Micro 408: Maru's Mollas Grand Idea Mafia

Aleumdaum · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:30 pm

I understand my role.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #38 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:21 am

This game hasn't started?

Aleumdaum · Post Post #68 (isolation #2) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:30 am

Vote Flames682

Aleumdaum · Post Post #96 (isolation #3) » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:59 pm

I claim a shitty town role.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #141 (isolation #4) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:50 pm

What is going on? I go away for a few days and I'm already lost...

Aleumdaum · Post Post #143 (isolation #5) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:59 pm

This game isn't going anywhere, is it? Do we not even have any wagons?

Vote Siveure

Aleumdaum · Post Post #194 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:25 am

Sorry I've been inactive. I'll be fully active again by tomorrow.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #264 (isolation #7) » Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:26 pm

I am a Chocolate Townie, which other than Vanilla Townie is probably the most passively useless role. This is part of why I haven't been very interested in this game. It's disappointing to sign up for a game expecting a crazy and fun role only to get stuck with something that's practically Normal.

So, lynching me probably wouldn't do much harm, and it seems as if I've missed out on enough of this game as is.

However

, I don't understand why the claimed third party roles seem to be getting by with minimal questioning, and it feels like people aren't considering them as lynch options because of the forwardness of their claims (if there's something important I missed while quickly skimming through the past few pages, please inform me). It seems like a good scum tactic to claim a beneficial/benign third party role so that guilty investigations and those sorts of actions on you will be rendered useless, giving you more of a free pass to pursue your own agenda.

Finally, if I am secretly a lynchee or something to that effect, I'm not even mad. I haven't played up to par with what I consider my town game to normally be at, and while it's easy to blame the role for that, a lot of that is due to me being inactive in general (apparently Pine accused me earlier of active lurking, and no, that isn't the case).

Unvote

In short, lynching me wouldn't be a travesty. But now that I'm here, and considering this is a Micro game for a setup with great potential for multiple anti-town roles, I'm not ready to resign myself to becoming Day 1's mislynchbait just yet. I'll reread with more clarity in a bit.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #266 (isolation #8) » Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:46 pm

Actually, if you're still up for a Constantine lynch, the last few posts in his ISO have me coming around to that.

Vote Constantine

Aleumdaum · Post Post #267 (isolation #9) » Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:49 pm

No, never mind. I forgot about that daykill. It still feels like town.

Unvote

Well, his ISO isn't that great either:

Vote BBmolla

Aleumdaum · Post Post #269 (isolation #10) » Sun Nov 09, 2014 4:46 pm

I think scum would more likely save it for someone they want gone, and either way first take the time to develop a legitimate-sounding "scumread" on them in order to avoid potential unwanted backlash. Though sad, it makes more sense that Constantine is town not caring and not overthinking the possible repercussions- the "I don't care"/"I do whatever I want" attitude is really hard to fake, much less act on, as scum.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #280 (isolation #11) » Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:04 pm

In post 271, Flames682 wrote:
In post 269, Aleumdaum wrote:the "I don't care"/"I do whatever I want" attitude is really hard to fake, much less act on, as scum.

Not true whatsoever.

My main point revolves around "act on". You and Pine can theorize all you wish; the point is, when it comes to actually going through with a daykill like that, I'm more inclined to believe scum would rather save it to rid themselves of an inconvenience. While of course what I see what Constantine did as in no way optimal, it looks to me more like impetuous town than bloodthirsty scum.

Aleumdaum · Post Post #301 (isolation #12) » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:42 pm

In post 689, Kaiveran wrote:
Alien Weeping Angel

You are 1-Shot Bulletproof.

Once in the game, you may kill anyone that has not visited you with a night action. After you perform this kill you will be treestumped for the rest of the game.

You know, I think the wording of this particularly "this kill" as singular plus no indication otherwise imply that only one kill is allowed. It feels like a weakened Alien in terms of kill powers, but strengthened in terms of the 1-Shot BP. Yes the idea that you can kill multiple players is open, but so is the idea that "kill anyone" refers to making a single choice out of that group of allowed kills, not to mention it makes a lot more sense balance-wise. Kaiveran's other roles aren't nearly as OP as the interpretation of this one was.