindly refrain from attempting to read us based on whether or not you think we are scumhunting and leave it to someone else in the thread who has more experience doing so. Your read on us is irrelevant in this regard because you are using a measuring stick for something you don't even know how to do yourself.
And had I noticed Bins was at L-3, I might have said something, but for some reason I also thought that L-3 was a lot more votes than just 2. I'm very much used to larger games.
In post 81, Phallacy wrote:LOL kaboom. You signed up a few months ago. We are a hydra of two very experienced players with high win rates. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself now.
I'm not sure why you are expecting a fully fleshed out case on Page 2 or 3,
but it's not going to happen. I'll vote where I wish, and I'll reveal my conclusions when I wish.
You call my pressure on you "fake" but you are the one who has responded so defensively.
Not to mention the false bravado that is very unlike you, so yeah. You're scum.
You say there is scum motivation. Please do explain which post, what is the motivation behind it, and why you think it comes from scum?
In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.
In post 124, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 121, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 119, kabooooom wrote:In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.
You didn't answer my questions.
Stop skating round the issue
In post 126, Not_Mafia wrote:No. You didn't answer the second part and you keep repeating that RVS is useless like it's gospel. You started by saying you voted the mod for shits and giggles and that Phallacy is "fake scumhunting" because it didn't matter what you did in RVS because RVS contains no pressure. Bins and Phallacy point out why it does matter what you do in RVS, you call them wrong and bad in return, then when I question you on this you start going on about how you got us of RVS and how there "has to be something different".
You're all over the shop and you've been evasive from the beginning.
So RVS gets the game going, how does it do that if the votes are entirely meaningless? Howw can we transition out of RVS and have things to question if it doesn't matter what we do in it?
Were you or were you not acting scummy to get us out RVS?
Now just answer the questions directly and don't just repeat what you've already said, and don't use the word "Bins" in your reponse because she is irrelevant to your response to those questions.
In post 33, Phallacy wrote:er.... I'm not angry that he voted the mod?
I asked a simple question that he's now dodged twice. I'm frustrated by that and find it arrogant, rude, and scummy.
[/quote]In post 129, kabooooom wrote:In post 33, Phallacy wrote:er.... I'm not angry that he voted the mod?
I asked a simple question that he's now dodged twice. I'm frustrated by that and find it arrogant, rude, and scummy.
I want to know why he specifically avoided interacting with anyone on the playerlistafterthe game had already begun and the whole joke about voting the mod in confirmation/pregame had run its course. Instead of giving me a direct answer, he makes a flippant half-assed response, and then you jump to his rescue.
Strange indeed.
Still waiting on that answer, kaboom.
In post 132, Not_Mafia wrote:So now we've come full circle.
Then what was the purpose of you voting the mod? You've gone from RVS having no value so it doesn't matter, to now trying to rationalise it as "adding variety" to RVS, as if that means anything, whilst still pushing the idea that RVS is pointless. Which one is it? I honestly can't see how you don't flip scum here.
In post 33, Phallacy wrote:
I asked a simple question that he's now dodged twice. I'm frustrated by that and find it arrogant, rude, and scummy.
In post 253, Doogal121 wrote:@Mod. When is the deadline? It's always been 9 Days, 6 Hours, 26 Minutes from the last vote count.
@kaboom. How LA are you going to be? You've got a ton of pressure on you and you are potentially disappearing till after the deadline.