Mini 1593 - 咲 -Saki- Mafia (OK)


User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #3736 (isolation #0) » Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:05 pm

Post by Nikanor »

In post 3735, pieguyn wrote:The Rufflig gets: No actions were performed on buymechocolates.

I assume the "on" is a typo.

Can you please post the role PMs too?

I probably would have hammered RG myself. Mantis says she wouldn't but it's not like she can undo my hammer vote so.
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #3738 (isolation #1) » Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:07 pm

Post by Nikanor »

Also, would like to know why we were killed over someone who thought DLA was scum!
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #3740 (isolation #2) » Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:13 pm

Post by Nikanor »

In post 3739, pieguyn wrote:
In post 3736, Nikanor wrote:I assume the "on" is a typo.

from what I can tell Rufflig lied about his role. he was really just a voyeur .-.

Well I meant that it should be "by" if he's a voyeur, and "on" if he was a watcher. :P Your post implied that his action was a watcher action!
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #3755 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 12, 2014 4:11 am

Post by Nikanor »

In post 3744, pieguyn wrote:
In post 3740, Nikanor wrote:Well I meant that it should be "by" if he's a voyeur, and "on" if he was a watcher. :P Your post implied that his action was a watcher action!

.-.
the way I looked at it, voyeur knows what types of actions were performed on somebody, while a watcher knows who targeted somebody. hence the "performed on on" and I'd use "was targeted by" for watcher. I might be doing this wrong though

Oh huh, I always thought it referred to what is apparently called a Follower. I am suddenly less confused!
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #3756 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 12, 2014 4:19 am

Post by Nikanor »

Also I'm sorry for being an ass to you mollie. But it was just so frustrating because we were obviously town but you kept trying to justify your gut read on us! And when I tried to defend myself you took it and twisted it so that it fit your read again.
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”