VOTE: Seohyon
Sounds like korean name
In post 18, Bins wrote:did nati even post in hope + 1
your hydra is confusing as fuck
and no i wanna be recruited
In post 64, Team 9 wrote:vote: okapoka
entrance reads as awkward scum who isn't sure how to blend into the thread, and then when gets called on it tries to cover it up as a joke. if your initial vote was a joke, why do you see a problem with Boo asking what your vote was for as opposed to flat out voting you over it?
in other news, I have a townread on vezok more or less for suggesting massclaim out of nowhere. he never has, and still doesn't, strike me as the type of scum to go for ballsy town points.
-Rumia
In post 57, Bookitty wrote:In post 49, OkaPoka wrote:if you were town you would be voting me right now
Well, THAT wasn't the right answer.
I thought it might have been an RVS vote, but I guess not.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Okapoka
In post 92, Bookitty wrote:In post 59, OkaPoka wrote:The thing is though none of you understand that it was a joke... So whatever
I don't think you get to have it both ways.
If it's a joke, then logically you should be at least surprised by the votes on you. Alternatively, I could see you voting OMGUS on one of the people who voted you.
What doesn't make sense is voting for someone who questioned your vote, if it was a joke. That only makes sense if you were trying to catch scum with what would essentially amount to a mini-gambit.
You're demonstrating a confusion of motive. If your vote had been a joke, you wouldn't have reacted as you did. If it was a gambit, why would you say it was a joke?
However, if the response is then to vote me because I didn't vote him for auto-voting a Hated role, that argues that he was not making a joke and he was seriously voting a Hated role for ???? reasons.
In post 120, Bookitty wrote:In post 116, Team 9 wrote:"Joke vote for reaction testing" doesn't quite sounds like a confusion of motive
Reaction testing? That's something you're bringing to the party. Oka hasn't said anything like that.
Joke vote =/= Reaction testing.
In post 125, OkaPoka wrote:wat is slayers gambit
In post 127, OkaPoka wrote:are u a whiteknight?
In post 146, Slandaar wrote:VOTE: FoD
If you think he's too scummy to be scum then other good votes include NM and Gif. (hes not)
In post 150, Slandaar wrote:Eh GiF is part of team 9... this is why we hate hydras. I really liked that read too
In post 143, GuyInFreezer wrote:In post 138, OkaPoka wrote:it was a joke man. and then it became a reaction test
...
I dunno how I feel about this but I admit I do this shit more than I ever think i do as town.
In post 144, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Too scummy to be scummy Yada yada
In post 145, GuyInFreezer wrote:I will quote them eventually
But not tonight
Let me have my omen toniggt
In post 15, Team 9 wrote:Oh to be clear.
If I don't sign or sign as cirno, it's me (GIF).
If I sign as rumia, it's pie.
If I sign as mystia, it's nati.
If I sign as wriggle, it's nacho
If I sign as daiyousei, it's fery.
Just to let you know.
In post 106, Bins wrote:I'm curious on how Marquis is reading Seo currently.
In post 172, Marquis wrote:player-specific towntell
In post 241, Bins wrote:*Third post. M'bad.
In post 114, Bookitty wrote:What do you think I should be commenting on, Bins?
I've already said what I think of his so-called joke vote.
@Not_Mafia: If I miscounted, fair enough. It's still 50 percent, not 25. And that's characteristic of my problem with Oka; the story keeps changing every time he tells it.
In post 253, Flames682 wrote:I didn't see pie in the game that was linked
In post 257, yoloswag123 wrote:Person on Team 9 that agreed with SB's post am I scummy though and what do you think about my response to SB because I believe you're not currently voting for me right now.(this goes for the other people that agreed with his post as well)
In post 260, Bookitty wrote:It's not the math mistake that makes the difference. It's the whole picture of trying to pass it off as a joke, then grabbing on to your "reaction test" comment and trying to play it off as both. The math mistake is more telling because:
1) he voted me for not voting him immediately (while still ignoring my question and every question I've asked him since)
2) he then complained about all the votes on him, despite his expressed opinion that voting for him was a townie move
3) he came up with what looks like a random selection of proposed scum on his wagon that doesn't bear any relation to the actual evidence in the thread
I don't believe I ever said he lied about the math. I said he can't keep his stories straight. That means he legitimately fucked up, not that he decided to lie.
In post 273, Flames of Disaster wrote:Lurkfucking? It's only been 48 hours since game start. My schedule isn't as free as it used to. Activity levels is not, and has never been an alignment tell.
In post 277, OkaPoka wrote:I can't tell if Team 9 is a genius or a huge whiteknight.
In post 284, Flames of Disaster wrote:We should investigate Flames682's 'scumread' on me.
In post 290, Flames682 wrote:In post 288, Team 9 wrote:It certainly wasn't because you were voting him!
Is this sarcasm?
In post 286, Bookitty wrote:@Team 9:No, the math error just struck me as amusing at the time, so I commented on it. I hadn't noticed the last vote on him since the vote count, though, so the joke was apparently on me :p
Making percentage errors or math errors isn't scummy; it's the thought process that unfolded later that really bothered me. My read on it was this:
My wagon is invalid and there is scum on it! like, one fourth of it is scum!
Who are the scums?
Um... let me just throw out some names here...
And he happened to throw out names that I have a strong town read on.
It seemed just a bit convenient. Especially since he now says he has no strong scumreads.
In post 302, Bookitty wrote:@Team 9:Read his ISO and tell me that this is scum trying to fly under the radar or fit in with the crowd.
In post 300, OkaPoka wrote:this is two townies killing each other
In post 316, Bookitty wrote:In post 310, Team 9 wrote:In post 302, Bookitty wrote:@Team 9:Read his ISO and tell me that this is scum trying to fly under the radar or fit in with the crowd.
Is this about Oka?
Which part of voting Hated claim while acknowledging what hated means is scum trying to fly under the radar or fit in with the crowd?
"Oka is scum for trying to fly under the radar or fit in with the crowd" argument is flawed regardless of Oka's alignment (for argument's sake. I still think he's town).
-C
This is related to your question regarding why I have a strong townread on Seohyun. The last question you asked me. It has nothing to do with Okapoka.
In post 316, Bookitty wrote:This is related to your question regarding why I have a strong townread on Seohyun. The last question you asked me. It has nothing to do with Okapoka.