In post 5, copper223 wrote:Hey guys, let's have a fun game of mafia!
If you're curious about my playstyle, here's my first mafia game on MS:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=59318
VOTE: mykonian for not random voting
VOTE: copper223
In post 5, copper223 wrote:Hey guys, let's have a fun game of mafia!
If you're curious about my playstyle, here's my first mafia game on MS:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=59318
VOTE: mykonian for not random voting
In post 43, Boonskiies wrote:@myk- I was asking Dessew specifically what his thoughts on Flubber were. I could care less what anyone else thinks about him right now.
Eh, why not.In post 71, mykonian wrote:eh, not really. It didn't really spread which is a shame.
Why aren't you voting flubber with me? He's scum. Anyone can see that.
What a let down.In post 74, Boonskiies wrote:
Also, why couldn't Dessew and I be scum together? I'd love to bus him so hard.
In post 97, CultivationTheory wrote:Third, where are literally half of our players?
So you want to lynch later someone whom you cannot get information from? Do I get it corrcetly?In post 106, Boonskiies wrote:I understand why people are voting Flubber. He always seems scummy, and I necessarily can't read him. That being said, I'm not going to vote Flubber because I can't read him. Not at this point of the game. We'd get absolutely no information either way. At this point I'd like to pursue some people who are currently voting Flubber. Unlike CT, I don't necessarily like what they are saying.
Myko, obv. Copper towns hard.@Dessew - if you had to pick to change your vote to either Copper or Myko, who would it be?
In post 107, CultivationTheory wrote:@Myko: Being definitive is one thing, being cocksure is another. It is good that you took your vote off Copper, but you don't get extra town points just for not being overtly scummy.
Then don't do it. When there's a wagon on you, you already know the alignment of one player taking part in the exchange while you're not the one producing actual content. If you couldn't act townie enough, at least grab that great opportunity to form valuable reads.In post 114, Whatisswag wrote:In post 83, copper223 wrote:@Flubber
why is your reaction once a wagon forms on you to town read everybody on it and to unvote?
This is exactly what I do as town.
I don't what you you don't see.
In post 93, copper223 wrote:No surprise there, it would not be a hard task for scum to misslynch him if this is flubber's standard town play. Naked vote on a guy whose name he claim he doesn't remember, then when a wagon forms on him attempting to buy it off by giving town reads left and right, followed by removing his vote (I can still her the sound of the cave crashing). I don't have past experience with Flubber like you two nor do I think it's good to second guess yourself if you see someone playing scummy just because he looked scummy in the last game as well and he was town. Just do the guy a favour and lynch him, after the x-th mislynch as town I'm sure his game will improve.
Since you never played a game with him, how can you be so sure?
In post 103, CultivationTheory wrote: On top of that, the most likely explanation in my mind for someone being so confident in a read with this little content out there is because he's mafia, and therefore doesn't have to guess.
This is exactly what I am thinking.
For once, I am not gonna unvote my RVS vote, myko's argument has no sense.
In post 124, Anatole Kuragin wrote:flubber/swag/nati maybe
In post 127, copper223 wrote:It's statistically unlikely that all the scum players have been active, so for me one or more are probably in the lurker pool for now. I can see Flubber Swag / Boon , but I don't like associative reads without flips.
In post 141, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 126, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Flubber, are you conscious of the fact that you seem to be playing differently from the other games we've finished together? Is it deliberate?
Yes I'd rather not lurk through this one.
In post 144, Boonskiies wrote:In post 143, Dessew wrote:In post 141, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 126, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Flubber, are you conscious of the fact that you seem to be playing differently from the other games we've finished together? Is it deliberate?
Yes I'd rather not lurk through this one.
You haven't really answered the question, though.
He completely answered it. He usually lurks...he's not lurking now. How did he not answer it?
In post 119, Anatole Kuragin wrote:In post 69, Flubbernugget wrote:Boonskiies softing a cc isn't hounding you so calm your tits.
Copper is town. Even if he is making massive contradictions they're all related to game theory which should be a null tell. Especially with a new guy.
Myko idk. Though I'd like to know why he thinks I'm scum.
The guy who I'm voting for who's name I can't remember and can't be assed to flip a page to remember is town.
UNVOTE:
Flubber, I have never seen you issue a list of reads this confidently on day one.
It's the first time you call him town, isn't it? Correct me if I'm wrong. I read through and read the lover claim, too, I just wanted to point this out.In post 205, Boonskiies wrote:In post 202, FuDuzn wrote:Bro, I just replaced in this game.
Cry me a river for having to read three pages.
It's not the 3 pages, bro. It's the content of the pages. I skimmed over, and I'm sorry you think 9 pages to read is so hard. You obviously think it is if you think I thought just reading the pages is what I was trying to infer was bad.
To everyone else...GET OFF OF FLUBBER! Seriously. He's so freaking town, that he should be considered NK bait.
Flubber, claim a PR. I want you to lie if you don't have one, as you will be 100% drawing the night kill from scum. This town is going to lynch an obvious town slot.
Before anyone says anything, yes, if you guys are going to be dumb and vote him, I want him to lie as town. There are scenarios where that is acceptable, and I believe this to be one. Flubber is not day 1 lynch material. We will get no information from that.
Mine is, that's true.In post 207, Boonskiies wrote:Mykonian and dessew's votes are very opportunistic.
Have you read the posts after? Read them.In post 211, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 143, Dessew wrote:In post 141, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 126, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Flubber, are you conscious of the fact that you seem to be playing differently from the other games we've finished together? Is it deliberate?
Yes I'd rather not lurk through this one.
You haven't really answered the question, though.
Wait a minuteyoustarted this shitfest?
Oh, this isn't actually a lover claim, herpderp. Then my question at the top of this post holds.In post 213, Boonskiies wrote:If it stops this wagon on Flubber, yes. Oh, actually guys, Flubber and I are lovers. That's why he shouldn't be lynched. (We're not really, don't take it to heart, but if Flubber flips scum, I will eat my pants.)
FuDzn, I like your reads. Myko/Dessew are super off for me. Also, I could see copper being on the scum team, but only if mykonians isn't.
What? :DD What the fucking hellfuck?In post 229, Whatisswag wrote:In post 124, Anatole Kuragin wrote:flubber/swag/nati maybe
Seriously, look back to all of your games, which of those cases do you get scum on the first read?
In post 135, Anatole Kuragin wrote:also fuck anyone who has "swag" in their username
This one I like.
I am not buddying with Flubber, just that my reads are better than most of yours. I dont have any scum read right now but my only town reads are copper, boon, flubber
In post 119, Anatole Kuragin wrote:In post 69, Flubbernugget wrote:Boonskiies softing a cc isn't hounding you so calm your tits.
Copper is town. Even if he is making massive contradictions they're all related to game theory which should be a null tell. Especially with a new guy.
Myko idk. Though I'd like to know why he thinks I'm scum.
The guy who I'm voting for who's name I can't remember and can't be assed to flip a page to remember is town.
UNVOTE:
Flubber, I have never seen you issue a list of reads this confidently on day one.
In post 126, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Flubber, are you conscious of the fact that you seem to be playing differently from the other games we've finished together? Is it deliberate?
In post 262, Flubbernugget wrote:I AM CONSCIOUS OF THE FACT THAT I AM NOT LURKING IN THIS GAME LIKE I WAS IN THAT GAME.
HOLY.
FUCKING.
SHIT.
changing activity =/= changing playstyle. You say you don't want to lurk and I absolutely like this decision of yours. However, you're avoiding addressing the concerns about you change of playstyle.In post 265, Flubbernugget wrote:I CHANGED MY FUCKING PLAYSTYLE BECAUSE I'M NOT FUCKING LURKING ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME
It's the second instance he brought up the "well-your-reads-are-probably not perfect-because-reads-usually-are-not-on-day-one" "point", so somebody, help me out. Is this actually scummy? Because I had a phase when I wanted to lynch AtE no matter what and I also really want to lynch him for this, but as you know, AtE is not necessarely alignment indicative and I have no experience with the stuff swag is posting.In post 281, Whatisswag wrote:So, currently 4 people are on Flubber's side: Flubber, Boon, Swag, Theory. So which are "scum"? I am very interested to find out all of your views. Trust me, none of you are scumhunting gods.
In post 229, Whatisswag wrote:In post 124, Anatole Kuragin wrote:flubber/swag/nati maybe
Seriously, look back to all of your games, which of those cases do you get scum on the first read?
There, I deleted parts of the posts, but it doesn't change the phenomenon.In post 281, Whatisswag wrote:Trust me, none of you are scumhunting gods.
???In post 308, Natirasha wrote:Swag/CT/Dessew, actually.
What content, what PoE? Like three slots haven't even posted, right?In post 312, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 307, Whatisswag wrote:the Nati vote right from flubber right after me seems like a possible attempt to drag me down as scum if he is lynched. Town read decreasing a little bit
@Flubber, please give an explnation on why you voted Nati, and especially right after my vote.
PoE/Minimal content
I'm townreading him. PEDIT: yes, Boon is. PEDIT2: Fu is, too.In post 318, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Anyone scumreading copper?
In post 244, comradekafka wrote:Good grief!
Apologies ladies & gentlemen, I've been away.
Will endeavor to make a 1st substantive post in the next 24 hours.
In post 333, Flubbernugget wrote:I trust him with quoting a post after my death that gives no alignment indicative information at all.
So can we knock the I trust Boons bullshit off? You're making it sound like I'm trusting him to hide my drugs from his fbi roommate and thats a really scummy misrep.
Sorry, I just read this post:In post 386, Boonskiies wrote:I don't believe I was scum reading AK? I have been falling behind in this game lately, and I apologize for that. Been busy in real life.
In post 363, Boonskiies wrote:
I'm inclined to vote Copper over Anatole in that situation. Maybe it's because of my bias towards loving Anatole because of our recent scum win together, and I'm blinded, but I would pick Copper over Anatole.
In post 422, mykonian wrote:@dessew
You can hardly be opposed to a boon lynch though, regardless of the connections. Don't think flubber will get killed tonight, you'll get your answer.
In post 416, mykonian wrote:In post 401, Boonskiies wrote:This is why I fucking hate being a town PR, ignorance in people who vote people for pretty much no reason.
oooh, it's not flubber doing it, but you! This is so awesome. There's the fake softclaim so now we are supposed to ask what you really are and you have some time to think etc.
Boon's a good second best anyway. Shame flubber couldn't happen today. Should boon flip scum, I probably was wrong about flubber.vote boon
In post 440, Empking wrote:Welcome Back
Not Voting: mykonian, Natirasha, Anatole Kuragin, droog, Dessew,Boonskiies, reinoe, Flubbernugget, Copper223, CultivationTheory, comradekafka, FuDuzn, Whatisswag
(expired on 2014-11-28 15:03:14)
In post 533, Anatole Kuragin wrote:kafka what result did you get?
In post 483, Natirasha wrote:Oh I should read before posting.
I still think jailor should claim but let's just quicklynch.
VOTE: Droog